
Not just electoral, but ideological: the challenges facing a Liberal party in existential crisis
A 'scorecard' spread through Liberal circles on 7 May ranking Ley, Angus Taylor and Dan Tehan – who at that stage was yet to rule himself out of the race – against a series of metrics, some more unconventional than others.
These included whether the candidates were 'beholden' to the factional powerbroker Alex Hawke (tick for Ley), had been sacked as a minister (another tick for Ley) and supported Israel (a cross for Ley, owing to past support for a Palestinian state).
Guardian Australia has confirmed the scorecard originated inside the party but was unable to verify exactly who wrote it.
But the intent was clear: to sabotage Ley's hopes of becoming the first woman to lead the federal Liberal party.
A similar subterranean campaign was launched after Ley floated ambitions for the foreign affairs portfolio in Dutton's pre-election reshuffle of his shadow cabinet.
The campaign achieved its desired outcome as Ley missed out on the role despite convention dictating the deputy leader has claims to the portfolio of their choosing.
The scorecard wasn't so effective.
Ten days after the Coalition's catastrophic election defeat, Ley defeated Taylor – and the powerful forces supporting him – to win the leadership, putting her at the helm of a party in existential crisis.
Ley inherited the leadership with the Liberal party reeling from its worst defeat in its 80-year history.
Across consecutive elections, the Liberals have lost more than 30 lower house seats, have been all but wiped out in the capital cities, deserted by women and migrant communities and abandoned by young people.
Its problems are not just electoral, but ideological. At the heart of the party's problems is a deep and unresolved rift between more moderate liberal forces and rightwing conservatives, divided on many issues, but above all the climate crisis.
In her first two months in the job, Ley and her inner-circle of MPs and senior advisers have begun the process of repositioning and rebranding the party.
Conversations with more than 20 Liberal MPs and party insiders, including a mix of Ley's supporters and detractors, indicate the step-change has been largely well received internally as senior colleagues across the factional divide rally behind the new leader.
But Ley's fledgling leadership will be tested as internal brawls over net zero and gender quotas, and the lingering animosity over a shadow ministry lineup that rewarded supporters and punished rivals, threaten to tear the party apart.
Attempts to drag the party to the centre will face resistance from powerful conservatives forces, including the former prime minister Tony Abbott, who are hellbent on entrenching the party on the political right.
'I am worried this is going to be a very divisive period,' one MP said.
In a new four-part series, Guardian Australia delves into the internal struggle to shape the future of the Liberal party, including one fringe senator's crusade to transform it from within. It will also examine the party's fraught relationship with the Nationals, and how the latest chapter in the long-running climate wars risk fracturing the Coalition – permanently.
Ley officially declared her candidacy for the Liberal leadership on 9 May, writing in a statement that Australia 'expects a change in direction and a fresh approach from the Liberal party'.
But the groundwork for the tilt was laid much earlier.
In the final stretch of the federal election campaign, between Anzac Day and 3 May, the deputy leader visited 22 seats to campaign alongside Liberal MPs and candidates.
Liberal sources says those timely seat visits were crucial for Ley in building internal support for the eventual leadership election. One MP joked they were surprised Ley didn't 'die' from the intensive travel.
Sources outside Ley's inner circle allege she was deliberately using the visits to 'manoeuvre' ahead of a potential leadership challenge against Dutton.
In doing so, she 'disappeared' from the national campaign, one Liberal said, to the point where people were asking, 'What the fuck is going on?'
The relationship between Dutton and Ley had deteriorated amid suspicions Ley's camp was leaking against the leader, including internal talking points exposing the mixed messaging on the Coalition's threats to break up certain industries in cases of market failure.
'She was clearly positioning herself for the week after the result. I didn't realise she was that cunning,' the Liberal said of Ley's apparent attempts to distance herself from Dutton.
The alleged manoeuvring is denied by those close to Ley, who say she wasn't preparing for a tilt, nor expecting Dutton to lose his seat.
Ley eventually prevailed 29 votes to 25 over Taylor after the moderates, members of her own centre-right faction and a collection of unaligned MPs swung behind her.
Despite the thin margin of victory, which was aided by votes from senators Linda Reynolds and Hollie Hughes – both no longer in parliament – and Gisele Kapterian, who ultimately lost Bradfield, Ley's camp is not concerned by the numbers.
They say they are 'relaxed' about her support in the party room, and are confident she would win by a bigger margin if another ballot were held now.
But several Liberals doubt Ley is the long-term solution. In fact, some MPs have already formed the view that the person capable of returning the party to government is not even in parliament.
'Some Liberals are discussing the WFJF – the waiting for Josh Frydenberg faction,' one Liberal source said, referring to a potential, long-speculated political comeback for the former treasurer, who lost his seat of Kooyong to the independent Monique Ryan in 2022.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
'People are already looking on the horizon.'
Another MP said: 'I think Sussan needs to make some decisions and take people with her very quickly, otherwise events will outpace her'.
One of Ley's closest confidantes and friends is senator Anne Ruston, a South Australian who sits somewhere between the moderates and centrists, but who hasn't been a factional player. The two are known to have honest conversations, and Ley seeks Ruston's advice.
The deputy leader, Ted O'Brien, is in the inner circle, as is Alex Hawke, a centre-right powerbroker who helped orchestrate Scott Morrison's unexpected rise to the prime ministership in 2018.
Also inside the tent are the senior New South Wales moderate Andrew Bragg, who encouraged Ley to run and made calls to colleagues on her behalf, his factional ally Maria Kovacic, and the Queensland senator James McGrath, who has been tapped to conduct a review into the party's long-term future.
Kovacic, Hawke, McGrath and Bragg were all elevated in Ley's first shadow ministry, irking internal rivals who viewed the appointments as rewards for loyalty over merit.
In her first weeks as leader, Ley addressed a core group that Dutton wouldn't: young people. She joined 25-year-old Billi FitzSimons in a podcast for the youth social media platform the Daily Aus, spoke to SBS's The Feed and Triple J's Hack program on the ABC.
To FitzSimons, Ley promised: 'I will not be in lecturing mode. I will be in listening mode.' It's a mantra she has repeated, including to members of the Chinese community – another group that abandoned the Coalition in droves – at a Sydney event on 7 July with her shadow attorney general, Julian Leeser.
On 25 June, Ley stepped on to the National Press Club stage to share her log cabin story and provide a blueprint for reform. The significance of fronting up to press gallery journalists at that forum, which her predecessor shunned for three years, was not lost on those reporters, nor her colleagues.
In her pitch for the leadership, Ley promised to be more collaborative with colleagues, who felt sidelined under Dutton's highly centralised operation.
Backbench committees will now play a greater role in shaping policy after being largely neutered during Dutton's tenure.
Victorian MP Aaron Violi, the new chief opposition whip, says it's a big opportunity for the party to open up more 'respectful and robust' policy debates, 'to give the backbench a bigger voice and ensure they have a direct line to shadow cabinet policy development'.
Several MPs, including Bragg, used the word 'open' to describe the new regime.
'It feels like we're moving into a whole new era of having a lot more openness, and frankly, I mean the idea that political parties can be these black boxes when everything's a secret, it's so passé, so I think it's been a breath of fresh air so far.'
Dr Jill Sheppard, a lecturer in politics at Australian National University, says allowing open debate and disagreement will be critical for Ley to manage – and survive – a divided party room.
'If she is to get through to 2028 [the next federal election] that'll be the key to her success,' Sheppard says.
'It won't be because of [gender] quotas or support from the moderates or anything else. It'll be an internal process of policy development that makes everyone feel included.'
Ley has made clear that she wants to empower, not control, her frontbench when it comes to selling the party's message in the media.
The leader's team has created a manual for shadow ministers to help them engage with journalists, a markedly different approach from Dutton's office, who largely shunned the Canberra press gallery.
In another change, Guardian Australia can reveal Ley will issue frontbenchers with 'charter letters' that outline expectations for them in the role.
Such letters are standard practice for prime ministers to keep their ministers in check, but are rarely issued by opposition leaders.
Of the myriad challenges facing the Liberals, the one Ley appears most desperate to confront is the task of increasing the number of women in the party's parliamentary ranks.
Women make up 33% of the Liberal party room in Canberra, compared with 56% for Labor.
At the press club, Ley described herself as a 'zealot' for action to increase female representation but stopped short of endorsing a particular method, such as gender quotas. She accepts the power to introduce such a mechanism rests with the party's state and territory branches, which are responsible for the process of selecting candidates.
Kovacic – a public advocate for quotas – says Ley is 'determined to drive change'.
'Starting with the structural reforms needed to achieve gender balance in our federal party room, her willingness to collaborate, listen and remain open-minded about how we reach that goal is a testament to her respect for members and colleagues,' she said.
The events of recent weeks in the NSW division, where even preliminary discussion of gender quotas quickly descended into internal warfare, illustrates just how difficult change will be.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Corporation which funds NPR and PBS closes after Trump cuts
National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) have been plunged into crisis after the body that provides their funds confirmed it was closing. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) announced Friday it was winding down operations shortly after the Trump administration ended federal funding for both broadcasters - bowing to an executive order from the president in the process. The order, signed on May 1, had demanded the private broadcasting corporation responsible for funneling federal funding from Congress to the two firms, 'cancel existing direct funding to the maximum extent allowed by law.' It also stated that NPR and PBS regularly produce 'biased and partisan news coverage'. THE CBP informed its roughly 100 staffers Friday that the majority of staff positions will end on September 1, a day before the deadline disclaimed in Donald Trump's executive order. Patricia Harrison, the president and CEO of the company, lamented the looming loss of the company in a statement, saying it comes 'despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB.' Such efforts fell flat, when Senate Republicans advanced a funding bill that also included no money for public media last week. The move came on the heels of a successful bid to remove $1.1billion in federal funding previously allocated to the CPB to be split amongst both broadcasters. 'We now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' Harrison wrote in response. She added that the CPB - essentially a middleman between the two companies and the federal government - 'remains committed to fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities and supporting our partners through this transition with transparency and care.' The CPB has previously said that 70 percent of its $1.1billiion in annual funding goes to the broadcasters' local stations - not the national outlets. Broken down, PBS - the company responsible for programs like Sesame Street and PBS NewsHour - receives a congressional appropriation each year of a little more than $500million. NPR, which is headquartered in Washington, DC, receives roughly the same. Congress created the CPB in 1967 to transfer taxpayer money to the stations and other public media outlets with the intent to shield the entity from political interference. Conservatives, however, have argued both now air content that's biased against their beliefs. Katherine Maher, the chief executive of NPR, said his month the decision to do away with federal funding for the station was politically motivated, framing it as one that would be devastating toward rural communities that rely on local affiliates that saw the most of the federal money. 'Lawmakers from both parties continuously acknowledge - in public and private - how important their local stations are to their constituents,' Maher told Status. 'This eviscerates funding for those independent, community-based stations. 'And for what purpose? Scoring political points by saying you voted against NPR and PBS?' she asked. She and others maintain that NPR and PBS both provide citizens with a vital service, particularly in less-traveled parts of the country where things like cellphone service and smartphones are less common. Federal funding, meanwhile, accounts for about 15 percent of PBS's annual revenue and just 1 percent For NPR. Also demanded in Trump's executive order was that the CPB ' decline to provide future funding' to both news organizations for the foreseeable future. Another portion reads: 'Neither [NPR or PBS] present a fair, accurate, or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens. 'Unlike in 1967, when the CPB was established, today the media landscape is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options,' it added. 'Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.' Maher, a progressive who previously headed Wikipedia before starting at NPR last year, pushed back at this idea at last month's DOGE hearing, while fielding questions about her outlet's alleged political slants . Joining Maher was PBS's CEO, Paula Kerger, who faced questions about a drag show performer who lawmakers falsely claimed appeared on her network and about the sexuality of Sesame Street puppet duo Bert and Ernie. Maher pled with Congress to 'give [both broadcasters] the opportunity to continue to serve the American people with this unique and vital resource.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Hammer blow for NPR and PBS as corporation which funds them says it's closing after Trump cuts
National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) have been plunged into crisis after the body that provides their funds confirmed it was closing. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) announced Friday it was winding down operations shortly after the Trump administration ended federal funding for both broadcasters - bowing to an executive order from the president in the process. The order, signed on May 1, had demanded the private broadcasting corporation responsible for funneling federal funding from Congress to the two firms, 'cancel existing direct funding to the maximum extent allowed by law.' It also stated that NPR and PBS regularly produce 'biased and partisan news coverage'. THE CBP informed its roughly 100 staffers Friday that the majority of staff positions will end on September 1, a day before the deadline disclaimed in Donald Trump's executive order. Patricia Harrison, the president and CEO of the company, lamented the looming loss of the company in a statement, saying it comes 'despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB.' Such efforts fell flat, when Senate Republicans advanced a funding bill that also included no money for public media last week. The move came on the heels of a successful bid to remove $1.1billion in federal funding previously allocated to the CPB to be split amongst both broadcasters. PBS will be in the same boat. The company receives a congressional appropriation each year of about $500M. CPB allocates the money mostly to public television and radio stations, with some assigned to NPR and PBS to support national programming 'We now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' Harrison wrote in response. 'CPB remains committed to fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities and supporting our partners through this transition with transparency and care.'


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Freedom Flotilla activists say they were ‘brutalised psychologically' by Israeli military after aid boat boarded
Two Australian activists have claimed they were 'brutalised psychologically' by the Israeli military, strip-searched and shackled, after their Freedom Flotilla boat was intercepted. Journalist Tania Safi and activist Robert Martin were detained while onboard the Handala, which was seeking to deliver aid to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. After their arrest alongside 19 other activists on Sunday, the pair were transported to Israel and spent days in Israeli custody, where they allege they were manhandled and treated like criminals. The Handala was carrying 21 civilians representing 12 countries - including the UK - with parliamentarians, lawyers, journalists, environmentalists, and other human rights defenders among them. It was carrying aid including baby formula, nappies, food, and medicine for the Gaza strip, where a starvation crisis has prompted international outcry after dozens of Palestinians died from hunger-related causes in recent weeks. Experts, the UN, and other countries say Israeli blockades caused the crisis. The Israeli government says Hamas is at fault and has accused the Palestinian militants of stealing food from aid trucks. The two Australian activists landed back in Sydney on Friday morning, where they spoke to reporters about their ordeal. Ms Safi said at least 30 IDF members boarded Handala when it was intercepted, and claimed all were armed, some with four guns. 'They knocked me in the leg with one of their machine guns,' Ms Safi said of the moment around 30 IDF soldiers boarded the Handala after it was intercepted, speaking to The Guardian. After being taken to the port of Ashdod south of Tel Aviv, the group was taken to interrogation rooms. Ms Safi supported earlier allegations by the group that Chris Smalls, the former president of the Amazon Labour Union who was onboard the Handala, was physically assaulted by IDF troops. 'Chris was pinned down by seven or eight men,' she told the outlet. 'When I asked about him they came into the room and dragged me out by my arms, I'm still bruised from it. 'They pulled me out and threw me down on the floor, they made me take off all my clothes, they strip-searched me right there, made me squat up and down … they treated us like we were criminals.' Ms Safi, who said she witnessed 'the soullessness and the cruelty and brutality' of Israeli detention, added that soldiers would 'handcuff me and grab the handcuffs and just throw me against the wall'. She said the military tried to get the Handala activists to sign documents which said they had entered Israel illegally, which Ms Safi says is 'not true… we were taken completely against our will and brutalised psychologically in every way'. Mr Martin alleged he was not allowed any of the medication that he required, nor was he allowed to make any phone calls to loved ones and 'anybody else' - despite the Australian government demanding to Israel that they were allowed to do so. They were eventually transported to Jordan, where they were assisted by the Australian embassy and taken to hospital, he added. The Handala incident came nearly two months after the Madleen, a Freedom Flotilla with Swedish activist Greta Thunberg on board, was intercepted by the Israeli army on 9 June. The IDF has been contacted for comment. In a statement on X after the boat was seized, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said the military had prevented the boat from 'illegally entering the maritime zone of the coast of Gaza'. It added: 'The vessel is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. All passengers are safe. Unauthorized attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts.' Regarding the alleged assault on Mr Smalls, the Israeli foreign ministry told The Guardian on Thursday: 'Contrary to the claims made, the passenger violently resisted. This was a planned provocation intended to create media attention.'