Trump downplays possibility of sending Ukraine long-range weapons as it struggles to repel Russia
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday downplayed the possibility of sending Ukraine long-range weapons as Kyiv awaits an injection of U.S. weaponry that it hopes will help it beat back an intensifying Russian air offensive.
Trump offered a more cautious tone on what to expect after he threatened Russia a day earlier with steep tariffs if President Vladimir Putin doesn't act within 50 days to end the three-year conflict. He also on Monday announced plans to bolster Kyiv's stockpile by selling American weapons to NATO allies who would in turn send arms to Ukraine.
Providing Ukraine with more long-range weaponry would give Kyiv the chance to strike further into Russian territory, a move that some in Ukraine and the U.S. have said could help push Putin toward negotiations to end the fighting.
Asked if he intended to supply Ukraine with weapons that could reach deeper into Russian territory, Trump replied, 'We're not looking to do that.' He made the remarks to reporters before departing the White House for an energy investment event in Pittsburgh.
While Trump's threats of weapons, sanctions and tariffs mark the most substantive pressure he's placed on Putin since returning to office nearly six months ago, some lawmakers said they remain concerned that the administration, with the 50-day deadline, is giving Putin time to grab even more Ukrainian territory.
Sens. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, and Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat from New Hampshire, said waiting 50 days before imposing sanctions on Russia would give Putin more time to gain an advantage in the war.
'The 50-day delay worries me that Putin would try to use the 50 days to win the war, or to be better positioned to negotiate a peace agreement after having murdered and potentially collected more ground,' said Tillis, who recently announced he won't run for reelection.
Tillis and Shaheen lead the Senate NATO Observer Group, which facilitates work between Congress and NATO, and met Tuesday with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Capitol Hill.
Trump himself scoffed at the idea that 50 days is giving Putin too much time. The president suggested he may act more quickly if he does not see signs that Putin is taking steps toward ending the conflict.
'I don't think 50 days is very long and it could be shorter than that,' he said.
Ahead of Trump's announcement that he would impose a 100% tariff on Russia's trading partners if Putin doesn't negotiate an end to the war, bipartisan legislation proscribing even tougher sanctions on Moscow was gaining steam in the Senate.
The legislation, in part, calls for a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. It would have an enormous impact on the economies of Brazil, China and India, which account for the vast majority of Russia's energy trade.
But Trump on Monday said 'at a certain point it doesn't matter' how high the tariff is set and that '100% is going to serve the same function.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he was putting the legislation on hold following Trump's announcement.
Trump during his campaign described the conflict as a waste of U.S. taxpayer money and vowed to quickly end it on his first day back in office. He deflected when asked by a reporter on Tuesday if his tougher tone on Putin suggests he's now on Ukraine's side in the bloody conflict.
'I'm on nobody's side,' Trump said, adding this concern was for 'humanity.'
U.S. officials say they are still sorting through Ukraine's wish list of weaponry to determine what can be most quickly replaced after Trump announced an agreement for Europe to supply Ukraine with defensive munitions from existing stocks.
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss arms transfers that have not yet been approved or completed, said Ukraine's requests for military equipment are roughly the same as they have been since the start of Russia's invasion. Those include air defenses like Patriot missiles and Advanced Precision Kill Weapon Systems, long-range missiles known as ATACMS and short- to medium-range ground-to-air missiles known as NASAMs, and assorted artillery, according to the officials.
Under the terms of the very rough agreement sketched out by Trump and Rutte on Monday, NATO members would ship billions of dollars of these weapons to Ukraine and then purchase replacements for them from the United States.
One official said some of the larger items — such as Patriots— could take up to five years to produce to deliver to the European donors, while smaller munitions like 155mm artillery shells can be produced on a much shorter timeline.
Trump has lately changed his once friendly tune toward Putin, whom he has long admired and whom he sided with publicly over his national security team during his first term when asked whether Russia had interfered in the 2016 election.
In recent weeks, Trump has chastised Putin for continuing his brutal assault on Ukrainian cities, even noting that the Russian leader 'talks nice and then he bombs everybody.'
Trump has continued to blame his White House predecessors for Putin's 2022 invasion on neighboring Ukraine — a conflict he says would have never happened if he were reelected in 2020.
'He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said Monday at the White House. 'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden. He didn't fool me.'
In February, Trump expressed confidence that Putin 'will keep his word' on any deal to end the war in Ukraine. But in an interview with the BBC published Tuesday, when asked whether he trusted Putin, Trump paused before answering.
'I trust almost nobody, to be honest with you,' Trump said. 'I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him.'
Associated Press writers Melissa Goldin and Matthew Lee contributed to this report.
Darlene Superville, Aamer Madhani And Stephen Groves, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
21 minutes ago
- Global News
Scotland streets fill with protestors as Trump arrives to play golf
United States President Donald Trump played golf Saturday at his course on Scotland's coast while protesters around the country took to the streets to decry his visit and accuse United Kingdom leaders of pandering to the American. Trump and his son Eric played with the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Warren Stephens, near Turnberry, a historic course that the Trump family's company took over in 2014. Security was tight, and protesters kept at a distance wand unseen by the group during Trump's round. He was dressed in black, with a white 'USA' cap, and was spotted driving a golf cart. The president appeared to play an opening nine holes, stop for lunch, then head out for nine more. By the middle of the afternoon, plainclothes security officials began leaving, suggesting Trump was done for the day. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on the cobblestone and tree-lined street in front of the U.S. Consulate about 100 miles (160 kilometers) away in Edinburgh, Scotland's capital. Speakers told the crowd that Trump was not welcome and criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for striking a recent trade deal to avoid stiff U.S. tariffs on goods imported from the U.K. Story continues below advertisement 1:06 Trump visits Scotland to open new golf resort, sparking mixed local response Protests were planned in other cities as environmental activists, opponents of Israel's war with Hamas in Gaza and pro-Ukraine groups loosely formed a 'Stop Trump Coalition.' Anita Bhadani, an organizer, said the protests were 'kind of like a carnival of resistance.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy June Osbourne, 52, a photographer and photo historian from Edinburgh wore a red cloak and white hood, recalling 'The Handmaid's Tale.' Osbourne held up picture of Trump with 'Resist' stamped over his face. 'I think there are far too many countries that are feeling the pressure of Trump and that they feel that they have to accept him and we should not accept him here,' Osbourne said. The dual-U.S.-British citizen said the Republican president was 'the worst thing that has happened to the world, the U.S., in decades.' Trump's late mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was born on the Isle of Lewis in Scotland and the president has suggested he feels at home in the country. But the protesters did their best to change that. Story continues below advertisement 'I don't think I could just stand by and not do anything,' said Amy White, 15, of Edinburgh, who attended with her parents. She held a cardboard sign that said 'We don't negotiate with fascists.' She said 'so many people here loathe him. We're not divided. We're not divided by religion, or race or political allegiance, we're just here together because we hate him.' Other demonstrators held signs of pictures with Trump and Jeffrey Epstein as the fervor over files in the case has increasingly frustrated the president. In the view of Mark Gorman, 63, of Edinburgh, 'the vast majority of Scots have this sort of feeling about Trump that, even though he has Scottish roots, he's a disgrace.' Gorman, who works in advertising, said he came out 'because I have deep disdain for Donald Trump and everything that he stands for.' Saturday's protests were not nearly as large as the throngs that demonstrated across Scotland when Trump played at Turnberry during his first term in 2018. But, as bagpipes played, people chanted 'Trump Out!' and raised dozens of homemade signs that said things like 'No red carpet for dictators,' 'We don't want you here' and 'Stop Trump. Migrants welcome.' One dog had a sign that said 'No treats for tyrants.' 2:00 Is a U.S.-Canada trade deal in jeopardy after Trump expresses doubt ahead of deadline? Some on the far right took to social media to call for gatherings supporting Trump in places such as Glasgow. Story continues below advertisement Trump also plans to talk trade with Starmer and Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president. But golf is a major focus. The family will also visit another Trump course near Aberdeen in northeastern Scotland, before returning to Washington on Tuesday. The Trumps will cut the ribbon and play a new, second course in that area, which officially opens to the public next month. Scottish First Minister John Swinney, who is also set to meet with Trump during the visit, announced that public money will go to staging the 2025 Nexo Championship, previously known previously as the Scottish Championship, at Trump's first course near Aberdeen next month. 'The Scottish Government recognizes the importance and benefits of golf and golf events, including boosting tourism and our economy,' Swinney said. At a protest Saturday in Aberdeen, Scottish Parliament member Maggie Chapman told the crowd of hundreds: 'We stand in solidarity, not only against Trump but against everything he and his politics stand for.' The president has long lobbied for Turnberry to host the British Open, which it has not done since he took over ownership. In a social media post Saturday, Trump quoted the retired golfer Gary Player as saying Turnberry was among the 'Top Five Greatest Golf Courses' he had played in as a professional. The president, in the post, misspelled the city where his golf course is located.
Globe and Mail
21 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Rivian Stock a Buy Now?
Key Points Rivian manages its key components in-house, including a proprietary technology platform for vehicle controls and autonomous driving features. It leveraged its technology to form a joint venture with Volkswagen, accelerating the development of next-generation electric vehicles. Rivian is scheduled to begin construction of a new EV manufacturing facility in Georgia in 2026. 10 stocks we like better than Rivian Automotive › Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN) has captured some investor attention in its quest to establish its place in the electric vehicle (EV) market. Following a meteoric rise after its initial public offering in late 2021, Rivian's stock plummeted in the two years that followed. The stock is still down 92% from its peak. However, recent developments, including its announcement of a joint venture with Volkswagen (OTC: VWAP.Y) and consecutive quarters of positive gross profits, show that Rivian may be turning a corner. Still, challenges remain as the company prepares to expand its manufacturing capacity and scale up production over the next several years. If you're thinking of investing in Rivian, here's what you need to know. Rivian's in-house focus and technology platform Rivian manages nearly all aspects of its business, from engineering to manufacturing, in-house. The company has developed a technology platform that encompasses a comprehensive software stack, covering everything from vehicle controls to the user interface, and enabling over-the-air updates and feature enhancements. Additionally, it features an in-house built autonomy platform with driver-assist technology that can be utilized for autonomous driving. The company leveraged this technology to establish a joint venture with the Volkswagen Group that focuses on software, electronic control units (ECUs), and related network architecture design and development. Volkswagen plans to utilize Rivian's zonal ECU architecture and software stack across its multiple brands. In November, Rivian received $1.3 billion for intellectual property licensed to Volkswagen. Volkswagen has also committed to making additional equity investments of up to approximately $2.5 billion in multiple tranches. Amazon is a major customer and investor One key aspect of Rivian's business since 2019 has been its partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) to develop the Rivian Commercial Van and Electric Delivery Van variants. Today, there are more than 20,000 of these vehicles on the road. In November 2023, their agreement was amended to adjust specific exclusivity rights for Amazon, allowing Rivian to sell its commercial vans to other customers. The Amazon contract has been a major portion of Rivian's business. In 2024, Rivian generated over $1.04 billion in revenue from Amazon -- 21% of its total revenue. In 2025's first quarter, revenue from Amazon totaled $99 million, a significant decrease from the $338 million reported in the same quarter last year. Amazon also holds a significant stake in Rivian, representing 13.3% of its voting power. This partnership with one of the world's largest retailers has been instrumental in helping Rivian establish its foothold in the competitive automotive industry. Still, it will be crucial for the EV maker to develop its other partnerships and revenue streams. What's next for Rivian? Rivian has a history of incurring significant net losses, including a net loss of $4.8 billion last year and a $541 million loss in 2025's first quarter. However, the company did achieve a gross profit of $206 million in Q1, its highest gross profit to date. It was also the company's second consecutive quarter of gross profitability. Management expects to achieve a positive gross profit for 2025 as it continues to focus on cost efficiencies. RIVN Revenue (Quarterly) data by YCharts. The EV maker will continue to ramp up production and add to its facilities. It plans to build a second manufacturing facility near Social Circle, Georgia, to meet demand from the United States and international markets. The plant is expected to have an annual capacity of 400,000 vehicles. It will be built in two phases, each contributing 200,000 units of annual capacity. Construction of that Georgia facility is expected to begin in 2026, with production on the first manufacturing line projected to start in 2028. Vehicles produced there will be on the company's midsize platform, which includes its R2 and R3 models. Development of this facility is supported by a loan arrangement with the U.S. Department of Energy for up to approximately $6.6 billion. Is Rivian right for you? Rivian is expanding its manufacturing footprint, strategically developing its software and services ecosystem, and forming strategic partnerships with key customers and partners. The company is making solid progress in revenue and gross profit, and I would like to see it continue to improve its cost efficiency and profitability. Investors buying today could be getting on the ground floor. That said, analysts project that the EV maker will continue to lose money through 2028, as it will take time and capital to build out its facilities and scale up production. For these reasons, Rivian is a high-risk, high-potential-reward stock that may take years to pay off, making it best suited for aggressive investors with long-term buy-and-hold timelines. Should you invest $1,000 in Rivian Automotive right now? Before you buy stock in Rivian Automotive, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Rivian Automotive wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
Bipartisan House committee launches new push for transparency in Epstein case
A key House committee is looking into the investigation of the late Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking crimes, working to subpoena President Donald Trump's Department of Justice for files in the case as well as hold a deposition of Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell. Article content The Republican-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee acted just before House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., sent lawmakers home early for a month-long break from Washington. The committee's moves are evidence of the mounting pressure for disclosure in a case that Trump has unsuccessfully urged his supporters to move past. But they were also just the start of what can be a drawn-out process. Article content Article content Here's what could happen next in the House inquiry as lawmakers seek answers in a case that has sparked rampant speculation since Epstein's death in 2019 and more recently caused many in the Trump administration to renege on promises for a complete accounting. Article content Article content The subcommittee agreed to redact the names and personal information of any victims, but besides that, their demand for information is quite broad, encompassing 'un-redacted Epstein files.' As the parameters of the subpoena are drafted, Democrats are demanding that it be fulfilled within 30 days from when it is served to Attorney General Pam Bondi. They have also proposed a list of document demands, including the prosecutorial decisions surrounding Epstein, documents related to his death, and communication from any president or executive official regarding the matter. Article content Article content Ultimately, Republicans who control the committee will have more power over the scope of the subpoena, but the fact that it was approved with a strong bipartisan vote gives it some heft. Article content Article content The committee chairman, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said he told the speaker that 'Republicans on the Oversight Committee were going to move to be more aggressive in trying to get transparency with the Epstein files. So, we did that, and I think that's what the American people want.' Article content Comer has said that he is hoping that staff from the committee can interview Maxwell under oath on Aug. 11 at or near the federal prison in Florida where she is serving a lengthy sentence for child sex trafficking. Article content In a congressional deposition, the subject typically has an attorney present to help them answer — or not answer — questions while maintaining their civil rights. Subjects also have the ability to decline to answer questions if it could be used against them in a criminal case, though in this instance that might not matter because Maxwell has already been convicted of many of the things she will likely be asked about.
