Five Small-Capitalization Stocks That Ring My Bells
Traditionally, large stocks were considered more international, and small stocks more domestic. At a time of trade hostilities, you'd think that small stocks would be doing well.
Alas, not. This year through April 18, big stocks (as measured by the Standard & Poor's 500 Total Return Index) are down 9.8%, while small ones (gauged by the Russell 2000 Index) have fallen 15.3%.
This is partly because the small fry are more volatile, and partly because in times of stress, people flee to the relative safety of big stocks.
Nonetheless, small stocks have advantages. They are less combed over by Wall Street analysts, and offer a better chance of big gains if you choose astutely.
Here are five little stocks that look promising to me.
Apogee Enterprises Inc. (APOG), based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, makes architectural glass and framing, especially for skyscrapers. The stock has been a miserable investment or a great one, depending on your timing. It's down 36% so far this year but up 150% over the past five years.
Right now, Apogee stock is out of favor, partly because commercial real estate is suffering in a post-Covid world. It sells for about 10 times the past four quarters' earnings. Over the past decade, that multiple has usually been more like 17.
Based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) has compiled a strong record of profitability. I like to see banks earn at least 1.0% on assets. Bank7 has done that nine years in a row, including six years where the figure was over 2.0%.
Unlike most banks, Bank7 has no corporate debt. It has increased its earnings by 18% a year over the past five years. The stock sells for less than eight times recent earnings.
A small homebuilder based in Bedford, Texas, Legacy Housing Corp. (LEGH) specializes in very small homes and manufactured homes. If the economy slows down, as seems possible this year, I would guess that the low end of the housing market might be a good place to be.
Mortgage rates remain higher than any homebuilder would prefer. But Legacy has very little debt, and so can probably make it through tough times if necessary. The stock sells for 10 times earnings and 1.2 times book value (corporate net worth per share).
Over the past decade, Monarch Cement Co. (MCEM) has increased its annual profits an average of 24% a year – coincidentally, the same as Alphabet Inc., the parent of Google. The stock has done extremely well, up 650% in the past ten years. It's up 7% year-to-date, defying the general downtrend.
Monarch stock is fairly inexpensive, selling for 13 times recent earnings. And the company is debt-free, a quality I love and rarely see these days. Based in Humboldt, Kansas, the company has little or no Wall Street coverage.
Though its name might fool you, Steel Partners Holdings LP (SPLP) of New York City is not a steel maker. It's more of a small conglomerate. It makes building materials and tubing, owns WebBank in Utah, and runs a youth sports business in New Jersey.
Steel Partners had four losses in the six years through 2019, but has been nicely profitable since, with a return on equity of 25% last year. Since the company is structured as a limited partnership, owning this stock may complicate your tax return.
Since the beginning of 2000, I've written 27 columns recommending small-cap stocks. The average one-year return on my recommendations has been 14.1%. That beats both the Standard & Poor's 500 Total Return Index at 8.5% and the Russell 2000 Index (with dividends reinvested) at 9.8%.
My picks in this series have been profitable 19 times out of 27. They have beaten the large-cap index 16 times and the small-cap index 15 times.
Bear in mind that my column results are hypothetical and shouldn't be confused with results I obtain for clients. Also, past performance doesn't predict the future.
I'd rather not tell you how last year's picks did, but I reluctantly will. All five of my picks from a year ago are down significantly, with an average loss of 40.7%. By comparison the S&P was up 8.5% and the Russell 2000 was down 3.4%.
While all my picks did badly, the worst was Quanex Building Products Corp. (NX), down 52%. The least disastrous was John B. Sanfilippo & Son Inc. (JBSS) down 29%.
That shows the dangers small-caps can pose. But the long-term results show the benefits.
Disclosure: I own Alphabet personally and for almost all of my clients.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
21 minutes ago
- UPI
Qantas ordered to pay record fine over COVID-19 layoffs
Qantas has been ordered to a nearly $60 million fine over mass layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic. File Photo by Brent Winstone/EPA-EFE Aug. 18 (UPI) -- An Australian court on Monday fined national flag carrier Qantas nearly $60 million for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground workers and then outsourcing their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia's Transport Workers Union said in a statement that it was the largest employer penalty in Australian corporate history. "Against all odds, TWU members have sent a $90 million warning to corporate Australia: you can't break the law and get away with it," the union said, referring to the amount Qantas was fined in Australian dollars. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said a little more than half of the penalty should be paid to the TWU, while the recipients of the remaining sum will be decided at a later hearing, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported. Lee said that while Qantas has expressed "genuine regrets" about the situation, he believes that "this more likely reflects the damage this case has done at the company rather than unique remorse for the damage done to the affected workers." He said that the airline "resisted until it could resist no more." Qantas said the Monday judgement holds the company "accountable for our actions." "We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result," Qantas Group Chief Executive Officer Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. "The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families. The impact was felt not only by those who lost their jobs, but our entire workforce." The ruling brings an end to a five-year fight by the TWU over Qantas's firing of some 1,800 workers and then outsourcing their jobs in 2020. Qantas appealed through the Australian court system, with the High Court affirming that the airline had acted illegally by outsourcing the employment. The Monday fine is on top of the roughly $78 million that Qantas agreed to pay eligible workers in December, after its failed bid arguing that it should not have to offer workers compensation. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over loudspeaker in the lunch room. It was not sorry when it dragged them all the way to the High Court, or when it argued it should have to pay them no compensation at all," TWU National Secretary Michael Kaine said in a statement. "Qantas is only sorrow now that it has to pay the larges penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history." The announcement comes about 14 months after Qantas reached a settlement with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to pay a multi-million-dollar fine for booking flights that had previously been canceled.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Qantas to pay record fine of $58 million for pandemic sackings criticized by judge
A court ordered Australia's largest airline, Qantas Airways, on Monday to pay a record fine of A$90 million ($58.64 million) for illegally sacking 1,800 ground staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and criticized it for a lack of contrition. In imposing the penalty, the largest ordered by a court on a company in the history of Australia's labor laws, Federal Court Judge Michael Lee also inveighed against the airline's litigation strategy. While Qantas made changes to its board and management team, Lee said subsequent expressions of regret seemed more aligned with "the damage" the case had done to the company than remorse for the harm caused to workers. "I accept Qantas is sorry, but I am unconvinced that this measure of regret is not, at least in significant measure ... the wrong kind of sorry," he added. Lee said the size of the penalty, about 75% of the maximum he could have set, was important to ensure it "could not be perceived as anything like the cost of doing business". He said A$50 million of the fine would be paid to the Transport Workers' Union, which brought the case against Qantas. After the decision, Michael Kaine, the national secretary of the TWU, said, "Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth ... that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won." Monday's decision follows a December agreement on a compensation fund of A$120 million struck by the airline and the sacked workers. During the pandemic in 2020, Qantas' senior management decided to lay off 1,820 ground staff and shift their work to contractors. Qantas said it was a commercial decision, but the Federal Court in 2021 held the move to be "adverse action", preventing staff from exercising their workplace rights and unionising, in breach of Australia's Fair Work Act. Assessing Qantas' actions, Lee said he was unconvinced it was truly contrite and criticized its culture, public relations approach and litigation strategy. For example, he said Qantas had announced it would appeal to the High Court against the 2021 court decision "without any time passing", to consider the 431-paragraph judgment. When its appeal failed, Qantas issued a statement "spinning" the outcome, however, and overlooking findings on its unlawful conduct, he added. He also criticized Qantas' conduct during litigation, such as opting to keep out of the witness box, Vanessa Hudson, its current chief executive and former chief financial officer. "It is one thing for the 'Qantas News Room' to issue press releases by a CEO saying sorry; it is quite another for written assertions of contrition, recognition of wrong and cultural change to be tested in a courtroom," Lee said. The penalty was the largest ever ordered by a court for violations of Australia's labor laws, said Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, which represented TWU. "This record-breaking penalty reflects the monumental scale of Qantas' wrongdoing," the firm's principal, Josh Bornstein, said in a statement. The fine also reflected the unprecedented finding of adverse action against so many workers, said Shae McCrystal, a labor law professor at the University of Sydney. "Adverse action cases are risky," she said. "It signals a message to employers that if they break the law, then trade unions may receive those penalties in order to assist them in enforcing the act." Qantas said it would pay the fine as ordered. "We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families," Chief Executive Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. Qantas shares were down 0.4% at A$11.58 in early trading.
2 hours ago
Qantas fined $59M for illegal pandemic layoffs
MELBOURNE -- A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59 million) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labor laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney-based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90 million ($59 million), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125 million ($81 million) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," she said. 'Over the past 18 months we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50 million ($33 million) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40 million ($26 million) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120 million ($78 million) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been canceled.
