Detroit community organizations launching new initiative after recent shootings
"You would have definitely, never, ever, forgotten about Samir and you will not forget him, as long as I have breath in my body," said his mother, Jasmine Grubbs.
In response, leaders of all the city's Community Violence Intervention organizations gathered to announce their newest initiative, "Protect the Zone," steps from where those lives were lost.
"We are tired, and we are sick of this deadly disease. This should not have happened. This should not have happened," said Quincy Smith, executive director of Team Pursuit.
"We're going to show up and support. This is not our zone. This is not our community, but the leaders in this community have the full support of every organization inside of Detroit. That's how Detroit is moving from now on," said DuJuan "Zoe" Kennedy, executive director of Force Detroit.
Teams of all ages took off immediately, putting boots on the ground to knock on every door in the neighborhood.
"We're also speaking to legislators, decision makers, people who have the power to fund public safety and put us in a position, so this doesn't happen again," said Smith.
Their goal is to encourage parents to engage with their children, connecting them with resources to help prevent senseless acts of violence in the future.
"This isn't a partisan issue! This is the most nonpartisan issue on the face of the planet!" said community activist Teferi Brent.
Organizers say they plan to visit every neighborhood in Detroit with their message to offer direct support, with what they call for zone and community-by-community approach.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
Reno, Nevada casino shooting remains a mystery as police reveal suspect fired 80 shots
The gunman who opened fire at a Reno casino on Monday fired 80 shots during a deadly rampage that left three people dead and several others injured, authorities said Tuesday, though the shooter's motive remains unclear. The suspect, identified as Dakota Hawver, 26, of Reno, is in critical condition after being shot by police during a gunfight outside the Grand Sierra Resort and Casino, according to the Sparks Police Department, which is leading the investigation. Investigators have found no connection between Hawver and the Grand Sierra Resort or any of the victims, and his motive remains unknown, according to the department. Hawver walked on foot to the valet area of the casino just before 7:30 a.m. and opened fire on a group of victims using a 9mm handgun and multiple magazines, officials said. Investigators determined Hawver legally purchased the gun about two years ago and purchased the ammunition recently. He has no criminal history and no history of mental health problems, officials said. Two of the victims – Justin Aguila, 23, and Andrew Canepa, 33 – were fatally shot from behind while waiting in the valet area for a ride to the airport, police said. Both men were in town from Southern California for a bachelor party with friends. A third victim, 66-year-old Reno resident Angel Martinez, was driving his car through the parking lot away from the casino when the suspect jumped out from behind another vehicle and shot Martinez several times, killing him, police said. Two other victims wounded in the shooting remained hospitalized but were expected to make a full recovery, police said. When the shooting began, the suspect's gun initially malfunctioned before he was able to get it to shoot multiple times on the group outside the casino, police said Monday. He then ran through the parking lot, where he encountered an armed security guard. The gunman shot at the guard, who returned fire, before continuing to run, police said. The suspect eventually encountered responding police officers and was shot in an exchange of gunfire. Authorities said the investigation is ongoing.
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Sex Offenders With Autism Face Obstacles In Federal Prison
Autism and Prison Incarceration is challenging for most individuals, but it poses unique and often severe hardships for those with mental health conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). For inmates with sex offense convictions, the prison environment is particularly hostile, marked by frequent bullying, social isolation, and even physical violence. When an individual has both ASD and a sex offense conviction, the combination can be profoundly damaging—amounting to a near-constant psychological assault on someone who may struggle to fully comprehend their offense or the intense hostility they face behind bars. Although the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) formally recognizes ASD as a condition, it lacks specialized programs or staff training tailored to the needs of this population. Inmates with ASD are subject to the same disciplinary rules and expected to conform to the same social dynamics as neurotypical individuals. Many with ASD have spent their lives struggling to fit in, and within the rigid, unforgiving structure of prison, that struggle becomes even more isolating and painful. Prison Culture Prisons in the United States are often informally segregated along lines of race, geographic background, religion, criminal history, and whether an inmate cooperated with authorities. While this division can partly be attributed to people gravitating toward those with similar backgrounds, inmates convicted of sex offenses face a deeper, more severe form of exclusion. They are systematically barred from participating in many aspects of prison life and are often subjected to open hostility and contempt. This widespread animosity presents ongoing challenges for prison management and raises serious concerns about the safety and well-being of those in BOP's custody. Sex offenders make up a substantial portion of the federal prison population—approximately 13.6%, or over 19,000 individuals—ranking just behind those convicted of drug and weapons offenses. Despite their numbers, the BOP does not house them separately from the general population, making peaceful coexistence critical. Many legal professionals recommend that such individuals request placement at facilities offering Sex Offender Management Programs (SOMPs), even if they don't intend to participate, simply for the relative safety provided by 'strength in numbers.' Still, this strategy offers no guarantee against harassment, extortion, or abuse. I spoke to attorney Elizabeth Kelley who specializes in defending those with mental disabilities. She told me that BOP is confronted by major issues when dealing with inmates on the spectrum. First, many inmates on the spectrum may be undiagnosed so their behavior and vulnerabilities are inexplicable even to themselves. This is particularly true of inmates who are middle age and older because the diagnostic tools were not as sophisticated during their childhoods. Kelley pointed out that some of these defendants may not even know their diagnosis with no mention of it in their Presentence Report relied upon by judges to formulate a sentence. Kelley said, 'Because they are undiagnosed, there is likely no mention of their ASD at sentencing and their lawyer could not argue for appropriate placement and accommodations at sentencing. A correction officer may sense that an inmate is different but the reason is not apparent. Hence, ASD is often called an 'invisible disability.'' Show Me Your Papers In federal prison, there is no official system for identifying inmates by the nature of their crimes. In fact, inmates are prohibited from possessing their Presentence Report—the document prepared by U.S. Probation that outlines the details of their offense. There is also no obligation for inmates to disclose their convictions. Nevertheless, upon arrival at a facility, new inmates are often pressured by others to 'show their papers,' a practice used to determine where they fall within the informal social hierarchy of the prison. Two groups are consistently placed at the bottom: individuals who have cooperated with authorities (so-called 'snitches') and those convicted of sex offenses. Sex offenders face immediate social exclusion. They are barred from communal activities such as watching television, one of the few available recreational outlets. They are often required to sit at designated tables in the dining hall and may only interact with other inmates within their group, or only when spoken to by someone outside of the group. Though these rules are not written or official, they are strictly enforced by fellow inmates. Additional restrictions may include limited access to showers or restrooms and being forced to eat or recreate at specific times. Many are subjected to extortion, coerced into depositing funds into others' commissary accounts under threat of violence and assault. In Prison With ASD It is not fair to assume that those with ASD are more prone to being convicted of sex offenses or any other crime. That is simply not true nor founded by any scientific study. However, those with ASD who do commit these crimes have a more difficult time adapting to prison than those who do not. People with ASD may struggle with understanding social cues, interpreting tone or intent, and adapting to unspoken rules—all of which are critical for navigating inmate hierarchies and avoiding conflict. Their behaviors, such as limited eye contact, repetitive motions, or rigid routines, may be misinterpreted by others as defiance, disrespect, or oddity, potentially leading to bullying or violence. Communication difficulties can hinder their ability to advocate for themselves or respond appropriately to orders from staff, increasing the risk of disciplinary action. Additionally, the sensory overload of prison—loud noises, lack of privacy, harsh lighting—can be overwhelming and contribute to heightened anxiety or meltdowns. The lack of specialized mental health support or ASD-specific accommodations within most prison systems further isolates these individuals, making incarceration especially traumatic and destabilizing for them. Inmates who feel threatened in the general population may request placement in Protective Custody (PC) to safeguard themselves. This typically involves being moved to the Special Housing Unit (SHU)—a section of the prison designed primarily for those facing disciplinary action or pending investigations. Unfortunately, inmates in protective custody are subjected to the same restrictive conditions as those being punished: they are confined to their cells nearly 24 hours a day, allowed only one 15-minute phone call per month, permitted to shower only a few times per week, and given minimal access to recreation. Despite being a protective measure, the experience is often indistinguishable from punitive isolation. If returning to the general population proves unsafe, the inmate may be transferred to another facility. This cycle frequently repeats itself, leaving the inmate vulnerable in each new environment. Over time, they may end up incarcerated far from family and support systems as options for safer placements close to home diminish. Families Suffer I spoke with Shawn Barrera-Leaf who is the Executive Director for United Voices for Sex Offense Reform, a group who advocates for fair sentencing and protection of sex offenders in custody. Barrera-Leaf told me, 'Parents, who have helped their child overcome the bullying and isolation of childhood, often feel helpless when they go to bed each night knowing that their son is living in fear and could be on the receiving end of abuses in prison.' There are stories of new inmates who report to prison and are told by BOP staff that it is not safe to go on the yard if they know the general population is not friendly to sex offenders. The inmate is placed in protective custody, SHU, and will sit until they can be sent to another institution, a process that can take months to complete. While movement brings the hope of safety, it also takes a toll on families who wait for word on the conditions of the next prison. Attorney Kelley has worked with many of these families and told me, 'Families of convicted sex offenders are often terrified for their loved ones' safety. Sex offenders are at the bottom of the food chain in prison and a constant target.' The BOP's Position The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) classifies individuals with sex offense convictions using a Public Safety Factor (PSF) designation, which automatically excludes them from placement in minimum-security camps—the lowest custody level. While the BOP employs a point-based system to determine appropriate placement, sex offenders are assigned a PSF regardless of their score. As a result, even those who would otherwise qualify for a camp based on low security points are placed in Low security institutions, representing a significant increase in custody level and restrictions. In addition to finding safe housing limitations, the BOP imposes communication restrictions on many sex offenders. One such restriction is limited or denied access to CorrLinks, the BOP's monitored email system. Advocates like Barrera-Leaf have pushed for change, emphasizing that family contact is vital for inmate well-being and reentry. In correspondence with the BOP, Barrera-Leaf noted that restricting email access "… severely hampers communication for Adults in Custody already struggling with the challenges of incarceration." CorrLinks offers a basic messaging platform that does not support hyperlinks or attachments but is still a crucial tool for staying connected. With phone calls capped at 300 minutes per month and limited to 15 minutes per session, sex offenders who lack email access are left with few options to maintain ties with their families and communities—relationships proven to be essential for rehabilitation and reducing recidivism. As to the unequal treatment of sex offenders in its prisons, Donald Murphy with the BOP's Office of Public Affairs provided a statement, 'As a general matter, the BOP takes seriously our duty to protect all individuals entrusted to our custody, as well as maintain the safety of correctional employees and the community. As part of that obligation, we review safety protocols and implement corrective actions when identified as necessary in those reviews to ensure that our mission of operating safe, secure, and humane facilities is fulfilled.' Judges Recognize the Problem Joshua Fields was an inmate in federal prison who believed he had been incorrectly classified as a sex offender. Life behind bars was pure hell for Mr. Fields who also suffered from mental illness. Judge U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty held a hearing and asked the BOP to consider removing the public safety factor for sex offender. Neither was done. In his next video hearing, McCafferty appeared on screen beaten and bruised. Upon seeing him, Judge McCafferty made the following statement, 'Mr. Fields made an oral request for the court to transfer him to the Strafford County House of Corrections or alternatively to order his immediate release on home confinement. The court construes his request as a motion for compassionate release.' The court ordered legal counsel be appointed for Fields on an expedited basis for a compassionate release hearing. During the next hearing, Fields was being held at the Strafford County House of Corrections, a place he and the judge believed would be safer. Fields appeared on the video screen with a red face and blackeye, explained that his orbital bone had been fractured by a prisoner at the jail who had discovered through an internet search that Fields was classified by BOP as a sex offender. Judge McCafferty ordered that Fields be released, writing in her Order, 'In this case, the error in Fields's original PSR [Presentence Report] that caused BOP to misclassify Fields as a sex offender is akin to a sentencing error. BOP's subsequent noncompliance with the court order compounded the error and prevented him from completing rehabilitative programming ... the mistake in Field's PSR and BOP's noncompliance with a court order, have made Fields's sentence disproportionately punitive.' At that hearing, neither government prosecutors nor US Probation objected to Fields' request for immediate release from BOP custody. Attorney Kelley told me that everyone in the criminal justice system could benefit from more understanding of the challenges people on the spectrum face in terms of their deficits in communication, understanding, and socialization. 'These challenges,' she said, "are magnified in the prison environment where people on the spectrum can be oblivious to the unwritten rules and the target of bullying.
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
New youth tech program in Camden County helping drive crime rates lower, officials say
Camden County leaders credit a new technology training program tailored to young people who are considered "at-risk" for helping to drive down crime in Camden to record lows. County leaders partnered with Hopeworks, a local nonprofit, to steer young people away from crime and train them for in-demand, technology-related jobs. James Horn, a program participant, said Hopeworks helped him on the road to stability after he spent time inside Camden County's Juvenile Detention Center. "You see your mom's face light up now, like, you're not getting a phone call, 'Oh yeah, press '9'. I'm not locked up no more,'" Horn said, referring to the automated call family members would receive when a loved one is locked up at the detention center. "You're getting a phone call, 'Oh yeah, your son is doing good!'" Camden County Police Capt. Vivian Coley previously only knew Horn from seeing his name in police reports. She credited programs like the ones offered at Hopeworks for contributing to the steady drop in crime in Camden over the last decade. "It gives us hope that we can turn this city completely around," Capt. Coley said. In the last two years, Horn received his high school diploma, a steady income and his driver's license. "I don't look at Hopeworks as just a job or a career building," Horn said. "I look at them as a family, for real, like they help me with everything in life." For more information on the partnership between Camden County and Hopeworks, visit the county's website.
