Vast swarms of hidden galaxies may be secretly bathing the universe in a soft glow
A secret population of hidden galaxies suffusing the universe in a soft glow of far-infrared light have been strongly suggested to exist, based on careful detective work into some of the most unique data to come from Europe's Herschel Space Observatory.
The galaxies, if they are real, are not necessarily a surprise. The cosmos is filled with light across all wavelengths — it's just that the far-infrared component seems to be stronger than can be accounted for by all the galaxies we can see in visible light. In other words, there must be something else in the universe producing its glow.
Far-infrared light, associated with longer wavelengths than what even the James Webb Space Telescope can see, is emitted by cosmic dust that has absorbed starlight. Cosmic dust is produced by the cycle of star birth and death. Dust condenses around newly formed stars — it's what planets like Earth are built out of, after all — and then is produced in huge quantities when stars die. The more intense the star formation, the more rapid the cycle of star birth and death. And the more rapid the cycle, the more dust is produced. Eventually, enough dust can be produced to literally hide the stars within a galaxy.
This has led astronomers to wonder whether there are countless galaxies out there shrouded in dust —- galaxies that are quietly contributing to the far-infrared background of the cosmos.
The trouble is, nobody had seen them —until possibly now.
"The cosmic infrared background is like a jigsaw puzzle, but there are some pieces missing," Chris Pearson, an astronomer at the U.K.'s Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, told Space.com. "We've always known that we need something to complete the puzzle, but we haven't really known what shape or form those missing pieces were going to be."
Pearson led a team who used archival data from the Herschel Space Observatory to search for these missing pieces. Herschel, which was capable of viewing the universe in long wavelengths of far-infrared light, ended its mission all the way back in 2013. However, as a member of Herschel's original instrumentation team, Pearson knew of some observations that hadn't been available to regular astronomers.
One of Herschel's primary instruments was SPIRE, the Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver. To ensure that SPIRE remained calibrated correctly, it was pointed towards a barren patch of sky just 3.5 degrees from the North Ecliptic Pole once or twice a month.
"By looking at the same area of sky we always expected to get roughly the same result, and if we didn't, if we saw a systematic drift over time such as everything getting bright each month, then that would be indicative of some change in the characteristics of SPIRE, and we'd have to create a calibration correction," Pearson said.
SPIRE imaged this "dark field" 141 times, but because it was only used by the instrument team to monitor the equipment itself, the dark field images were not released to the general astronomical community.
However, Pearson's team realized that the images could be useful for more than just calibrating SPIRE. They stacked the 141 images — astro-imaging parlance for adding and merging the images on top of one another, which dramatically increases the signal-to-noise ratio — and threw in some data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope to create the deepest far-infrared view of the cosmos ever made.
In this "dark field," they identified 1,848 sources of far-infrared emission. Now, the problem with observations at long wavelengths is resolution: you just don't get sharp images like you do with the Hubble or James Webb space telescopes.
Even though Herschel's mirror, was larger than Hubble's, at 3.5-meters (11.5 feet) in diameter, to Herschel, the 1,848 far-infrared sources all look like amorphous blobs.
Therefore, a careful statistical analysis had to be undertaken to figure out what these blobs actually are, and whether they match typical galaxy distributions. The conclusion is that they are dusty, star-forming galaxies at a range of distances from us; they are hard to find because they are faint, probably indicating that these are not large galaxies, but rather smaller dwarf galaxies undergoing their first intense bursts of star formation.
If one were to extrapolate the findings all across the sky, the result would be an awful lot of small, dusty, star-forming galaxies that collectively contribute a significant fraction of the far-infrared background, and of the overall energy budget of the universe.
Still, it's not necessarily the first time that some of these galaxies have been seen; they may have turned up in deep images taken by Hubble or the JWST, for example. "But it's making the link between what you see at one wavelength and what you see at another wavelength that's the problem, and again it's down to resolution," Pearson said. For example, an optical image taken by Hubble might show a cluster of individual galaxies, but in the Herschel image they would appear as just one blob of infrared light. "You don't know how many of those galaxies that you see at optical wavelengths are actually also contributing to the emission of this blob," Pearson said.
What's needed is more data to fill the gaps and confirm that this population of hidden galaxies is real. That data will not be forthcoming from Herschel, though: "We've pushed what Herschel could do right to the limit with this," Pearson said.
On the bright side, there are two other possibilities.
One option is to conduct observations at submillimeter radio wavelengths, which is the next waveband up from far-infrared. Although the North Ecliptic Pole is not viewable from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, Pearson's team does have some observing time coming up on the Submillimeter Array (SMA) in Hawaii, which can see the dark field. Beyond that, Pearson is a member of a consortium behind a proposed NASA mission called PRIMA, the Probe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics. PRIMA has made it to the final shortlist for NASA's next billion-dollar Probe class mission, competing against one other mission, the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite (AXiS). Final selection takes place in 2026.
Related Stories:
— Record-breaking 'dead' galaxy discovered by JWST lived fast and died young in the early universe
— Is our universe trapped inside a black hole? This James Webb Space Telescope discovery might blow your mind
— James Webb Space Telescope sees early galaxies defying 'cosmic rulebook' of star formation
If PRIMA does go ahead, its telescope mirror will actually be quite a lot smaller than Herschel's at just 1.8-meters (6 feet). "So in terms of taking pictures, it won't help us because they're still going to be blurry," Pearson said.
What PRIMA will specialize in is spectroscopy, breaking down the infrared light into individual wavelengths to learn more about the constituents of these galaxies, how much star formation is taking place and how far away they are.
As Pearson said,, "If PRIMA goes ahead, it's going to be absolutely instrumental in solving this."
Two papers describing the results, one with Pearson as the lead author and another led by Thomas Varnish of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, were published on April 9 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
The James Webb Space Telescope Has Found a New Moon Orbiting Uranus
No joke: Science has found a new teeny, tiny moon orbiting Uranus. NASA announced on Tuesday that the James Webb Space Telescope found yet another moon floating around Uranus, an ice giant that already had 13 other known moons. The discovery was made thanks to images taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. A team out of the Southwest Research Institute noticed an unfamiliar object that appeared to be orbiting around Uranus. The images have been stitched together in a slideshow on YouTube that shows the moon, which orbits much closer around Uranus than its 13 other known moons. "This object was spotted in a series of 10 40-minute long-exposure images captured by the Near-Infrared Camera," said lead scientist Maryame El Moutamid. "It's a small moon but a significant discovery, which is something even NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft didn't see during its flyby nearly 40 years ago." In terms of size, this moon is indeed small at around six miles in diameter. For reference, Earth's moon is 2,159 miles in diameter and the largest moon in our solar system, Jupiter's Ganymede, is 3,270 miles. The moon also has a circular orbit, per the SwRI team, meaning that it likely formed in the same area where it currently orbits. Uranus' 14th moon orbits closer to its rings than most of the other moons. NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, M. El Moutamid (SwRI), M. Hedman (University of Idaho). Animation: J. DePasquale (STScI) Better name TBA Despite obtaining a 14th moon, which NASA is calling S/2025 U1, Uranus has a long way to go to compete with Jupiter and Saturn, which have 95 and 274 confirmed moons, respectively. However, Uranus is the king of tiny moons. "No other planet has as many small inner moons as Uranus," said Matthew Tiscareno, research member of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California. Since S/2025 U1 is so much smaller than the known moons, Tiscareno posits that there may be even more small moons drifting around that have yet to be discovered. NASA does note that this research hasn't been peer-reviewed yet, so the for-now clunkily named S/2025 U1 may be yet dismissed as a non-moon. However, if it is confirmed, the moon will receive a (better, we hope) name from the International Astronomical Union and become completely official.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Don't miss Mercury, the moon and the Beehive Cluster align in a special August morning sky show
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Isaac Asimov (1920-1992), a legendary writer of science and science fiction, once noted in "The Solar System and Back," that the planet Mercury is rarely visible when it is truly dark. "I suspect, in fact," he observed, "that many people today (when the horizon is generally much dirtier and the sky much hazier with the glare of artificial light than it was in centuries past) have never seen Mercury." In pre-Christian times, Mercury had two names, as it was not realized that it could alternately appear on one side of the sun and then the other. When visible in the evening sky, it was called Mercury and when appearing as a morning star, it was known as Apollo. It was Pythagoras, around the 5th century B.C., who first recognized that Mercury and Apollo were the same celestial body. A fine viewing window is now open Mercury is indeed clever at escaping detection. It is said that the astronomer Copernicus never saw the planet. Yet you can find it, if you know where to look. As the innermost planet, Mercury is usually masked by the sun's glare, so we must look for Mercury either soon after sunset, or in the case we are discussing here, just before sunrise. On the morning of Tuesday morning (Aug. 19), Mercury reaches its greatest western elongation, meaning it's at its maximum apparent distance from the sun. To catch a glimpse, set your alarm for 45 minutes before sunrise and look low toward the east-northeast horizon. First, you'll spot brilliant Venus. About one and a half fist‑widths (approximately 15°) lower left of Venus, look for a bright, yellowish point of light, Mercury. Skinny moon points the way on Thursday On Thursday morning (Aug. 21), besides Venus, there will be another celestial object to guide you to Mercury. That will be our moon. The moon will appear as a very slender sliver of light, only 4% illuminated and less than two days before the new phase. It will be positioned 5 degrees (half a fist) above Mercury. Binoculars will make things a bit easier to make a sighting, though sighting this very thin waning lunar crescent should be evident with the unaided eye. This morning Mercury will shine at magnitude -0.3. Among the stars, only Sirius and Canopus shine brighter, so once you locate the moon, sighting Mercury should be a relatively easy task. And although it swings back toward the sun after Aug. 18, it will continue to be visible until virtually the end of the month as it continues to brighten. By Aug. 28, it will have more than doubled in brightness, reaching a brilliant magnitude of -1. Beehive buzzes nearby TOP TELESCOPE PICK Want to view the night sky up close? The Celestron NexStar 8SE is ideal for beginners wanting quality, reliable and quick views of celestial objects. For a more in-depth look, check out our Celestron NexStar 8SE review. Besides viewing the moon and Mercury with binoculars on Aug. 21, there will be another celestial sight to look for that morning. Try looking for it when the twilight sky is not so bright, roughly an hour or more before sunrise. Located about 2 degrees below the hairline-thin moon will be M44, one of the sky's finest open clusters. Popularly known as the Beehive, it's also one of the nearest open clusters at a distance of 500 light-years. Binoculars are ideal for examining this wide, interesting star field. Its central group of stars is arranged into rough rows that form a generally triangular shape, suggesting an old-fashioned beehive. For centuries, M44 has also been known as Praesepe, Latin for "Manger." Pressing close to it are the two stars that supposedly represented the Northern and Southern Donkeys: Asellus Borealis and Australis. Joe Rao serves as an instructor and guest lecturer at New York's Hayden Planetarium. He writes about astronomy for Natural History magazine, Sky and Telescope and other publications.


The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope has found a new moon orbiting Uranus.
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope has found a new moon orbiting Uranus. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) hasn't given it a name yet, but NASA has announced that astronomers discovered a new moon orbiting Uranus using images taken by the James Webb Space Telescope's near-infrared camera last February. Currently designated S/2025 U1, the tiny moon's estimated to be around six miles in diameter which is potentially why it wasn't previously spotted by Voyager 2 or other telescopes. It's located about 35,000 miles from the center of Uranus in an orbit between Ophelia and Bianca.