VW introduces monthly subscription to increase car power
Auto Express, who first reported the story, said a lifetime subscription would be for the car rather than the individual - meaning the upgrade would remain on the car if it was sold on.A VW spokesperson told the BBC they believed giving people the option to purchase more power for their car is "nothing new"."Historically many petrol and diesel vehicles have been offered with engines of the same size, but with the possibility of choosing one with more potency," they said.They added that the power upgrades would allow customers to opt for a "sportier" driving experience at any time, "rather than committing from the outset with a higher initial purchase price".Such offers have proved controversial for some customers in the past, who are displeased they may have to pay to access features which - in some cases - are already present inside the car they own.
'Nothing new'
Other vehicle manufacturers such as BMW have introduced similar subscription-based add-ons in the past, such as for heated seats and steering wheels.And Mercedes introduced an online subscription service in the US in 2022 which allowed customers to pay to make its electric cars speed up quicker.According to a survey from S&P Global, some customers may be put off by the cost of in-car subscriptions for features such as connectivity, or by basic functions being split into paid tiers.It said the number of respondents who said they would pay for connected services had fallen from 86% in 2024 to 68% in 2025.This is despite a wider embrace of subscriptions in general, with market research firm Juniper Research estimating in 2024 the global subscription economy would reach nearly $1tn (£740bn) in value by 2028.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: I warned whisky firm would cause a hangover
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. Ms N.P. writes: I bought bonds in beverage company Linc Drinks Ltd and casks of whisky from Whisky&Co Ltd, both promoted by the same sales firm. However, I've just seen that Whisky&Co has gone into liquidation. Now I'm worried about my investments – do you think there is any chance that I'll get my money back? Tony Hetherington replies: I am afraid the picture does not look good. The two companies were promoted by Nicholas James Finance Ltd, based in Canary Wharf, in London. But this firm has never been authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority to sell investments to the general public. It exploited a legal loophole which let it sell bonds to people who are wealthy enough or experienced enough to take serious risks – and I warned in January that it was not checking that investors would fit the bill before selling them high-risk IOUs issued by Linc Drinks. Linc Drinks wanted to borrow £3 million from investors, predicting it would be worth £150 million by the end of last year and become a takeover target for Diageo, the owner of Guinness. This was total rubbish, and I said so. Whisky&Co sold casks of whisky as investments, claiming that they would be stored at HMRC-approved distilleries in Scotland. In fact, the casks held Irish whiskey, stored in Ireland, where HMRC has no jurisdiction. Nicholas James Finance told investors to expect annual gains of up to 12 per cent, claiming it had a close relationship with top auctioneers Bonhams, but I also reported that Bonhams denied this completely. Now to bring things up to date. Companies House has begun proceedings to strike off Linc Drinks after it failed to file legally due details revealing who owns it. Whisky&Co put itself into liquidation on August 5, and Nicholas James Finance applied on July 22 to Companies House to be struck off and dissolved. Where does this leave investors? The man behind Nicholas James Finance and Whisky&Co is Ashley Wilkinson. I invited him to offer reassurance to his investors, but he has failed to respond. On paper, the director of Linc Drinks is ex-Aston Villa footballer Sam Williams, but he could not be contacted at the business's serviced office address in London and its phone number appears dead. Mail for Linc Drinks now goes to Companies House in Cardiff. The Mail on Sunday passed its evidence on all three companies to the Financial Conduct Authority in January. The regulator rarely comments on active investigations, but it confirmed it had begun enquiries. With all three firms folding, it would be no great surprise to see news of official action very soon. Five in the dock as savers lose £75m in pension pots Thursday will see the appearance at Westminster Magistrates' Court of five individuals charged over an investment scheme involving the sale of storage units. The charges follow an eight-year investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), which says more than 1,900 investors transferred £75 million from their pension savings into the scheme, run by Store First, near Burnley, Lancashire. The company's boss, Toby Whittaker, and Stephen Talbot, Stuart Grehan, Terence Wright and Emma Hawkins face charges of conspiracy to defraud. Talbot and Grehan have also been charged with perjury and – alongside an unnamed sixth defendant – the pair are also charged with money laundering. I reported on Store First in 2013 and after that. Legal restrictions now apply to what can be published. The SFO alleges that misrepresentations were made, including that investors would receive a guaranteed return from renting out units. We're watching you 2 A solicitor closely connected to will writing company Town & Country Law has been suspended from practising law for one month after an investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) found his firm – Scunthorpe-based Tyto Law – employed a legal assistant who had been banned from the profession over previous misconduct. Tyto Law boss Oliver Saxon was granted permission to employ Ben Moore only after assuring the regulator that Moore would work from the firm's offices and that Saxon himself would supervise him. Moore was barred from having direct contact with clients. All these conditions were breached, and Moore was in close contact with Town & Country Law, preparing its clients' wills. When this was discovered, the SRA cancelled its permission for Moore to be employed by Tyto Law. Town & Country Law is not regulated by the SRA, as preparing wills can be done by anyone with no qualifications needed. If work has to be done by a solicitor, it instructs Tyto Law, whose owner Oliver Saxon runs an offshoot called Town & Country Law (Two Roses) Ltd. In 2022 I revealed that Town & Country Law's owner James Scotney obtained a credit licence from the Financial Conduct Authority after failing to declare he served a prison sentence for drug dealing. And in 2024 I warned that Scotney employed ex-solicitor Jonathan De Vita, who was struck off after his firm massively overcharged clients, falsified records, and used clients' funds without their permission. We're watching you 3 Three fraudsters have been convicted at St Albans Crown Court of running a wine investment scam, following a complex investigation by Trading Standards officials from Hertfordshire County Council. Investigators say victims lost £6 million. Benjamin Cazaly, Greg Assemakis and Dominic D'Sa were behind Imperial Wine & Spirits Merchant Ltd. The wine they supplied had a price mark-up of as much as 400 per cent, making profit impossible for investors. The company's sales team was made up of young people schooled in telemarketing, and the movie The Wolf Of Wall Street was used as a training film. Assemakis was previously a director of a similar wine scam business, European Fine Wines Ltd. I revealed in 2013 that two of that company's bosses were forced to quit after being banned as directors for operating rip-off land investment firms. It went into liquidation in 2014, with customers' claims topping £3 million. Claimants finally received 1.4p for every £1 owed to them. If you believe you are the victim of financial wrongdoing, write to Tony Hetherington at Financial Mail, 9 Derry Street, London W8 5HY or email Because of the high volume of enquiries, personal replies cannot be given. Please send only copies of original documents, which we regret cannot be returned.
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Veteran 'Superman' Li Ka-Shing could save Thames Water
The fate of crisis-torn Thames Water is set to be decided within weeks as Ministers prepare to effectively nationalise the troubled utilities firm before getting it ready for a sale. And the front-runner in any bidding war for the debt-laden supplier to 16 million customers in London and the Thames Valley is likely to be a business conglomerate controlled by one of Asia's richest men. Last week, reports emerged that CK Infrastructure (CKI), which also owns Northumbrian Water, had told the Government it was prepared to take over Thames imminently if it were to fall into special administration, buckling under the weight of £17 billion of debt. A successful takeover of Britain's largest water group would add another asset to the burgeoning portfolio of CKI's parent firm, CK Hutchison (CKH), which controls a globe-spanning empire encompassing pub chains, container ports and High Street stores. Behind it all is Li Ka-Shing, CKH's founder, considered the most successful tycoon in Hong Kong's history after amassing a fortune worth nearly £30 billion. The 97-year-old, who arrived in the British colony in 1940 aged 12 as a refugee from the Sino-Japanese war, is called 'Superman' by locals for his business acumen. Li is the firm's 'senior advisor' after stepping down as chairman in 2018 after 46 years at the helm. Despite his advanced years, the tycoon remains involved in the business and still goes into the office twice a week. He can also be spotted at the Tsz Shan Monastery, a ten-year-old Buddhist temple that Li financed to the tune of £142 million. CKH remains a family concern, with Li's son Victor serving as chairman. His UK empire includes the 226-year-old Greene King pub chain, bought for £4.6 billion in 2019 through one of the family's other businesses, CK Asset Holdings. Other assets include retailer Superdrug and UK Power Networks, the electricity grid operator for London and the South-East. CKH also owned mobile network Three before its merger with rival Vodafone earlier this year. It now controls just under half of the new business, which leapfrogged BT's EE to become Britain's biggest mobile phone provider. CKH's eyeing up of Thames Water comes as the conglomerate's British operations become increasingly profitable. Last week, CKH's half-year results saw underlying profits rise 11 per cent to £1.1 billion as sales rose to £22.6 billion from £21.8 billion in 2024. But overall profits fell 92 per cent to £80.3 million due to a one-off £983 million loss from the Vodafone-Three merger. Included in the figures were results from CKI, which is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange but is controlled by CKH. CKI reported that its profits from the UK had jumped 19 per cent since last year thanks to 'higher contributions' from Northumbrian Water as well as its electricity grid arm and three British gas networks it also controls. Despite the firm's success in Britain, a swoop on Thames Water has sparked fear among those who are wary of handing over control of vital infrastructure to a Chinese company. On Thursday, former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith said a takeover by Li's firm risked handing 'a country that is a threat, greater power over national infrastructure'. It has also caused consternation in the US Congress. But Li's history is not all kowtowing to Beijing, with the tycoon having butted heads with China's communist authorities in the past. When Hong Kong saw a wave of pro-democracy protests in 2019, the government of the People's Republic accused Li of 'harbouring criminality' and allowing the city to 'slip into the abyss' when he called for police to show 'humanity' dealing with demonstrators. More recently, CKH has found itself caught in Donald Trump's trade war with China. Earlier this year, the company was forced to delay the sale of 43 ports, including two in the crucial Panama Canal, to a consortium backed by US asset manager BlackRock after Beijing criticised the deal. In its results, Victor Li said the firm expected global trade to 'remain volatile' as Trump's tariffs reverberated through the market. But despite the headwinds, CKH raised its half-year dividend by 3.2 per cent, landing the elder Li, who controls just over 28 per cent of the business, a £72 million payday. With Thames Water sinking under its own debt, Ministers may overlook CKH's Chinese ties in the absence of a better offer. Lower-ranking holders of Thames Water's debt are also understood to be keen on a long-term infrastructure owner such as CKH. The firm has reportedly said it would agree to new rules imposing tougher fines for breaking environmental regulations, which the water group's senior hedge fund creditors have said is financially unviable. Ministers will be hoping Hong Kong's 'Superman' can save the day.
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
RACHEL RICKARD STRAUS: We pay a high price if No 11 is scared of markets
What can throw tantrums and fling its toys out of the pram when it doesn't get what it was hoping for? A petulant child may spring to mind – but it's an equally accurate description of financial markets. Investors crave certainty and Governments tie themselves in knots trying to give it to them for fear of the consequences. Understandably so – if investors start to lose confidence in a Government's prudence, they can throw a strop and refuse to lend it more money unless they are compensated with higher interest payments. Debt costs then spiral, gobbling up taxes and leaving the Government with less to spend on everything else. So you can see where Chancellor Rachel Reeves was coming from when she made it clear from the off that her mission is to keep financial markets happy. With debt interest predicted to cost us £111 billion this year, we can hardly afford for the bill to rise further. That's already around £3,915 per household. Appeased markets should mean lower debt payments – in theory, good news for us all. But Reeves' attempts to provide security for financial markets are resulting in her eroding it elsewhere. UK households are now the ones in the dark and fearful about what's coming their way – and that is starting to have its own consequences. Ms Reeves' strategy to create certainty was to construct rules about how much the Government would borrow and pledge never to break them. But meeting her rules is getting trickier as economic growth weakens. Short of a miracle, the only way she'll manage it is if households stump up. She'll have to find £50 billion from somewhere – be it tax rises or spending cuts. The problem is that we won't know where she'll target – and are unlikely to for several long months until the autumn Budget. The uncertainty is already starting to bite. Financial experts have told us that households risk making costly mistakes when trying to protect their estates against the possibility that Ms Reeves chooses to target inheritance tax. Leading estate agent Savills last week warned that a 'vacuum' of information about potential changes to inheritance tax is also affected house sales. Potential buyers are sitting on their hands in part because they don't know what is coming down the line. Collectively that hurts the housing market, but individually that's thousands of households stuck in homes that no longer suit them and putting life plans on hold. Aviva boss Amanda Blanc also warned last week that fears of a Budget tax raid are stoking customers' uncertainty. 'There's been a huge amount of speculation… customers should wait and see before they take any action,' she said. 'It is really important you don't do anything detrimental.' Relentless uncertainty about the outlook for pensions erodes confidence in them – which can make savers think twice before making such a long-term investment. Things will only get worse as we get closer to the Budget. Chancellors and the Treasury have a habit of stoking rumours about what they might do – to gauge the public response and decide whether or not to go ahead. Think-tanks, financial firms and other invested organisations publish endless papers about what the Chancellor could and should do in the hope of steering her decisions. Speculation mounts, fears grow. It's easy to get caught up in the frenzy. So what to do? For most of us, the best action to take is likely to be none at all. Acting rashly on rumour could leave you worse off than waiting to see what happens. Any changes the Chancellor does make are unlikely to come in immediately, so you should have time to act then if you need to. But it doesn't hurt to do things that are win-win – in other words, that you wouldn't regret regardless of what the Chancellor does or doesn't announce. That means stashing what you can in your Isa, where investment returns, dividends and interest earned are tax-free. It means remembering your pension as well. Tax relief is effectively free money in your long-term savings – an incredibly generous perk – and long may it remain. And it means doing what makes sense in your life, rather than what may prove to be the most tax efficient. Giving away wealth now may help keep it from the Chancellor if she targets inheritance tax, but that's little solace if it leaves you short in older age. Finally, the Chancellor should keep a check on the uncertainty that she's creating among households. If it results in fearful households curbing their spending, making poor financial decisions and a gummed-up housing market, then financial markets won't like that either – and, as always, they'll make her pay.
