
SF offers $1,200 in bill credits for efficient water heater upgrades
Why it matters: Heat pumps are up to seven times more efficient than a gas-powered water heater and reduce exposure to pollution and fire risk, city officials say.
Driving the news: Customers of CleanPowerSF, the city-run energy choice program that sources from renewable energy, can apply to the upgrade program and receive a $50 monthly bill credit for two years.
Customers on a discount program like CARE/FERA get the credit for up to three years.
"We're budgeted for about 1,000 participants every year," Tim Minezaki, who works on CleanPowerSF's customer programs team, told Axios. "We hope this new, different approach helps break through some of the customer barriers."
By the numbers: Standard heat pump installation costs from $6,000 to $9,000 in San Francisco — compared with $2,000 to $3,000 for a traditional gas-powered unit, Minezaki said.
But heat pumps use less electricity than conventional heating, making them an important tool for curbing emissions, while helping save money long term, studies have found.
How it works: Rather than relying on burning fuel, heat pumps absorb heat from the surrounding air and transfer it to water in an enclosed tank.
They can also help reduce energy use during expensive peak hours by heating water during off-peak periods and storing it for later.
Between the lines: Other incentives can also help reduce upfront costs for switching to a heat pump, including federal tax credits, California's TECH Program and Golden State Rebates.
The big picture: Residential and commercial gas use constitutes more than one-third of San Francisco's greenhouse gas emissions, per CleanPowerSF.
In residential homes, "the two highest sources of direct gas are going to be turning on a furnace or heating your water," Minezaki said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
ChatGPT now handles 2.5 billion prompts a day — and it's changing how we search
ChatGPT users are officially chatting at scale and Google might want to start paying closer attention. According to Axios, ChatGPT now processes more than 2.5 billion prompts per day, with around 330 million of those coming from users in the U.S. alone. No wonder CEO Sam Altman is pushing for more GPUs. That's a dramatic surge from just seven months ago, when the platform was averaging about 1 billion daily prompts. The sharp rise in usage signals a major shift in how people are turning to AI for everyday answers, ideas and productivity also raises an important question: what happens when we start asking ChatGPT more questions than we do Google? Google still dominates traditional search, with around 14 billion queries per day. But ChatGPT is catching up fast. While search engines are built to index the internet and surface relevant links, ChatGPT is trained to understand, summarize and synthesize language. That difference matters. More users are beginning to favor AI chat assistants for explanations, writing help, summaries and planning rather than sifting through web results. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. OpenAI's growing numbers show that chatbots are becoming default tools for a wide range of tasks, from work to school to daily life. If ChatGPT becomes the first stop for everything from dinner recipes to customer service scripts, it could chip away at Google's dominance in user attention, and eventually, ad dollars. It also suggests that generative AI is becoming deeply embedded in user habits, which means this shift for everyday users could mean: But there are trade-offs. ChatGPT's free tier still makes up the bulk of its user base, and while that scale is impressive, it also presents challenges. Running billions of prompts a day takes serious compute power, and OpenAI may need to adjust pricing, access or model behavior as it balances growth with sustainability. If you're already using ChatGPT regularly, this moment confirms you're not alone. But it also highlights the importance of knowing when to use a chatbot versus a traditional search engine. Use ChatGPT when you want something explained or simplified, you need help brainstorming or organizing ideas, or want support learning something new. If you're shopping locally or looking up something and want a variety of sources. Google is also a good option for fact-checking, although you can use ChatGPT for that, too. It's clear that ChatGPT is becoming a daily tool for hundreds of millions of users, and its 2.5 billion daily prompts show no signs of slowing. Whether this is a Google killer or a new kind of assistant remains to be seen. But one thing's clear: the way we search, learn and interact with information is evolving fast, and AI is at the center of it. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


Business Journals
3 hours ago
- Business Journals
Fennemore bolsters construction law depth with Denver deal
2026 40 under 40 Awards Program (Nominations close Thursday, October 13, 2025) Do you know a young professional making big moves? If you or someone you know is under 40 years of age, a recognized business leader and an active participant in the community, nominate them for Denver's most prestigious recognition of up-and-comers.


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Sen. Hawley says Congress needs to focus on AI's impact on working class
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said Wednesday that AI has "enormous disruptive potential" that so far has mostly not been beneficial for Americans. Why it matters: Hawley has been ringing the alarm on the need for lawmakers to better regulate AI companies at a time when Congress is struggling with how to regulate the industry. Speaking Wednesday at Axios News Shapers' event, Hawley pointed to senators voting 99-1 against the proposed 10-year moratorium on state-driven AI regulation in the "big, beautiful bill" as proof that they know the stakes of AI's potential for harm. "If the Republican Party wants to be a party of working people, I think we better start thinking about how AI is going to affect working folks," Hawley told Axios' Steph Kite. Driving the news: Hawley and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) introduced a bill on Monday that would bar AI companies from training their models on pirated personal data.