Entain cashes in as BetMGM partnership pays off
The FTSE 100 operator behind brands like Ladbrokes and Coral reported its total Group Net Gaming Revenue (NGR), including its 50 per cent share of BetMGM, jumped 10 per cent on a constant currency basis.
This performance came despite facing a tough comparison to the same period last year, which included the Euros football tournament .
Entain's online NGR, excluding the US, was up eight per cent, with the firm attributing the growth to 'strong volumes in sports and gaming'.
Trading NGR in the UK and Ireland surged by 21 per cent as the company regained market share.
BetMGM: a major growth engine
The jewel in Entain's crown, its joint venture BetMGM, continued to be a major growth engine.
The venture's net revenue soared 35 per cent year on year to $1.4bn, a performance described as ahead of expectations.
BetMGM also reported strong half year results for the first half of 2025, with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of $109m, marking a significant turnaround from a loss in the previous year.
Entain to upgraded its full year outlook off the back of the figures. It now expects to deliver revenue of at least $2.7bn.
Chief executive Stella David, who was permanently appointed in April, said: 'I am delighted by the ongoing momentum and strong performance that both Entain and BetMGM have delivered in H1 2025'.
David added that the business is 'getting stronger, fitter and faster,' with the results reinforcing the company's confidence in its ability to drive 'sustainable underlying growth' and generate more than £0.5bn of cash annually in the medium term.
Overall group EBITDA for the first half was £583m, up 11 per cent year-on-year. Including BetMGM's contribution, total group EBITDA rose by 32 per cent to £625m.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homes on 'noisy road' must be sound proofed before first residents can move in
A DEVELOPER will have to show five new homes to be built beside a 'noisy' road have been sound proofed before anyone can move in. Wayne Gregory has been granted planning permission for the five homes on the site of a derelict former workshop which as well as being on what has been officially designated as a 'noisy road' is next door to a tyre fitters. As a result council planners have made it a condition of the permission that none of the homes can be occupied until post construction noise readings have been submitted to and approved in writing by the council. The readings will have to meet the recommendations of a noise impact report that was submitted as part of the application and demonstrated how 'desirable' noise levels could be achieved including a requirement for the building fabric to be upgraded. The report was required by the council as Snatchwood Road in Abersychan, Pontypool is defined as a 'noisy' road within a Welsh Government Noise Action Plan Priority Area and the former Artisan Precision Engineering site is next door to the Sam's Tyres fitting garage. Planning officer Justin Jones said residential homes shouldn't be approved if they are likely to lead to complaints, such as noise nuisance, that would force an existing commercial use to stop. However the planned homes will be oriented away from the garage. He said the assessment had shown road noise from the properties would be 'high' which has required action to achieve 'acceptable internal noise levels' including a mechanical ventilation system as upper floor windows will have to be shut. Read more: Plea to allow giant shed to be used for holiday lets rejected on appeal New flats development can support town centre, say planners It was also found there wouldn't be an unacceptable level of noise from the tyre fitters impacting the back gardens. There would be two parking spaces, as well as two garages provided for plots one and five, for each home which is below the council's guidelines but Mr Jones said as the site is in a sustainable location close to shops and with bus links the parking is considered acceptable. Other conditions relate to potential land contamination and details related to access and road markings.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Angela Rayner warned thousands of new homes at risk of dangerous lead pollution
A housing project in Kent that could provide 3,500 homes to support Angela Rayner's housebuilding drive has been paused amid claims that dangerous lead pollution from a neighbouring refinery could put future residents at risk. The project, which comes amid government plans to fast-track new developments and build 1.5m homes, would see thousands of homes built next to one of Europe's leading lead refineries on brownfield land in Gravesham, Kent. Planning permission was initially granted by Gravesham Borough Council following a planning application in October 2022, but the project is now under review amid fears its location would make it dangerous for residents, with Britannia Refined Metals (BRM), the owner of the refinery, itself saying the area is 'a lead pollution hotspot'. The developers have pointed to the government's drive for new housing, saying that a 'radical response is required, including by approving development that may be controversial'. The scheme includes up to 3,500 homes, commercial space, a new hotel and a new stadium for Ebbsfleet United Football Club. A planning inquiry opened in May and ran for four weeks before being adjourned. It is expected to resume next month. Once it delivers its findings, the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government will take a decision on whether the project can proceed. While the refinery has operated safely for decades under strict controls, BRM has warned that anyone living on the proposed residential site would have a high exposure to lead. 'It is a lead pollution hotspot - you could put residential development anywhere else in the South East of England and the concentration of lead would be lower than on the application site,' BRM said in its opening submissions to the inquiry. 'And people coming to live on the site would have a far higher exposure to lead here than where they have come from.' They warned that there is 'no safe level for exposure to lead', adding: 'The health and neurotoxic effects of lead have no identified threshold, and children are among the most vulnerable to its effects even at low levels. 'Exposure to lead is harmful and preventable by not bringing residents close to a lead pollution hotspot.' The World Health Organisation says exposure to lead, which was attributed to more than 1.5 million deaths globally in 2021, can affect the development of the central nervous system in children, while in adults it can cause 'increased risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular problems and kidney damage'. The development plan includes community orchards and allotments near the refinery, an idea BRM brands as irresponsible. 'Imagine the scene, kids foraging fruit within a few metres of people working on the BRM premises wearing full protective clothing including helmets with filtered air units. It's hard to think of a more irresponsible idea', the refinery said. But the developers, Northfleet Harbourside, have dismissed BRM's warnings as merely 'a cluster of technical and operational points'. 'The BRM operation and the scheme would be able to co-exist without the latter imposing unreasonable requirements on the former', they said in their submission to the inquiry. The submission continues: 'The secretary of state has made it as clear as anything in the world of planning the scale of the national housing crisis, of which this Gravesham situation forms a part, is so great that a radical response is required, including by approving development that may be controversial. 'Trying to deliver many more homes is the fundamental aim of the government's national planning reforms but its application has to be local and involves keeping a beady eye on what matters most. 'Against that background, it is clear that 3,500 homes would be a tremendous stride forward in housing delivery for the borough, delivered on sustainably located, previously-developed land. The scheme would make an important contribution to pressing local and national needs.' The government's updated national planning policy framework (NPPF) commits to a 'brownfield first' strategy, with disused sites that have already been developed in the past prioritised for new buildings. The default answer when a developer seeks to build on brownfield sites will be 'yes', but the government says these sites will not be enough for the number of homes needed. Meanwhile, the forthcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill is intended to rip up red tape and make it faster for projects to be approved. But there are concerns a drive to hit housing targets could force social housing onto unsuitable sites, without proper safeguards. The Northfleet Harbourside project would include 350 affordable housing units, 10 per cent of the overall residential space. Once the inquiry has closed the inspector will prepare a report and recommendation for Ministers in MHCLG to consider. Upon receipt of the report, it is understood ministers will then have 13 weeks to issue a decision. Speaking in December, Sir Keir Starmer said the government is 'determined to do what's necessary' to build enough homes. 'For years, we have had not enough houses being built. That means that individuals and families don't have the security that they want', he said. 'Of course we want to get the balance right with nature and the environment, but if it comes to a human being wanting to have a house for them and their family, that has to be the top priority'. MHCLG, BRM and Northfleet Harbourside have been contacted for comment.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should I sell my vacation home that I dream of living in when I retire to pay off $50K in credit card debt?
Total credit card debt in the US stands at $1.18 trillion this year, with 4.3% of debt in delinquency, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With these near record-high numbers, many Americans are feeling the pinch and want to find ways to dig themselves out. But should you allow your debt to disrupt your retirement plans? Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Let's look at the example of Gavin, a 40-year-old married man with two children. He bought a home in the Caribbean in 2019 with the goal of eventually making the house his retirement home. The house is worth $400,000 now, with a $120,000 mortgage balance. Unfortunately, the mortgage loan has a variable interest rate, which is currently at 10.5% with no possible options for refinancing. The home currently generates $700 per month in profit as a short-term rental, but makes less during off off-season and managing it is stressful. Worse, the neighborhood may soon prohibit short-term rentals in the area, so that would be the end of this revenue stream. Additionally, Gavin might also be on the hook for local property taxes and, as a foreign investor, other possible fees and taxes too. On top of this, the buyer is a renter in the US where he currently lives and he has $50,000 in credit card debt. Does it make sense for him to sell the vacation property to pay off what he owes? He's considering buying a home locally and using the rest of the money to invest, build up an emergency fund, or start a college fund for his kids. Selling the vacation home could be a great solution Selling the vacation home in this particular case seems like an easy answer. While it is currently generating a small profit, earning $8,400 per year on a $400,000 asset isn't a great return, especially given the hassle of being the host and the substantial interest he is paying on his mortgage. But losing the short-term rental income would be a major downside. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Aside from the poor ROI of the home, the interest on $50,000 in credit card debt that he currently has is an absolute financial killer, given that the average credit card interest rate is 21.16% as of May 2025. The $700 per month he is earning from his rental most likely is not even enough to cover the interest that his credit card debt accrues each month. With a home worth $400,000, and assuming closing costs are around 4% (the average is 2% to 5%), this homeowner would still end up with about $384,000 after paying for the transaction fees from the sale of the home. Now, since the home isn't his primary home, it's possible he could owe capital gains taxes if his profits exceeded $250,000 as a single person or $500,000 as a married joint filer. However, since Gavin is married and the home isn't netting in excess of $500,000, he'd likely be spared this tax. He may also need to pay additional sales taxes to the government of his host country. If he doesn't, he could pay off the $120,000 still remaining on the mortgage he owes, as well as his $50,000 in credit card debt and still walk away with around $214,000. That would be a good start to make a down payment on a home in the US for his family (in which he can retire), or to start investing for his future. He could save for his two kids to go to college, start an emergency fund and best of all, free up a lot of income by eliminating his credit card debt and the interest he would be paying on that into the future. In fact, if he uses the money wisely, he could not only set himself up for financial stability, but he could also choose to save to buy another retirement home down the road, when it makes more financial sense. Are there downsides to selling? While Gavin's circumstances make a strong case for selling the home, it's worth looking at whether there are any downsides to doing so, beyond losing the $700 in rental income. Since the home he owns doesn't have a great mortgage, isn't generating a big profit and there's no reason to believe it is a one-of-a-kind home, there's very little downside in cashing out now and using the proceeds to create some more financial stability. The only real risk would be that real estate values skyrocket in his chosen Caribbean retirement destination. This would either price him out of buying his dream retirement home later on or prevent him from earning more on the possible future sale of his vacation home. However, it's unlikely the ROI on Caribbean real estate would exceed the returns he'd get by investing in the stock market in the states or that the increase in the value would be worth paying the interest on the credit card debt and the mortgage combined. There are likely wiser ways to make that money work. So, if he's investing wisely over time, he should likely be able to buy a comparable home as a retiree if he wants to. He could also end up changing his retirement plans if he decides he'd rather stay in the US and be close to his potential grandchildren — and if that happens, it would have been a poor investment to pay for a house that's costly to keep only to end up not retiring there anyway. Selling now with the chance to rebuy later seems like a much better bet. In fact, all signs point to the fact that selling the home seems like the best move in this situation and it could be the start of a much more financially secure — and less stressful — future. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
