‘The same faces, swapping places': Polish candidates aim to break two-party hold on power
Hidden off a charming market square in central Poland, a bar offers the closest physical experience to walking into the internet.
Stretching incongruously through medieval basements, Pub Mentzen in Toruń feels like it was designed by someone on a full-fat diet of online politics. As you enter, a gallery wall displays mugshots of 'customers we don't serve', but instead of rowdy patrons, it features Polish political leaders, including at least five prime ministers.
The wall presents a surreal indictment of the country's political elite. There is a 'meme museum', a blown-up, fake 'gazillion złoty' banknote with the face of a former prime minister, and a gold-plated figure of that leader with a begging bowl. In the toilets, you listen to Donald Tusk speaking German and bizarre speeches by other Polish politicians.
The pub could be dismissed as eccentric if it wasn't owned by Sławomir Mentzen, the tax adviser turned politician of the libertarian far-right Konfederacja (Confederation) party that has been tipped to come third in this Sunday's presidential election in Europe's sixth-largest economy.
And it is not just a commercial enterprise, but an expression of his politics.
About 400 people gathered in the rain as Mentzen, 38, came to his home town to deliver a shotgun pitch covering taxes, political elites, public services, EU regulations, immigration, green policies, and the general state of the world.
He first rose to notoriety in 2019, presenting 'the Mentzen five': 'We don't want Jews, homosexuals, abortion, taxes and the EU.' He has since distanced himself from that list, but remains on the far-right end of the spectrum. Emboldened by Donald Trump, he seeks to turn his unfiltered language, such as in his criticism of Ukrainians in Poland, into political strength.
Related: Runoffs, reruns and rightwingers: Europe prepares for electoral 'super Sunday'
His rise as the 'common sense' candidate – capturing the discontent among younger male voters, and with 1.6 million followers on TikTok – allowed him to briefly challenge the mainstream conservative candidate, Karol Nawrocki, for second place in polls. Recent comments on abortion and tuition fees reversed most of his gains, but in the weeks leading up to the vote he was on course to secure a double-digit vote share.
In a well-rehearsed speech – Mentzen completed 348 rallies, visiting all of the country's powiaty (counties) – he raged against 20 years of the duopoly between the country's two main parties: Donald Tusk's centrist Civic Platform (PO) and Jarosław Kaczyński's populist-nationalist Law and Justice (PiS), which have dominated the country's politics since 2005. In this election, they have the two frontrunners once again, in the centrist mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski, and Nawrocki.
'For God's sake, how long can we wait for something to change?' Grzegorz Płaczek, a Konfederacja MP, tells the Guardian. 'It's the same faces, just swapping places.'
This anti-establishment rhetoric strikes a chord. Never before in the country's post-1989 history was the combined vote share of the top two candidates forecast to be as low as this year.
Ben Stanley, a sociologist and political scientist at SWPS University in Warsaw, said: 'PiS is far from detoxifying itself after eight years in power, while PO is seen as responsible for the government's lack of ambition in key areas for younger voters, particularly abortion and housing. That leaves the race more open to others.'
Another challenger hoping to break the duopoly is Adrian Zandberg. Born in Denmark to Polish parents, the 45-year-old is a towering figure – literally, nicknamed 'the Mighty Dane' – with a booming voice and hard-left socialist views.
In the last parliamentary election in 2023, his party, Razem (Together), ran as part of the coalition against PiS but declined to join the government because it didn't feel it was offered the tools to meet its promises to voters.
Now 'outside the tent pissing in', he, too, has become a brutal reviewer of 'two 70-year-old men' he says are stuck in disputes irrelevant to younger voters.
Addressing about 800 people near Warsaw University on Wednesday, he focused on immediate challenges facing his audience, such as housing and healthcare, as well as Poland's long-term ambitions.
He spoke in an urgent, angry tone – the crowd shouted 'disgrace' as he rhetorically asked them about the track record of previous administrations – and urged voters to back a Poland 'made of nuclear power, silicon and steel, and not of plywood'.
He resists one label that captures his views, having recently said: 'I am less interested in the word 'the left', more in pro-social and libertarian change.'
Aleks Szczerbiak, a professor of politics at the University of Sussex, says: 'For this 'stuff-them' electorate, a reaction against the duopoly … the ideological profile doesn't really matter that much.'
Zandberg's fellow Razem MP Maciej Konieczny says the left's response to the far right needs to go beyond 'old leftwing aesthetics', adding: 'Younger people may not have settled political opinions, but they can smell bullshit and want [politics] to be about something.
'And we are credible: because we actually refused to play ball.'
Polls published before the country went into electoral silence on Friday night suggested Mentzen and Zandberg would take almost half of all votes from under-35s, streets ahead of the established candidates.
Despite polarised views on migration and abortion, some of their voters even suggested they could see themselves voting for the other candidate, instead of mainstream parties.
Angelika, a 'campaigner on maternity leave', is not surprised when asked about these views at Zandberg's rally.
'The young electorate of Zandberg and Mentzen want largely similar things: to get stability and live a dignified life,' even if their proposed solutions are largely incompatible, she says. 'Instead we get this ping-pong from PO and PiS.'
The two candidates could get up to a combined 20% of the vote share on Sunday. That would force the two mainstream candidates who are expected to advance to the runoff to at least consider how to court their supporters.
If they fail to do that, they, too, will end up on the wall at Pub Mentzen. And the 2027 parliamentary election is just two years away, with that anger not going anywhere.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
As fresh tariffs take effect, the ‘Taco Trump' meme turns into a weekly internet fiesta
Following last week's mainstream debut of the Wall Street-borne acronym TACO, or Trump Always Chickens Out, high-ranking Democrats and random social media users alike have turned the taunt into a weekly celebration: Taco Tuesday. Just in time for a fresh round of tariffs. Though the slogan had quietly circulated for weeks among stock traders navigating tariff turbulence, it hit critical mass on May 28, when a reporter asked Trump about it during a press conference. The president's nuclear response, a warning to not 'ever say what you said,' ended up Streisand Effect-ing the catchphrase into instant ubiquity. Democrats at the highest levels embraced it—including Rep. Eric Swalwell, who made a stilted TikTok about it, for which he was rightly roasted online —while millions of others simply wanted to know more. According to CNN's Harry Enten, by May 30, Google searches for 'Trump TACO' had shot up 9,900%. If it weren't obvious enough from the press conference, a separate CNN report confirmed that the acronym got under Trump's skin. Apparently, the president later chewed out members of his team for not alerting him that the taco meme had gained traction, leaving him to find out in real time, in full public view. 'It clearly bothered him, primarily because it demonstrated a lack of understanding about how he actually utilizes those threats for leverage,' a source told CNN. 'But obviously he's not a guy who looks kindly on weakness, so the idea anyone would think that with respect to his actions isn't received well.' Perhaps sensing how much the press conference blowup had stung Trump, both elected Democrats and random social media users went all in on the acronym. 'Taco Trump' memes retained an ambient internet presence throughout the week, before erupting on- and offline on Tuesday. Taking advantage of the existing cultural branding, Taco Tuesday, Trump critics including Rep. Jamie Raskin used the occasion of the first such day since the slogan's debut to drill down on their message. On X and Bluesky, there was a fresh round of AI-generated taco imagery alternately depicting Trump as a chicken, a baby, a restauranteur, a reluctant diner, and, somewhat inexplicably, Mr. Miyagi from the Karate Kid movies. ('Tax on, tax off,' a caption reads.) Billy Baldwin, younger sibling of perennial Trump foe Alec Baldwin, couldn't resist tweeting some AI slop, while New Yorker artist Barry Blitt offered a decidedly non-AI take on the subject matter. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party commemorated the day by commissioning a taco truck to serve free meals near the Republican National Committee's headquarters in DC. Though the gesture risked convincing oblivious pedestrians that Trump himself was offering free tacos, it was meant to contrast Democrats' agenda with Trump's tariff tactics. 'With his idiotic trade policy,' DNC chair Ken Martin said in a statement, 'he talks a big game, caves, and then leaves working families and small businesses to deal with the fallout.' Making the celebration timelier, this 'Taco Tuesday' happened to fall on the day before Trump's latest tariff gambit —a whopping increase from 25 to 50% levies on steel and aluminum from nearly every country around the globe—went into effect. Senator Adam Schiff was sure to highlight the correlation in his post about the holiday on Bluesky. As for Trump's defenders, the response has mainly been to brush off the taco stuff as ' cringey.' JD Vance quote-tweeted a post touting the Democrats' taco truck with a devastatingly dismissive caption, 'We have the lamest opposition in American history.' (Abhi Rahman, deputy communications director for the DNC, quickly responded to the tweet, telling Fox News, 'We understand that JD Vance, the cringiest VP in American history who cannot order a donut like a normal human being, prefers to take food away from people, including 40 million Americans whose SNAP benefits were just scrapped in the GOP budget.') What gives Vance's eye-rolling response some heft is the fact that Trump hasn't offered any additional glimpses into his feelings about the acronym since that disastrous press conference. His anger was the reason that TACO took off; his silence on the matter since then has neutralized the power of posts that act as though Trump is actively livid about it at all times. Given that there are now fresh tariffs to potentially back down from, though, and a standing appointment for calling out the pattern if Trump does, the meme might potentially give everyone something to taco 'bout for weeks to come.


News24
an hour ago
- News24
A lingering Musk: Will ex-aide Elon get up Trump's nose?
Elon Musk slammed Donald Trump's key domestic policy bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' risking a high-profile rift. Musk's criticism has energised right-wing lawmakers and complicated Republican efforts to pass the legislation. Analysts warn their fragile alliance could implode, but Trump allies are downplaying tensions to avoid a public fallout. Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill has careened into an Elon Musk-shaped brick wall, complicating its passage into law and risking a schism between the most powerful man in the world and the wealthiest. The US president's 'big, beautiful bill' - the centerpiece of his domestic agenda - could define his second term and make or break Republican prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. But the budget-busting package is getting a rough ride in Congress over proposals to fund an extension of his 2017 tax relief by piling on debt and cutting social welfare for the poorest Americans. Enter tech billionaire Musk, who dropped a nuclear bomb on the 1 100-page blueprint at a crucial stage in negotiations on Tuesday, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Musk, who last week ended his brief advisory tenure as Trump's costcutter-in-chief, tore into the bill's exploding deficits and runaway spending in a prolonged denouncement. The South African-born tycoon has voiced concerns before, but his language was much more combative, coming across as a declaration of war on the Republican Party, if not Trump himself. The White House brushed off the criticism, saying Trump 'already knows where Elon Musk stood,' but the remarks will likely have gotten under the president's skin. 'Lennon and McCartney' The stakes could hardly be higher for Trump, who has made clear, with signature hyperbole, that he sees his bill as 'arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed.' He has yet to respond personally to Musk's rant - sustained over six hours, across 13 posts and reposts on his social media platform X - and Washington watchers aren't necessarily expecting a public falling-out. A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 4, 2025 Behind the scenes, a careful circling of the wagons is under way, with pro-Trump pundits under orders to refrain from trashing Musk and instead frame his broadside as what Politico called 'principled self-interest.' Still, for analysts contacted by AFP, there may be choppier waters ahead. 'It's the Lennon and McCartney of modern politics. Two egos, one spotlight, and a fragile alliance built on mutual benefits,' said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. The moment either one sees more upside in conflict than cooperation, the breakup goes public. Evan Nierman But political consultant and former Senate aide Andrew Koneschusky, a key player in negotiations over Trump's 2017 tax cuts, believes the Republican leader has nothing to gain by biting back. 'Musk has more money. Musk's megaphone, X, is bigger than Trump's. And Musk was deeply embedded in the administration for months,' he told AFP. 'There's no telling what Musk heard or saw that could be embarrassing or problematic for the administration if the two were to go to war.' 'Bromance' Crucially, Musk lit a fire under right-wing lawmakers who voiced concerns over debt but cleared the bill for Senate consideration anyway - almost the entire 220-strong House Republican group. Musk, who spent around $280 million getting Trump elected, undoubtedly has the cash to make his mark on the midterms and in the internal Republican candidate selection process. And the de facto leader of America's 'tech bro' community demonstrated his political firepower in a single tweet in December that blew up a government funding bill that had enjoyed bipartisan support. His take on the deficit implications of Trump's proposals is evidenced by copious independent research and he was immediately backed by some fiscal hawks in the Senate. Continued interventions by Musk over government policy could be an ongoing headache for Trump, as he bids to shepherd his policy priorities through razor-thin Republican majorities in Congress. But cheerleaders of the package - and independent analysts contacted by AFP - believe the Tesla magnate may discover that his celebrity in Trumpworld relies entirely on the say-so of its mercurial chieftain. 'Musk may have had influence in December when his bromance with Trump was in full bloom,' said Donald Nieman, a political analyst and professor at Binghamton University in New York State. 'But his break with Trump and his massive unpopularity with voters makes it easy for lawmakers to ignore him. If anything, it helps Trump by distancing him from a man who has become a pariah.'


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Musk vs. MAGA on Big, Beautiful Bill, but GOP needs both
Last week, there were rumblings that Elon Musk had reservations about President Donald Trump's so-called big, beautiful bill. This week, Musk, shall we say, clarified his position, calling the legislation a "disgusting abomination." Tell us how you really feel, Mr. Musk. And yes, his concerns that this bill, now in the Senate, could balloon the national debt, though disputed by the White House, are not particularly far-fetched. Until Trump, cutting as much spending as possible was Republican orthodoxy. The problem for those like Musk, who want to see the bill revamped to cut the debt is not just that GOP margins in Congress are as narrow as a coin slot, it's that Trump's base, the only group of people he consistently pleases, like the bill, and they like it a lot. A recent poll showed that 44% of Americans approve of the bill, while 38% oppose it, pretty decent numbers already, but among those polled who "support Trump-like policies," the number is a whopping 78%. The most popular provisions of the bill, as I have reported numerous times on the ground, are no tax on overtime and tips, which polls at nearly 80% approval among all American voters. Santa Claus wishes he was that popular. This is a real impasse between Musk and Trump's base, and Musk has proven to be a very valuable ally not just for Trump but for the GOP in general. His purchase of Twitter and its transformation into free speech champion X has been a major shift in our political discourse. One for the better for conservatives and the country. Musk also has the money needed to bankroll any campaign he chooses to, and conversely, to use that money to primary those Republicans he deems ineffective on the debt, a threat he made explicit this week. Money carries a lot of water, but at the end of the day, if you are a candidate for Congress in a GOP primary, what do you want more, a blank check from Elon Musk, or an endorsement from Donald Trump? For now, obviously the latter. Trump has been wise to play it cool, not clapping back at Musk. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took the right tone in saying, the president was aware of the criticism, but, "this is one big, beautiful bill, and Trump is sticking to it." In other words, they will have to agree to disagree. This puts the ball in Musk's court. Even after his outbursts against the bill, there is no reason he cannot continue to work with Trump, as he promised in their press conference in the Oval Office together last week. No lasting harm has been done here. Democrats are trying to make hay out of Musk's opposition, but after spending a year demonizing him, the effort is simply laughable. enate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-NY, look like fools as they furiously scratch out, "is a fascist," on their Musk protest signs and write in, "is absolutely right." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-NY, look like fools as they furiously scratch out, "is a fascist," on their Musk protest signs and write in, "is absolutely right." You can't call a guy a Nazi and then say, "Hey look, the Nazi agrees with me!" Much like Trump himself, Musk is a man who knows how to draw attention. But unlike Trump, he does not have a vast constituency of voters across America. What Musk has is a constituency of the powerful. In populism, you have to do what is popular. It's right there in the name. To paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, what Republicans have right now is a winning coalition, if they can keep it. There's a reason that so many ex-Democrats voted for Trump, and the GOP can't just suddenly shove massive austerity measures down their throats. Back in the 1990s, then-Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich balanced the federal budget four times, but he didn't do it by fear-mongering. His Contract With America was not gloom and doom, it was hope, a hope for better government, better lives. Ultimately, this is what is missing from Musk's impassioned and quite possibly correct howling from the rooftop about the debt. Voters need to hear the upside. The one thing that every Republican agrees on is that, in some form, this bill has to pass. Otherwise they are presiding over a massive tax hike. It is likely, even with changes, Musk will not be pleased. The question then becomes, now what? On every issue Musk holds dear, from not transing kids, to immigration, to birth rates, he is aligned with the GOP and in stark opposition to Democrats, who he has often accused of being afflicted with the "woke mind virus." Musk has earned his place as an important voice in the Republican Party and conservative politics, but part of that role is also listening, and right now, the GOP base wants this bill. Hopefully, by the fall, with this vote long gone behind us, Musk, the Trump administration, and Congress can all work to fight against the debt, and that is why everyone should dearly hope that Elon Musk does not take his ball and go home.