US sanctions Congo militia tied to forced labour, smuggling in key mining zone
A senior US government official who spoke on condition of anonymity ahead of the formal announcement said the State and Treasury departments are sanctioning the CODECO armed group, which controlled the key coltan mining site of Rubaya from 2022 to early 2024.
'During this period, CODECO generated revenue by overseeing mining operations, collecting illegal fees and taxes for miners and engaging in mineral smuggling. It also imposed forced labour and executed civilians in mining areas under its control,' the official said in Washington.
The US is also sanctioning the Congolese mining company CDMC, saying it sold minerals which were sourced and smuggled from mines near Rubaya, and two Hong Kong exporters, East Rise and Star Dragon, that purchased minerals from the mining area.
The State Department said it is freezing the assets of the armed group and companies in the US or under US control and banning all transactions with them.
Rubaya is currently under the control of the M23 rebel group, which is already targeted by US sanctions.
The mining site lies in the heart of eastern Congo, a mineral-rich part of the Central African nation, which for decades has been ripped apart by violence from government forces and different armed groups, including the Rwanda-backed M23, whose recent resurgence has escalated the conflict, worsening an already acute humanitarian crisis.
In June, Congo and Rwanda signed a peace deal facilitated by the US to help end the conflict while helping the US government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region.
Congo and the M23 rebels have also agreed to sign a permanent peace deal by August 18, but renewed fighting has threatened this effort.
On Tuesday, Congo and M23 both accused each other of violating the agreement by attacking each other's forces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What might a Russia-Ukraine ‘land swap' entail?
The American and Russian Presidents will meet in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday (early hours of Saturday in India) to discuss, possibly decide, the future of the war in Ukraine. Ahead of the meeting, US President Donald Trump has repeatedly spoken about a 'land swap' which, he says, will help end the fighting. 'There'll be some land swapping going on,' Trump told reporters earlier this week. Russia currently occupies around a fifth of Ukrainian territory. Ukraine holds next to no Russian land. So what might a potential land swap entail? Status of war Three and a half years into the war, Ukraine is well and truly on the defensive. According to Reuters, Russia currently controls 114,500 square km (more than 19%) of Ukraine, including Crimea and a major chunk of territory in eastern and southeastern Ukraine. Some estimates peg this number to be even higher. Ukraine, on the other hand, controls next to no Russian territory. After making significant gains in Kursk last August-September, Ukrainian forces were pushed out of Russian soil by March this year. As things stand, Russia holds all of the initiative in the war: with Ukraine running out of men to send to the frontlines, Russian forces continue to make steady progress. If the fighting were to continue in its current tempo, experts suggest Russia would occupy all of the four eastern and southeastern Ukrainian provinces of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. At the moment, Russia holds almost all of Luhansk, and about three-quarters of Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Reuters reported. Putin officially incorporated all four provinces as Russian territory in 2022, shortly after the war began. Russia also controls small pockets of land in the northern Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions of Ukraine. Russia has said it is carving out a buffer zone in Sumy to protect Kursk from a future Ukrainian attack. Russia has held Crimea since 2014. While Kyiv publicly maintains that the peninsula is Ukrainian territory, in private, officials have long admitted that getting Crimea back by force would be next to impossible at this point of time. Swap or surrender? Earlier this week, Trump had said that Russia had occupied some 'very prime territory', and he would 'try to get some of that territory back'. But since Ukraine currently holds no Russian land that can be leveraged in a negotiation, many have wondered what Trump's land swap would entail. Moscow wants Ukraine to unilaterally withdraw from all of the strategically and economically vital Donbas region, comprising provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, multiple media reports from this week have suggested. If Kyiv were to agree — and that is unlikely — this would entail pulling Ukrainian troops back and ceding some 6,600 sq km it still holds onto in this region. In return, Moscow would be willing to freeze the frontier in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, return the small pockets of land it holds in northern Ukraine, and possibly concede the even smaller pockets of land Ukraine still holds in Kursk. Ukraine Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrsky in June had said that despite Russian claims to the contrary, Ukrainian forces still held some 90 sq km of Russian territory in Kursk. Even if this were to be true, whatever Russian land Ukraine holds is incomparable in size and strategic importance to the Ukrainian land held by Russia. This is why the talk of swapping land has been perceived more as a surrender in Ukraine. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot,' Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine told local media this week. No good options Given it has no leverage on the battlefield, Kyiv will be hoping that Western sanctions are hurting Moscow enough to force Putin to make some concessions. Such hope is not altogether unjustified: the latest secondary sanctions will potentially leave a massive hole in Moscow's budget, and Trump has promised to further squeeze Putin if Russia does not agree to make peace. That said, the Russian economy has thus far been remarkably resilient against Western pressure. Even if the economy were to be in terrible shape, that alone is no guarantee of a Russian capitulation in what Moscow views as a fight against an existential threat. In this context, experts suggest that the best-case scenario for Ukraine at the moment would be for the conflict and battlelines to be frozen. In theory, this would buy Ukraine some much needed time to rebuild its manpower base and economy, both of which lie in tatters at the moment. At the same time it would also give Russia time to recoup, and potentially prepare for another future invasion — something that Kyiv believes is an inevitability. As Al Jazeera defence editor Alex Gatapoulos puts it: 'This is a really dangerous time for Ukraine.'
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Contacts with the U.S. did not cease even during Biden's presidency: Senior Russian interlocutor on Russia-U.S. talks
Russia's back channel links intensified under President Donald Trump, but Russian representatives had maintained contacts even with the previous administration under President Joe Biden, said a senior interlocutor who has been part of the back channel negotiations that helped in maintaining dialogue tracks between Russia and the United States in the last three and half years since the Ukraine crisis began. Trump-Putin Alaska Summit LIVE In a written interview to The Hindu, Nikolai Plotnikov, Head of the Center for Scientific and Analytical Information of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said the summit in Alaska is not just about Ukraine and that there is a sense of panic in Europe as Russia and the U.S. have made a fresh beginning. 'Contacts with the U.S. did not cease even during Biden's presidency. With the start of Trump's second term, the situation began to change dramatically. Contacts resumed through the foreign policy departments, special services, and the military. Special representatives have been actively at work: Kirill Dmitriev on the Russian side and Steve Witkoff on the American side. One should also mention contacts at the expert and academic levels,' said Mr. Plotnikov. The summit in Alaska is the first in recent years when the top leaderships of Russia and the United States are meeting seven months after the return of President Donald Trump as the U.S. President. Formal communication between the two sides had broken down after the Biden administration imposed a slew of sanctions on Russia after President Putin ordered a 'special military campaign' against neighbouring Ukraine on 24 February 2022. The Alaska summit has been opposed by the President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy who has demanded that a discussion on the future of Ukraine must include Ukraine's leadership. That however did not prevent a number of countries, India included from welcoming the summit. Mr. Plotnikov said that Ukraine was not included in the summit as Mr. Zelenskyy has 'no legal rights'. 'They voluntarily gave up their independence in favor of Washington, London, Paris, Brussels, Berlin, and other Western capitals,' said Mr. Plotnikov marking 2014 as the year when Ukraine according to him ceased to be independent after the removal of President Viktor Yanukovych in the so called 'Revolution of Dignity'. He further said that European Union's strategy on Russia has failed and that the European states had miscalculated their strategy of using a 'blitzkrieg' of sanctions against Russia. 'Judging by the plentiful statements coming out of various European capitals (except perhaps for Hungary and Slovakia), Europe is panicking. With his decision to meet President Putin, Donald Trump revealed who is really in charge,' said Mr. Plotnikov. He further said that discussion between President Trump and President Putin would also make a difference in enduring conflict zones of the world including in Armenia-Azerbaijan and India-Pakistan. 'If the two world powers and leading members of the nuclear club find common ground in resolving existing issues, everyone will benefit,' said Mr. Plotnikov.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia–US peace talks: From Bill Clinton to Joe Biden – list of presidents who met Vladimir Putin
Former US presidents (AP images) Vladimir Putin is no stranger to high-level talks with US presidents. Over his decades as Russia's leader serving either as president or prime minister he has held high profile meetings with five American presidents. On Friday, he will meet Donald Trump in Alaska. This meeting is considered one of the most critical since the Russia-Ukraine conflict and their controversial 2018 summit in Helsinki, Finland. It will be their first meeting of Trump's second term. Trump has made ending the conflict a top priority, setting an August 8 deadline for Putin to agree to a ceasefire or face tough sanctions. That deadline has passed without an agreement. The Alaska meeting will also mark Putin's first visit to the United States since 2015 and his eighth overall as president, as reported by ABC News. Putin has met every US president since Bill Clinton, but such meetings have become less common in recent years, particularly after Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, military intervention in Syria in 2015 and interference in the 2016 US election. No US president has visited Russia since Barack Obama attended the G20 summit in St Petersburg in 2013. Bill Clinton: Vladimir Putin and Bill Clinton first met when Putin was serving as Russia's prime minister. However, their first official summit took place in June 2000 in Moscow, as Clinton's presidency was nearing its end and Putin had just assumed the presidency. The meeting, held nearly a decade after the end of the Cold War, centered largely on arms control. Speaking at a press briefing, Clinton said of Putin, "I think he is fully capable of building a prosperous, strong Russia while preserving freedom and pluralism and the rule of law. It's a big challenge. I think he's fully capable of doing it." Putin, in turn, described Clinton as a 'very experienced politician'. "In my mind, we've established now not only good business ties, but also personal relations. For me, President Clinton is a person who is a very comfortable and pleasant partner in negotiations," Putin said. George W Bush : George W Bush and Vladimir Putin held their first summit in Slovenia in June 2001. After the meeting, Bush called it 'an important step in building a constructive, respectful relationship with Russia.' When asked if he could trust Russia, Bush said that he found Putin 'very straightforward and trustworthy '. Putin described their discussion as 'very interesting and positive'. The two leaders went on to meet several more times, including a 2002 visit to Moscow where they signed a treaty to reduce their countries' nuclear arsenals. Putin also made multiple trips to the US, visiting Bush's ranch in Texas and his family home in Kennebunkport, Maine. However, relations strained over the years, particularly after Russia opposed the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Tensions grew in 2008 during the Beijing Summer Olympics, when Bush confronted then–Prime Minister Putin over Russia's military assault on neighboring Georgia. Barack Obama: During the early years of Barack Obama's presidency, Vladimir Putin served as Russia's prime minister. Obama first met Putin in July 2009 in Moscow, alongside then–Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. At the time, Obama said he wanted to engage not only with his official counterpart but also with Putin and 'all other influential sectors in Russian society' to better understand the needs and concerns of the Russian people. Putin returned to the presidency in 2012. The following year, the White House canceled a planned Moscow summit, citing Russia's 'disappointing decision' to grant asylum to US national security leaker Edward Snowden and the lack of progress on the bilateral agenda. R elations worsened further after Russia's 2014 invasion and illegal annexation of Crimea, as well as Moscow's military support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom Washington had called to step down. Obama and Putin did not hold a formal meeting again until September 2015, when they met at the United Nations General Assembly in New York. This was Putin's last visit to the US before the planned Alaska summit. Donald Trump - 1st term: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin first met as presidents in July 2017 during the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany. One of their most notable and controversial summits came a year later in Helsinki, in July 2018, where the two leaders held a private meeting for nearly two hours with only interpreters present. After the press conference, while standing next to Putin, Trump appeared to believe Putin's denial of election interference instead of US intelligence reports. '[Putin] just said it's not Russia. I will say this: I don't see any reason why it would be,' Trump said. He added, 'I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.' When asked why Trump should believe Moscow's denial, Putin replied, 'You can trust no one,' dismissing US intelligence conclusions as 'utter nonsense.' He also admitted he wanted Trump to win the 2016 election because the Republican candidate spoke about restoring US-Russia relations. The remarks sparked widespread bipartisan criticism in Washington. The next day, Trump walked back his statement, saying he had misspoken and meant to say, 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia.' Later in 2018, Trump canceled a planned meeting with Putin at the G20 summit in Argentina, citing Russia's refusal to release Ukrainian Navy ships and sailors seized near Crimea. Joe Biden : Joe Biden has met with Vladimir Putin once during his presidency in Geneva in June 2021. Biden requested for the high-stakes meeting amid growing concerns over Russia's military aggression toward Ukraine. After more than three hours of talks, Biden described the meeting as 'positive'. Putin called the discussion 'quite constructive' but insisted that Russia's actions in Ukraine were not America's concern.
