
Visa wants to give artificial intelligence 'agents' your credit card
Artificial intelligence 'agents' are supposed to be more than chatbots. The tech industry has spent months pitching AI personal assistants that know what you want and can do real work on your behalf.
So far, they're not doing much.
Visa hopes to change that by giving them your credit card. Set a budget and some preferences and these AI agents — successors to ChatGPT and its chatbot peers — could find and buy you a sweater, weekly groceries or an airplane ticket.
'We think this could be really important,' said Jack Forestell, Visa's chief product and strategy officer, in an interview. 'Transformational, on the order of magnitude of the advent of e-commerce itself.'
Visa announced it is partnering with a group of leading AI chatbot developers — among them U.S. companies Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI and Perplexity, and France's Mistral — to connect their AI systems to Visa's payments network. Visa is also working with IBM, online payment company Stripe and phone-maker Samsung on the initiative. Pilot projects begin Wednesday, ahead of more widespread usage expected next year.
The San Francisco payment processing company is betting that what seems futuristic now could become a convenient alternative to our most mundane shopping tasks in the near future. It has spent the past six months working with AI developers to address technical obstacles that must be overcome before the average consumer is going to use it.
For emerging AI companies, Visa's backing could also boost their chances of competing with tech giants Amazon and Google, which dominate digital commerce and are developing their own AI agents.
The tech industry is already full of demonstrations of the capabilities of what it calls agentic AI, though few are yet found in the real world. Most are still refashioned versions of large language models — the generative AI technology behind chatbots that can write emails, summarize documents or help people code. Trained on huge troves of data, they can scour the internet and bring back recommendations for things to buy, but they have a harder time going beyond that.
'The early incarnations of agent-based commerce are starting to do a really good job on the shopping and discovery dimension of the problem, but they are having tremendous trouble on payments,' Forestell said. 'You get to this point where the agents literally just turn it back around and say, 'OK, you go buy it.'
Visa sees itself as having a key role in giving AI agents easier and trusted access to the cash they need to make purchases.
'The payments problem is not something the AI platforms can solve by themselves," Forestell said. 'That's why we started working with them.'
The new AI initiative comes nearly a year after Visa revealed major changes to how credit and debit cards will operate in the U.S., making physical cards and their 16-digit numbers increasingly irrelevant.
Many consumers are already getting used to digital payment systems such as Apply Pay that turn their phones into a credit card. A similar process of vetting someone's digital credentials would authorize AI agents to work on a customer's behalf, in a way Forestell says must assure buyers, banks and merchants that the transactions are legitimate and that Visa will handle disputes.
Forestell said that doesn't mean AI agents will take over the entire shopping experience, but it might be useful for errands that either bore some people — like groceries, home improvement items or even Christmas lists — or are too complicated, like travel bookings. In those situations, some people might want an agent that 'just powers through it and automatically goes and does stuff for us,' Forestell said.
Other shopping experiences, such as for luxury goods, are a form of entertainment and many customers still want to immerse themselves in the choices and comparisons, Forestell said. In that case, he envisions AI agents still offering assistance but staying in the background.
And what about credit card debt? The credit card balances of American consumers hit $1.21 trillion at the end of last year, according to the Federal Reserve of New York.
Forestell says consumers will give their AI agents clear spending limits and conditions that should give them confidence that the human is still in control. At first, the AI agents are likely to come back to buyers to make sure they are OK with a specific airplane ticket. Over time, those agents might get more autonomy to 'go spend up to $1,500 on any airline to get me from A to B," he said.
Part of what is attracting some AI developers to the Visa partnership is that, with a customer's consent, an AI agent can also tap into a lot of data about past credit card purchases.
'Visa has the ability for a user to consent to share streams of their transaction history with us,' said Dmitry Shevelenko, Perplexity's chief business officer. 'When we generate a recommendation -- say you're asking, 'What are the best laptops?' — we would know what are other transactions you've made and the revealed preferences from that.'
Perplexity's chatbot can already book hotels and make other purchases, but it's still in the early stages of AI commerce, Shevelenko says. The San Francisco startup has also, along with ChatGPT maker OpenAI, told a federal court it would consider buying Google's internet browser, Chrome, if the U.S. forces a breakup of the tech giant in a pending antitrust case.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Nikkei Asia
5 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
DeepSeek's next AI model delayed by attempt to use Chinese chips
DeepSeek's generative AI chatbot is a direct rival to ChatGPT © Reuters August 14, 2025 21:57 JST BEIJING/HONG KONG (Financial Times) -- Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek delayed the release of its new model after failing to train it using Huawei's chips, highlighting the limits of Beijing's push to replace U.S. technology.


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
AI Startup Perplexity Makes Bold $34.5 Billion Bid for Google's Chrome Browser
Aug 12 (Reuters) – Perplexity AI made a $34.5 billion unsolicited all-cash offer for Alphabet's GOOGL.O Chrome browser on Tuesday, a bid far above its own valuation as the startup reaches for the browser's billions of users pivotal to the AI search race. Run by Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity is no stranger to headline-grabbing offers: it made a similar one for TikTok US in January, offering to merge with the popular short-video app to resolve U.S. concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership. OpenAI, Yahoo and private-equity firm Apollo Global Management have also expressed interest in Chrome as regulatory pressure threatens Google's grip on the industry. Google did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. The company has not offered Chrome for sale and plans to appeal a U.S. court ruling last year that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department has sought a Chrome divestiture as part of the case's remedies. Perplexity did not disclose on Tuesday how it plans to fund the offer. The three-year-old company has raised around $1 billion in funding so far from investors including Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank. It was last valued at $14 billion. Multiple funds have offered to finance the deal in full, Perplexity said, without naming the funds. Alphabet's shares were up 1.6% in afternoon trading. As a new generation of users turns to chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity for answers, web browsers are regaining prominence as vital gateways to search traffic and prized user data, making them central to Big Tech's AI ambitions. Perplexity already has an AI browser, Comet, that can perform certain tasks on a user's behalf and buying Chrome would allow it to tap the browser's more than three billion users, giving it the heft to better compete with bigger rivals such as OpenAI. The ChatGPT parent is also working on its own AI browser. Perplexity's bid pledges to keep the underlying browser code called Chromium open source, invest $3 billion over two years and make no changes to Chrome's default search engine, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters. The company said the offer, with no equity component, would preserve user choice and ease future competition concerns. Analysts have said Google would be unlikely to sell Chrome and would likely engage in a long legal fight to prevent that outcome, given it is crucial to the company's AI push as it rolls out features including AI-generated search summaries, known as Overviews, to help defend its search market share. A federal judge, Amit Mehta, is expected to issue a ruling on remedies in the Google search antitrust case sometime this month. 'Judge Mehta is a pretty orthodox guy. It's very possible that he would hold off on requiring a sale until the appeals process is worked out and that could be a very lengthy period of time,' said Herbert Hovenkamp, professor at University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. 'It would go to the DC Circuit, which is skeptical of forced divestitures, and it's possible it would even go to the Supreme Court after that. So that process could run out for a couple of years.' Perplexity's bid is also below the at least $50 billion value that rival search engine DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, suggested Chrome may command if Google was forced to sell it.


Yomiuri Shimbun
5 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Media Organizations in West Sue Generative AI Firms Over Copyright Infringement; Organizations in Japan Likely to Follow Suit
There have been a series of cases in which media organizations in the West have sued generative artificial intelligence companies for copyright infringement over using their articles without permission. There are already more than 30 such news organizations, and many of them are located in the United States. In Japan, it has been pointed out that there are issues with the Copyright Law, as it fails to prevent generative AI companies from using news articles for free to train their AI systems. It is likely that more media organizations in Japan will take their cases to court. Generative AI services, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, can be trained, as well as gather information from various online sources, allowing it to answer users' questions. Therefore, stories written by media organizations are vital for generative AI firms to improve the accuracy of their products, as the articles are thoroughly fact checked. If AI companies obtain permission from the media organizations to use the stories as a study tool or reference, it would not be an issue. However, many are concerned that the stories have been used without consent. According to British media industry journal Press Gazette, there were at least eight cases as of July in which AI development companies were sued for using stories without permission. The defendants include OpenAI, Microsoft Corp. and Perplexity, all U.S. companies. In one of the cases, The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, which are affiliated with each other, in December 2023. The lawsuit claimed that several millions of articles had been used for AI training and other purposes without permission, resulting in several billions of dollars in damages. Specifically, the newspaper claimed that when ChatGPT was asked to provide what was written in a New York Times article, which was not available for free, about an avalanche in the state of Washington in 2012, the generative AI included parts from that very article almost word for word. There are also cases in which generative AI companies become affiliated with media organizations and make payments to them. It has been reported that Inc. will pay up to $2.5 million (about ¥3.7 billion) annually to The New York Times to use their articles for generative AI services. However, Press Gazette reports that there have been only 30 or so such cases.