Cambodia-US trade negotiations scheduled for May 14-15
A man shops for shoes from a Nike store at an outlet in Los Angeles, California on April 10, 2025. Trump on April 9 announced a 90-day pause on the most onerous new tariffs on imports to the United States for every country except China. Americans spend about $31 billion on sneaker brands with almost all sneakers in the US market coming from Asian countries of Vietnam, China, Indonesia and Cambodia, as Trump tariffs impose a new consumption tax of at least 42% on most inbound sneakers to the United States. - AFP
PHNOM PENH: Economists are optimistic that Cambodia will see positive outcomes from upcoming bilateral trade negotiations with the US, set to take place in Washington, D.C., on May 14–15.
On the morning of May 2, the Office of the Spokesperson of the Royal Government of Cambodia issued a press release stating that Sun Chanthol Deputy Prime Minister and first-vice president of the Council for the Development of Cambodia (CDC), and Cham Nimul, Minister of Commerce, led the AD Hoc Cambodia-US Bilateral Relations Coordination Working Group in a virtual conference with the US Trade Representative (USTR), led by Sarah Ellerman, assistant USTR for Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
'The Royal Government, led by Prime Minister Hun Manet will continue to cooperate closely with the US to achieve a mutually beneficial trade and investment relationship,' said a spokesperson unit press release.
Lor Vichet, an economist and vice-president of the Cambodia Chinese Commerce Association (CCCA), expressed confidence that the government is demonstrating a strong commitment to promoting trade cooperation with the US — through efforts such as increasing imports from the US and a commitment to reducing certain import tariffs.
He added that if the negotiations yield positive results, Cambodian-made goods will gain broader access to the US market. At present, Cambodia's production output continues to rise, particularly in the apparel, footwear, travel bags, bicycles, vehicle tires and some agricultural products.
Vichet noted that for smoother negotiations, Cambodia must also be committed to increasing imports of US products to help create a more favourable environment for trade discussions.
'Because Cambodia has very competitive labour costs, if the US eases import tariffs on our products, more Cambodian goods will enter the American market. However, Cambodia also needs to make purchases of US-made goods,' he told The Post on May 2.
'For the negotiations to bear fruit, Cambodia should offer trade terms such as committing to increase imports from the US from around US$300 million per year to over US$1 billion in the future. Additionally, the Cambodian government could consider the possibility of reducing import tariffs on US goods to zero in order to make the talks more attractive to the US,' he added.
According to the General Department of Customs and Excise of Cambodia (GDCE), in 2024, trade between Cambodia and the US reached US$10.18 billion, a rise of 11.2 per cent. Of this, Cambodian exports totalled US$9.9 billion (up 11.4 per cent), while US imports amounted to US$264.14 million.
The US administration, led by President Donald Trump, announced a new round of 'reciprocal' tariffs on April 3. However, their implementation was delayed for 90 days, ostensibly to allow for negotiations.
The US imposed a 49 per cent import tariff rate on Cambodian goods — the highest of any Asean countries. The rate was calculated on the 2024 bilateral trade imbalance between Cambodia and the US. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
an hour ago
- BusinessToday
Stonepeak Partners' Reported Acquisition Of Yinson Could Value The Deal At RM9 Billion
Yinson Holdings Bhd - FSO (FPSO) Helang New York-based infrastructure investment firm Stonepeak Partners is reportedly in exclusive negotiations to acquire Malaysian energy infrastructure company Yinson Holdings Berhad, in a deal that could value the company at up to RM9 billion (US$2.1 billion). The development was first reported by Bloomberg. According to analysis by CIMB Research, this valuation translates to approximately RM3.23 per share, based on Yinson's 2.784 billion existing shares. CIMB Research indicated that if the report proves accurate, these exclusive talks could pave the way for a privatisation offer for the remaining shares of Yinson. Yinson's current market capitalisation stands at around RM6.5 billion. CIMB Research noted that the exclusivity arrangement suggests the deal has entered advanced stages of negotiation. The Lim family, who founded Yinson, currently holds a significant 26.6% stake in the company. The research house also commented that Stonepeak's investment focus appears to align well with Yinson's strategic direction, particularly given Yinson's growing presence in floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) and renewable energy sectors. From a valuation perspective, CIMB Research highlighted that the indicative RM9.0 billion take-private valuation, equivalent to RM3.23 per share, implies a substantial 38.0% premium to Yinson's last closing price. Relative to CIMB Research's own target price of RM2.93, the proposed acquisition price would represent a slight premium of 10.2%, suggesting potential additional upside should a formal offer materialize. Related
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Tariffs tarnishing jeweller's shine
PANDORA, the world's largest jewellery company, is based in Denmark and has nearly 500 stores in the United States, more than any of its other key markets. But in some ways, its real home is Thailand, where the company has been making its products for nearly four decades. Like many global corporations, Pandora's continent-crossing supply chain has allowed it to sell its goods worldwide at a low cost. That supply chain became a grave weakness in April when US President Donald Trump said he would impose 36% tariffs on goods entering the United States from Thailand, alongside steep tariffs on dozens of other countries. After Trump unveiled his 'reciprocal tariffs', Pandora's shares were among the worst performing in Europe. Later, Trump postponed those tariffs until early July, offering a reprieve. But the threat looms, and Alexander Lacik (pic), CEO of Pandora, is not expecting the uncertainty that is paralysing businesses to end. Unless tariffs return to previous levels, the next year will be turbulent, he said in an interview. For now, he added, there is little to do but wait to see how investors, customers and competitors react. 'With the information at hand today, I would be crazy to make big strategic decisions,' Lacik said. Alongside business leaders all over the world, Lacik is grappling with how to respond to Trump's unpredictable policies, which have generated almost maddening uncertainty. Lacik says he is not expecting the uncertainty paralysing businesses to end unless tariffs returned to previous levels. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times The Trump administration has started to show a willingness to lower tariffs, but his first agreements, with Britain and China, have posed more questions than answers, and tariffs are still higher than they were a couple of months ago. Although some aspects of the trade war have been suspended, Pandora and other multinationals are in limbo, waiting for more agreements to be finalised. Pandora, best known for its silver charm bracelets, has been making jewellery in Thailand since 1989. Across three factories, thousands of people handcraft the products. The company is building a fourth plant in Vietnam, but Trump has also threatened tariffs on Vietnamese goods. Last year, the company sold 113 million pieces of jewellery, about three items every second, making it the largest jewellery brand by volume, with stores in more than 100 countries. A third of Pandora's sales, US$1.4bil, was generated in the United States and Lacik said he had no intention of moving away from the company's most profitable market. But prices will rise, he said, and who will bear the brunt of that is unclear. 'The big question is, am I going to pass on everything to the US consumer, or am I going to peanut butter it out and raise the whole Pandora pricing globally?' Lacik said. Jewellery by Pandora being worn by a model at a promotional event in Los Angeles. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times But Pandora keeps several months' worth of stock, giving him time to see how other jewellers change their pricing and then decide. A few things can be done immediately, such as streamlining parts of the supply chain. The day after the reciprocal tariffs were announced, Pandora said that it would change its distribution so that products sold in Canada and Latin America would no longer move through the company's distribution hub in Baltimore, a process that would take six to nine months to complete. Moving production into the United States is not being considered, in part because of higher labour costs. Pandora employs nearly 15,000 craftspeople in Thailand and expects to hire 7,000 more in Vietnam. In an earnings report last month, the company estimated the cost of the trade war. If higher tariffs go back into effect, they would cost Pandora US$74mil this year, and then US$135mil annually after that. But the jeweller is not panicking. In fact, the economic curveballs are starting to feel normal, Lacik said. 'We are battle ready,' he added. When he joined the company as the CEO in 2019, Pandora was struggling. Its share price had dropped more than 70% from its peak three years earlier. Lacik instituted a 'complete overhaul', he said, with new branding and store designs, an emphasis on its 'affordable luxury' label and showcasing its complete jewellery line, not just charms. That prepared the company for the trials that hit the global economy next. First, the Covid-19 pandemic, when 15,000 store employees were sent home, and some factory workers slept on cots to keep production going. Then, a surge in inflation risked customers pulling back. Lacik's strategy appeared to be working. In January, Pandora's share price reached a record high. Since then, however, it has dropped more than 20% as it shields itself from some of the trade turmoil. — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Forlorn Gaza – the world's shame
ON June 4, exactly a month ahead of the country's independence day, the United States vetoed – for the fifth time – a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza'. The draft resolution vetoed by the solitary US vote received 14 in favour. It also called for the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry and distribution of humanitarian aid in Gaza, calling for safe and unhindered access for UN and humanitarian partners across the enclave'. In what appeared to be a move coordinated with the veto, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the US was sanctioning four judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for 'targeting'with arrest warrants Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Earlier, the US had sanctioned the ICJ prosecutor for the same 'crime'. These US actions came as the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Mirjana Spoljaric, described Gaza as 'worse than hell on earth'. In an interview with the BBC at the ICRC headquarters in Geneva, she said 'humanity is failing' as it watched the horrors of the Gaza war. Israel's policy, backed by its US-led Western allies and the acquiescence of the regional Arab governments, has always been aimed at the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, and its governing coalition leaders have been unequivocal in explicitly stating their military objectives. The systematic destruction of any and all infrastructure that supports human life is near complete, with water, power, homes, schools, universities, and even hospitals bombed to rubble. Of the number of functioning hospitals in Gaza, only two remain. The UN has called for the protection of these last two hospitals, particularly providing emergency services to the Strip, which is being bombed and hit by missiles daily, causing dozens of casualties, young and old. The UN also says the percentage of malnourished children is rising by the day. This malnourishment is due to the Israeli food blockade on Gaza. Israel has brushed aside all aid organisations' protestations to introduce its own 'food distribution' points, where dozens of starving Palestinians, including women, have been killed by Israeli tank-mounted machine gun fire. The Conservative member of the UK Parliament, Kit Malthouse, defied his party's pro-Israel policy to offer the most apt description of what is happening. Speaking in the Commons, he said Gaza has become 'an abattoir where starving people are lured out through combat zones to be shot at'. 'If the situation were reversed, we would now be mobilising the British armed forces as part of an international protection force,' Malthouse said, exposing Western hypocrisy and his own government's inaction. Adding another twist to the food crisis in Gaza is the Israeli Prime Minister's confirmation – after Israeli defence sources had earlier told local journalists that accusations made by the Opposition politician Avigdor Lieberman were correct – about the arming of a group that many believe comprises criminals. Lieberman, according to the BBC, told the state broadcaster that the Prime Minister had unilaterally approved the arming of the Abu Shabab clan and transferred weapons to it. 'The Israeli government is giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons, identified with the Islamic State group.' Sources in the know say the group is led by Yasser Abu Shabab, who was an IS commander, and is an Israeli intelligence asset. His band of about 300 men, according to the Israeli Occupation Forces, has been armed to 'protect food trucks' trickling into Gaza. But sources on the ground say the group is doing the opposite, commandeering the trucks and looting the vital food supplies for the malnourished, starving Palestinians. It is this one-sided ethnic-cleansing, being facilitated by the US and its envoy Steve Witkoff, that may be impacting public opinion in Europe at least. Public opinion is shifting, which is also reflected in the robust questioning of the Israeli Hasbara spin doctors in the media. These advocates for the Israeli cause are outraged even by some basic questions a few journalists are beginning to ask because they have had a free pass to spin their lies since October 2023. European government leaders are beginning to express unease – only in words and not deeds, though – in calling the Gaza situation intolerable and unacceptable but stopping well short of any concrete measures such as an arms embargo. This rhetoric too is driven by the changing public mood reflected in a recent YouGov poll across Europe. The poll showed Israel as being viewed most unfavourably since they started polling on this issue in 2016. And Israel's actions in Gaza are seen as disproportionate and unjustified. Even then, US President Donald Trump is likely to be convinced his Gaza Riviera plan is on course and in the end the Palestinians will be displaced. With few friends in the Arab world, whose leaders generously opened up their cheque books for the US president and applied little, if any, pressure to secure an end to the genocide, the Palestinians seem to be on their own. The (resource-starved) government of the ummah's most potent military power may have co-sponsored the vetoed UN resolution, but its powerful elite queued up at the embassy gate for hours to be able to have the honour of celebrating US Independence Day inexplicably on June 4, a month earlier than July 4. The ethnic cleansing in Gaza and, don't forget, the West Bank will continue. The collective conscience of the people around the globe will not be able to stop it on its own. This is the world we inhabit. — Dawn/Asia News Network Abbas Nasir is a former editor of Dawn.
