SAP shares drop after it maintains outlook despite strong quarter
SAP shares were down by 3.9 per cent at 0730 GMT, after the company late on Tuesday reported higher sales, profitability and free cash flow in the second quarter, but maintained its outlook, citing "elevated levels of uncertainty and reduced visibility".
"As we move into the second half, we remain cautiously optimistic, keeping a close eye on geopolitical developments and public sector trends," finance chief Dominik Asam said in the quarterly report.
SAP still forecasts full-year operating profit in the range of 10.3 billion to 10.6 billion euros ($12.44 billion), compared to 8.15 billion a year ago.
Deutsche Bank analysts said the reiterated targets left a margin for error as uncertainty surrounding Washington's tariffs slows decision-making among U.S. customers.
For the second quarter, SAP reported an 83 per cent year-on-year jump in its free cash flow, used to determine dividends to investors, to 2.36 billion euros, exceeding market expectations by about a billion.
Operating profit rose by around a third to 2.57 billion euros, boosted by the company's 2024 restructuring programme, which it concluded in the first quarter.
SAP announced the 2-billion-euro pivot towards artificial intelligence last year, either retraining employees or replacing them through voluntary redundancies.
But some traders said results were still driven by SAP's old licences business.
"The future cloud biz lagged expectations, giving the report a sour tone. Also, the outlook was just confirmed sending a somewhat cautious note," one local trader said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Wall Street warning investors to get ready for stocks to drop
The calls are coming amid mounting concerns about the US economy after data showed an uptick in inflation and weakening job growth. NEW YORK - A chorus of stock market prognosticators at some of Wall Street's biggest firms is warning clients to prepare for a pullback as sky-high equity valuations slam into souring economic data. On Aug 4, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank and Evercore ISI all cautioned that the S&P 500 Index is due for a near-term drop in the weeks and months ahead. The predictions come after a furious rally from April's lows that propelled the gauge to levels it has never seen before. Morgan Stanley strategist Mike Wilson sees a correction of up to 10 per cent this quarter as tariffs hit consumers and corporate balance sheets. Evercore's Julian Emanuel is expecting a more substantial decline of as much as 15 per cent. And a team at Deutsche Bank led by Parag Thatte notes that a small drawdown in equities is overdue considering they've been on a tear for over three months. 'Over the last couple of weeks, we have noted that investors should expect a modest pullback in the third quarter,' Mr Wilson said in his note to clients. The calls are coming amid mounting concerns about the US economy after data last week showed an uptick in inflation as well as weakening job growth and consumer spending. In addition, stocks are entering what's usually their weakest time of the year. Over the past three decades, the S&P 500 has performed the worst in August and September, losing 0.7 per cent on average in each month, compared with a 1.1 per cent gain on average across other months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In addition, stocks have gotten expensive. The S&P 500's 14-day relative strength index topped 76 last week – its highest point since July 2024 before US stock briefly peaked last summer and above the 70 level that market technicians view as a sign of overheating. Options trading is also showing the fear of a downturn, as hedging against another rout becomes more expensive. Contracts protecting against a 10% decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over the next 60 days compared to the cost of contracts hedging against a similar rally is hovering around levels not seen since the regional banking crisis in May 2023. Still, despite the near-term concerns, the warnings come with a big bullish caveat: In the event of a dip, buy it. At Evercore, Mr Emanuel emphasizes that the long-term bull market in stocks is still intact despite expectations for volatility, and he advises clients to stay invested, particularly in companies capitalising on the artificial intelligence boom. Deutsche's Mr Thatte points out that historically the S&P 500 experiences small pullbacks of around 3 per cent every one-and-a-half-to-two months on average, and larger ones of 5 per cent or more every three-to-four months. 'We're buyers of dips,' Mr Wilson told clients. So far, traders are heeding to the advice. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 Index are both up than 1 per cent on Aug 4 after Aug 1's sell-off on optimism that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates soon. BLOOMBERG
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: The AI job cuts are accelerating
LONDON: Microsoft, by chief executive Satya Nadella's own description, is 'thriving'. Its quarterly profits soared by almost 25 per cent and its market valuation hit US$4 trillion last week. In any normal situation, it would seem incongruent that the company is at the same time slashing its workforce by the thousands. The pursuit of a leaner workforce is not new. In times of economic uncertainty, companies prune excesses - cutting headcount and eliminating inefficiencies. But today it is not just about doing more with fewer people. Companies are preparing for a time where there might be less work for their employees altogether. Even as business leaders claim AI is 'redesigning' jobs rather than cutting them, the headlines tell another story. It is not just Microsoft but Intel and BT that are among a host of major companies announcing thousands of layoffs explicitly linked to AI. Previously when job cuts were announced, there was a sense that these were regrettable choices. Now executives consider them a sign of progress. Companies are pursuing greater profits with fewer people. THE RISE OF ONE-PERSON FIRMS For the tech industry, revenue per employee has become a prized performance metric. Y Combinator start-ups brag about building companies with skeleton teams. A website called the 'Tiny Teams Hall of Fame' lists companies bringing in tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue with just a handful of employees. OpenAI's Sam Altman has gone further, predicting the eventual rise of a one-person US$1 billion company. That may still sound far-fetched - but it is undeniable large language models are already reshaping white-collar work. While new jobs are being created in the AI age and some workers redeployed, a lot of positions will be eliminated. Companies are increasingly saying the tasks of those workers no longer exist. Already it's clear the hiring of coders has dropped off a cliff. And almost daily, my inbox delivers examples of AI's prowess versus humans. Among the latest is how one Big Four firm has slashed turnaround times for research by 75 per cent, reclaiming 3,600 analyst hours by using AI-generated reports. FEWER STARTER JOBS AND FRAGMENTED CAREER PATHS Younger workers should be particularly concerned about this trend. Entire rungs on the career ladder are taking a hit, undermining traditional job pathways. This is not only about AI of course. Offshoring, post-COVID budget discipline, and years of underwhelming growth have made entry-level hiring an easy thing to cut. But AI is adding to pressures. Dirk Hahn, chief executive of recruiter Hays, said to me: 'While there will be exceptions, the rise of AI could constrain the recovery in some junior white-collar roles.' If the footholds are eroding, where does that leave future workers? What shape do organisations take if there are fewer starter jobs and middle management positions? Professional development and leadership pipelines need to be redefined. The consequences are cultural as well as economic. If jobs aren't readily available, will a university degree retain its value? Careers already are increasingly 'squiggly' and not linear. The rise of freelancing and hiring of contractors has already fragmented the nature of work in many cases. AI will only propel this. CAN LEANER FIRMS LAST? But are leaner organisations necessarily better ones? I am not convinced these companies are more resilient even if they perform better financially. Faster decision making and lower overheads are great, but does this mean fewer resources for R&D, legal functions or compliance? What about a company's ability to withstand shocks - from supply chain disruptions to employee turnover and dare I say it, runaway robots? Some companies such as Klarna have reversed tack, realising that firing hundreds of staff and relying on AI resulted in a poorer customer service experience. Now the payments company wants them back. The tech bros touting people-light companies underestimate the complexity of business operations and corporate cultures that are built on very human relationships and interactions. In fact, while AI can indeed handle the tedium, there should be a new premium on the human - from creativity and emotional intelligence to complex judgment. But that can only happen if we invest in those who bring those qualities and teach the next generation of workers - and right now, the door is closing on many of them.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Americans face price rises for luxury watches after Trump's Swiss tariffs
Switzerland's watch industry is facing a threat to sales after Donald Trump said he would impose 39 per cent tariffs on the country, raising the prospect of significantly higher prices in one of its biggest markets. The elevated levy will push prices up for US consumers and hit volumes at some brands, analysts warned. The US accounted for 16.8 per cent of Swiss watch exports in 2024, worth roughly SFr4.4bn (US$5.4 billion, S$6.96 billion). Swiss manufacturers The Swatch Group and Richemont, as well as London-listed Watches of Switzerland, a big Rolex and Patek Philippe dealer, all face 'pain' if tariffs kick in next week as planned, Jefferies said. At 39 per cent, the levy exceeds the 31 per cent proposed by Trump on 'liberation day' in April, and far outstrips the 15 per cent facing Switzerland's EU neighbours. Even at the lower rate, some retailers previously said they would need price rises 'in the mid to high teens' to preserve US gross profit, according to Jefferies. Watches of Switzerland shares fell 8 per cent in London trading on Friday. The company said it would 'continue to work closely with our brand partners to mitigate any potential impact'. Brian Duffy, chief executive, said the tariff level was 'a shock' but insisted the business was better positioned than some rivals, with its wealthy customers, many of whom wait years for chosen timepieces, able to bear higher prices. 'Half our business is in the US and half is waiting lists. It impacts us less than others,' he added. 'Demand for watches still exceeds supply.' The company — which had already warned investors of the impact of tariffs, saying last month that some of the brands it sells had already raised prices in the US — will try to bring forward orders and ship stock earlier to beat the changes. However, it is limited by how much stock is on hand, and Duffy acknowledged that watches 'could get more expensive' in the US. Barclays warned that even high-end brands such as Rolex and Patek Philippe — which deliberately limit supply to boost desirability and value — may struggle with such steep tariffs, while 'non-supply-constrained brands will find substantial price increases more difficult' and risk volume declines. The tariffs compound existing issues for Swiss watchmakers. The weaker dollar — down roughly 5 per cent against the Swiss franc since mid-2024 — had already made Swiss watches more expensive for American consumers. June export data showed Switzerland's watch exports to the US were down 18 per cent on a year earlier. Swiss watch exports have been weakening overall, declining by 2.8 per cent to SFr26bn in 2024 — the first annual drop since a pandemic rebound in 2020. Vincent Subilia, head of Geneva's chamber of commerce, warned that 'the US consumer will unfortunately have to pay the price' of what he labelled an 'irrational' US tax policy. Oliver Muller, founder of LuxeConsult, which advises the watch industry, said Swiss watchmakers were 'perceiving the punitive new custom duties . . . as being particularly unfair, because we are not threatening any US-based industry . . . Apart from a few niche watch brands, the US watch industry disappeared a long time ago.'
