
Booze up: is gen Z's ‘sensible' relationship with alcohol moving towards hedonism?
But could that be about to change? Recent data has shown the proportion of gen Z – those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 – who are of legal drinking age and have consumed alcohol in the past six months has increased by 7% between 2024 and 2025.
Alcopops are apparently all the rage among gen Z customers, with booming sales of Smirnoff Ice, Bacardi Breezers and BuzzBallz, while last year's 'brat summer' was said to herald the end of the clean-living era.
The reality, experts say, is more complicated.
'We're seeing a generational recalibration, not a simple return to hedonism,' said Ivo Vlaev, a professor of behavioural science at Warwick University. 'This isn't a simple return to the past – it's a complex blend of coping, compensation, identity expression and socioeconomic constraint. The behaviours may look familiar, but the psychology behind them has evolved.'
He said the fact that gen Z came of age during a pandemic, climate crisis and increased concerns over the cost of living was a recipe for 'psychological whiplash'.
Key factors at play included a rebound from the restrictions of the Covid era with young people now 'reasserting agency through social behaviours'.
Vlaev said research showed that 'when autonomy is suppressed, people later overcompensate with behaviours that signal freedom or control'. There was also an element of 'self-soothing' as a result of rising levels of anxiety, depression and loneliness, as well as the glamorisation of certain drinks and behaviours on TikTok.
Financial concerns may have also pushed the younger generation towards 'present-biased decision-making'.
'When the future feels unstable, people are less likely to invest in long-term health and more likely to seek short-term mood boosts, like alcohol or late nights out,' he said.
Vlaev also said an element of 'wellness culture' fatigue had probably set in. 'Some gen-Zers are pushing back against the pressure to optimise every aspect of life,' he said.
Richard Halstead, chief operation officer of consumer research at drinks market analysis company IWSR, said: 'From a consumer research and data point of view, it does seem there is some pushback on this idea that we're all perfect, having perfect pictures taken of us on Instagram and we're all super in control of our lives.
'Every cultural move has a countercultural move associated with it.'
He said gen Z's attitude towards drinking and socialising was more nuanced than is often portrayed in the media – gen Z were not 'puritans' who abstain from alcohol, but nor did they like booze as much as previous generations.
'The idea that gen Z do not drink at all or that they have turned their backs on alcohol is not supported by data,' he said. 'The idea that they have a different relationship with alcohol compared to previous generations is supported by data.'
He said that, for instance, gen Z were more likely to drink a wider variety of alcohol, and drink out in bars and restaurants.
'Their pattern of behaviour is actually going out for a reason, as opposed to just meeting for a pint in the pub because the pub's there and you've got nothing better to do,' he said.
Dr Laura Tinner, a research fellow at the Centre for Public Health at the University of Bristol, said people should not underestimate the power of the alcohol companies themselves, keen to capture a younger audience they feared they were losing.
'It's not necessarily that there has been a swing in the pendulum or a return to previous drinking behaviours, it's more that alcohol companies are continually trying to target young people with their products,' she said. 'They are using the current revival and zeitgeist around 00s and 90s culture to design their products to target young people.'
There was also a suggestion that gen Z were simply older – they are now roughly between the ages of 13 and 28 – so those at the older end of the group were more likely to have access to well paid jobs and disposable income.
'I think we're seeing some tailwinds develop,' said Halstead. 'They're getting older so some are probably in better paying, stable jobs and they've got more opportunity perhaps to do things that people with a bit more money like to do, which is go out and buy a drink and not worry too much about how much it costs you.'
What many researchers were interested in was whether the characteristics that make gen Z different from their predecessors will stay with them as they age, with evidence suggesting generations become more and more similar as they get older.
'We've always had a question about whether or not the decline [in drinking alcohol] will persist into adulthood,' said Dr Laura Fenton, a research associate at the University of Sheffield who specialises in youth drinking cultures.
'What makes gen Z slightly distinct as a generation is their attitude towards risk. They've engaged in fewer [risky pursuits] proportionally compared to people their age 20 years ago – and that extends to sex, it extends to driving, it extends to smoking and drug use,' she said.
'I think the question really is, is their approach to risk going to stay intact?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The unhealthy food nutritionists say you shouldn't ban from your diet
Burgers and fries are usually a no-no for health conscious consumers and parents trying to feed their kids a balanced diet. But a group of top nutritionists have revealed that fast food can be enjoyed in moderation and they wouldn't advise a full-out ban. Julia Cassidy, a dietitian and eating disorder specialist with Eating Recovery Center in California, says that demonizing certain foods can cause children to develop an unhealthy relationship with eating. She lets her son eat at McDonald's and she doesn't label fast food 'or any food as good or bad'. 'My sons eat at McDonald's sometimes, and I treat it the same way I would at any other meal,' she told HuffPost. She added: 'In the long run, this approach supports food flexibility, reduces guilt and protects against the kind of rigid thinking that can contribute to disordered eating.' Heidi McIndoo, a registered dietitian based out of Boston, says she also lets her children have McDonald's for the same reason. She explains: 'When you completely ban food from your kids, you're just making those foods more appealing to them. 'It also encourages the mentality of "good" and "bad" foods, which can lead to issues with healthy eating as they get older.' McIndoo reveals that when she dines at McDonald's with her family or orders take-out, she tries to balance out the meal. She highlights that along with burgers and fries, there are some healthier options on the menu. For example, she suggests swapping soda out for milk and she highlights that McDonald's sells apple slices - which contain just 15 calories per bag - and these make for a refreshing accompaniment to cut through the grease. Similarly Nikki Fata, a registered dietitian based out of Chicago, told HuffPost McDonald's is 'a welcome option for me and my future children'. She acknowledges that fast food is an affordable and convenient option for many people. And she highlights that it can be nutritious, with many items packed with essential carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. Fata explains: 'Whether it's a Big Mac, French fry, chicken nugget or McFlurry, each one of these options contains vital nutrients for the human body: carbohydrates, fat, protein and various micronutrients. 'I wouldn't recommend only eating McDonald's for every meal, every day of the week, but I also wouldn't recommend eating any other food or type of food for every meal, every day of the week.' Award-winning nutritionist Kate Llewellyn-Waters previously told that if you are opting for fast food, she would recommend pizza over McDonald's or food from a similar restaurant. 'A healthy pizza loaded with a mix of different veggies and a good-quality protein source, such as tuna, eggs, can be high in fiber, protein, healthy fats, calcium, vitamins and minerals, and is fine to be included in a balanced diet once a week,' Llewellyn-Waters explained. 'Opt for a nutrient-dense, good quality pizza over a McDonald's, which is ultra-processed, deficient in nutrients, and contains numerous chemical additives. 'I would advise keeping these types of fast-food takeaways, which are devoid of any beneficial nutrients, to the complete minimum.' However, no matter what you eat, Llewellyn-Waters points out that the portion size is key, especially if you're watching your weight. 'If the portion size is too large this can be double the calories or more even of a not-so great nutritional value takeaway [such as McDonald's]. So, watch the portion sizes.'


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
At three weeks old, I thought my baby was going to die
F ive months ago, aged 41, I gave birth to my daughter, after five gruelling years of fertility treatment as a single mother. When Violet was eight days old, a friend came to visit. She's a neonatal nurse. She had a cold sore and said: 'I'm not going to kiss her, of course.' I thought little of it, assuming she was being overcautious because of her profession. When Violet was two and a half weeks old, I said to my maternity nurse: 'She feels a bit warm, she doesn't feel quite right.' She looked as though she was getting conjunctivitis. Thermometers gave variable results, so we took her to the GP, who said: 'She's fine.' The next day, Violet still felt warm. After an e-consultation with the GP, who again told me not to worry, I called 111. You don't want to be a nuisance, but they said to bring her in. Though she was smiley during the examination, I had this funny feeling. They said: 'Because she's so small, and going on your gut, we're going to do a lumbar puncture.'


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Netflix's Biggest Loser documentary sparks criticism over show not prioritizing contestants' health
A new Netflix documentary, Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser, has revealed the extreme conditions and health risks faced by contestants on the weight-loss program. Season eight contestant Tracey Yukich recounted her near-fatal experience, collapsing from rhabdomyolysis, a condition that caused her organs to shut down, after a challenging run. Despite medical advice to send her home, Yukich remained on the show, with trainers reportedly pushing her against the recommendations of the program's medical advisor, Dr. Robert Huizenga. The documentary exposed trainers encouraging dangerously low calorie intake, around 800 calories, and intense exercise, often overriding the medical team's recommended 1,200-2,000 calories. Viewers on X expressed widespread outrage, criticizing the show's alleged prioritization of ratings over contestant health.