Government declines to rule out wealth tax after ex-Labour leader Lord Kinnock calls for one
Lord Kinnock, who was Labour leader from 1983 to 1992, told Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that imposing a 2% tax on assets valued above £10 million would bring in up to £11 billion a year.
On Monday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's spokesperson would not say if the government will or will not bring in a specific tax for the wealthiest.
Asked multiple times if the government will do so, he said: "The government is committed to the wealthiest in society paying their share in tax.
"The prime minister has repeatedly said those with the broadest shoulders should carry the largest burden."
He added the government has closed loopholes for non-doms, placed taxes on private jets and said the 1% wealthiest people in the UK pay one third of taxes.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves earlier this year insisted she would not impose a wealth tax in her autumn budget, something she also said in 2023 ahead of Labour winning the election last year.
Asked if her position has changed, Sir Keir's spokesman referred back to her previous comments and said: "The government position is what I have said it is."
16:02
On Sunday, Lord Kinnock told Sky News: "It's not going to pay the bills, but that kind of levy does two things.
"One is to secure resources, which is very important in revenues.
"But the second thing it does is to say to the country, 'we are the government of equity'.
"This is a country which is very substantially fed up with the fact that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in the UK, the same interests come out on top unscathed all the time while everybody else is paying more for getting services.
"Now, I think that a gesture or a substantial gesture in the direction of equity fairness would make a big difference."
The son of a coal miner, who became a member of the House of Lords in 2005, the Labour peer said asset values have "gone through the roof" in the past 20 years while economies and incomes have stagnated in real terms.
5:31
In reference to the chancellor refusing to change her fiscal rules, he said the government is giving the appearance it is "bogged down by their own imposed limitations", which he said is "not actually the accurate picture".
A wealth tax would help the government get out of that situation and would be backed by the "great majority of the general public", he added.
His comments came after a bruising week for the prime minister, who had to heavily water down a welfare bill meant to save £5.5bn after dozens of Labour MPs threatened to vote against it.
With those savings lost - and a previous U-turn on cutting winter fuel payments also reducing savings - the chancellor's £9.9bn fiscal headroom has quickly dwindled.
In a hint of what could come, government minister Stephen Morgan on Monday told Wilfred Frost on Sky News Breakfast: "I hold dear the Labour values of making sure those that have the broadest shoulders pay, pay more tax.
"I think that's absolutely right."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Angela Rayner has become the most influential figure in Starmer's government
As Keir Starmer gathered his top ministers for a special away day in Chequers for a team-building reset on Friday, one figure arrived in a much more powerful position than she was in just two weeks ago. It is now widely recognised by Labour MPs, across the different wings of the party, that deputy prime minister Angela Rayner 's influence in this government is greater than almost anybody else. Certainly more than the wounded chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has been beset by economic woes, and even more than health secretary Wes Streeting who, like Rayner, has been tipped as a future contender for the leadership. She was, though, completely unprepared for the shot fired by the Unite union, after its general secretary announced it had suspended her membership for failing to resolve the Birmingham refuse collectors dispute. But while a trade union that looks set to peel off and back Jeremy Corbyn's new party gave her a headache, Ms Rayner nevertheless is enjoying a surge in influence – for now. Welfare rebellion The biggest reason for her rise is the result of the welfare rebellion just over a week ago. As one party whip put it: 'There's nobody more powerful in the government than Angela at the moment. 'She was the one who brokered the deal with Labour rebels, she was the one who talked people off the ledge from voting against the government.' As another ally pointed out that she did not even want the disability cuts and had already sent a leaked memo to Ms Reeves suggesting wealth taxes instead of austerity. Now, after last Wednesday's PMQs, it seems like the government has no option but to raise taxes. But the turnaround for Ms Rayner actually started with her holdout in the spending review, where she got a £39bn for housing and more than expected for local government. A spot of union bother Some may see the recent decision by Unite the union to suspend her membership (even though she left the union in April) as a problem. But behind the scenes it has confused people on the left and other unions, who believe Ms Rayner has turned Starmer's government leftward on disability benefits and steering through the bill on workers' rights. As a TUC source noted: 'The main metric we are judging this government by is the workers' rights legislation and that is on course.' Unite took action because of her position on the Birmingham bins strike. But an ally of Ms Rayner said: 'It's wild! They know full well that Angela cannot directly intervene in the way that they say, and to attack one of the few remaining cabinet members who is standing up for workers rights and real labour values is simply mad.' However, it remains to be seen if the escalating clash with Unite will halt Ms Rayner's rise. A rival court to Downing Street How the tide can turn. Just over a month ago, there was talk about Ms Rayner being demoted and losing the housing part of her portfolio. Now there is speculation in Westminster that the deputy prime minister could soon have her own official office, with its own staff and comms team. There is some scepticism, especially over what it would mean for Sir Keir himself and his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. As one ally of Ms Rayner noted: 'Morgan will hate the idea and do everything he can to stop it. An Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) would create a rival court, an alternative centre of government.' The last person to have an ODPM was John Prescott under Tony Blair, but unlike Ms Rayner, Prescott was never seen as a candidate to replace Sir Tony. All about the leadership There is still a lot of fevered speculation about whether Sir Keir can survive as prime minister. The image of his chancellor in tears while he failed to guarantee her future this month became the image of a government spiralling out of control after just a month. There are many waiting to see the results of the elections in Scotland, Wales and English councils next May to decide whether to launch a putsch. If he is forced out, Ms Rayner is now the clear favourite to take over, despite her protestations that she does not want the job. Beware the 'Rayner's rise' trap While Ms Rayner is on top at the moment, there is some speculation that the spending review with Ms Reeves has laid a trap for her much more problematic than the issues with Unite. In getting her cash for local government and housing it appears that the deputy prime minister has signed up to council tax rises of 5 per cent. At the housing and local government select committee hearing this week in the Commons she denied that the increase was 'baked in', but MPs from her own party and the opposition were not convinced at all. The Independent has been told that already the term 'Rayner's rise' is being used for hefty council tax increases not seen since the Blair era two decades ago. Back in the Blair government it was Prescott and his Office of the Deputy PM which took the brunt of the anger over rising bills - it will be the same for Ms Rayner. Among her allies there is genuine concern that Ms Rayner's opponents inside and outside the party are 'preparing to weaponise' it as an issue when council tax bills land at the end of the year. There are fears that it will not take much to turn the public against her.
Daily Mirror
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Stealth' tax alert for pensioners who face £15k burden by 2030
Brits planning to retire may need additional retirement savings if the personal allowance tax freeze is extended New data suggests that those planning to retire in 2030 and beyond could need to save around £15,000 if the personal allowance tax freeze is extended. This increased cost of maintaining their current lifestyle is attributed to fiscal drag, which is a consequence of rising state pensions, escalating living costs, and frozen personal allowances. Pensions UK's latest Retirement Living Standards report reveals that a single pensioner currently needs an annual income of around £43,900 for a comfortable retirement. However, this figure is predicted to soar to over £58,800 in just five years' time to maintain the same standard of living. It's important to note that this £14,960 increase is projected by 2030 if the freeze on personal allowance and income tax thresholds persists. Right now, the personal allowance allows most people to earn £12,570 each year before they're liable for income tax. However, this has been frozen until 2028, and according to the Telegraph, Sir Keir Starmer hasn't ruled out the possibility of extending this freeze even further. During Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, the PM reassured that he plans to honour Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise taxes for working people. However, he avoided answering questions about whether the halt on income tax thresholds would continue beyond 2028, reports the Express. Experts widely acknowledge this as a 'stealth' tax, which doesn't directly raise taxes but instead quietly pushes people into higher income tax brackets as wages and benefits climb with inflation over time. This process, commonly referred to as fiscal drag, might eventually make the state pension subject to tax in years to come. Although the state pension isn't automatically tax-free, it presently sits below the personal allowance limit, meaning it avoids taxation altogether. Given that the triple lock ensures a minimum yearly rise of 2.5% and the current full new state pension stands at £11,973, pensioners could find themselves paying tax solely on their state pension if the freeze continues over the coming years. Alan Barral, a financial planner at Quilter Cheviot, warned the Telegraph: "Frozen income tax thresholds may feel like a technical detail, but they have real consequences for retirees whose standard of living is being squeezed." He added concerns about the Government's commitment, saying: "With the UK facing significant fiscal challenges, there's a real risk that Rachel Reeves may feel compelled to backtrack on Labour's pledge to unfreeze thresholds." A government spokesman responded to the publication and said: "We are committed to helping our pensioners live their lives with dignity and respect, which is why in April the basic and new state pension increased by 4.1pc. Pensioners will receive a boost of up to £470 to their income in 2025-26. Our commitment to the triple lock means millions will see their pension rise by up to £1,900 this parliament."
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The worklessness crisis ravaging Corbyn's North London enclave
Often lauded as one of London's most middle-class hubs, Islington seems an unlikely place for high unemployment. Yet the numbers don't lie. According to a new report, young people in the borough are more likely to be unemployed or out of education than almost all other parts of the country. In fact, only four other local authorities have a higher likelihood of young people becoming Neet (not in education, employment nor training). That is despite Islington boasting the ninth-highest level of household income in the UK at £38,638, well ahead of the national average of £21,259, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This disparity is encapsulated by Islington having the second-highest number of pupils on school meals in England, demonstrating the stark divide between Islington's rich and poor. This wealth gap has been cited as one of the drivers for soaring worklessness in the borough, which has ballooned post-Covid. 'You have these pockets of extreme wealth next to these pockets of relatively severe deprivation,' says Ben Gadsby, the head of policy and research at the charity Impetus. 'There will definitely be some bits of Islington that will be noticeably more deprived than people are expecting.' Barriers to work Cavan is just one of many young people in the borough struggling to find work. After leaving school, he had hoped to land a job in retail and even applied to the Army – but he remains unemployed. To boost his chances of employment, Cavan recently enrolled in Spear Islington, a six-week scheme for 16 to 24-year-olds aimed at getting them into work, training or education. The Spear programme, led by employment charity Resurgo, was found to have reduced a young person's likelihood of being Neet by 17pc, offering coaching and interview advice. However, initiatives such as Spear are few and far between in Islington, as well as in areas nearby. Ayesha Baloch, a senior policy adviser at Impetus, says there is a wide range of barriers that prevent young people from finding employment. One such obstacle is a lack of awareness of what's out there, she says, particularly for poorer households. 'Part of the reason that work experience, internships and representation is so important is because it gives young people the opportunity to see someone like them working in sectors that they maybe wouldn't have heard of,' says Baloch. 'You have some communities where they're predominantly working in hospitality or they run restaurants so they maybe wouldn't have as much of a concept of working in a bank.' Ironically, Islington's worklessness crisis has emerged despite Jeremy Corbyn, the constituency's MP, previously winning over young workers by championing radical Left-wing policies. During his time as Labour leader, he vowed to abolish university tuition fees and introduce a £10 minimum wage for under-18s. However, since splitting from his former party and serving Islington North as an independent, Corbyn has increasingly focused on more geopolitical issues such as the Israel-Gaza conflict. Meanwhile, thousands of young people in his constituency struggle to find work, like many others elsewhere in the country. There are 923,000 16 to 24-year-olds classed as Neet in the UK, according to the ONS, up from 793,000 in 2020. As well as Islington, other local authorities affected by the crisis include Middlesbrough, Knowsley, Nottingham and Hartlepool. Soaring Neet figures have prompted charities to take action. Gadsby says that reducing the rate of Neets is 'about understanding different people's needs and a programme that works for them'. 'Different young people are going to have different challenges, which I think is part of the reason this has been a perennial problem, because there probably isn't a simple one-size-fits-all scheme that solves everything,' he says. Rise in mental health complaints Another barrier facing young people is a lack of preparation. A recent report from IPPR found that fewer than half of young people (47pc) felt ready for work after education. Mangala Nanda, chief learning officer at Generation, a charity that runs job-specific boot camps to get people into work, says 'the link between education and employment is not strong enough'. 'We see that there are lots of people who go into university, they've taken on all of that debt, and then six months go by, one year goes by, two years go by – and they've not managed to get a job,' she says. Resurgo is one of the charities attempting to help Neets in Islington, working with youngsters who face barriers such as poor qualifications, a family history of unemployment or special educational needs. Pete Bacon, the deputy chief executive of the group, said a sharp rise in mental health complaints post-Covid has also fuelled unemployment. 'The number of young people we enrol who are now reporting mental health issues of some type feels really significant,' he says. 'The amount of young people we now speak to who, day to day, are just not leaving their house, sometimes, no exaggeration, for years they won't have actually left their building'. One of Resurgo's most successful offerings is the Spear programme. At Spear Islington, its six-week programme is in full swing. Young people are hearing from coaches about professionalism in their workplace, phone communication skills and practising interview techniques. 'I've personally learnt to be more confident and to know it's not just me that has a hard time looking for jobs or looking for studies, it's a community of people that struggle,' says Hailey, one of the participants. The programme also works with local companies to create a network between young people and businesses. However, others claim a complete shift in perception is needed to help Islington's unemployed youngsters. Anna, the centre manager of Spear Islington, says: 'We need to myth-bust that Islington is just a wealthy borough because it's got wealth. 'It also has great deprivation, and I think that can often get overlooked depending on where you go and what circles you mix in.'
