Clat 2026 exam date announced for December 7, registration begins on August 1
For the undergraduate exam, candidates must have completed Class 12 with at least 45 percent marks (or 40 percent for reserved categories).For the postgraduate exam, a basic requirement is an LLB degree with similar marks criteria -- 45percent for the general category and 40 percent for reserved categories.Last year's fees were Rs 4,000 for General and OBC candidates and Rs 3,500 for SC, ST, and BPL applicants. While the fee structure for 2026 has not yet been announced, a similar policy is expected.AFTERMATH OF CLAT2025 CONTROVERSIESThe CLAT 2025 exam, conducted on December 1, was mired in controversy due to errors in question framing. This led to multiple legal challenges, court interventions, and over five months of delay before results and counselling were finalised.In May, the Supreme Court expressed 'deep anguish' over the Consortium's 'callous and casual manner' in framing CLAT 2025 questions. The Court also ordered revisions to six questions, republishing of scores, and a rushed start to counselling.The apex court has called for a permanent and robust framework for clat, suggesting a model similar to that used for NEET or JEE, to prevent future mishaps.By announcing the exam schedule early and emphasising the offline format, the Consortium aims to instil confidence amongst stakeholders.Prospective candidates are advised to begin preparation in advance, review eligibility criteria, and track updates on the official CLATwebsite.With registration open between August 1 and October 31 as per the official notification for clat 2026 exam, aspirants have ample time to apply.It remains to be seen if the Consortium will introduce enhanced quality checks or permanent oversight mechanisms following last year's turmoil.- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
State Education Policy: move to scrap board exam for Class XI faces criticism
The State government's move to do away with the Class XI board exams as part of its push for reforms through the freshly released State Education Policy (SEP) 2025 on School Education has invited sharp reactions, including from from the ruling DMK's alliance partners. Taking to social media, D. Ravikumar, VCK MP, expressed concern that the move would not only adversely affect higher secondary education but also bring down the quality of higher and vocational education. While Mr. Ravikumar did not put forth any argument in support of his point of view, E. Balagurusamy, former Vice-Chancellor of Anna University, said the move would affect prospects of students appearing for entrance exams such as the NEET and JEE since these followed the curriculums of both Classes XI and XII. Performance of Tamil Nadu students in these competitive exams improved after the introduction of the Class XI Board Exam, he observed. However, Prince Gajendra Babu, general secretary, State Platform for Common School System-Tamil Nadu, welcomed the cancellation of the Class XI Board Exam, stating it did not provide any breathing time for students pursuing higher secondary education. In response to criticism that schools would be encouraged to skip the Class XI syllabus altogether, he said that it was the duty of the Chief Education Officer and the District Education Officers to ensure the curriculums were followed in every class. He added that the SEP speaks of introducing continuous formative assessment for students but was silent on appointment of teachers to permanent posts. Mr. Babu was also critical of the provision to create what he called a 'multi-track schooling system' by starting a set of 'Schools of Success' (Vetri Palligal), in addition to the already existing model schools. He said it went against the spirit of equitable education introduced by the previous DMK government through the Samacheer Kalvi scheme (Uniform System of School Education) and was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The proposed board exam reforms highlighted in the Policy stated that the cancellation of the Class XI boards would 'help reduce examination-related stress, encourage deeper subject understanding and ensure students are better equipped for the Class XII board examination'. The proposal seeks to 'assess conceptual understanding, application, problem-solving, and creativity' of students, touching upon higher aspects of Bloom's Taxonomy, a pedagogical tool to classify learning objectives.
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
NEP vs Tamil Nadu's SEP: Key differences in exams, language, and admissions
Tamil Nadu has launched its very own State Education Policy (SEP), and it's a straight-up rejection of the National Education Policy (NEP) brought in by the Centre. Chief Minister MK Stalin unveiled the new policy with a clear message -- education in Tamil Nadu will follow its own Tamil Nadu SEP was drafted by a 14-member panel led by Justice Murugesan. The policy rejects key NEP provisions, retains the two-language policy, and prioritises science, AI, and what's different between the NEP and SEP? Here's a section-by-section breakdown:1. LANGUAGE POLICY NEP: Proposes a three-language formula, often Hindi, English, and a regional language, across all Tamil Nadu sticks to its long-standing two-language policy — Tamil and student, regardless of whether they study under CBSE, ICSE or state board, must learn Tamil up to Class state has clearly rejected any form of language imposition.2. SCHOOL EXAMINATION SYSTEMNEP: Introduces public board exams in Classes 3, 5, and 8, aiming for regular Completely scraps public exams for Classes 3, 5 and students will be promoted till Class 10, with no fail system in these will be no Class 11 exam intention is to reduce pressure and stop the early commercialisation of education.3. UG COLLEGE ADMISSIONSNEP: Encourages common entrance tests for undergraduate admissions, even in arts and science Rejects this. Tamil Nadu will base admissions for arts and science UG courses on a consolidated score from Classes 11 and 12, with no entrance exam required. 4. POSITION ON NEET AND CENTRAL EXAMSNEP: Supports standardised national exams like NEET for medical Strongly opposes NEET. Tamil Nadu has consistently campaigned against it, citing stress and state claims the Centre withheld Rs 2,152 crore in funds (Samagra Shiksha) due to its refusal to adopt NEP and Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin reiterated: 'Even if they give Rs 1,000 crore, Tamil Nadu won't implement NEP. Tamil Nadu doesn't like imposition in any form.'5. CONTROL OF EDUCATIONNEP: Keeps education in the Concurrent List, meaning both Centre and State control Recommends moving education back to the State List, giving full control to the state reflects Tamil Nadu's push for more autonomy in policymaking.6. EDUCATION FOCUS AREASNEP: Focuses broadly on digital learning and vocational Adds a strong push towards science, artificial intelligence, and English language idea is to prepare students for future job markets and global opportunities.7. POLITICAL STAND AND FUNDING APPROACHadvertisementNEP: A centralised national policy that promotes public-private partnerships and varied education models. The Centre positions NEP as a uniform framework for all A state-first policy that firmly rejects central imposition and calls for more direct state investment in public schools and colleges. Tamil Nadu sees education as a state subject and argues for greater local control and public funding to ensure quality and access without over-reliance on private Nadu's SEP is more than just a state document. It's a strong political and educational message that local needs come first, and that student wellbeing matters more than rankings or centralised exams.- Ends
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
SC says evaluate NEET booklets manually
NEW DELHI: In a setback for National Testing Agency (NTA), Supreme Court has ordered manual evaluation of a NEET-UG 2025 answer sheet after a candidate alleged that the question paper was stapled incorrectly, resulting in a jumbled sequence of questions. The direction comes amid growing criticism that NTA has failed to adequately address students' grievances, with some even being told to seek redressal "from courts." Despite repeated representations by candidates about faulty booklets and scoring discrepancies, NTA has largely maintained that its processes are foolproof. However, in this case, SC took serious view of the complaint and rejected NTA's suggestion that no real harm was caused. TOI on June 11, in its report titled "Students raise serious concerns over errors in NEET-UG papers" highlighted the issue. Candidates interviewed had flagged faulty booklets with jumbled page orders, stating they marked incorrect answers due to mismatch between questions and the OMR sheet. When asked specifically about such instances, NTA responded by saying, "There are four series of question papers. The jumbling is thus of four types. There are four sets of keys. These are applicable to the respective series." Students, however, said this response ignored cases where jumbling was not just due to booklet series but stapling or printing errors. "We were told that nothing could be done and that we should take it up legally if we had a problem," said a candidate from Odisha. In this particular case before the top court, the petitioner claimed the sequencing in his paper was highly erratic - running from question numbers 1 to 27, followed by 54 to 81, then 28 to 53, 118 to 151, 82 to 117, and 152 to 180. This disordered layout, he argued, made it virtually impossible to match the questions correctly with the standard serial OMR sheet, which was in the expected 1 to 180 format. In its Aug 5 order, SC said, "We have heard learned ASG (additional solicitor general) appearing for the respondent(s). She has submitted a copy of the question paper in order to explain that there was a mistake merely in the stapling of the question paper which led to erroneous sequencing in as much as sequencing was not in seriatim and that this could not have caused any prejudice to the petitioner herein." "However, in order to satisfy ourselves, we direct that the petitioner's paper shall be evaluated manually and the result of the evaluation be placed on the record. The said exercise shall be carried out within a period of one week," it had said.
