logo
Bloomberg Opinion: China's Long Game on Trade Is Working

Bloomberg Opinion: China's Long Game on Trade Is Working

Bloomberg3 days ago
China is playing the long game and willing to endure short-term pain in its trade war with the US, Bloomberg Opinion's Karishma Vaswani says. She explains how President Xi Jinping's Mao-era strategy and focus on long-term advantage could shape a final deal with Washington. (Source: Bloomberg)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)'s Selling In Dollar General Because 'It's The Last One,' Says Jim Cramer
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)'s Selling In Dollar General Because 'It's The Last One,' Says Jim Cramer

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)'s Selling In Dollar General Because 'It's The Last One,' Says Jim Cramer

We recently published . e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE:ELF) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE:ELF) is a firm that can't seem to catch a break. After struggling in a tough cosmetics market in 2024, the firm has continued to struggle in 2025 as investors fret about its ability to weather the inflationary storm from tariffs. e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE:ELF)'s affordable cosmetics depend on its Chinese supply chain, making the tariff concerns self-explanatory. Cramer remarked on the firm selling cosmetics in Dollar General: '[On why ELF was selling its products in Dollar General] Because it's the last one. The shorts are telling me, not that I listen to the shorts, but the shorts are saying, what's after Dollar General? Is there anything after?' Copyright: antonioguillem / 123RF Stock Photo Here are his previous thoughts about e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE:ELF): 'What the heck just happened to e.l.f. Beauty? I mean, the last time we got results from this low-cost cosmetics and skincare brand and the stock got eviscerated today, down nearly 10%. You know, we've long championed this one. It's been a great growth stock over the last few years, largely because it offers its customers quality merchandise at incredibly affordable prices. Unfortunately, it can charge low prices because it makes most of its goods in China, which means most of e.l.f.'s products are about to become more expensive. So last night, even though e.l.f. delivered a nice top and bottom line beat, management declined to issue a full year forecast because they really have no idea how the tariff situation's… going to play out. However, the limited guidance they gave did suggest that their margins are going to take a real hit… Maybe that's why things got, well, just awry.' While we acknowledge the potential of ELF as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store