New report reveals concerning trend in global technology financing: 'There's really been a big uptick'
Investment in clean tech companies fell 40% in 2024, with total funding reaching $51 billion compared to $84 billion in 2023, according to new research from BloombergNEF.
This marks three years in a row of falling investment in companies working on solutions to cool down our planet.
Would you work for a company that doesn't have a sustainability strategy?
No
Only if the pay is good
Only if I couldn't find another job
Only if the company is working to develop a plan
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Nuclear power companies bucked the trend, bringing in the most money among clean energy startups. Pacific Fusion Corp. led the pack with a $900 million investment round. Companies working on nature-based solutions also had more money flowing in, thanks to growing interest in carbon removal and stronger policies supporting it.
But most other clean tech sectors struggled. Chinese companies making solar panels and energy storage felt the pinch from too much manufacturing capacity and tariffs that lowered product demand.
The shift away from funding planet-cooling solutions comes when we need them most. While AI companies pulled in nearly $100 billion last year, clean tech startup funding dropped by $20 billion to $32 billion.
"There isn't an unlimited pool of capital to be invested in startups, and there's really been a big uptick in AI," said Mark Daly, head of BNEF's technology and innovation team. "It's definitely having some impact."
Some bright spots remain. Overall spending on the switch to clean energy hit $2 trillion for the first time when counting all funding sources. This includes money going toward building clean energy projects and strengthening supply chains.
Plus, established clean tech such as solar power and electric cars stayed strong. The principal funding challenges hit newer technologies, including clean steel and green hydrogen, which need more policy support to grow. As policies develop and costs fall, investment could bounce back.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China has reportedly told its data center operators to source more than 50% of their chips from domestic manufacturers in an effort to break away from US tech
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The Chinese government has reportedly mandated that its domestic data center operators nationwide should source more than 50 per cent of their chips from domestic producers. The mandate is said to have originated in guidelines proposed last March for the Shanghai municipality, which stipulated that 'adoption of domestic computing and storage chips at the city's intelligent computing centres should be above 50 per cent by 2025" (via the South China Morning Post). According to the SCMP, a source working as an adviser in the data center industry told the outlet that the Shanghai chip quotas for the city's data centers had since become a mandatory nationwide policy. In the great AI race, China is often viewed to be somewhat behind when it comes to computing power, despite efforts in recent years to build more than 500 new data centers across the country. Sources have told the SCMP that while Chinese chips are considered "usable" in inference training for AI models within these facilities, Nvidia chips are still the go-to choice. While the US government has recently decided to grant licenses to Nvidia to sell its H20 GPUs to the country once more, a requirement of 50% or more all-Chinese chips would likely affect potential sales—although given the rate of expansion and the apparent popularity of Nvidia hardware in the country, I'd say it was still likely to shift a fair few units to Chinese shores. The SCMP also reports that data centers are facing adaptation challenges in integrating Nvidia's hardware with domestic solutions. Nvidia's AI GPUs make use of Nvidia's CUDA software ecosystem, while Chinese models often use Huawei CANN or similar. Integrating the two together is apparently quite the technical challenge, particularly if firms wish to min/max the number of faster Nvidia chips they're allowed to use. Despite these issues, it should be noted that Chinese developers were still able to create DeepSeek's AI models under previous chip restrictions, an open-source alternative that shook the industry considerably at the start of this year. While China may be behind in the hardware game, it doesn't appear to have held it back as much as advocates for the previous US sanctions may have hoped, with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang openly praising the Chinese AI industry last month. In reference to fears of the Chinese military advancing its tech with US AI hardware, Huang said: "There's plenty of computing capacity in China already. If you just think about the number of supercomputers in China, built by amazing Chinese engineers, that are already in operation." "They don't need Nvidia's chips, certainly, or American tech stacks, in order to build their military." How much of China's current AI output is being trained and run on Chinese hardware, compared to US equivalents, is currently unclear. Still, this mandate looks to be an attempt by the Chinese government to put curbs on a potential future US tech dominance within its AI industry, and ensure that Chinese AI hardware remains at the forefront of its AI development. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
WIRED
an hour ago
- WIRED
Labubus Are on Track to Be a Billion-Dollar Business This year
Aug 19, 2025 10:49 AM Pop Mart, the Chinese company behind the Labubu franchise, has sold $670 million worth of related products so far this year—more than iconic US toy lines Barbie and Hot Wheels. Photograph: UCG/Getty Images Labubus, the mischievous elf plush toys seen hanging on every celebrity's designer bag this summer, have gone viral across the world, but now we know exactly how popular—and profitable—they have been. On Tuesday, the Chinese company Pop Mart, which manufactures and sells the Labubu franchise, released its financial report for the first half of 2025, and it has had a terrific year. Overall, Pop Mart's revenues grew 204 percent compared to the year before, and net profits increased 362 percent. The company's gross margin rate reached 70.3 percent in 2025. The Monsters franchise, designed by Chinese-Dutch artist Kasing Lung and primarily represented by the character Labubu, generated over 4.81 billion RMB ($670 million) in revenues for Pop Mart in the first six months of 2025, a 668 percent increase compared to the same period last year. (For comparison, Mattel sold $374 million worth of Barbie toys and $626 million worth of Hot Wheels products during the same period.) The soaring popularity of Labubu has also made The Monsters series Pop Mart's most successful franchise, contributing to nearly 35 percent of the company's total revenues, an increase from just 14 percent in June 2024. Another major factor that has helped turn Labubu into a viral sensation is the company's product line of vinyl-plush keychains. This specific type of toy, which combines the softness of plush toys and the sculptural details of facial features seen more in figurines, has unexpectedly blown up, even though the company only started selling them in late 2023. First in China and then in the West, the soft Labubu keychains have been used as bag charms and accessories by celebrities like Rihanna, Lady Gaga, and Kim Kardashian, fueling a social media obsession and causing them to sell out everywhere. According to Pop Mart's latest financial report, the company's revenue from plush products grew over 1200 percent overall this year to 6.13 billion RMB ($854 million), accounting for 44 percent of the company's total revenues. Pop Mart has released over 20 different plush products since the start of 2025 using different manufacturing techniques in an attempt to replicate Labubu's success. While these numbers are impressive, they only capture a portion of the true popularity of Labubu keychains, because there are also countless counterfeit Labubus (commonly called Lafufus by fans) sold around the world. Because of a supply shortage deliberately orchestrated by Pop Mart, some of the company's products, including the Labubu plush dolls, are traded for far more than their list price on second-hand markets, profits of which are also not reflected in its earnings. Pop Mart was founded in 2010 as a variety store selling trendy toys and gadgets, and has become increasingly international. By June 2025, over 40 percent of Pop Mart's revenue came from outside China. Pop Mart has been growing particularly fast in the United States. Revenues in the Americas market (primarily the US) rose more than 1100 percent to 2.26 billion RMB ($315 million) in the first half of 2025. The number of physical Pop Mart stores in the Americas have also almost doubled to 41, making it the company's fastest growing region. In total, Pop Mart currently has 571 stores across the world.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump Is Demanding a Panama-China Breakup — and Making Life Harder for Panama's Leaders
'You have the chance to speak with [China's] Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister of Commerce, or whoever it is you want, and Panama didn't send even a vice minister,' said Sebastian Naranjo, a Panamanian scholar who used to lead the Asia-Pacific division of Panama's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 'There's been a clear separation and slowdown' in Panama-Chinese relations, he said. Beyond these signs of cooling diplomatic relations, once-growing commercial activity between the two countries appears to be dwindling, too, particularly on big infrastructure projects. While China was once the exclusive superpower bidding for a stake in major projects like the fourth bridge over the Panama Canal and a new metro line in Panama City, the United States appears to be vying to replace it on some major transportation projects in Panama. After Trump's election, Mulino's administration hired the American firm AECOM to revise a master plan, first completed by a Chinese company, for a high-speed rail line across the country. In June, Mulino met with leaders from a dozen American companies, including Visa, Pfizer, JP Morgan and Amazon, which is eyeing Panama as the site of a potential data center or distribution or logistics hub. Earlier this year, Amazon launched free delivery in Panama and met with Panama City's mayor to discuss a partnership program that helps cities migrate municipal technology and software to Amazon Web Services. The global spotlight, though, remains squarely on the Panama Canal, where China's grip on development is loosening, too, and American influence is stepping in to fill it. A consortium of companies led by the American firm BlackRock is in negotiations to acquire two ports on the canal owned by the Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison, which is looking to sell its $22.8 billion international ports business. The sale was touted by Trump as a victory in his campaign against Chinese influence along the canal. For now, it's unclear if it will go through: Panama Canal Authority administrator Ricaurte Vásquez Morales has raised concerns that the acquisition could compromise the canal's neutrality, and Chinese regulators have put the sale on hold as Beijing continues to haggle for a stake in the deal. The Panama Canal advisory board, a group of business leaders that reviews toll increases and counsels Vásquez and the board of directors, also lacks a Chinese member for the first time in decades, after the country's sole representative, Wang Haimin, the executive vice president of China Ocean Shipping Company, departed the board last winter. His exit, confirmed by advisory board member Joe Reeder, could put the canal's second-largest user at a disadvantage at a critical moment. 'There is every reason in the world for COSCO to be on that board, because they're, if not the largest, one of the largest users of the canal,' said Evan Ellis, a professor of Latin American studies at the United States Army War College who called Haimin's departure 'an anomaly whose timing coincides with the ratcheting up of U.S. pressure.' All of this has been noted by Panamanians — many of whom have been unhappy with Mulino's deference to Trump and, specifically, with his spurning of China. Panama's compliance with Trump's demands, such as an April agreement to allow more American forces onto Panamanian military bases, has proven unpopular. Thousands of Panamanians marched in May against the agreement, compounding a wave of domestic turmoil in the country triggered by social security reforms passed in March. A July poll found that 73.6 percent of Panamanians disapprove of the national government, up from 14.8 percent in October.
