logo
Democrats begin the long 2028 campaign in South Carolina, 'for whatever reason'

Democrats begin the long 2028 campaign in South Carolina, 'for whatever reason'

Yahoo4 days ago

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Over the weekend, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Maryland Gov. Wes Moore quoted Martin Luther King Jr., ate fried fish with hot sauce, and thanked the Democratic voters – most of them black – whose primacy in Democratic politics is part of Joe Biden's ambiguous legacy to his party.
But while Biden's Democratic National Committee put South Carolina first in part to shut down any possible challenge to the aging president, the state may not fight to keep the privilege.
'We had nothing to do with being number one,' Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told Semafor at his 'world-famous fish fry,' flanked by Moore and Walz in matching CLYBURN t-shirts. 'That's something that Joe Biden decided to do, for whatever reason.'
Democrats won't set their next calendar for more than a year, but the move to put South Carolina first had been pitched as a tribute to black voters. Moore and Walz were embraced by party activists, most getting their first in-person look at one of the country's first black governors, and at the Minnesotan who shared a ticket with their first black female nominee.
'Even if you have no moral courage in your body at all, if you want to see us survive economically, you're damn sure we've got to start investing in black communities,' Walz told delegates at the party's convention on Saturday.
But Democrats weren't sure that the state needed to stay first on their calendar, a source of internal friction during Biden's presidency. Moore said he 'hadn't put enough thought into it,' while Walz said it was 'important' to keep South Carolina at the front.
'I don't know why we would move it,' state party chair Christale Spain told Semafor. 'If we're serious about keeping our base, why wouldn't we keep the primary that we moved up because of our base?'
South Carolina, which has not voted for a Democratic president since Jimmy Carter, has played a powerful role in picking its nominees. Clyburn was part of that, lobbying to ensure that the state got one of the 'first four' primaries in 2008 along with Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada.
For Republicans, the 'first in the south' primary empowered conservatives and evangelical Christians, canceling out the New Hampshire independents who liked to boost more liberal candidates. For Democrats, it empowered black voters who tended to be less ideologically progressive than Iowa caucus-goers, and more loyal to the party than white New Englanders.
'We haven't heard from the most committed constituents in the Democratic Party, the African-American community,' Biden said at a rally here the night of the 2020 New Hampshire primary, betting correctly that a South Carolina win would vault him to the nomination. 'Ninety-nine-point-nine percent – that's the percentage of African-American voters who haven't had the chance to vote in America.'
Jaime Harrison, a former state party chair here who presided over the schedule change as DNC chair, recalled how Biden fought for it. At an early meeting over the primary calendar in 2021, when DNC leaders briefly brought up South Carolina, Biden chimed in and said it deserved a bigger role.
'I go all over the country, and I meet black folks in this state or that state, but they all have family in South Carolina,' said Biden, according to Harrison.
During his last days in office, when Biden flew Air Force One to Charleston to thank black voters and Clyburn for their loyalty, he told Harrison that the new schedule should stay in place.
'He said to me: Listen, I'm proud that we chose to put South Carolina first,' said Harrison. 'He said, that's gonna be a part of my legacy, and I'm gonna fight like hell to make sure it works.'
Harrison, like many Democrats here, believed that some of the party's post-2024 problems could be fixed in South Carolina. Harris lagged recent Democratic nominees with black men, and Trump made gains with working class voters of all races. Campaigning in South Carolina would put candidates right in front of them.
'Who is really the influential bloc here?' he said. 'It is older, middle-aged, African-American folks who've been through something in life, who've not always had everything that they wanted, but have worked hard to provide for themselves and their family. They take that pragmatism, that seasoning that they've gotten from life, and they apply that to looking at who can actually win. Not who delivers the fanciest speeches.'
In South Carolina, those voters are also used to losing. Democrats have not elected a governor here since 1998 – Jim Hodges, who Walz shouted out from the stage at Friday night's fundraising dinner. Republican-drawn maps have locked Democrats into one safe House seat, Clyburn's, and Donald Trump's coattails reinforced the GOP supermajority in Columbia. The state's largest cities, which had Democratic mayors when Biden took office, are now led by Republicans.
Walz and Moore framed all this as a temporary setback, and a reason for Democrats to fight harder and act faster. They put special emphasis on the needs and histories of black voters and poor people.
'Right now, the Trump administration is actively divesting in black communities, actively dismantling our minority business programs, and actively banning books about our history,' said Moore. 'If Trump can do so much bad in such a small amount of time, why can't we do so much good? Now is the time for us to be impatient, too.'
Moore's speech was boycotted by a black state legislator, John King, angered by Moore's veto of a bill to study reparations for the descendants of slaves. In an interview, Moore ticked off programs that he'd already expanded to help black Marylanders.
'This would be the fifth study in 25 years. What are we studying?' said Moore. 'We have got to stop being the party of bureaucracy and multi-year studies on things that we know the answers to, and be the party of action.'
It would be a while before Democrats decided that the voters who heard this message would get the first vote on their 2028 nominee, or a later vote. Clyburn was less concerned about that than Biden had been.
'The most important hitter on a baseball team is a clean-up hitter,' Clyburn said on Friday, 'and he comes in fourth place.'
To riff on Harrison's remark, the modern role of South Carolina's primary has been a Democratic gut check. White liberals get their say in Iowa, secular white moderates vet the candidates in New Hampshire, and multi-racial progressive unions set their terms in Nevada.
When Biden won the primary, black voters made up 56% of the electorate, and 83% of all voters said they attended church at least once a week, compared to 48% in New Hampshire. Half of the electorate called itself 'moderate,' or 'conservative,' groups that were in the deep minority in Iowa and New Hampshire. Biden thrived once he got away from protesters asking about Medicare-for-All and deportation moratoriums.
That wasn't Biden's stated reason for rewarding that state. He cited its debt to black voters, and other Democrats cite its rich, painful civil rights history, as Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Ca.) did after he saw chatter about South Carolina moving down the calendar. But the remarks Moore and Walz gave, and the receptions they got, demonstrated why Democrats like campaigning here. They talked almost entirely about economic results and messaging and how their party would build out the safety net — the sweet spot that Republicans and protesters knock them off of.
They did not talk about Biden, whose legacy here is complicated. 'The one thing about black voters that you should understand: They're pragmatic and they're loyal,' Harrison told me. No Democrat would benefit from criticizing Biden here, and the ongoing media/GOP study of the former president's choice to run again was seen as pure distraction.
Still: Biden described his choice to put South Carolina first as a legacy project. His defeat strengthens the negotiating power of New Hampshire Democrats, who expect to vote first again, and other state parties that want to bid for an early calendar spot.
In Politico, Brakkton Booker to Democrats who worry that the Biden hangover might give another southern state the plum primary spot: 'Some people just need to get over themselves and whatever issues they have with Joe Biden.'
For CNN, Arit John and Jeff Simon South Carolina Democrats what they really want from the next candidate: 'I think South Carolina is looking for a person of the people, that can speak to the people without lowering and debasing themselves, like the current administration seems to be doing.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

time9 minutes ago

Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud

WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'

Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps
Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration faces growing bipartisan pressure over Job Corps

Nearly 200 House members signed onto a bipartisan letter this week to express support for Job Corps after the Department of Labor recently announced it would soon be pausing operations at centers nationwide. In the letter to Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer, the lawmakers express support 'for the continuation of the Job Corps program,' while noting it remains funded through government funding legislation that passed earlier this year. 'Nearly 20,000 young people utilize Job Corps to learn skills for in-demand vocational and technical job training,' the letter said. 'Job Corps is one of the few national programs that specifically targets the 16-24-year-old population that is neither working, nor in school, and provides them with a direct pathway into employment openings in industries such as manufacturing and shipbuilding.' Job Corps, established as part of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, is a free residential education and job training program for low-income people between 16 and 24 years of age. In an announcement explaining the Labor Department's decision to suspend operations at Job Corps centers, Chavez-DeRemer said the program was found to no longer achieve 'the intended outcomes that students deserve,' citing what she described as 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities.' The department said it will begin a 'phased pause' initiating 'an orderly transition for students, staff, and local communities.' The pause will occur by June 30, the office said. The move was met with swift backlash from lawmakers, including Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), who defended the program in a statement expressing strong opposition to the department's move to pause operations. 'Serving nearly 500 students in Maine, the Loring Job Corps Center and the Penobscot Job Corps Center have become important pillars of support for some of our most disadvantaged young adults,' Collins said at the time. In the new letter sent to the secretary Thursday, the group of lawmakers said by 'filling job openings, Job Corps ensures that young people become productive members of the American workforce.' 'No other program takes homeless youth and turns them into the welders, electricians, shipbuilders, carpenters, nurses, mechanics, and vocational workers of the future,' the letter said. The letter came a day after a federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from suspending operations at Job Corps centers as critics argue the move is illegal. 'The Department of Labor is working closely with the Department of Justice to evaluate and comply with the temporary restraining order,' the agency said in a statement to The Hill on Friday. 'We remain confident that our actions are consistent with the law.' Updated: 12:51 p.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store