AP Exam Scores 2025: How to check results online? See release date, rescore request process
AP Exam Scores 2025 Release Date
The College Board began releasing AP scores on Monday, July 7. The release time may vary depending on location. Most students will receive their scores in early July, though some may experience delays due to late testing or other processing factors. Students who do not see their scores by August 15 should contact AP Services for Students.
How to Check AP Exam Scores 2025?
To check AP scores, students should visit apstudents.collegeboard.org. Students must log in with their existing College Board account. Creating a new account could delay score access. Email notifications will be sent once scores are posted.
AP Score Distribution
The College Board has released score distributions for all AP subjects. For example, in AP Statistics:
17% earned a 5
Live Events
21% earned a 4
22% earned a 3
16% earned a 2
24% earned a 1
Score reports help students compare their results to national performance.
Also Read:
Ozzy Osbourne Farewell Concert: Where will Black Sabbath band perform again? Here are shocking details
What AP Scores Mean?
According to the College Board:
A score of 5 equals an A+ or A
A score of 4 equals an A-, B+, or B
A score of 3 equals a B-, C+, or C
Many colleges award credit or placement for scores of 3 and above. Scores of 1 or 2 often do not qualify.
How to Request Free Response or Rescore?
Students can request printed copies of their
AP free-response
answers for $10 per exam by submitting the AP Free-Response Request Form by September 15. These copies will not include comments or updated scores.
For multiple-choice sections, students may request hand rescoring by submitting the Multiple-Choice Rescore Service Form by October 31. This service costs $30 per exam. Score changes, whether higher, lower, or unchanged, will be automatically updated with score recipients.
What Are Advanced Placement Exams?
AP courses allow high school students to take university-level classes and earn college credit or advanced placement. Created by educators and subject experts, the program includes over 40 subjects. The College Board has managed AP exams since 1955. Exams are graded from 1 to 5 and are recognized by many universities in the US and worldwide.
Recent AP Controversies in Florida
In Florida, AP courses have faced policy challenges. In January 2023, Governor Ron DeSantis's administration banned AP African American Studies over content concerns. The College Board later revised the course but denied political influence.
In August 2023, Florida restricted content in AP Psychology related to gender and sexuality. The College Board warned that teaching a modified version would not qualify for AP credit. This affected nearly 30,000 students. The policy was reversed after one day.
In June 2024, DeSantis introduced the Commission for Public Higher Education to replace existing accreditation systems in several Southern states.
Also Read:
Texas Flooding Live Updates: Does Kerr County have a river warning system?See flash flood warnings, rainfall forecast
Iowa Sees Increased Participation
In Iowa, AP participation has grown since 2001.
In 2001, 156 schools offered AP exams
By 2023, 190 schools offered them
In 2024, this fell slightly to 177
Student participation rose from 4,000 in 2001 to over 12,000 in 2024. About 70% of Iowa test takers scored 3 or higher in 2024, exceeding the national average of 65%.
Access and Credit Policies
Students can check which AP courses qualify for credit at individual colleges using the AP Credit Policy Search tool on the College Board website. Policies vary by institution.
FAQs
How do I access my AP scores from the College Board?
Log into your My AP account at apstudents.collegeboard.org using your existing credentials. Avoid creating a new account to prevent delays in receiving results.
Can I get my AP exam rescored?
Yes, only the multiple-choice section may be rescored for $30. Submit the Rescore Service Form by October 31. Free-response answers cannot be appealed or rescored.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Osprey came back from the brink once. Now chicks are dying in nests, and some blame overfishing
GLOUCESTER POINT, Va. (AP) — Stepping onto an old wooden duck blind in the middle of the York River, Bryan Watts looks down at a circle of sticks and pine cones on the weathered, guano-spattered platform. It's a failed osprey nest, taken over by diving terns. 'The birds never laid here this year,' said Watts, near the mouth of Virginia's Chesapeake Bay. 'And that's a pattern we've been seeing these last couple of years.' Watts has a more intimate relationship with ospreys than most people have with a bird — he has climbed to their nests to free them from plastic bags, fed them by hand and monitored their eggs with telescopic mirrors. The fish-eating raptor known for gymnastic dives and whistle-like chirps is an American conservation success story. After pesticides and other hazards nearly eliminated the species from much of the country, the hawk-like bird rebounded after the banning of DDT in 1972 and now numbers in the thousands in the U.S. But Watts has documented an alarming trend. The birds, which breed in many parts of the U.S., are failing to successfully fledge enough chicks around their key population center of the Chesapeake Bay. The longtime biologist blames the decline of menhaden, a small schooling fish critical to the osprey diet. Without menhaden to eat, chicks are starving and dying in nests, Watts said. Watts's claim has put him and environmental groups at odds with the fishing industry, trade unions and sometimes government regulators. Menhaden is valuable for fish oil, fish meal and agricultural food as well as bait. U.S. fishermen have caught at least 1.1 billion pounds of menhaden every year since 1951. Members of the industry tout its sustainability and said the decline in osprey may have nothing to do with fishing. But without help, the osprey population could tumble to levels not seen since the dark days of DDT, said Watts, director of the Center for Conservation Biology at The College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia. 'The osprey are yelling pretty loudly that, hey, there's not enough menhaden for us to reproduce successfully,' Watts said. 'And we should be listening to them to be more informed fully on the fisheries side, and we should take precaution on the fisheries management side. But that hasn't won the day at this point.' Watts, who has studied osprey on the Chesapeake for decades, has backed his claims of population decline by publishing studies in scientific journals. He said it boils down to a simple statistic — to maintain population, osprey pairs need to average 1.15 chicks per year. Osprey were reproducing at that level in the 1980s, but today in some areas around the main stem of the Chesapeake, it's less than half of that, Watts said. In particularly distressed areas, they aren't even reproducing at one-tenth that level, he said. And the decline in available menhaden matches the areas of nesting failure, Watts said. Also called pogies or bunkers, the oily menhaden are especially important for young birds because they are more nutritious than other fish in the sea. Osprey 'reproductive performance is inextricably linked to the availability and abundance' of menhaden, Watts wrote in a 2023 study published in Frontiers in Marine Science. Conservationists have been concerned for years, saying too many menhaden have been removed to maintain their crucial role in the ocean food chain. Historian H. Bruce Franklin went so far as to title his 2007 book on menhaden 'The Most Important Fish In The Sea.' Menhaden help sustain one of the world's largest fisheries, worth more than $200 million at the docks in 2023. Used as bait, the fish are critical for valuable commercial targets such as Maine lobster. They're also beloved by sportfishermen. The modern industry is dominated by Omega Protein, a Reedville, Virginia, company that is a subsidiary of Canadian aquaculture giant Cooke. The company pushed back at the idea that fishing is the cause of osprey decline, although it did acknowledge that fewer menhaden are showing up in some parts of the bay. Federal data show osprey breeding is in decline in many parts of the country, including where menhaden is not harvested at all, said Ben Landry, an Omega spokesperson. Climate change, pollution and development could be playing a role, said Landry and others with the company. Blaming fishing 'just reeks of environmental special interest groups having an influence over the process,' Landry said. The menhaden fishery is managed by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, an interstate body that crafts rules and sets fishing quotas. Prompted by questions about ospreys, it created a work group to address precautionary management of the species in the Chesapeake Bay. In April, this group proposed several potential management approaches, including seasonal closures, restrictions on quotas or days at sea, and limitations on kinds of fishing gear. The process of creating new rules could begin this summer, said James Boyle, fishery management plan coordinator with the commission. The osprey population has indeed shown declines in some areas since 2012, but it's important to remember the bird's population is much larger than it was before DDT was banned, Boyle said. 'There are big increases in osprey population since the DDT era,' Boyle said, citing federal data showing a six-fold increase in osprey populations along the Atlantic Coast since the 1960s. To a number of environmental groups, any decline is too much. This irritates some labor leaders who worry about losing more jobs as the fishing industry declines. Kenny Pinkard, retired vice president of UFCW Local 400's executive board and a longtime Virginia fishermen, said he feels the industry is being scapegoated. 'There are some people who just don't want to see us in business at all,' he said. But Chris Moore, Virginia executive director for Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the country risks losing an iconic bird if no action is taken. He said Watts's studies show that the osprey will fail without access to menhaden. 'Osprey have been a success story,' Moore said. 'We're in a situation where they're not replacing their numbers. We'll actually be in a situation where we're in a steep decline.' Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. ___ This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX crash: Boeing's last minute settlement with Canadian man whose family died in disaster; avoids trial
Rescuers work at the scene of an Ethiopian Airlines plane crash (AP) US aviation giant Boing reached a settlement on Friday with a Canadian man whose family was killed in a 737 MAX crash in Ethiopia, avoiding the federal trial in connection with the deadly event set to begin on Monday, reported news agency AP. A jury trial in Chicago's federal court was set to determine the compensation owed to Paul Njoroge, whose entire family perished in March 2019 when Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed en route to their hometown in Kenya. The Boeing aircraft malfunctioned shortly after takeoff, killing all 157 passengers on board. Njoroge, 41, was set to testify in a Chicago federal court about the emotional and psychological trauma he has endured since the tragedy. He has been unable to return to his family home in Toronto, citing the overwhelming grief, and has struggled to find employment. According to his legal team, he also faced criticism from relatives for not traveling with his wife and children at the time of the crash. 'He's got complicated grief and sorrow and his own emotional stress,' said Njoroge's attorney, Robert Clifford. 'He's haunted by nightmares and the loss of his wife and children.' A spokesperson for Clifford Law Offices, the firm representing Njoroge, confirmed that 'the case has settled for a confidential amount.' Robert Clifford, a senior partner at the firm, added: 'The aviation team at Clifford Law Offices has been working round-the-clock in preparation for trial, but the mediator was able to help the parties come to an agreement on behalf of Paul Njoroge.' Njoroge also lost his mother-in-law in the crash, making the tragedy even more devastating for the family. Legal proceedings in the lawsuit filed were not expected to delve into the technical aspects of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, Boeing's bestselling jet that has remained at the centre of controversy since two fatal crashes within five months. The crashes, one in Ethiopia in 2019 and another in Indonesia in 2018, claimed the lives of 346 people, including passengers and crew members. In 2021, Chicago-based Boeing acknowledged responsibility for the Ethiopian Airlines crash through a legal agreement with victims' families. The deal allowed families to file individual claims in US courts, bypassing legal systems in their home countries. Citizens from 35 countries were among the deceased. While many families have since reached settlements, the financial terms of those agreements have not been disclosed publicly. The Ethiopian Airlines jet, en route to Nairobi, crashed shortly after takeoff from Addis Ababa Bole International Airport, plunging into a barren field. Investigators concluded that both the Ethiopian and Indonesian disasters were caused by a malfunctioning system known as MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System). The software, which was triggered by faulty sensor data, repeatedly forced the aircraft's nose downward, ultimately overwhelming the pilots. Following the Ethiopian crash, Boeing's 737 MAX fleet was grounded worldwide. The aircraft was only cleared for service after Boeing redesigned the flawed system. Earlier this year, Boeing reached a separate agreement with the US department of justice to avoid criminal prosecution related to the two deadly crashes.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 hours ago
- First Post
No action recommended yet, what all Air India crash probe panel investigated: 10 points
As India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau released the preliminary report on the devastating Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad. Here are the 10 things the authorities have investigated as of now read more Parts of an Air India plane that crashed on Thursday are seen on top of a building in Ahmedabad, India. AP A preliminary report on the devastating Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad revealed some of the key facts that were previously unknown in the case. The report noted that the fuel to the engines of the aircraft that crashed and killed 260 people last month appeared to be cut off seconds after the flight took off. The flight AI171 crashed into a densely populated residential area in Ahmedabad on June 12. While 241 passengers onboard were killed, with just one survivor, the impact also led to the death of 19 other people on the ground, making it one of the most devastating aviation disasters in Indian history. It was the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which was bound for London, that crashed on the fateful day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The report released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found that switches in the cockpit that controlled fuel moved to a 'cutoff' position and suggested that Boeing and engine maker GE had no apparent responsibility for the accident. 'The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 knots IAS [indicated airspeed] at about 08:08:42 UTC, and immediately thereafter, the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 1 second," the report said. 'The engines N1 and N2 began to decrease from their takeoff values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off.' The aircraft started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall. With the preliminary report out, here are the 10 things that have been investigated in the case as of now: 10 things the Air India probe panel investigated in the preliminary report The investigation of the wreckage site activities, including Drone photography/videography, has been completed. The wreckage has now been moved to a 'secure area near the airport'. Both engines of the aircraft were retrieved from the wreckage site and quarantined at a hangar in the airport. Components of interest for further investigation have been identified and quarantined as well. Fuel Samples taken from the browsers and tanks used to refuel the aircraft were tested at the DGCA's Lab and found satisfactory. A very limited number of fuel samples could be retrieved from the APU filter and Refuel/Jettison valve of the left wing. The testing of these samples will be done at a suitable facility capable of carrying out the test with the limited available quantity. The EAFR data downloaded from the forward EAFR is being analysed in detail. The investigators have obtained all the statements of the witnesses and the surviving passenger. Complete analysis of postmortem reports of the crew and the passengers is being undertaken to corroborate aeromedical findings with the engineering assessment. Apart from this, additional details are being gathered based on the initial leads. At this stage of the investigation, there are no recommended actions for B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers. The report concluded by stating that the investigation is still ongoing and the authorities would further review and examine additional evidence, records and information that are currently being sought from the stakeholders.
