New Washington Metro line feasibility study under way
Designs for new Metro stations and bridges are set to be drawn up in a bid to win government support for a £900m expansion.The proposed new route to Washington in Sunderland would use part of the disused Leamside line running from Pelaw in Gateshead.Engineering consultants Arup have been appointed to carry out a feasibility study for the project and design work for infrastructure, which is being overseen by Labour's North East Mayor Kim McGuinness.It is hoped their designs will help local leaders when lobbying for the huge amount of public funding that would be needed to actually build the extension.
The Local Democracy Reporting Service said full details of where Metro trains would stop in the area, the economic benefits of the eight mile (13km) rail extension and the true cost of the project are expected to be revealed during the development of the outline business case.
The Washington Metro Loop represents the first section of a wider ambition to reopen the entire Leamside Line, which runs down through County Durham and could allow for the launch of new Tyne-Tees train services.It was estimated in 2022 that the scheme would cost £745m, but this has since been listed as costing £900m in the mayor's new regional transport plan, which sets a target of delivering the project by 2032.While the restoration has been a top priority for leaders for years, some critics have raised concerns it could be a "vanity project" which it may not be feasible to deliver.
However, McGuinness has long stated her determination to deliver on the promise of bringing the Metro to Washington, describing it as a "major part" of her ambition to re-open the Leamside route through County Durham and Sunderland."I am determined to transform our transport network to change the lives of local people for generations to come," she said."This project will be the biggest expansion of the Metro for more than 20 years – and it will be just as transformative as the Sunderland line was when it first opened back in 2002."
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW PIERCE: Oh Kemi, you're getting too blue for the Commons
Keep an ear out for Kemi Badenoch 's fruity language at this week's PMQs. I hear Commons clerks are worried that the Tory leader is pushing the limits of acceptable parliamentary language. Six weeks ago, she sent them into a spin after inelegantly accusing the PM of 'having no balls' over his woeful record on gender self-ID and protecting single-sex spaces. Then, just ten days ago, the Tory leader followed it up by suggesting he and his policies were 'shafting the country'. It's rare indeed for either the PM or the Leader of the Opposition to be brought up short by the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, during Commons exchanges. But Sir Lindsay will be guided by his bewigged officials before deciding whether to rebuke Badenoch if she pushes it too far again. How long before she reduces Hansard, the official report of parliamentary proceedings, to using asterisks? QUOTE OF THE WEEK: Former Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie reveals that a new car is being released: 'Kia has announced a model that performs U-turns unaided – the Kia Starmer.' Labour's bad D:Ream A YouGov poll reveals Labour has recorded its lowest approval rating since the dreaded Jeremy Corbyn was leader. Under Sir Keir Starmer, the party's rating has fallen to 21 per cent. As D:Ream – and Labour – sang in 1997: 'Things can only get better.' Jeremy Corbyn, an Arsenal supporter, has been lamenting the departure from the BBC of Match Of The Day presenter Gary Lineker. Lineker, said Corbyn, was a 'brilliant sportsman, an outstanding broadcaster and wonderful human being'. Presumably he's forgotten that, in 2017, Lineker tweeted pithily: 'Bin Corbyn.' An outbreak of invasive honey fungus mushrooms has felled a birch tree on the Dorneywood estate, the grace-and-favour country retreat of Chancellor Rachel Reeves in Buckinghamshire. I'm sure it won't be long before Tory wags delight in referring to the Chancellor as 'dead wood'. Lord (Michael) Farmer, a former Tory treasurer, had a clever riposte to Nigel Farage over the Reform leader's decision to support lifting the two-child benefit cap. 'Limiting the number of children the State will pay for is popular because working people sense it is fair and encourages responsibility,' said the hedge fund millionaire, who founded an academy school to help disadvantaged children. 'They are not willing to pay higher taxes to subsidise other families when they have already cut their own cloth to suit their income.' Quite. Talking of Farage, there was a touch of genius about the choice of venue for his 'lift the cap' press conference last week. This was held in Whitehall's Royal Horseguards Hotel, in the same building as the National Liberal Club, the haunt of senior Lib Dems such as leader Sir Ed Davey. The sight of the Farage fox inside their hen house had Lib Dem activists spitting feathers, I hear. Another fine mess, Sadiq On the same day London Mayor Sadiq Khan caused predictable uproar by irresponsibly calling for the decriminalisation of cannabis, he discreetly raised the congestion charge in the capital by a swingeing 20 per cent to £18. The move has been sparked by large numbers of drivers refusing to pay his hated Ultra Low Emission Zone fines. In February, the resulting shortfall was put at £438 million. And they are not the only defaulters. The capital's foreign embassies, who argue that the Ulez charge is a tax and they are therefore not liable to pay it, 'owe' a further £143 million.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour pushes ‘military Keynesianism' to win support for defence spending
Labour's push towards increased militarisation, with Keir Starmer already having slashed the aid budget in favour of defence spending, may not be a policy greeted enthusiastically by many of the party's core supporters. But the government wants to win support for the change in thinking by arguing that investment in defence helps create skilled jobs, particularly outside London, such as at shipyards in Barrow, Devonport, Glasgow and Rosyth. This 'military Keynesianism' was emphasised on Sunday morning when ministers announced plans to build six new munitions factories, which would in time create 1,000 jobs and support a further 800, the Ministry of Defence said. John Healey, the defence secretary, argued that by 'diverting funds from overseas development aid', money would 'go into reinforcing the British industrial base, more jobs in every part of the UK' – an argument almost certainly made with Reform UK at the forefront of the polls at the back of his mind. Fiona Hill, one of the three independent members of the government's strategic defence review team, has long been focused on the impact of post-industrial decline on the economics and politics of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. It reflects her personal experience. Hill grew up in County Durham, but moved to forge a successful career as a national security analyst in the US, mindful of her father's advice about where she had grown up: 'There is nothing for you here.' Russia's invasion of Ukraine and Britain's support to help Kyiv defend itself have pushed the UK to seek to revive forms of manufacturing that the long period of peace after the cold war had made obsolete. Last year, an agreement with Germany paved the way for a revival of artillery barrel manufacturing at a site in Telford, a decade after it had been abandoned. And ahead of Monday's strategic defence review, the government again focused on a long-term industrial commitment, this time to eventually build a fleet of Aukus nuclear powered attack submarines, starting in the late 2030s. Assembled in Barrow, the effort would support 30,000 jobs, the MoD said. Such a longer-term focus may also help conceal the relative shortage of money in the short term for defence. The current commitment to lift defence spending to 2.5% of GDP in 2027 may easily be swallowed up in funding existing commitments and overspends. Fresh spending on armaments is of course hardly neutral – it depends entirely on what the weapons are intended to be used for. And while there may be strong public support for Ukraine, in other cases the export of arms can be controversial. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion In May, it emerged that the UK had supplied $169m worth of arms to Israel between October and December last year, despite announcing a partial ban on exports in September amid concerns they could be used in breach of international law as part of the ongoing offensive against Gaza. Critics argue that while state spending will always stimulate the economy and create jobs, defence spending may not be the most efficient way to do that. A study by Greenpeace looking at the economies of Germany, Italy and Spain concluded that investing in healthcare, education or green technologies creates more jobs and growth than investing in defence. A more honest position, said Sam Perlo-Freeman of Campaign Against Arms Trade, would be to 'separate security arguments from economic arguments' and seek to justify military investment only the basis of the threat perceived. But it is not one that politicians are likely to make when it is possible to point to new factories being built and new jobs created as a result of defence spending.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Defence review to say UK must be ready to fight a war in Europe or Atlantic
Britain needs to be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, a strategic defence review will conclude, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat. The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which may only last days in a crisis. Keir Starmer, the prime minister, will launch the review on Monday, saying the exercise 'will ensure the UK rises to the challenge and our armed forces have the equipment they need' in what ministers say is an increasingly unstable world. But it is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments and the defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, will have to wait until after the election. Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to a low 70,860 – below the government's current target of 73,000. The minister conceded that Labour had so far failed to turn the situation around, despite talk that Britain is prepared to participate in a peacekeeping deployment in Ukraine. 'We've still got more people leaving than joining,' he said. 'The first job is to reverse that trend, and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number [of soldiers],' Healey continued, apparently deferring any increase until after an election due in 2029. There had been speculation that Healey had been seeking to secure a commitment to increase the target size of the army to 76,000, though defence sources said that could have cost up to £2.5bn in pay, accommodation and equipment. Though Russia is heavily embroiled in the war in Ukraine, experts believe that if the Kremlin agreed to a ceasefire, it could allow time for a country with an army of more than 600,000 and a militarised economy to threaten other parts of Nato's eastern flank. The three-strong review team, led by Lord Robertson, a former Nato secretary general, has made 62 recommendations, in response to what the team has concluded is 'a new era of threat' from aggressive states such as Russia and drones, artificial intelligence and other new technologies. On Sunday, Ukraine said that it had attacked 40 Russian bombers at airfields deep inside Russia, using remotely piloted one-way attack drones that were hidden in trucks inside Russia until ready to use. Operation Spider's Web was in preparation for 18 months, with relatively cheap drones targeting strategic Russian aviation. It is also expected to conclude: The UK will commit to building 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines at Barrow in Cumbria and Raynesway, Derby, as part of the three-country Aukus programme with the US and Australia. The first submarines will launch in the late 2030s, replacing seven Astute-class submarines, tasked to operate around the world. A total of £15bn will be invested in modernising the production of nuclear weapons at Aldermaston in Berkshire, supporting more than 9,000 jobs as part of a programme to supply bombs for the Dreadnought submarines that will replace the ageing Vanguard boats that carry the Trident deterrent. That Russia poses an 'immediate and pressing' danger posed by Russia while China is a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge' to British interests. Iran and North Korea will be described as 'regional disruptors' and potentially hostile to the UK, with each of the four showing growing signs of being willing to work together. A new volunteer-led Home Guard be created to help protect airports, communications nodes and other parts of Britain's critical national infrastructure from drone and other surprise attacks, freeing up the time of soldiers and specialist police who guard such locations at present. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Ministers are also considering whether to restore an air-launched nuclear deterrent by buying F-35A aircraft which have been certified to carry the US B61-12 gravity bomb, which has a maximum explosive yield of 50 kilotons, more than three times the size of the 15kT bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. A report in the Sunday Times said the UK was considering buying the F-35A, though any arrangement to deploy B61 nuclear bombs in addition would probably be similar to existing situations in the Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey, where nuclear weapons belonging to the US are stored in bunkers in those countries. Britain is the only big nuclear power that has only one method of delivering a nuclear weapon, from a submarine at sea. But engaging in 'nuclear sharing' with the US would be complex, and would require sensitive negotiations with the Trump administration if it were the path chosen. In Europe, B61 bombs remain US property until there is a deemed to be war. At that point, because non-proliferation rules are then deemed not to apply, 'the host country puts the weapons on their planes and sets off with them,' according to Dave Cullen, a nuclear expert at the Basic thinktank. Healey declined to comment on air-launched nuclear weapons on Sunday, and no announcement is expected on the issue shortly. The minister instead reiterated the value of Trident. 'For over 70 years, our UK nuclear deterrent has been the ultimate guarantee of security in this country. It's what Putin fears most,' he told the BBC. The defence review is not expected to announce any immediate increase in defence budgets, beyond a commitment to lift spending by about £5bn to 2.5% of GDP in 2027 and to 3% in the next parliament. But Starmer and other Nato leaders are expected to discuss and agree fresh spending targets at a summit in The Hague later this month, of about 5% of GDP, of which 3.5% will be on military spending and the rest on cyberdefence and other infrastructure.
