Wiltshire: Decision to be made on deadly pathogen research facility
There are calls for a serious review into plans to spend £3bn moving a research centre almost 90 miles (144 km) across England.John Glen, Conservative MP for Salisbury, said plans to move the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) campus to Harlow, in Essex, rather than using its existing Porton Down site in Wiltshire was a "redundant" plan.More than £39m has already been spent on proposals for Public Health England's new site, where scientists would study deadly pathogens, which are disease-causing microorganisms.Health minister Ashley Dalton said the government would announce its decision "in a matter of weeks", with a commitment "to sorting this issue out once and for all".
Mr Glen, whose Salisbury constituency is home to Porton Down, told the Commons that "Porton has remained instrumental in delivering translational health research for our nation".The UKHSA's £27m Robinson Building opened in Wiltshire in 2022, one of two facilities that made up a new £65m vaccine evaluation centre during the Covid-19 pandemic. Mr Glen said this decision "reinforced" his point and asked why such a "significant" capital investment was made if the centre was to be moved to Harlow. He called for a "serious review of what is going on here" and continued: "Effectively what we're doing is clinging, I think, to a redundant plan."
In 2015, HM Treasury approved Public Health England's outline business case for a new £530m national integrated hub for public health science.Funding for the programme was used to purchase the Harlow site in 2017 and it was planned that both the laboratories and workforce from Porton Down and Colindale in London would be relocated there.
But the Commons Public Accounts Committee, which looks at whether Government schemes provide value for money, warned of "spiralling" costs, which had risen by more than 500% since 2015 - putting the price tag at more than £3bn.Dame Meg Hillier, the committee chairwoman, said as time passes with no decision made, a "risk" of a gap in service for the UK's high containment public health laboratories service grows.A report by the National Audit Office, in February, found failings to establish the new site had "undermined" the UK's future resilience to dangerous diseases.
'Over a decade'
Intervening in Mr Glen's speech, Chris Vince, Labour MP for Harlow, said: "We really want a decision on this particular, whether it's a move or not, because actually both our constituents are currently in limbo."Responding, Ms Dalton told MPs that if the Harlow project continues "things will not happen overnight" due to rigorous scientific requirements.She said: "[This] means that completion will take over a decade, and that's why we continue to invest in maintaining our current site and facilities at Porton Down."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bad news for hairy hipsters as scientists warn men with beards carry more germs than dogs
Hairy hipsters have received some shocking news as scientists have revealed men with beards carry more germs than dogs. Hollywood heartthrobs including Jason Momoa and Zayn Malik are known for their luxuriant facial hair, but a new report may make clean-shaven men more attractive. An expert revealed beards provide a unique environment for bacteria to thrive, and in extreme cases hirsute guys carry more germs than the average toilet. SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO Dr Primrose Freestone, an expert in clinical microbiology at the University of Leicester, in England, explained the findings in an article for The Conversation. She said: 'Beards create a warm, often moist environment where food debris and oils can accumulate – ideal conditions for microbial growth. 'These microbes thrive not just because of the warm, moist conditions beards provide, but also because of constant exposure to new contaminants and microbes, especially from hands that frequently touch surfaces and the face.' Studies dating back 50 years show that facial hair can retain bacteria and bacterial toxins even after it has been washed. This led to the longstanding idea that beards harbor bacteria and could pose an infection risk to others. One study, published in 2018, looked at whether it would be hygienic to evaluate dogs and humans in the same MRI scanner. Analysis revealed most beards contained significantly more microbes than dog fur – including a greater number of harmful bacteria. The study, published in the Nature journal European Radiology, said: 'Our study shows a significantly higher bacterial load in specimens taken from men's beards compared with dogs' fur. 'All 18 men showed high microbial counts, whereas only 23 out of 30 dogs had high microbial counts and seven dogs moderate microbial counts.' Beards can also sometimes spread skin infections such as impetigo – a contagious rash often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which is commonly found in facial hair. Sometimes, in rare cases, parasites like pubic lice, which usually live in the groin area, can also show up in beards. However, other studies have challenged the idea that beards increase infection risk. One investigation concluded there was no significant difference in bacteria colonization between bearded and clean-shaven healthcare workers. But Dr Freestone said: 'Neglected beards can foster irritation, inflammation and infection. 'The skin beneath a beard – rich in blood vessels, nerve endings and immune cells – is highly sensitive to microbial and environmental stressors. 'When sebum, dead skin, food debris and pollutants accumulate, they can irritate the skin and provide fuel for fungal and bacterial growth.' Bearded men should wash their beard and face every day, experts say, to help remove dirt, oils, allergens and dead skin. Other tips include moisturizing to prevent dryness, using a beard comb to remove debris, and trimming to control loose hairs. 'With daily hygiene and proper grooming, beards pose little risk and may even be healthier than we once thought,' Dr Freestone concluded.
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer accused of using private school VAT raid to ‘house illegal migrants'
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of using private school VAT cash to 'house illegal migrants' after he suggested the policy would fund Labour's house-building targets. The Prime Minister wrote on X, formerly Twitter, yesterday that the decision to levy 20pc VAT on private school fees had allowed the Government to make the 'largest investment in a generation' to affordable housing. Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, accused Sir Keir of taxing children's education to build homes which would be 'given away' to migrants. Labour has long-maintained that its controversial VAT raid, which has already seen dozens of schools close as a result, would be used to improve state schools. But this week it was forced to abandon its manifesto promise to hire 6,500 new state school teachers. Yesterday, the Prime Minister tweeted how the 'tough choice' on VAT had paid off. In the budget last year, my government made the tough but fair decision to apply VAT to private schools. The Tories opposed it. Reform opposed it. Today, because of that choice, we have announced the largest investment in affordable housing in a generation. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 11, 2025 Ms Trott described the post as 'madness.' She told The Telegraph: 'Labour needs to come clean with the public. Not only have they broken their promise to hire 6,500 more teachers but now they are taxing British children's education to build homes that will be given away to illegal migrants. 'The sums don't add up. It's children, parents and teachers in the state sector who'll pay the price for Labour's ideological agenda.' The Treasury hopes to raise £1.5bn from its VAT raid this year, rising to £1.7bn by 2029-30. In December, Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters 'every single penny' of the £1.5bn it hoped to raise from the private school VAT raid would be ring-fenced for state education. In an interview with ITV, Ms Reeves was asked: 'Will all of that money be ring-fenced for state schools?' She replied: 'Yes, every single penny of that money will go into our state schools to ensure that every child gets the best start in life.' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said her party had opposed the VAT raid because it was 'terrible policy'. She said: 'It has forced schools to shut, sending thousands of pupils into state schools that are now struggling for space, teachers and money you didn't account for. 'You said every single penny would go into state schools, but now it's housing?' Questions have also been raised over whether the Government's forecasts are accurate. It was revealed last week that four times as many pupils left private schools last year than was predicted. In the spending review, Labour said it would spend £4bn by 2029-30 on its Affordable Homes Programme. It also vowed to stop housing asylum seekers in hotels by 2029, raising suggestions these people would instead be moved into social housing. Rachel Reeves said she was providing a 'cash uplift' of more than £4.5bn for schools between now and 2029. However a large proportion of this is as a result of the decision to extend free school meals to 500,000 more children. When this figure is removed, the core budget for schools will rise by 0.4pc over the next three years. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, said: 'Throughout the debate on VAT, schools were promised that the money raised – if any – would go to state education. We have seen the rhetoric on this watered down to 'public services' and now the revelation that it will now pay for housing. 'We are in the worst-case scenario, one that we have warned about since the introduction of this policy: real damage has been done to independent education without any benefit to state schools, who are also facing further cuts. It is children who will lose out as a result.' The Treasury was approached for comment.
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Assisted dying adverts to be banned if service legalised, Kim Leadbeater says
Adverts promoting assisted dying services will be banned if the procedure is made law under a new amendment, the MP sponsoring the bill has said. Labour's Kim Leadbeater said adverts promoting an assisted death as an option for terminally ill people would not be allowed. She will table an amendment prohibiting such advertising when the bill returns to the Commons on Friday, as well as an amendment that would require the Department of Health and Social Care to undertake an assessment of the state of palliative care. In a letter to MPs, Leadbeater said there was a 'wide consensus' that advertising the procedure should not be permitted. Adverts in other countries including Belgium and the Netherlands have received widespread backlashes for appearing to promote assisted dying as a preferable option. 'I have worked with colleagues on both sides of the debate and I believe there is wide consensus that if assisted dying does become legal, we wouldn't want to see it promoted through advertising,' Leadbeater said in her letter. 'There is also widespread consensus and support for improvements in palliative care. It is not a choice between assisted dying or palliative care – I firmly believe we should take a holistic approach to choice and care for terminally ill people.' Leadbeater said she was still meeting and hearing from MPs about ways the bill could be improved. 'One area where supporters and opponents, both in parliament and in the country, agree is that if we are to pass this legislation it should be the best and safest bill possible. I'm confident it can and will be,' she wrote. She said the bill would have received up to 200 hours of consideration if it passes the House of Lords, 'placing it among the most heavily scrutinised bills in recent times'. Other amendments tabled by Leadbeater include a clause on the regulation of substances used to hasten the death of patients who choose an assisted death. The bill would allow those with less than six months to live, who are terminally ill and of sound mind, to have an assisted death. There is relatively little detail on what that would mean in terms of the procedure contained in the bill. There would also be extra duties on the health secretary to consult people with learning disabilities, providers of health and care services including palliative and end of life care, and people with protected characteristics – such as race, religion and belief. Leadbeater said she would back an amendment from the Liberal Democrat MP Munira Wilson – an opponent of the bill – for the government to undertake a detailed assessment of the state of palliative and end of life care. 'I fully support it. It is not a choice between assisted dying or palliative care – I firmly believe we should take a holistic approach to choice and care for terminally ill people,' Leadbeater said. 'This amendment also has the backing of Marie Curie and others in the charitable and end of life sector.' MPs will have their final vote on the bill next Friday with more than a dozen believed to have switched sides to oppose the bill, though at least three have moved to support it. On Wednesday the Labour party chair, Ellie Reeves, who abstained at the last vote, confirmed she would vote for the bill. But two others, including the former health minister Andrew Gwynne and the Labour MP Paul Foster, suggested they would now oppose the legislation.
