logo
Two East Sussex beaches among first to be 'smoke free'

Two East Sussex beaches among first to be 'smoke free'

BBC News13-03-2025

Two Sussex beaches are among the first in England to become voluntarily smoke free.On Wednesday, Bexhill beach from the De La Warr Pavilion to the Coronation Bandstand on East Parade and all of Camber Sands became designated as smoke free.According to Public Health England, there are more than 57,000 smokers in East Sussex. Councillor Doug Oliver, leader of Rother District Council, said it was a "positive initiative to establish the first voluntary smoke free beaches in England".
Rob Tolfree, acting director of East Sussex Public Health, said: "Second-hand smoke is just as toxic outdoors as it is indoors."Creating two smoke free beaches in East Sussex will help protect our children and young people from the effects of smoking by encouraging people to think twice before smoking on the beach."Sussex Wildlife Trust said cigarette butts are one of the most littered items globally and take years to biodegrade. "They leak chemicals including nicotine, ethyl phenol and heavy metals into the sea as they break down, damaging delicate marine ecosystems," the Trust's spokesperson said.The Trust added East Sussex has two Marine Conservation Zones which protect rare underwater chalk reefs and vulnerable blue mussel beds, as well as diverse marine life.The initiative was launched by East Sussex County Council and Rother District Council, supported by Sussex Wildlife Trust on No Smoking Day.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My ex-girlfriend used me for sex. How do I move on from the betrayal?
My ex-girlfriend used me for sex. How do I move on from the betrayal?

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

My ex-girlfriend used me for sex. How do I move on from the betrayal?

My last relationship felt like the best sexual relationship I'd ever had. After my marriage ended, exploring intimacy with a new partner with a well-matched libido felt liberating and life-affirming. After a brief split last summer, she reappeared and said she wanted to have sex again but not to resume as a couple. I declined, explaining that intimacy worked for me only in the context of a relationship. She then said she wanted to get back together, so our relationship briefly resumed. Two weeks later she said she wanted out again, leaving me feeling I had been duped and manipulated. The destruction of trust has eroded much of the confidence I had gained. I have found it impossible to consider starting a new relationship. How do I move on from this feeling and untangle the damage? No relationship is perfectly easy and uncomplicated. Most involve periods of uncertainly and confusion. You seem to have a pretty good idea about what you do and don't want, so act on that and take charge of your life. Avoid the pitfalls of viewing yourself as a victim. Remove the things that don't work for you, and never re-enter old problems. Refuse to allow the way you may have been treated in the past to stop you finding better relationships, better sexual experiences. You deserve to be happy; allow yourself to be so. Pamela Stephenson Connolly is a US-based psychotherapist who specialises in treating sexual disorders. If you would like advice from Pamela on sexual matters, send us a brief description of your concerns to (please don't send attachments). Each week, Pamela chooses one problem to answer, which will be published online. She regrets that she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject to our terms and conditions.

Plan for 'trotting track' at Bannockburn thrown out by Ministers
Plan for 'trotting track' at Bannockburn thrown out by Ministers

The Herald Scotland

timea day ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Plan for 'trotting track' at Bannockburn thrown out by Ministers

They have now rejected the scheme, saying it would have 'a significant adverse effect' on the character of the battlefield, its setting and sense of place. The news has been welcomed by Scotland's largest conservation charity, the National Trust for Scotland (NTS), who has vociferously opposed the development. The Trust has previously claimed that the planning process had been flawed and that Stirling Council should not have given its approval to the scheme, given its visual and other impacts on the historic battlefield. The Battle of Bannockburn, fought in June 1314, saw Robert the Bruce and his Scots army defeat the English troops led by King Edward II. Members of the public visit the Robert the Bruce statue (Image: Jeff J Mitchell) The proposed development would have parking for more than 200 cars and access roads within view of the battle site. NTS claimed the trotting track, car parking, fencing and buildings, would have been directly visible from the Rotunda, which acts as a national monument to commemorate the battle Stirling Council approved the application in July last year despite many objections and it was subsequently 'called in' by Scottish Ministers. READ MORE: 'Deeply flawed': Heritage watchdogs slam horse track plan for Bannockburn New battle of Bannockburn as heritage custodians fight development The National Trust for Scotland's Acting Director of Conservation & Policy, Diarmid Hearns, said: 'This is very welcome news for the Trust and all who care about Scotland's heritage and history. Ministers' conclusions closely accord with our stated views that this development was simply in the wrong place and would have badly impacted upon the setting of the battlefield.

Channel Islanders lack trust in politics, survey finds
Channel Islanders lack trust in politics, survey finds

BBC News

time7 days ago

  • BBC News

Channel Islanders lack trust in politics, survey finds

There is a widespread lack of trust and representation in local politics, a pan-island survey has survey by Island Global Research, focused on understanding people's attitudes on "topical issues", also asked islanders the extent to which they trusted different institutions.A total of 1,140 residents aged over 16 in Guernsey participated and 601 took part in than 70% of respondents in Guernsey and 68% in Jersey believed their island was "heading in the wrong direction" and they had no or limited influence on decisions being made. Cost of living Across both island less than 20% said they felt elected officials represented their views well while 46% of respondents in Jersey and 58% in Guernsey said they would definitely vote in their next in Jersey said their top concerns were healthcare and inflation, with inflation being more important to younger residents and healthcare to older priorities for improvement included the cost of living, hospital waiting lists and residents said they were mainly concerned about housing, with 80% saying it was important, as well as the priorities for improvement were affordable housing, the cost of living and than 70% of islanders rated their quality of life as being 6 or higher out of 10 and most believed their lives were better in the islands than in the UK.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store