Former Fianna Fáil councillor ‘recklessly' failed to disclose son's interest in lands, ethics watchdog finds
Fianna Fáil
councillor who failed to disclose his son's interest in lands before a vote that would 'significantly increase' their value, contravened ethics rules and 'acted recklessly', the
Standards in Public Office Commission
(Sipo) has found.
Tommy Reilly, who was a councillor in
Meath
for almost three decades, was the subject of a complaint received in March 2022 over 'acts and omissions' concerning lands at Liscarton in
Navan
.
Those lands were owned by his son, Ciarán Reilly, and had increased in value from €500,000 to some €4.2 million, at which they were marketed for sale in 2020 following the rezoning for housing and the granting of
planning
permission.
Ciarán Reilly purchased the lands in 2016, telling the commission during a hearing in June that while he had not initially purchased the lands as an investment for development, he later formed the view that they may be an investment opportunity.
READ MORE
He told the commission he did not discuss the Liscarton lands with his father until June or July 2017, when he inquired about the proposed rezoning and development plan process.
He held the interest in the lands through his company RABS, the director of which ultimately became his brother, Tomás Reilly.
Tommy Reilly attended several meetings concerning the lands between July 2016 and July 2017 while a councillor,
according to the Sipo report
published on Tuesday.
He told the commission he did not learn of his son's beneficial interest in the lands until July 2017, about two weeks before the special planning meeting, saying he did not generally discuss his son's business interests with him.
After questions from his son regarding making a submission, Mr Reilly said he told him it was too late to make one, and that he 'could have nothing to do with it'.
The commission said it was not persuaded by the evidence provided by Mr Reilly and his two sons and found itself 'unable to rely on it'.
Mr Reilly said he spoke to a council official before the special planning meeting in July 2017. He said he proceeded to declare that he had a conflict of interest, which was recorded in the minutes, and excused himself from the vote.
However, he did not disclose the nature of his interest or the fact of his sons' interest.
Mr Reilly told the commission that in 30 years, he had never seen anyone do that at a meeting. He added that three years after the meeting, in September 2020, he wrote to the council's ethics registrar, disclosing the nature of the conflict of interest.
A review carried out by then chief executive of the council, Jackie Maguire, found 'there was compliance with the spirit but not the letter' of the Ethical Framework for Councillors and that he had 'inadvertently breached' the framework.
The commission said Mr Reilly's failure to disclose his son's interest in the lands at the special planning meeting was a contravention that was 'committed recklessly' and was a 'serious matter'.
Noting that the vote at the special planning meeting was likely to 'significantly increase' the value of the land owned by his son, the commission said Mr Reilly 'acted recklessly' in not declaring his son's interest.
'As a long-standing councillor of 21 years' service at the time, and with all the experience that entails, the commission finds that he should have known better and, if he was in doubt, should have sought specific advice beforehand,' it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on climate policy: Government must avoid backsliding
Methane arising from agriculture and the fossil fuel industry is a notorious greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. While it breaks down relatively quickly in the atmosphere – unlike carbon dioxide – it is a serious threat to climate stabilisation. The quicker it is reduced, the more global average temperatures can be cut. Much can be done to reduce methane releases in oil and gas production, but it is much more challenging in agriculture. Livestock exporting countries like Ireland and New Zealand are supporting a new approach to classifying methane which is gaining political traction. This is based around achieving national 'temperature neutrality', also known as 'no additional warming'. The Government has yet to take a formal position on the concept. Significantly it got the backing of the Climate Change Advisory Council, its key advisory body. It chose to interpret Ireland's legally-binding climate neutrality obligations in terms of temperature neutrality – rather than the more onerous target of 'net zero emissions'. An international study , published in the Environmental Research Letters journal this week, has questioned this approach. It says that it 'grandfathers high emissions from wealthy, livestock-exporting nations', shifts the burden of cutting emissions to others, and limits space for lower-income countries to grow food systems. The approach fails on food security grounds, with trade data showing most exports serve high-income markets. This risks locking in inequality and misses 'a critical opportunity to reduce peak warming'. READ MORE The most concerning finding was highlighted by lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy of the University of Galway: 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees.' The Government is in a bind on this. How methane is regarded in policy terms has big implications for carbon budgets up to 2040, which must be signed off on soon. Climatologist Prof John Sweeney has argued that the shift, which reduces the required emissions reduction target, is not aligned with scientific recommendations and could hinder Ireland's ability to meet its climate goals. The study emphasises that governments must set targets that are internationally credible and farmers need to be supported within a national framework, rather than targeted for blame. The bottom line is that Ireland will not meet the global climate challenge by redefining climate targets. Ireland has yet to deliver an honest appraisal of what a genuinely climate-neutral, sustainable and resilient agricultural sector could look like in coming decades. Avoiding this issue would amount to backsliding on vital climate action.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jewellery chain Claire's appoints administrators to business in Ireland and Britain
The Irish and British businesses of struggling jewellery chain Claire's has fallen into administration, putting 2,150 jobs at risk. The retailer formally appointed insolvency practitioners from Interpath Advisory on Wednesday, a week after the chain's parent group filed for bankruptcy protection in the US. Interpath had been recently tasked by the US parent company to find a buyer for the European operation but, according to reports from the UK, the company struggled to find a financial backer. One industry source said that as many as one-third of its shops might be closed under a restructuring programme. Claire's, known for selling colourful necklaces and bracelets and offering ear piercing services, has 306 stores in Ireland and Britain aimed at the teen and preteen market, and 2,150 staff. That includes 20 stores in Ireland. READ MORE It recorded a pretax loss of £4 million on sales of £137 million according to its most recent results for the year to February 3rd, 2024. Administrators at Interpath, which had been trying to sell the business, said shops will remain open for now as they assess options for the chain, including 'exploring the possibility of a sale which would secure a future for this well-loved brand' shorn of its liabilities. Customers will no longer be able to buy goods online. The update comes after the wider Claire's group, which operates 2,750 stores in 17 countries, applied for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in a Delaware court. The company last week said that it was in discussions with vendors and landlords about the future of its North American stores. Claire's previously filed for bankruptcy in 2018, exiting Chapter 11 in 2022. The Illinois-based group is owned by a group of investment firms, including Elliott Management and Monarch Alternative Capital. It has also had two failed attempts at a stock market IPO. Last week, the group blamed 'increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail' for the bankruptcy, as well as 'debt obligations'. The retailer's trading difficulties are understood to have been exacerbated by uncertainty surrounding tariffs imposed on China by the US administration, which is likely to have seen its overheads increase substantially in recent months. The parent company said it has between 25,001 and 50,000 creditors. Claire's Irish and British business is the second high-street brand to battle to maintain a presence on the high street in as many weeks. Fashion retailer River Island managed to avert administration after a court approved a restructuring plan last week that includes the closure of 33 of its 230 stores. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Small Claims Court: relevance must be protected
The Small Claims Court would appear to be a victim of its own success. Established in 1996 as an arm of the District Court, it has helped many consumers to resolve small disputes without going to the expense of hiring a solicitor. It costs €25 to bring a claim but only actions involving goods, services, damage to property or non-return of key money are admissible. However, the use of the court is declining according to the Courts Service with only 2,081 cases lodged with it last year, a fall of 55 per cent on the previous year. Amongst the possible explanations for the decline advanced by the Courts Service is the intriguing notion that a greater awareness among goods and service providers of the small claims process – and the likelihood that they will lose if they end up in the court – has brought about a more conciliatory attitude when it comes to dealing with consumer complaints. There is no doubt that the court does seem to look kindly on plaintiffs. Last year 70 per cent of the 478 small claims cases which went ahead with a hearing were successful, according to the Courts Service. Many others were settled, usually following mediation led by court officials. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) has put forward another somewhat more prosaic explanation for the decline in use of the court. The €2,000 limit on cases that can be brought before the court 'is out of step with many of the most basic and unavoidable expenses faced by consumers today,' according to the watchdog. READ MORE The CCPC – which refers a significant number of complaints to the court each year – points out that many of them are about issues such as car purchases or home improvements. These fall within its remit and are well suited to its procedures but are generally excluded from its jurisdiction by virtue of the €2,000 limit. The limit was last raised – from €1,000 – in 2006. Cumulative inflation since then has been close to 30 per cent, meaning a review of the limit is warranted. The court's success in settling disputes suggests that the adjustment should be even greater than this.
