David Corenswet Chooses STAR WARS Over SUPERMAN 2 While Taking a Lie Detector Test — GeekTyrant
During a Vanity Fair lie detector test interview with his Superman co-star Nicholas Hoult, Corenswet was put on the spot with a tough choice: Would he rather play Superman again in a sequel… or take on the role of a Jedi Knight in Star Wars?
He didn't hesitate for long.
With a deep breath and a sheepish grin, Corenswet chose Jedi Knight. Hoult's reaction? Pure shock.
But before the DC fandom gets too worked up, Corenswet made it clear that he's still locked in as the Man of Steel for future films.
'In the end, as many things do, it came down to the money. I'm already under contract for a sequel, but I'd be fresh negotiating with Star Wars,' he joked.
That's not the only time Corenswet's Star Wars fandom has shown through. He's been openly enthusiastic about the galaxy far, far away during the Superman press tour, even revealing a personal tradition: 'I just started a Star Wars marathon every New Year's Eve,' he said in the same interview.
So while a Superman 2 is likely already in the cards, and in his contract, it's clear Corenswet has a deep affection for both iconic franchises. Can you blame him? He's living every geek's dream right now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
5 reasons ‘Fantastic Four' is better than ‘Superman'
Not since the summer of 2012 have Marvel and DC gone toe to toe like two comic book titans are right now. The battle for the big screen is currently being fought by DC's 'Superman' and Marvel's 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps.' And, at least for me, the winner is clear. There's no doubt, my more lukewarm reaction to 'Superman' is something of a hot take. And if I didn't already know that based on its 91% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, the myriad of less-than-impressed comments on my recent opinion piece certainly made that point clear. However, having now seen Marvel's tentpole blockbuster for 2025, in my eyes, there's no denying that the MCU's First Family soars higher than the Man of Tomorrow (and for what it's worth, FF's RT viewer score is 93%). The margins are somewhat slim. Both movies have clear faults, falling into many of the predictable superhero tropes that have seen the genre grow stale over the past 15 years, but if you can only see one in theaters this summer, I'd recommend spending your money on Fantastic Four." So, here are the five reasons I believe that 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' beats 'Superman.' 'Fantastic Four's' biggest strength is how it successfully balances its four main players, the eponymous quartet, ensuring that each is given their moment to shine, while also feeling part of a superhero team as well. Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn are all well cast in their roles, and I really enjoyed how each brings something to the comic book collective. Which isn't to say 'Superman' isn't also well cast and stuffed with acting talent, David Corenswet is a promising Clark Kent, and Rachel Brosnahan nearly steals the whole movie as Lois Lane. However, 'Superman's' struggles to balance its roster of heroes, with some upstaging the titular cape-wielder (Edi Gathegi's Mister Terrific is the focus of the flick's best action scene), while others are relegated to barely background extras like Isabela Merced's Hawkgirl. 'Fantastic Four' juggles its heroes significantly better, ensuring that all of them feel developed and play a key part in the overall story, and of course, contributing to saving the universe. Audiences have been treated to (or in recent years forced to endure) a lot of superhero movies since the MCU debuted in 2008 with 'Iron Man.' With dozens upon dozens of big-budget flicks all mining similar source material, it's increasingly hard to stand out in such a crowded field. From a narrative, tone, and character perspective, 'Fantastic Four' is largely more of the same. It sticks to the largely quippy vibe of the MCU without any real deviation. However, where it does stand out is in its 1960s aesthetic and its retro-futurism setting. Inspired by the Golden Era of Comic Books, which birthed many of the heroes we love together, and the 'Fantastic Four's' own debut in 1961, 'The First Steps' has a charming retro look which intentionally feels like a '60s-era idea of the far future. Yes, that does mean that 'Fantastic Four' drive a hovercar at one point, and the Baxter Building TVs remain delightfully chunky. This visual design helps elevate 'Fantastic Four' and ensures that even when the narrative falls into predictable tropes, there's a novel quality about the proceedings that kept me hooked. Plus, the cast's supersuits are just the right amount of dorky for me to love them. I often find that modern-day superhero movies hinge on their villains. After all, a compelling superpowered protagonist needs an equally well-considered antagonist to defeat in the grand finale. 'Superman' offers up the mack daddy of comic book foes in Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor, and while this take on the character has been met with much praise, it did little for me (through no fault of Hoult). His whiny tech bro persona grates, and the attempts to make him seem threatening feel manipulative. The less said about the army of trolling monkeys, the better. In this third 'Fantastic Four' reboot, the First Family faces off against an equally legendary villain: Galactus (Ralph Ineson). And oh boy, does this big purple boi feel intimidating. The first scene where the four encounter Galactus in his hulking ship sent a shiver down my spine, and his cold-blooded approach to consuming whole planets feels befitting of an enemy that is supposed to strike fear into the hearts of even the most powerful heroes. That Julia Garner's Silver Surfer is also thrown into the mix is a very appreciated bonus. I do wish that Galactus wasn't defeated quite so easily in the third act. However, this is a problem with superhero movies in general. The villain is hyped up to be a near undefeatable threat to the whole world, only to be snuffed out and dealt with inside a studio-demanded two-hour runtime. If you didn't already disagree with me on my point above, now I'm really going to put the cat among the pigeons. Or should that be dog, because Krypto was one of my least favorite parts of 'Superman.' As I noted in my previous 'Superman' article, I find the modern blockbuster trend of including some form of 'cute' animal/creature very tiresome. The cynic in me can't see it as anything other than a calculated attempt to create a sidekick ripe for merchandising opportunities. 'Fantastic Four' doesn't escape this trend either, with robot helper H.E.R.B.I.E. on hand to assist the family throughout. And, to the surprise of nobody, you can now buy a Pop Vinyl figure of the adorable android for the low price of just $15. Still, at least director Matt Shakman shows a little restraint with H.E.R.B.I.E., and unlike Krypto the Super Dog, he's not used as a 'get out of jail free' card to save the heroes whenever they're in a sticky situation (Krypto is used for those purposes twice in 'Superman'). Frankly, I could probably do without either sidekick, but if I'm picking between the two, at least H.E.R.B.I.E. fits within the '60s aesthetic and isn't leaned on like a cheap crutch. Both 'Superman' and 'Fantastic Four' aren't shy about winking nods to future comic book movies in the pipeline at their respective studios. But while 'Superman' leans into sequel-baiting and universe setup pretty hard, 'Fantastic Four' mostly saves it for the post-credits stinger. 'Superman' is so busy introducing us to the Justice Gang that it forgets this is the viewer's first chance to get acquainted with a character who is supposed to be the lynchpin of the new-look DC universe going forward. Marvel, who admittedly have the benefit of a well-established universe already humming, focuses first on establishing the 'Fantastic Four.' In the post-credits scene, we get our first glimpse of Robert Downey Jr's return to the MCU as Doctor Doom, and this tease feels well handled. It's a great preview for next year's 'Avengers: Doomdays,' but it also reminds us that the Fantastic Four are part of a larger world. It's enough to get superfans speculating, but it doesn't dominate the actual movie.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin Butler's Dating History Includes Vanessa Hudgens, Kaia Gerber, and More
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." THE RUNDOWN While Austin Butler has kept his love life relatively private, he has had a number of famous past girlfriends. His most notable long-term relationship was with Vanessa Hudgens, whom he dated for over seven years. Butler is currently publicly single but last dated Kaia Gerber. Austin Butler had been very busy lately, with starring turns in some of the biggest blockbuster hits of recent years, like Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Dune, and as Elvis Presley in Baz Luhrmann's Elvis, which earned him an Academy Award nomination for Best Actor. The star has also managed to have a personal life, which includes some high-profile romances. Though Butler is often in the spotlight, he's generally pretty close-mouthed about his love life. He may walk the red carpet with his partners, but Butler keeps details of his relationships discreet. Here's what is known about Butler and his complete dating history so far. Vanessa Hudgens Hudgens and Butler met on the set of High School Musical, according to the Daily Mail. At the time, Hudgens was dating Zac Efron, but she and Butler remained friends. They didn't spark dating rumors until 2011, a year after she split from Efron. In September of that year, they were seen leaving her house in Los Angeles. In January 2012, they were photographed kissing at a Lakers game. Soon after, they made their red carpet debut at the premiere of Hudgens' film, Journey 2: The Mysterious Island. In December 2013, Butler made his first appearance on Hudgens's Instagram timeline, as part of a group of friends from her church, Hillsong. She wrote in the caption, 'We may be rowdy but man we have fun. Love these people with all my heart. Thanks @hillsong for my new home.' The couple didn't discuss their relationship that much in public, but in August 2015, Hudgens told Entertainment Tonight, 'It's important to put that other person first. If you're constantly looking for ways that you can make them happy, and they're constantly looking for ways that they can make you happy, then you kind of lift each other up as much as possible, and you can't go wrong.' Reports that the couple might be on the outs began appearing in late 2019, after they spent the holidays apart. On Jan. 2, 2020, Hudgens discussed the difficulties of often being long-distance with Butler in an interview with Cosmo UK. 'It's eight years this year–FaceTime, good communication, respect and trust [are what keep us going],' she said. 'The longest we've been apart was four months. It sucks! You start hating hearing yourself say, 'I miss you.' But if it's your person, you make it work.' In mid-January 2020, Us Weekly reported they'd broken up, with a source saying, 'Vanessa and Austin are officially broken up, and Vanessa has been telling those close to her about their breakup.' Two sources speaking with E! said that the pair 'are split for now,' but claimed they planned to 'see what happens.' The insider continued, 'They have such a history and deep connection [that] they could find their way back to one another. Right now, she felt like he needed to go and be single and see if that's what he really wants.' Butler was shooting Baz Luhrmann's Elvis Presley biopic in Australia at the time, while Hudgens was working in Los Angeles. The second source claimed that 'they're just shooting on two different continents, and it's a matter of distance. There is no bad blood at all, and they have a lot of respect for each other.' However, the two never publicly reconciled, and Hudgens went on to marry baseball player Cole Tucker. In January 2023, Butler did comment on his past relationship with Hudgens after referring to her as his 'friend' when discussing who motivated him to play Elvis. Fans noted the designation, and it sparked some controversy. In a follow-up with the Los Angeles Times, reporter Mark Olsen asked Butler, 'There's something else I hope you can clear up. You've talked about a moment even before you had the role, it was Christmastime, and an Elvis song came on and you were with a friend, and you were singing along.' Butler interjected to say, 'I was with my partner at the time.' After Olsen asked if that partner was Hudgens, Butler replied, 'That's right. We'd been together for so long, and she had this sort of clairvoyant moment and so I really, I owe her a lot for believing in me.' Olivia DeJonge Butler worked with Olivia DeJonge on the set of Elvis, and it was rumored they had a brief fling after they were seen at a movie theater looking cozy in Melbourne, and then again on the beach in November 2020, per the Daily Mail. But they were never seen together after that year. Lily-Rose Depp In August 2021, Butler was photographed kissing Lily-Rose Depp in London, who had herself recently split up with her boyfriend Timothée Chalamet. They were also not seen together again, and Depp went on to date rapper 070 Shake. Kaia Gerber Like with most celebrity romances, Butler's connection with model Kaia Gerber began as a rumor. But in December 2021, a source confirmed with Us Weekly, 'They are low-key dating. It's still very new.' Butler had been seen on December 8 at a Celine fashion show in Los Angeles, where Gerber was walking the runway. Butler was accompanying her parents, Cindy Crawford and Rande Gerber. A source told People a few weeks later, 'She seems really happy. All of her friends think he's really cute.' Though they made many public appearances throughout their relationship, the couple did not speak about their love much in public. In February 2024, Gerber told WSJ magazine, 'Honestly, I feel like so few things in my life are private, and that is one of the things that I try to keep as sacred as possible.' In May 2022, Butler was asked about Gerber by GQ and replied, 'I don't think there's anything I want to share about that. But thank you for providing the space.' That same month, they were seen kissing in Cannes after a screening of Elvis. In September 2023, a source told Us Weekly that after almost two years together, they were both feeling good about their relationship. 'They've both been so busy with their careers that the time has flown by,' the source said, adding that 'they spend as much time together as they can. Although Austin and Kaia are both in the public eye, they're really down to earth and have a very secure relationship, so they never let jealousy or anything like that get in the way.' They continued, 'Kaia loves that her family gets along so well with Austin. He's joined them on several vacations, and he's definitely a part of the family.' Butler did tell Entertainment Tonight in February 2024 that he was proud of Gerber's British Vogue cover that month. 'It was legendary,' he said. 'It was amazing. I loved getting to see that. What an exciting cover. I loved it.' Gerber and Butler were last seen together in October 2024, heading from dinner to Gracie Abrams's concert at Radio City Music Hall. But rumors of a breakup started circulating after they failed to make more public appearances. In January 2025, sources told TMZ that they had split 'around the end of 2024.' 'The relationship just simply ran its course after a good three years together,' the insider claimed. Gerber began dating actor Lewis Pullman in early 2025. You Might Also Like The 15 Best Organic And Clean Shampoos For Any And All Hair Types 100 Gifts That Are $50 Or Under (And Look Way More Expensive Than They Actually Are)
Time Business News
5 hours ago
- Time Business News
IPTV Sverige: Samla all din TV på ett ställe 2025
Sound familiar? You flop down on the couch after a long day, ready to relax. Maybe you want to watch that new, hyped-up series everyone's talking about—or the big Allsvenskan match. You grab the remote and… then it begins. Which service was it again? Is the show on Netflix, HBO Max (or just 'Max' now?), SkyShowtime, or Prime Video? And the match—is it on TV4 Play or Viaplay? Before you know it, you've spent ten minutes jumping between apps, and that relaxing feeling? Gone. I've been there. I had three—sometimes four—different streaming subscriptions draining money every month. Yet it always felt like I was missing something. That was the last straw. There had to be a smarter way to watch TV in 2025. And there is. Let me tell you about my biggest 'aha!' moment in a long time. Back in the day, it was simple. One box, one remote. You just flipped channels. Today, every media company and production house has its own platform. Sports and series rights are scattered like shotgun pellets. If you want to watch everything—from Premier League and Formula 1 to local SHL games and the latest Hollywood hits—you'd need a wallet as thick as an old phone book. It's a deliberate strategy to lock us in. But for those of us who just want easy access to entertainment without the hassle or crazy costs, it's… exhausting. While searching for a better solution, I stumbled across a term I had heard before but never truly understood: IPTV. And no—it's not super technical or complicated. Quite the opposite. Imagine combining the best of old-school TV (all your channels in one place) with the best of the new era (the freedom to watch whatever, whenever, wherever). In its simplest form, it's TV streamed through your internet connection. This was a total game-changer for me. Suddenly, everything was right there—in one single app. I'm glad you asked! It's easy to get nerdy here, but let me break it down to the three things I personally love the most: And I'm not just talking about standard Swedish channels. I mean global sports, the latest blockbusters straight from the cinema (VOD – Video on Demand), thousands of series, and even international news channels. Jumping from a Djurgården match to a brand-new documentary without switching apps is so liberating. Let's be honest—this is a huge reason. I went from paying over 800 SEK/month for various services to a fraction of that. For more content. That's tough to beat. I can watch on my Smart TV in the living room, my tablet in the kitchen, or my phone on the bus. Perfect for summer cabins—or when the family can't agree on what to watch. Here's where you need to be a little smart. The entire experience hinges on which provider you choose. There are lots of IPTV services out there, and quality varies widely. I did the hard work—testing different options and reading endless forum threads. The key is to find a reliable service with a broad offering and good support. After a lot of research, I found an IPTV provider that ticked all the boxes. Setup was super easy—basically just download an app and enter a code. Within ten minutes, I had access to an entire world of entertainment. What really sold me was how well-tailored the service was for us in the Nordics. Finding a solid IPTV Nordic provider that brings together everything from SVT's archive to the hottest local sports leagues felt like finding a digital home. Make sure you have a stable internet connection (at least 30 Mbps is recommended for HD streaming). That's the key to a buffer-free experience. IPTV doesn't use more data than streaming Netflix in high quality, but a solid connection makes all the difference. Today, watching TV feels logical again. One app, one interface, endless options. I've rediscovered the joy of aimlessly channel-surfing on a Tuesday night and stumbling across a classic movie—or a sport I've never watched before. I'm not saying you should cancel all your subscriptions tomorrow. But if you, like me, are tired of overpaying for a fragmented and frustrating experience, it might be worth exploring a smarter alternative. For me, it's meant more entertainment, lower costs, and—most importantly—less stress. Now I'm curious—what show or sport are you most looking forward to this fall? Drop a comment below! TIME BUSINESS NEWS
