TOWARDS A SHARED FUTURE IN ASEAN CLASSROOMS
LANGKAWI: Efforts to enhance the movement of students and academicians within the Asean region – commonly referred to as student and academic mobility – were among the topics discussed and agreed upon during the Asean Higher Education Ministers' Roundtable: Envisioning the Next Decade and Beyond, that took place recently.
Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir said this includes initiatives to facilitate the exchange of both undergraduate and postgraduate students, as well as academic staff from other Asean countries who may come to teach at universities or other institutions of higher learning in Malaysia.
'In addition, the discussions resulted in an agreement to establish a dedicated body to manage matters related to scholarships, with Malaysia taking the lead through the proposed Asean Global Exchange for Mobility and Scholarship (Asean GEMS) platform,' he said during the press conference after the roundtable.
Zambry said the platform will be used to source financial support from Asean member states to provide scholarships.
Launched on June 19, the Asean GEMS is a one-stop platform for information on regional scholarship and mobility programmes across the Asean region.
Zambry chairing the roundtable attended by education ministers and officials from Asean member states.
Zambry also shared that member states agreed to acknowledge and support ongoing efforts to develop a roadmap and work plan aimed at creating a shared space in higher education within the region.
He said this initiative is intended to strengthen regional cooperation and alignment in the field of higher education.
Among other matters agreed upon was the establishment of a steering committee comprising representatives from each Asean member state.
He said the committee will be responsible for formulating and monitoring the implementation of the proposed roadmap and work plan.
'We also agreed to establish a system that facilitates the mobility of graduates across Asean member.
'The aim is to enable graduates to move more freely and contribute their expertise in various fields, fostering knowledge sharing and cross-border collaboration,' he said.
He said Asean members agreed to create a network and collaborative platform at the university level, involving all institutions of higher learning across the region.
'In the context of Malaysia, higher education includes not only universities but also polytechnics and community colleges, all of which will be part of this regional effort,' he added.
The initiative, according to Zambry, is supported by the launch of the Global Asean Portal, which serves as a digital hub for educational collaboration, research, and employment opportunities across the Asean region.
He added that other matters discussed included proposals to establish networks and collaborative platforms among Asean higher education institutions, and to ensure that all outcomes from the discussions are brought to the Asean Heads of State Meeting in October.
'And to achieve the objective, a committee at the Asean level has also been established and was concluded during the roundtable discussions.'
The Philippines' Commission on Higher Education chairperson Dr Shirley Castaneda Agrupis described the roundtable as a valuable platform for Asean to discuss the future of higher education in the region.
She praised Malaysia for hosting the event, which she said provided a meaningful opportunity for every Asean member state.
'I have to commend the Malaysian government for hosting The Asean Higher Education Ministers' Roundtable: Envisioning the Next Decade and Beyond,' she said.
Agrupis said the roundtable is an opportunity for Asean members to exchange ideas, benchmark good practices and identify weaknesses.
She said research is a core function of higher education, and it is vital to strengthen research, development and innovation practices to ensure high-quality output in the region.
Castaneda added that there should be a common platform for each member country to exchange good practices on how to approach the universal upliftment of the socioeconomic status of every single family residing in the region.
She said this can only be achieved through education, which is a powerful tool for breaking barriers.
Delegate Dr Salim M. AlMalik, who is the Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ICESCO) director-general, said he was honoured to be invited to the event.
He said he had been given the opportunity to deliver a speech on student dropouts among member countries of the organisation.
'Statistics have shown that 250 million children are out of school — and what are we doing about this?
'Unfortunately, the majority of them are in our member states, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, where more than 70 million students are out of school.
'We (ICESCO) have carried out a number of initiatives to address these problems, particularly girls' dropout.
'And it has been very successful in the way we are solving these issues,' he said.
Salim also pointed out that he was pleased to see the vision and leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, whom he met recently to discuss the importance of AI and how to incorporate it into all universities in Malaysia.
'The people of Malaysia have to be well aware of the importance of AI, while also keeping in mind the Islamic values of AI – how to use it, when to use it and who should use it,' he said.
Salim also expressed hope that ICESCO can become a strategic partner for the Festival of Ideas, which will take place in Kuala Lumpur in November.
He described the visit as very fruitful and productive, and said he was confident there would be more collaboration between ICESCO and Malaysia — collaboration that would benefit not only ICESCO and Malaysia, but also ICESCO member states.
The meeting saw the participation of higher education ministers from Asean member states and Timor Leste, as well as senior representatives from Myanmar and the Asean Secretariat.
Others who attended the meeting also included Brunei's Minister of Education Datin Seri Setia Dr Romaizah Md Salleh, Indonesia's Minister of Higher Education, Science and Technology Brian Yuliarto and Singapore's Senior Minister for Education Dr Janil Puthucheary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
EPB cautiously optimistic of near-term prospects
KUALA LUMPUR: EPB Group Bhd remains cautiously optimistic on its near-term outlook, despite global trade uncertainties and input cost pressures. The group said its confidence is underpinned by a strong balance sheet, an expanding market presence and a clear execution strategy. 'The favourable Asean trade environment, supported by targeted fiscal and monetary policies across key markets, continues to present compelling opportunities for EPB in the food manufacturing and packaging solutions sector,' the one-stop food processing and packaging machinery solutions provider said. In the second quarter ended June 30, EPB posted a slightly higher net profit of RM2.6mil, or 0.70 sen per share, raising first-half (1H25) net profit by 35.2% to RM5.2mil, or 1.40 sen per share. Quarterly revenue jumped 40.2% to RM29.6mil, lifting 1H25 revenue 45% to RM56.9mil. As at July 31, EPB's order book stood at RM81.25mil, of which RM51.65mil is expected to be fulfilled in the second half of the financial year ending Dec 31, 2025 (FY25), and RM29.6mil in 1H26. Notably, over RM70.08mil of the current order book relates to the group's core food processing and packaging machinery segment, reaffirming its dominant contribution to EPB's revenue base. 'Our healthy order pipeline and improved project execution capabilities provide a solid foundation for the remainder of FY25. 'With favourable regional trade conditions and sustained investments in automation, we remain confident in our ability to expand our market share and deliver long-term value,' managing director Yeoh Chee Min said
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ringgit rises against major currencies, eases vs US dollar
KUALA LUMPUR: The ringgit appreciated against most major currencies but eased slightly against the greenback at the close on Wednesday amid cautious market sentiments ahead of the release of the US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes later tonight. At 6pm, the local note dipped to 4.2250/2290 against the US dollar from yesterday's close of 4.2215/2255. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said that apart from the minutes, comments by senior US central bank officials will also come into focus after the release of the FOMC details. "Markets are anxious about whether the US Federal Reserve (Fed) will deliver a 25 basis points interest rate cut in the upcoming FOMC meeting," he told Bernama. Afzanizam said last week's US consumer price index and producer price index dynamics suggested that the Fed might continue to focus on inflation, but noted that the weak labour market warranted additional monetary stimulus. In addition, the market sentiment will stay guarded ahead of policy signals from the Fed's Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium later this week. At the close, the ringgit settled mostly higher against a basket of major currencies. It gained versus the euro to 4.9196/9242 from 4.9307/9354 yesterday and inched up against the British pound to 5.7033/7087 from 5.7066/7120, but dropped vis-à-vis the Japanese yen to 2.8648/8677 from 2.8572/8601. The ringgit also traded mostly higher against other Asean currencies. It gained versus the Singapore dollar to 3.2864/2898 from 3.2901/2935 at Tuesday's close, strengthened against the Thai baht to 12.9756/9935 from 12.9848/13.0027 and inched up vis-à-vis the Indonesian rupiah to 259.6/260.0 from 259.8/260.2. However, it slid against the Philippine peso to 7.41/7.42 from 7.39/7.40 yesterday.
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Asean and the FPDA: Twin anchors of Malaysia's security outlook — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 20 — When Asean was established on August 8, 1967, its founding members envisioned a regional order built on dialogue, cooperation, and resilience. For South-east Asia, still emerging from the shadows of colonial rule and Cold War confrontation, Asean was a bold attempt to craft a zone of stability. Four years later, in 1971, Malaysia and Singapore joined hands with Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand to launch the Five Power Defence Arrangements (FPDA). This pact was no accident of history; it was a deliberate complement to Asean's vision of regional security. The FPDA was born just a year after Asean declared the Zone of Peace, Freedom, and Neutrality (Zopfan) in Kuala Lumpur in 1970. Zopfan was a political statement of intent: South-east Asia must not become the playground of great power rivalry. But declarations alone could not guarantee safety. The Vietnam War was raging, and the withdrawal of British forces east of Suez left Malaysia and Singapore vulnerable. The FPDA filled this gap. While Zopfan embodied Asean's diplomatic quest for neutrality, the FPDA offered a hard security safety net—anchored not in alliance obligations but in consultation and cooperation. The importance of the FPDA for Malaysia cannot be overstated. Unlike Nato, it does not bind members to collective defence. Instead, it institutionalises regular consultations and joint military exercises, ensuring Malaysia and Singapore are never isolated in the face of aggression. Over the years, exercises such as Bersama Shield and Bersama Lima have done more than sharpen tactics; they have nurtured interoperability, exposed Malaysian forces to advanced operational practices, and prepared them for United Nations peacekeeping deployments. These engagements are Malaysia's only consistent multinational military training opportunities—an invaluable supplement to its limited defense capacity. When Asean was established on August 8, 1967, its founding members envisioned a regional order built on dialogue, cooperation, and resilience. — Picture by Raymond Manuel At the same time, Asean and the FPDA should not be seen as competing pillars of security. They are symbiotic. Asean, with its emphasis on consensus and dialogue, creates the political environment that makes cooperative security possible. The FPDA, in turn, provides a practical mechanism for capacity-building, ensuring that Malaysia and Singapore remain confident participants in Asean's broader vision of regional stability. Together, they reflect Malaysia's dual strategy: embrace neutrality and diplomacy through Asean, while anchoring deterrence and preparedness through the FPDA. Half a century on, both institutions face new tests. The rise of China, the resurgence of US strategic primacy, and tensions in the South China Sea demand careful balancing. Here, Asean continues to serve as the convenor of dialogue through the Asean Regional Forum, East Asia Summit, and the ongoing negotiations on a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea. The FPDA, meanwhile, has adapted to include non-traditional security threats—counterterrorism, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief—broadening its relevance in an era where security is no longer defined solely by state-to-state conflict. Critics often argue that the FPDA is a relic of the Cold War. Yet its enduring value lies in flexibility. It reassures Malaysia and Singapore without constraining them in rigid treaty commitments. Similarly, Asean, though derided as slow-moving, has preserved South-east Asia as one of the least conflict-prone regions in the world. Neither is perfect, but both are indispensable. For Malaysia, the lesson is clear. Asean and the FPDA are not parallel tracks but complementary ones. They represent two sides of the same coin: Asean provides the diplomatic shield, while the FPDA delivers the operational muscle. In a region where great powers jostle for influence, Malaysia's security will continue to rest on the twin anchors laid down in 1967 and 1971. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
