NewsNation accuses Fox News of stealing their slogan for its Super Bowl ad
Calling out Fox News in a new TV promo, 'centrist' cable news upstart NewsNation accuses its much larger competitor of ripping off its slogan for a prominent ad the right-wing network ran during the Super Bowl this past Sunday.
The new on-air commercial, which NewsNation posted to its social media accounts on Tuesday night, points out that the Fox News promo boasts that it is a news channel 'For All America,' a slogan that is remarkably similar to the tagline that NewsNation first debuted in 2021 and slightly revised late last year.
'News for all Americans,' NewsNation anchor Chris Cuomo declares in the channel's ad alongside a graphic that blares 'A Tagline So Good.' Cuomo then points out that Fox News ended their widely seen commercial with the 'For All America' slogan emblazoned on the screen.
'Sound familiar?' Cuomo snarked. 'Of course it does. They took it from NewsNation!'
While additional graphics stated that 'it's easy to talk the talk, because only one network walks the walk,' Cuomo took a swipe at Fox News for not featuring any of its conservative opinion hosts — such as Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters or Greg Gutfeld — in the Super Bowl commercial.
'Why are none of the main players at Fox in the ad?' Cuomo wondered while footage of NewsNation anchors Elizabeth Vargas, Leland Vittert, Ashleigh Banfield and Cuomo played in the background. Incidentally, Vittert was once a Fox News correspondent and host before jumping to the Nexstar-owned station in 2021.
NewsNation first debuted its 'News for All America' tagline in a promotional campaign in August 2021, which was when the then-nascent network was first expanding to a full-time cable news channel. Following the 2024 presidential election it made a minor tweak to its slogan, changing it to 'News For All Americans' as the station hoped to continue to build on the growing viewership it has experienced over the past year.
Meanwhile, as media reporter Oliver Darcy noted in his Status newsletter on Monday, 'media organizations can't seem to get enough of the phrase 'For All America'' now that Donald Trump is in office. Besides Fox News' ad and NewsNation revising its slogan, The Washington Post has been testing out the new mission statement 'Riveting Storytelling For All of America.'
Fox News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rolls-Royce named winning bidder for UK small nuclear reactors
Rolls-Royce has won a competition to be the first company to try to build small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) in the UK, as part of a government effort to push Britain to the frontier of nuclear energy technology. Great British Energy – Nuclear said on Tuesday that Rolls-Royce SMR was the preferred bidder for the programme, after a drawn-out competition that pitted the FTSE 100 manufacturer against two US-owned companies. The state-owned power company's announcement came as part of a broader push for nuclear power by the government, as it promised to invest £14.2bn to build the large Sizewell C power station in Suffolk. Related: Sizewell C power station to be built as part of UK's £14bn nuclear investment The nuclear investments will form a key part of the spending review due to be announced by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, on Wednesday as the government tries to shift attention from a U-turn on winter fuel payments for pensioners. Sizewell C will produce 3.2 gigawatts (GW) of power, enough for about 6m homes. By contrast, Rolls-Royce's SMRs will provide about 470 megawatts each. A separate government release said SMRs would collectively generate up to 1.5GW of electricity, suggesting that Rolls-Royce will be granted permission to build at least three SMRs. The crucial difference between large plants such as Sizewell C and the mini nuclear sites is that SMRs will mostly be built to a single design on a factory line, rather than individually on-site. Those factory-built 'modules' will then be fitted together at the site, in an effort to make the construction of nuclear plants cheaper, less complex and less prone to the hugely costly delays that have plagued the Hinkley Point C plant. The SMR approach is unproven, with no sites yet fully operational anywhere in the world. They are also likely to face local and national opposition. The Green party on Tuesday said that nuclear power was slow and expensive. However, Rolls-Royce has argued that the pressurised water reactor technology it has chosen is well understood, and will allow it to start generating power by 2032 at the earliest. Datacentres for tech companies are a key target customer. Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, said: 'We are ending the no-nuclear status quo as part of our plan for change and are entering a golden age of nuclear with the biggest building programme in a generation.' The government did not reveal the locations of the first UK SMRs, which some in the industry had hoped for to speed the process along. They are likely to be sited beside retired nuclear power stations such as Oldbury in Gloucestershire and Wylfa in north Wales. Derby-based Rolls-Royce beat competition from the US companies Holtec and GE Hitachi, while the Canadian-owned Westinghouse dropped out of the competition earlier. Rolls-Royce SMR was always considered by far the favourite. The company is majority-owned by Rolls-Royce, with other investors including Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, BNF Resources controlled by France's Perrodo family, whose wealth stems from fossil fuels, the US energy company Constellation, and the Czech utility CEZ. The decision will nevertheless represent a further boost for Rolls-Royce, which saw its share price hit a record high this month, making it Britain's biggest manufacturer by market value. Rolls-Royce's share price rose 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new record high of £9.12. The company has benefited from the recovery in demand for its jet engines, the increase in defence spending prompted by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as well as efforts to renegotiate contracts by the chief executive, Tufan Erginbilgiç. Erginbilgiç said: 'This is a very significant milestone for our business and Rolls-Royce SMR. It is a vote of confidence in our unique nuclear capabilities, which will be recognised by governments around the world.' The decision to try to build SMRs has been subject to years of delay. Rolls-Royce first submitted a design proposal in 2015 in the hope of building the first reactor in 2025. That target date kept slipping back as Rolls-Royce awaited approval under Conservative and now Labour governments. The government said the move would create 3,000 jobs at the peak of construction, grow regional economies and strengthen energy security. It will aim for 70% of the parts to be based in the UK, although the delay has already meant Rolls-Royce has chosen a non-UK supplier for crucial pressure vessels. While the UK is due to get the first reactor, Rolls-Royce has already agreed to produce an SMR in the Czech Republic, and it is in the final two in a competition in Sweden.
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Washington Post editorial admits colleges must take 'strenuous action' to restore free exchange of ideas
Harvard may win its legal battle against the Trump administration, but the fight to restore confidence in higher education as defenders of the "free exchange of ideas" would still be far from over, The Washington Post editorial board wrote on Tuesday. "In the past decade, trust in higher education has dropped precipitously. Ten years ago, a robust majority of Americans told Gallup they had a 'great deal' or 'quite a lot' of confidence in higher education; today, only one-third of Americans say the same," the editorial stated, highlighting similar concerns over an uptick in those who say they have "very little" or "no" confidence in higher education. That percentage rose to 32% from 10% a decade ago. Such discontent with higher education has created opportunities for Republicans to seize on the trend and "attack the foundations of academic independence," the board argued. A cocktail of problems, ranging from free speech concerns to rising costs and lower returns on investment, was said to have fed into the growing distrust. In one corner, conservative faculty members have reported self-censoring due to fear of how others might respond to their opinions. The Post argued this isn't isolated to one group, however, and that left-wing voices are also choosing to stay quiet when controversial topics are discussed. "In an academic community in which 'diversity statements' are required of new hires (and professors can be denied jobs merely for criticizing them), university administrations and disciplines issue official statements embracing social justice causes, journal editors apologize for or withdraw papers that offend the left, and conservative professors are becoming an increasingly endangered species, even moderates or those on the center-left can reasonably wonder what they're allowed to say, and universities can seem drastically out of step with mainstream society," the editorial said. The editorial board went on to say that institutions of higher education lack a solid foundation to demand that the government respect their "academic freedom" unless they demand the same from their own teachers and leaders. "The worst of this political fever might be behind us, but academia will have to take strenuous action to restore its reputation as defenders of the free exchange of ideas…" "Renaming the diversity, equity and inclusion office will not suffice; they need to foster a campus environment in which the frank discussion of ideas is the core value. If they do not, they will find the public yawning as conservative attacks intensify and courts struggle to contain the damage," the Post's editorial board continued.
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says
About 100 National Endowment for the Humanities employees laid off, union says About 2/3 of National Endowment for the Humanities employees were laid off Tuesday. The agency plans to issue half of the number of grants next year Show Caption Hide Caption Active-duty marines deployed for Los Angeles anti-ICE protests President Donald Trump is sending in active-duty Marines to assist law enforcement with immigration protests in Los Angeles, California. Approximately two-thirds of the staff at the National Endowment for the Humanities will lose their jobs when their "reduction in force" goes into effect June 10, according to their union, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 3403. "A major agency restructuring is underway without the appropriate planning needed to ensure the continuity of operations," the local said in a statement. "These drastic changes … represent an existential threat to those institutions and individuals who rely on support from NEH to research, preserve, and interpret our shared heritage. The agency's employees were not part of the lawsuit that currently has other reduction in force efforts on hold. The National Endowment for the Humanities did not respond to a request for comment. Less than 60 employees are expected to remain. The agency has a $207 million budget to fund humanities programs such as history, law, literature, philosophy, and linguistics. In early April, NEH terminated more than 1,000 existing grants, including one for the National History Day competition and grants for state humanities councils in all 50 states. The agency has already quietly posted that roughly half of its funding opportunities will not be offered in the next fiscal year or will no longer be offered at all. Among the grants that the agency will no longer offer next year are awards specifically for faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions, tribal institutions, training for K-12 and higher education teachers and studies on endangered languages and the experiences of war. The preserved grants include projects for the country's 250th anniversary, including a statue garden of famous Americans.
