Airline Data Breach Warning — Air France And KLM Confirm Cyber Attack
What We Know About The Air France And KLM Data Breach
A reader contacted me yesterday to alert me to the fact that he had just received an email from KLM informing him that there had been a data breach and his personal details were impacted. That email notification has been published below in its entirety, aside from redacting the reader's name for privacy reasons.
Air France and KLM have both now confirmed that this was due to a cyber attack on 'an external platform that we use for our customer service,' and that customer data was accessed. The brief statement, which I have translated from Dutch, said that 'Internal Air France and KLM systems have not been affected,' and that the attack has stopped, along with measures being taken to prevent a repeat of the data breach, although what those measures are was not shared. 'No sensitive data such as passwords, travel details, Flying Blue miles, passport or credit card information has been stolen,' the statement read. However, as the notification email explained, data that could be of use to cybercriminals in further attack scenarios was breached, including:
KLM advised that customers remain 'extra alert to suspicious emails or phone calls,' as a consequence.
A sentiment shared by the lead security awareness advocate at KnowBe4, Javvad Malik, who told me that 'customers must remain alert for sophisticated follow-on scams, while organisations need to rigorously assess and continually monitor all parties who have access to their data.'
'Air France and KLM's response to a recent breach is a notable example of effective breach handling: they swiftly cut off the attackers, notified authorities, and informed affected customers,' Boris Cipot, senior security engineer at Black Duck, said in relation to the latest airline data breach revelation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Stumbles, but Elon Musk Gets a Massive Payday
Key Points Tesla's sales are struggling in key markets overseas. Consumer backlash from Elon Musk's political stance is real. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Unless you've been purposely hiding from the news -- which would be understandable -- you know that investors in Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) have had plenty to digest. Between allegations Tesla isn't paying its bills and hurting small businesses, to facing consumer backlash from CEO Elon Musk's political tour (and we can't forget the sliding sales and global profits), it's been a full downpour. Let's consider the recent speed bumps, as well as Musk being rewarded with a hefty $29 billion payday. The overseas spiral July figures are seeping in from Europe, and they show that Tesla registrations checked in 41.6% lower compared to the prior year, despite sales of electric vehicles (EVs) surging across the Continent. It's a continuation of the sales spiral the EV maker faced during the first half of 2025. And the problem is that the decline was supposedly due to the new Model Y being in limited supply -- but the issues appear to be deeper than that. The story is similar in China, another crucial market for Tesla. Its sales of China-made EVs dropped 8.4% in July compared to the prior year. That was a reversal from the small gain Tesla posted in June, which at the time reversed an eight-month losing streak. The consumer backlash The consumer displeasure is real, and Musk's political allegiances have pushed some buyers to new and different brands. There's evidence of the effect this is having on Tesla's once-spotless brand image, according to new data from S&P Global Mobility, which tracks sales data across the automotive industry. The new data, shared with Reuters, showed that Tesla's consumer loyalty took a nosedive in July 2024, correlating with Musk's public commitment to an anti-environmental political campaign. According to Reuters, Tesla's loyalty peaked at 73% in June 2024 before bottoming out in March at 49.9%. No matter how you slice it, that's a quick and dramatic decline in consumer sentiment, literally driving buyers to another brand. A massive payday Tesla's board granted Musk 96 million shares, worth roughly $29 billion, in an attempt to keep the billionaire focused on the EV company amid his multiple businesses and ventures. The vote comes after a 2024 Delaware court ruling that voided Musk's 2018 compensation package, which was valued at over $50 billion. The court said the approval process was flawed and unfair to shareholders. According to Automotive News, the special committee that was formed to consider the new pay package said: "While we recognize Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging ... we are confident that this award will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla." What it all means Tesla and its investors certainly appear to be at a crossroads. While selling EVs and zero-emission credits keeps the lights on for the young company, it constantly reminds investors that its future may be more in line with artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and robotaxi services. Long-term investors should stay the course but should also prepare for a bumpy few quarters as the company works through its upcoming identity crisis, the slow ramp-up of the robotaxi, and an aging lineup. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Tesla Stumbles, but Elon Musk Gets a Massive Payday was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What convinced Man Utd to spend £74m on Benjamin Sesko transfer
Man Utd have committed a whopping £74 million to sign Benjamin Sesko, who they are hoping will be the team's star striker for the next five years at least. The deal sees them pay an initial transfer fee of £66.26m (€76.5m), plus a potential £7.36m (€8.5m) in performance-related add-ons. That's a huge figure for a forward is just 22 years of age and has played only two seasons in one of Europe's top five leagues. So why were the Red Devils so willing to part with such a large sum of money? What convinced Man Utd to spend £74m on Sesko transfer Man Utd themselves say their data analysis and research helped them conclude that Sesko has 'the required qualities and personality to thrive' at Old Trafford. Indeed, The Athletic report that their scouting dates back seven years, so they had a ton of data and reports to rely on. In their statement announcing his arrival, they point out he scored 39 goals for Leipzig, the most of any player under the age of 23 over the past two seasons. It's a nice stat, but the underlying numbers don't make for great reading. In the Champions League and Bundesliga he scored 33 goals from just 21.7 non-penalty expected goals (npxG), according to FBref. That means he scored 11.3 goals more than 'expected' by the data, a huge overperformance that no one should expect to continue. This follows the trend of their transfer business when it comes to attacking signings this summer. Both Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha were number one and two respectively on the list of biggest npxG overperformers in the Premier League last season. This is generally the opposite of what smart clubs look for when judging potential future performance; Liverpool, for instance, almost always acquire forwards who had underperformed relative to their xG, like Mo Salah for example. They are betting on the possibility of that correcting itself, while Man Utd are simply hoping that their newcomers are awesome finishers who will continue delivering at the same rate. It seems more likely, from this writer's point of view, that Sesko's physical traits were far more important in their decision to sign him than his numbers. The Slovenia international is, as a Proper Football Man might put it, a Big Lad. But he's also quick and willing to run himself into the ground for the team. Read – Ruben Amorim evidently loves this about him, as well as his workrate. 'He is really young, he's good in the air, he's good running the channels, he's good on the ball. So I think he has a great potential,' the manager said. Man Utd director of football Jason Wilcox went even further, commenting that Sesko 'possesses a rare combination of electrifying pace and the ability to physically dominate defenders, making him one of the most exceptional young talents in world football'. Will those characteristics translate into the goals that Man Utd need to make them a relevant force again? Only time will tell. Read – In Pictures – Follow The Football Faithful on Social Media: | | | |
Associated Press
40 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Thousands march against plan to build massive bridge linking Sicily to Italy's mainland
ROME (AP) — Thousands of people marched in the Sicilian city of Messina on Saturday to protest a government plan to build a bridge that would connect the Italian mainland with Sicily in a massive 13.5-billion-euro ($15.5 billion) infrastructure project. Protesters staunchly oppose the Strait of Messina Bridge project over its scale, earthquake threats, environmental impact and the specter of mafia interference. The idea to build a bridge to connect Sicily to the rest of Italy has been debated off and on for decades but always delayed due to these concerns. The project, however, took a major step forward when a government committee overseeing strategic public investments approved the plan this week. Transport Minister Matteo Salvini, the project's main political backer, called it 'the biggest infrastructure project in the West.' Salvini cited studies estimating the project would create up to 120,000 jobs annually and help stimulate economic growth in economically lagging southern Italy, as billions more are invested in surrounding road and infrastructure improvements. Opponents are not convinced by these arguments. They are also angry that about 500 families would have to be expropriated in order for the bridge to be built. 'The Strait of Messina can't be touched,' protesters shouted as they marched in Messina. Many carried banners that said 'No Ponte' (No Bridge). Organizers estimated crowd size at 10,000 people. The proposed bridge would span nearly 3.7 kilometers (2.2 miles) with a suspended section of 3.3 kilometers (more than 2 miles). It would surpass Turkey's Canakkale Bridge by 1,277 meters (4,189 feet) to become the longest suspension bridge in the world. Preliminary work could begin as early as late September or early October, pending approval from Italy's Court of Audit. Full construction is scheduled to begin in 2026, with completion targeted between 2032 and 2033. Plans for a bridge have been approved and canceled multiple times since the Italian government first solicited proposals for one in 1969. Premier Giorgia Meloni's administration revived the project in 2023. With three car lanes in each direction flanked by a double-track railway, the bridge would have the capacity to carry 6,000 cars an hour and 200 trains a day — reducing the time to cross the strait by ferry from up to 100 minutes to 10 minutes by car. Trains would save 2/12 hours in transit time, Salvini said. The project could also support Italy's commitment to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP targeted by NATO, as the government has indicated it would classify the bridge as defense-related. Italy argues that the bridge would form a strategic corridor for rapid troop movements and equipment deployment, qualifying it as 'security-enhancing infrastructure.' Environmental groups, however, have lodged complaints with the EU, citing concerns that the project would impact migratory birds. Italy's president has also insisted that the project remain subject to anti-mafia legislation that applies to all large-scale infrastructure projects. Salvini pledged that keeping organized crime out of the project was a top priority.
