logo
Two additional groups ask to join Arkansas League of Women Voters suit against changes to referendum law

Two additional groups ask to join Arkansas League of Women Voters suit against changes to referendum law

Yahoo16-05-2025

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Two additional groups filed in federal court on Thursday to join the Arkansas League of Women Voters lawsuit against recent changes to the election referendum law.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas filed the motion to intervene. It asked the court to allow Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids to challenge the changes to the referendum law made during the 95th General Assembly of the Arkansas legislature.
Arkansas League of Women Voters files federal suit, calls changes to voter referendum process 'Unconstitutional'
Arkansas law allows voter referendums to appear on the ballot if certain steps are taken. In the recent past, the referendum process has allowed voters to raise the state minimum wage and permit access to medical marijuana.
In the most recent legislative session, multiple bills were passed to make those steps more difficult to accomplish. Some of the recently passed provisions being challenged in the suit are:
A requirement that citizen initiatives pass a machine-generated reading test before petitioning may begin.
Rules that force circulators to recite specific warnings, verify IDs, and stop collecting signatures after an affidavit is filed.
Restrictions on who may serve as a canvasser, including prohibitions on non-residents and additional burdens for paid petition circulators, and when canvassers may collect signatures
Mandatory disclosures and procedures with the potential for harassment, including public release of canvasser addresses
A law that gives the Secretary of State authority to exclude all signatures collected by a canvasser when the Secretary of State unilaterally determines that the canvasser violated laws or committed even technical violations.
Both Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids are pursuing different referendums and are at different stages in the process.
Protect AR Rights is a coalition meant to safeguard the ballot initiative process. Its members include Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, Arkansas Appleseed, Arkansas Citizens First Congress, Arkansas Public Policy Panel, For AR People and the Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP.
Attorney General Tim Griffin rejects Arkansas League of Women Voters ballot title to overturn petition rules
For AR Kids is a coalition working to amend the education clause of the Arkansas Constitution. Its member organizations include the Arkansas Education Association, Arkansas Public Policy Panel, Arkansas Retired Teachers Association, Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP, Citizens First Congress and Stand Up Arkansas.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arkansas ranks first-place in election security, according to conservative group
Arkansas ranks first-place in election security, according to conservative group

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Arkansas ranks first-place in election security, according to conservative group

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – From number eight to number one, Arkansas has moved up in the Heritage Foundation's Election Security Scorecard. Secretary of State Cole Jester says it's all due to eight recent key changes, including policies from his office. 'We're partnering with the federal government to get DHA, Homeland Security data on illegal immigrants who might be on our rolls and using credit agencies to flag addresses that may be industrial or just don't exist,' Jester said. Arkansas coalition submits proposed ballot initiative to overturn legislative changes to referendum law Arkansas is now sharing voter registration data with other states to check for people registered in multiple states, along with implementing other new policies. Recently passed laws have also contributed to the new ranking. 'One, getting data from federal juries so we can eliminate people who shouldn't be on our voter registration list, two, requiring a witness for absentee ballots,' Jester said. Gennie Diaz, with the democracy rights advocacy group Protect AR Rights, said they would like to see policies that make democracy more accessible, not less. 'It's a really interesting contrast, if you will, from where we rank in voter participation and then this declaration that our state is number one in voter integrity. I think there is a big chasm there,' Diaz said. While the Heritage Foundation does not have a ranking category dedicated to the petition process, Jester said one of the eight changes includes mandating a photo ID for signing initiative petitions. There are 100 factors that determine the ranking based on a point system. Arkansas League of Women Voters files federal suit, calls changes to voter referendum process 'Unconstitutional' Protect AR Rights is proposing the Arkansas Ballot Measure Rights Amendment, which aims to block existing laws they believe interfere with the right to sign petitions and collect signatures. 'How can we find ways to, of course, protect the voting process and the petition process, but also make it easier for people to vote? Because in our state it's just incredibly difficult, and often fewer than half of our registered voters turn out for elections,' Diaz said. Jester said these are common-sense laws and policies, while Diaz questioned the practical benefit of the ranking for voters. 'What does this number one ranking for election integrity actually mean for the voters of this state? Is this just simply a ranking that we get because we check off certain boxes with this particular think tank, or is this something we're actually working toward as a state?' Diaz said. 'Things like when a ballot is damaged and remade, procedural checks to make sure it's done correctly, things like nursing homes requiring two witnesses, two assisters when you're helping someone fill out their ballot, just common-sense steps everyone can get behind,' Jester said. Lawmakers seek to rein in citizen ballot initiatives with new requirements for petitions To view the scorecard, please visit Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Protect AR Rights ballot title to overturn recent ballot title laws rejected
Protect AR Rights ballot title to overturn recent ballot title laws rejected

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Protect AR Rights ballot title to overturn recent ballot title laws rejected

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Protect AR Rights' first ballot title submission to the Arkansas attorney general was rejected on Monday. The group has stated that the submission is intended to place before voters the chance to overturn ballot initiative laws passed during the most recent general assembly. Citing concerns about security, the legislature passed multiple laws tightening the requirements for ballot referendums to be accepted, including increased restrictions on signature gathering and referendum language. Arkansas bill aims to let attorney general determine constitutionality of ballot initiatives One of those laws requiring ballot titles to be at no more than an eighth-grade reading level was the primary reason Attorney General Tim Griffin rejected the Protect AR Rights submission. 'I must reject your popular name and ballot title because the ballot title does not comply with Act 602 of 2025,' Griffin wrote in his opinion. 'As explained above, Act 602 prohibits me from certifying ballot titles that are above an eighth-grade reading level under the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula. The ballot title you have submitted ranks at grade 11.5. Thus, your ballot title requires significant revisions before it complies with the Act.' The attorney general also cited ambiguity in two parts of the ballot title's language. Attorney general approves Arkansas League of Women Voters, Save AR Democracy ballot title for referendum roll-back A statement from Protect AR Rights said the group expected its first submission to be rejected. 'We're not surprised by today's decision from the Attorney General because it's rare for a ballot measure to be approved on the first try,' the statement read.' This is simply the first step in a long process, and our coalition remains fully committed to protecting the rights of Arkansans to shape their own laws.' The group also classified the reading requirement as being 'passed by politicians trying to limit access to the ballot' and a 'serious barrier to a fundamental right.' Protect AR Rights has its policy position on its website. Arkansas coalition speaks on proposed ballot measure process amendment Griffin recently approved a ballot initiative with similar intent for the Arkansas League of Women Voters. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Second Arkansas ballot measure rejected for failing to meet reading-level standard
Second Arkansas ballot measure rejected for failing to meet reading-level standard

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Second Arkansas ballot measure rejected for failing to meet reading-level standard

Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families Executive Director Keesa Smith-Brantley discusses a proposed constitutional amendment submitted to the attorney general's office during a press conference at the state Capitol on May 19, 2025. (Sonny Albarado/Arkansas Advocate) Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin on Monday said he could not certify a proposed constitutional amendment related to direct democracy because it violates a new state law that prohibits ballot titles from being written above an eighth-grade reading level. Act 602, which became law in April, prohibits the attorney general from certifying a proposed ballot title with a reading level above eighth grade as determined by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula. The test uses word complexity and sentence lengths to calculate what grade of education is needed to comprehend written material. 'The ballot title you have submitted ranks at grade 11.5. Thus, your ballot title requires significant revisions before it complies with the Act,' according to Monday's opinion, which was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Jodie Keener and approved by Griffin. Monday's opinion identified additional issues with the proposal, including ambiguity regarding the Arkansas General Assembly's authority and how conflicting measures become law. The Arkansas Ballot Measure Rights Amendment, sponsored by the Protect AR Rights coalition, would amend Article 5 Section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution, the section that governs the state's initiative and referendum process. It would designate as a 'fundamental right' the right of voters to propose laws and constitutional amendments that can be put to a statewide vote. Among its various provisions, the measure would require petition signatures be gathered from at least 15 counties instead of 50 and would explicitly prohibit the Arkansas General Assembly from amending or repealing a constitutional amendment approved by voters. This is the second ballot measure proposed this year in response to state lawmakers approving about a dozen direct democracy-related laws during the 2025 legislative session. Supporters of the new laws have said they will ensure the integrity of the initiative and referendum process, while opponents have argued it will make it more difficult for citizen-led initiatives to qualify for the ballot. The direct democracy process allows Arkansans to propose new laws or constitutional amendments and put them to a statewide vote. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allows citizen-led initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Protect AR Rights spokesperson Bill Kopsky said in a phone interview that Monday's decision was expected because the attorney general often rejects the first draft of a proposed ballot title. The ballot question committee intends to request a meeting with Griffin's staff to gather feedback, Kopsky said. In an emailed statement, Protect AR Rights noted this was 'the first step in a long process, and our coalition remains fully committed to protecting the rights of Arkansans to shape their own laws.' Griffin's rejection of the group's proposed amendment reinforces why it's 'so urgently needed,' according to the group. 'We're reviewing the AG's feedback and will revise and resubmit our amendment. But let's be clear: the new 8th grade reading requirement — passed by politicians trying to limit access to the ballot — is a serious barrier to a fundamental right,' the statement reads. 'We believe measures should be clear, accessible, and accurate. That's exactly why we're fighting this provision in court.' Court filings reveal opposition to intervening motion in Arkansas direct democracy lawsuit Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids, another ballot question committee pursuing an education-focused constitutional amendment, are trying to challenge Act 602 by intervening in a federal lawsuit that challenges several other new laws governing the state's direct democracy process. The League of Women Voters of Arkansas filed the lawsuit against the secretary of state in April. The League proposed its own direct democracy-related ballot measure this year that was thrice rejected by the attorney general, including once for violating Act 602. Griffin substituted and certified the popular name and ballot title so it met the eighth grade-reading level requirement on May 21. That means the League can begin gathering signatures to try to place their measure on the 2026 ballot. In response to the motion to intervene, both the League and the state argued in court filings last week that Protect AR Rights lacks standing and is not entitled to intervene in the case. Protect AR Rights could file its own lawsuit if a judge dismisses the motion to intervene, but Kopsky said the court would likely freeze both lawsuits while deciding whether to consolidate them. 'We believe it would slow the process down substantially, which doesn't seem to be in anybody's interest,' he said. 'So we were surprised that they opposed the motion to intervene, but our legal team is going to respond to it in a way that's appropriate. The bottom line is we're committed to protecting the right to direct democracy and the right to have access to ballot measures in the state.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store