1 arrested after roughly 500 protest outside Butler County Jail
According to the Butler County Sheriff's Office, approximately 500 people were outside the county's correctional complex around 6 p.m. on June 8. The sheriff's office claimed people gathered because someone was reportedly being held on an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.
Members of the sheriff's office responded to make sure the protest stayed orderly. It is reported by the office that while most people stayed peaceful, some reportedly got on a road and allegedly obstructed traffic.
An unnamed individual was arrested at the scene by a Hamilton police officer. The person arrested is reportedly facing a number of charges.
Butler County Sheriff Richard Jones said protesting peacefully is recognized under the First Amendment.
'The First Amendment protects the right to peaceful protest, and we will always defend that right,' said Jones. 'However, when individuals break the law or endanger others, they will be dealt with swiftly and according to the law. Public safety and the rule of law are non-negotiable.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
R.I. prosecutor told police to turn off a body-worn camera during her arrest. Do officers have to comply?
'I want you to turn your body cam off,' Devon Flanagan tells an officer during the Aug. 14 confrontation, Content Warning: Profanity. Body camera footage shows R.I. Special Assistant Attorney General Devon Flanagan and Veronica Hannan being arrested in Newport. 'Protocol is that you turn it off if a citizen requests to turn it off,' Flanagan said. Is that true? Not really, experts say. 'The state's body-worn camera policy is very clear that the request to turn off the cameras is something that an officer should consider, if asked by a victim or a witness to a crime – not to somebody who was suspected of the crime,' said Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up 'And it remains within the discretion of the police officer in any event,' Brown added. 'It's not an obligation.' Advertisement Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association President Thomas Oates III said officers in the Newport incident were 'well within policy.' 'I don't know that young lady, what knowledge she has of body-worn camera policy or what she thought it was, but whatever she was saying, she was inaccurate,' said Oates, who is also the chief of police in Woonsocket. Under the Advertisement Police could also decide to deactivate a camera in 'areas where there may be a reasonable expectation of privacy and [in] other sensitive locations,' the policy states. Those areas could include private residences, locker rooms, law offices, schools, daycare facilities, certain places in hospitals or clinics, and where 'First Amendment rights are being exercised,' including places of worship, newsrooms, and where peaceful protests are taking place, the policy states. Officers recording in those areas 'shall be mindful not to record beyond what is necessary to capture contact with members of the public, effect an arrest, or search for an individual,' according to the policy. Whether police mute or stop the recording, or only record audio in those areas should based on whether an officer 'observes activities or circumstances of a sensitive or private nature,' or if there are people present who are not involved with the police matter; who are minors; and who are witnesses and want anonymity, the policy states. Brown noted the alleged incident in Newport 'was out in public.' 'These are precisely the circumstances where the body cameras should be activated,' he said. Officers 'acted appropriately in not turning the camera off,' Brown said. Timothy Rondeau, a spokesperson for the Attorney General's Office, said on Monday that Flanagan's request is not part of the statewide body-worn camera policy, and confirmed the policy applies only to victims and witnesses of crimes. According to Oates, departments adopted provisions of the statewide policy to receive funding when Advertisement The Newport police Lieutenant Robert Salter, a department spokesperson, wrote in an email the department would not comment further on Tuesday regarding last week's incident. According to Oates, the decision for police to record depends on the circumstances. 'Obviously a case where there's an alleged disturbance involved, or someone potentially acting in a disorderly manner and is argumentative and doesn't want to comply with the commands of the police officers to clear them from an area, we're never going to turn the body camera off,' Oates said. Oates has not heard of many people requesting not to be recorded, he said. 'This is why it's important that body-worn cameras are existent,' Oates said. 'In a lot of cases, what it does is it causes people who are behaving badly to ... calm down and not behave badly when they know that they're being recorded and their actions are being documented.' It doesn't always work that way though, Oates said. Related : In Newport on Aug. 14, officers arrived around 9:51 p.m. at 24 Bannister's Wharf – the Clark Cooke House restaurant – after receiving a report of an intoxicated woman – later identified as Veronica Hannan – refusing to leave, police wrote in a report. During the encounter caught on video, Flanagan, who was with Hannan, repeatedly tells officers to turn off the camera. She also tells them several times, 'I'm an A.G.,' and as she is placed in a cruiser, she says, 'You're going to regret this.' Advertisement Police identified Flanagan as Devon Hogan, 34, of Warwick. The Attorney General's Office confirmed that Hogan and Flanagan are the same person. She was charged with willful trespass – a misdemeanor – and was given a summons to appear in court. Salter would not provide the court date on Tuesday. Flanagan has not returned requests for comment, and it was unclear on Tuesday whether she had obtained an attorney. Speaking on He said he gives police credit 'for treating her like everybody else,' and acknowledged Flanagan was incorrect about camera policy. 'She's embarrassed herself – humiliated herself – treated the Newport Police Department horribly,' Neronha said, adding that it was 'inexcusable behavior.' Still, it has been difficult to find and retain 'capable lawyers,' Neronha noted. If Flanagan keeps her job, she will not 'go on as if nothing happened,' Neronha said. 'There'll be a strong sanction here,' he said. Officers can also be seen on the video struggling to apprehend Hannan, 34, of Westport, Conn. She was arrested and charged with willful trespass, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest – all misdemeanors, police said. Court records show Hannan was arraigned on Friday in Newport County District Court, where a plea of not guilty was entered. She was released on $1,000 personal recognizance and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for Aug. 27. 'Veronica is obviously overwhelmed by this experience. It happened so quickly and with a lot of energy,' John R. Grasso, an attorney representing Hannan, wrote in an email requesting comment on Tuesday. 'Once we have the facts and she processes it, maybe we can speak more then.' Advertisement A now-removed LinkedIn profile listed Hannan as a senior manager for data and AI product management at PepsiCo. PepsiCo did not immediately return a request for comment on Tuesday. Asked about any concerns the ACLU has about government officials making comments to police such as those Flanagan allegedly made, Brown said officials can say 'whatever they want' during run-ins with the law. 'The question is how police officers react and whether they end up giving special treatment to somebody because they're a government official,' Brown said. 'In this case, they didn't.' Christopher Gavin can be reached at
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge freezes Beto O'Rourke's ability to send money, property outside of Texas
Democratic activist Beto O'Rourke and his nonprofit Powered by People are no longer allowed to send money out of Texas, a Tarrant County district judge ruled on Friday. 348th District Court Judge Megan Fahey issued the freeze as an expansion of an original restraining order filed against O'Rourke on Aug. 8 as the result of a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, according to court documents. Fahey's ruling came one day after lawyers for O'Rourke argued in a downtown Fort Worth courtroom that the funds are a form of free speech protected under the First Amendment. The dispute stems from O'Rourke and his organization's effort to fund Texas Democrats who fled the state to deny the legislature a chance to vote on redistricting legislation, the Star-Telegram previously reported. Fahey also denied O'Rourke's motion to move the proceedings to El Paso County, according to court documents. O'Rourke's attorneys argued that El Paso County was the proper venue because it is where the activist and former congressman lives and where his nonprofit does business. In a Sept. 2 hearing, Fahey will decide whether to issue an injunction against O'Rourke, according to court documents. 🚨 More top stories from our newsroom: → See how your child's school rates in new Texas A-F grades → Jury hears of woman's grave under house at Fort Worth death penalty trial → North Texas Powerball player just misses $531 million jackpot [Get our breaking news alerts.] 'In Texas, lawless actions have consequences, and Beto's finding that out the hard way,' Paxton said in a statement on Saturday. 'His fraudulent attempt to pad the pockets of the rogue cowards abandoning Texas has been stopped, and now the court has rightly frozen his ability to continue to send money outside of Texas.' Neither O'Rourke nor his lawyers could immediately be reached for comment on Saturday. In a post on X, O'Rourke wrote, 'Thanks to everyone who has joined us in this fight for Texas, we've been able to donate over $1 MILLION to the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, the Texas House Democratic Caucus, and the Mexican American Legislative Caucus during the special session.' Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Woman charged with threatening Trump's life
An Indiana woman accused of posting threatening messages about President Trump on social media is facing federal criminal charges after prosecutors say she admitted to Secret Service officers that she was set on 'killing' Trump to 'avenge' lives lost during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nathalie Rose Jones, 50, of Lafayette, Ind., was arrested during a protest event in Washington, D.C., on Saturday and faces charges of threats against the president, as well as transmitting threats across state lines, court documents show. Jones was already on the Secret Service's radar because of a series of posts she had made on Instagram and Facebook before she was interviewed and arrested in D.C., according to court records. In one Facebook post dated Aug. 6 and included in the court filing, Jones allegedly wrote that she 'literally told FBI in five states today that I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea.' According to a court filing, Jones agreed to speak with law enforcement on Friday about the messages she had posted online. Authorities said she told them that she believed Trump was a 'terrorist' and 'Nazi,' who she would kill at 'the compound' if necessary. Jones also allegedly told officers that she had access to a 'bladed object' to use to 'carry out her mission of killing' the president in retaliation for the pandemic death toll, which she attributed to Trump and his previous administration. Jones was tracked down in the District of Columbia the following day and confirmed her previous statements but said she no longer wanted to harm the president, records show. 'Threatening the life of the President is one of the most serious crimes and one that will be met with swift and unwavering prosecution,' U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro said in a news release. 'Make no mistake — justice will be served.' Trump has faced multiple assassination threats, and he survived a shooting during a campaign rally in July 2024 when a bullet grazed his ear. The Hill's sister station NewsNation interviewed Jones during a protest in D.C. before her arrest Saturday. She told the station that she believed Trump's policies cost lives by undermining vaccines and health care needs of the vulnerable. 'This regime has to go, the whole administration,' she said. She also addressed Trump's recent federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and deployment of D.C.'s National Guard to address crime. 'You do not deploy the military against the American people,' Jones told NewsNation. 'We will not be suppressed. We will not exist in this authoritarian regime. We will not accept fascism.'
