
EU Can't Ban Non-Member India From Buying Russian Oil
The European Union seems to have arrogated itself with extrajudicial power to prevent outside nations from purchasing Russian oil. It has no locus standi to impose its will on countries which are not members of EU. Thus, the latest expansion of the EU sanctions targeting Russian energy exports can legally cover only its 27 member countries and entities operating within the EU and not beyond. It is free to implement such decisions as fixing price caps and restrictions on shipping and insurance for Russian oil sold to EU countries, it cannot legally prohibit non-EU countries from buying Russian oil on the global market using non-EU flag carriers and insurers. The EU has no jurisdiction over countries such as India and China. Together, the two countries accounted for around 85 percent of Russia's crude oil exports in the month of June, last.
It is also illegal if the EU tries to shut down the Gujarat-based Nayara Energy (formerly Essar Oil), in which Rosneft, the Russian oil giant, holds a 49.13 percent stake, or tries to prevent Indian oil refineries from importing crude oil from Russia. Reliance Industries (RIL) is India's largest importer of Russian crude oil for processing and exporting refined products. RIL shipped an average of 2.83 million barrels of diesel and 1.5 million barrels of jet fuel per month to Europe in the first seven months of this year, according to London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) ship tracking data. Rosneft is present in Singapore through its subsidiary, Rosneft Singapore Pte. Ltd., to manage regional projects and develop international trade in oil and petroleum products as part of Rosneft's strategic focus on the Asia-Pacific region, which is expected to see significant growth in energy consumption. It also has a joint venture with PetroChina to build a refinery and petrochemical complex in Tianjin, China.
The EU, in its 18th package of sanctions against Russia, approved on July 18, has banned imports of refined petroleum products made from Russian crude coming from third countries although it excluded a handful of Western nations, including Norway, the UK, Switzerland, Canada and the US. It banned vessels from accessing EU ports and docks, or undertaking ship-to-ship transfers of oil in a bid to shut down the so-called 'shadow fleet' of older oil tankers which are reportedly used to transport Russian oil and circumvent sanctions. It may be noted that the US has somewhat resisted the action, leaving the EU to move forward on its own, with limited power to enforce the measure because oil is largely traded in dollars, for which payment clearing is controlled by US banks. The EU's new package of sanctions is most unlikely to hit Russia's oil and gas exports. India and China are expected to continue buying discounted Russian crude although some Indian refineries, such as RIL, will find it difficult to re-export processed Russian crude to EU member countries.
RIL may have to find new ways or new destinations to re-export processed Russian crude which may be further discounted after the fresh EU sanctions or face a big financial blow. As a whole, the Indian refinery industry will have to find ways to re-export refined Russian crude oil if they desire. This may not be an easy task. India was a supplier of refined petroleum products worth $15 billion annually to Europe. India imported crude oil worth US$50.3 billion from Russia in 2024-25. The share of Russian oil in India's crude oil basket is more than 44 percent. Several non-EU countries import processed crude oil, particularly refined petroleum products derived from Russian crude. India, China, and Turkey are significant buyers of Russian crude oil and refined products. Other notable processed crude oil importers include South Korea and Taiwan. The latest EU package of sanctions will make Russian crude oil even cheaper. It lowers the price on Russian crude to $47.60 a barrel from $60. The new cap, which takes effect on September 3, also includes a mechanism to ensure it is always 15 percent below average Russian crude prices.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), Russia earned around $192 billion last year from selling oil. Cutting a part of that may mean a loss to the country's export revenue, but it could also be at the cost of the rest of the world with spiking oil prices globally if the export of Russia's more than seven million barrels of oil per day abruptly disappears. Anyway, India and China, the two top importers of Russian oil, are most unlikely to go by so-called universal ban on import of Russian oil imposed by the EU or the US threat to order such a ban in due course to force a truce in the Russia-Ukraine war. Incidentally, both India and China continue to have good relations with Ukraine. Last year, India's imports from Ukraine were valued at $1.036 billion, while India's exports to Ukraine were $0.187 billion. The total trade turnover between the two countries for the same period was $1.224 billion. China's imports from Ukraine totalled US$2.68 billion, according to the UN COMTRADE database.
So far, both India and China appear to be unfazed by the EU ban on Russia's oil and gas exports. India's Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri thinks the market would more or less continue to operate as usual. The EU lens on Rosneft is a concern. Rosneft was believed to be in talks with some potential Indian buyers, including RIL, to sell off its majority stake in Nayara Energy, even before the EU contemplated further tightening the ban on Russian oil exports. The Indian petroleum minister seems to be generally happy that oil markets have not hardened following the announcement of fresh EU sanctions on Russia. Although India's $15-billion refined petroproducts export to the EU will take a hit, the country is already exploring new markets for the export of refined petroleum. The export earning, last year, was worth as much as $85 billion. Given the current geopolitical situation, import-based India needs to work out a strong strategy to protect its energy security as well as export trade. (IPA Service)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
US President Trump says imposing 25% tariff on Indian imports
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India starting on Aug.1. He said India, which has the world's fifth largest economy, will also face an unspecified penalty on Aug.1, but did not elaborate on the amount or what it was for. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that India "is our friend' but its "Tariffs are far too high' on US goods. "While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. "They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE - ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!" India's commerce ministry, which is leading the trade negotiations with the United States, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the two countries, which had been under negotiation for several months. The Republican president added that India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, which he said has enabled the war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional "penalty' starting on Friday as part of the launch of his administration's revised tariffs on multiple countries. The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the US market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations. "We are back to square one as Trump hasn't spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff," Sahai said. "The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.' US and Indian trade negotiators had held multiple rounds of discussions to resolve contentious issues, particularly over market access for American agricultural and dairy products. Despite progress in some areas, Indian officials resisted opening the domestic market to imports of wheat, corn, rice and genetically modified soybeans, citing risks to the livelihood of millions of Indian farmers. The new tariffs are expected to impact India's goods exports to the US, estimated at around $87 billion in 2024, including labour-intensive products such as garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jeweler, and petrochemicals. The United States currently has a $45.7 billion trade deficit with India. India now joins a growing list of countries facing higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade policy, aimed at reshaping US trade relations by demanding greater reciprocity. The White House had previously warned India about its high average applied tariffs - nearly 39% on agricultural products, with rates climbing to 45% on vegetable oils and around 50% on apples and corn. The setback comes despite earlier commitments by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump to conclude the first phase of a trade deal by autumn 2025 and expand bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, up from $191 billion in 2024. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he'll impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. The announcement comes after a slew of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which Trump said would open markets for American goods while enabling the US to raise tax rates on imports. The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs. While Trump has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in US growth and greater inflationary pressures as some of the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers. Trump's approach of putting a 15% tariff on America's longstanding allies in the EU is also generating pushback - possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to US leadership on the world stage. Reuters / AP


Sharjah 24
an hour ago
- Sharjah 24
Abdulla Al Hamed engages media and tech leaders in Shanghai
The discussions explored strategic opportunities to co-develop digital content for Middle Eastern markets, drive investment in creative media, integrate artificial intelligence into education, and develop intelligent infrastructure for next-generation media cities. Preparations for BRIDGE Summit 2025 Held as part of the preparations for BRIDGE Summit 2025, set to take place in Abu Dhabi this December, the meetings aim to deepen strategic partnerships with international organisations and unlock new pathways for collaboration across the global media and technology landscape. Engagements with key innovation leaders Abdulla Al Hamed met with Jinjian Zhang, Founding Partner of VitalBridge, a Shanghai-based venture capital firm investing in cutting-edge AI and robotics ventures. The Chairman also held talks with Bonnie Zhang, Founder of Cartea, a fast-growing automotive lifestyle platform bridging Chinese brands and Gulf markets, and Vivi He, Founder of Xiaguangshe (ShineGlobal), a think tank providing global market strategies for Chinese firms expanding overseas. Strategic dialogue with Huawei The Chairman also held a high-level meeting with Lv Yang Ming, President of Huawei Cloud Media Services Product Department, where discussions centred on advanced AI-powered content production, live-streaming solutions, and next-generation media infrastructure. UAE's strategic media vision Commenting on the meetings, His Excellency Abdulla bin Mohammed bin Butti Al Hamed underscored the importance of deepening collaboration with leading global technology and media firms as a strategic priority for the UAE. He said: 'Forging strong international partnerships is essential to building an agile and integrated media ecosystem that can thrive amid the rapid shifts of the digital age. We are committed to positioning the UAE as a global media hub, driving the creation of impactful, responsible, and forward-looking content. Through this, we aim to raise public awareness, encourage open dialogue, and reinforce our country's role as a vibrant platform for intellectual and cultural exchange on the world stage.'


Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
France, 14 other countries urge recognition of Palestinian state
France and 14 other Western nations called on countries worldwide to move to recognise a Palestinian state, France's top diplomat said on Wednesday. The foreign ministers of 15 countries late on Tuesday issued a joint statement following a conference in New York, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, aimed at reviving a two-state solution between Israelis and the Palestinians. 'In New York, together with 14 other countries, France is issuing a collective appeal: we express our desire to recognise the State of Palestine and invite those who have not yet done so to join us,' French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot wrote on X. President Emmanuel Macron announced last week he would formally recognise Palestinian statehood in September, provoking strong opposition from Israel and the United States. France is hoping to build a momentum around the formal recognition of a Palestinian state. Also on Wednesday, Jordan's King Abdullah II said that the 'humanitarian catastrophe' unfolding in the Gaza Strip was the worst in modern history. 'Gaza is witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe that exceeds anything we have witnessed in modern history,' the longtime Western ally said, adding that Jordan was in contact with international partners 'to pressure for an end to the war,' now in its 22nd month. On Tuesday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK will formally recognise the State of Palestine in September unless Israel takes various 'substantive steps', including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. Starmer's move, paired with Paris, would make the two European allies the first G7 nations to do so. In the statement, 15 nations including Spain, Norway, and Finland affirmed their 'unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution.' Nine of the signatories which have not yet recognised the Palestinian state expressed 'the willingness or the positive consideration of their countries' to do so, including Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Seventeen countries plus the European Union and Arab League during the conference joined calls for Hamas to disarm and end its rule of Gaza, in a bid to end the devastating war in the Palestinian territory. Meanwhile, Britain on Wednesday rejected criticism that it was rewarding Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days and on Tuesday, a hunger monitor warned that a worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding there and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death. Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline for Israel, prompted an immediate rebuke from his counterpart in Jerusalem, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of their 2023 cross-border attack. US President Donald Trump said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. Asked about that criticism, British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to questions in a series of media interviews on Wednesday — said it was not the right way to characterise Britain's plan. 'This is not a reward for Hamas. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death,' she told LBC radio. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' The co-founder of pro-Palestinian activist group Palestine Action can launch a court bid to overturn the UK government's decision to ban the group under anti-terrorism laws, a judge ruled on Wednesday. The government earlier this month banned the group days after activists broke into an air force base in southern England. Prosecutors have said they caused an estimated £7 million ($9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft at the base. Being a member or supporting the group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Agence France-Presse