logo
Subramanian's position as India's executive director at IMF terminated due to impropriety: Congress

Subramanian's position as India's executive director at IMF terminated due to impropriety: Congress

Time of India06-05-2025

Live Events
The Congress on Tuesday claimed the government suddenly terminated KV Subramanian 's position as India's executive director at the IMF due to "impropriety", and raised questions of "wastage of public money" over the Union Bank of India allegedly placing an order for two lakh copies of his book. The opposition party also alleged the cost of this "blatant propaganda" was borne by the public exchequer and being done because Subramanian justified every economic blunder and flawed policy of the government.There was no immediate reaction from the government, Subramanian or the Union Bank of India on the allegations.Addressing a press conference, Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate said the Modi government suddenly terminated Subramanian's position as India's executive director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) two days ago with only six months left in his tenure."The government has so far given no reason for this abrupt and rare sacking. He is the same KV Subramanian who was the chief economic advisor and who had during Covid, when the economy had shrunk by over 24 per cent, predicted a V-shaped recovery ... One that never happened," she said.Citing internal documents of the public sector Union Bank of India, she claimed they brought to light the bank placed an order for two lakh copies of Subramanian's book "India@100" at a cost of Rs 7.25 crore. Of this, Rs 3.5 crore was paid in advance."These books were meant to be distributed through zonal and regional offices of the Union Bank of India to its deposits to schools, colleges and libraries. Each of the bank's 18 zonal offices were meant to receive 10,525 copies. After making the advance payment, the regional offices were asked to incur the rest of the cost under their miscellaneous expenditure," Shrinate said."But it now seems that hard evidence has left the government embarrassed and forced his premature removal from the post of India's executive director at the IMF, six months before the completion of his three-year term," the Congress leader claimed.This episode raises several key questions of "wastage of public money" and "gross impropriety", she said.Posing questions to the government, Shrinate asked if it was true that Union Bank of India obtained prior approval from its board of directors or the Department of Financial Services for spending crores or rupees on the bulk purchase of books authored by Subramanian."What is the intended purpose of distributing these books, and how does this expenditure align with the bank's obligations to prudently utilise public funds? Has Modi government's finance ministry evaluated whether this expenditure adheres to the fiduciary responsibilities of a public sector bank towards its depositors and taxpayers?" she said.She also asked if the Union finance Ministry investigated whether the transaction constituted a conflict of interest or not, given Subramanian's previous role as chief economic advisor and his proximity to key government figures.It is also alleged that the MD and CEO of Union Bank of India, Manimekhalai, who is due for an extension in June, facilitated the royalty payments from this purchase as an "indirect bribe" to lobby for her extension, securing approval through none less than Prime Minister Modi, Shrinate said."How does the ministry address these allegations and ensure that no undue influence or misuse of public funds occurred?" she asked.She further asked if Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman would come clean on this transaction.Shrinate also raised the issue of Pakistan asking for a loan of USD 1.3 billion from the IMF."Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh was the first to raise this issue on April 29 and urged the Indian government to strongly oppose this. After this, there are reports that India asked the IMF to review Pakistan's loan and funding," Shrinate said."We hope India's demand will be accepted and Pakistan, which harbours terrorists and indulges in anti-India activities, will be denied this loan," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘They look for excuses': Chirag Paswan slams Rahul Gandhi amid EC row, says LoP has 'accepted defeat' in Bihar polls
‘They look for excuses': Chirag Paswan slams Rahul Gandhi amid EC row, says LoP has 'accepted defeat' in Bihar polls

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘They look for excuses': Chirag Paswan slams Rahul Gandhi amid EC row, says LoP has 'accepted defeat' in Bihar polls

File photo: Union minister Chirag Paswan and LoP in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi (Picture credit: ANI) NEW DELHI: Union minister Chirag Paswan on Sunday claimed that Congress MP and leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi , has already conceded defeat in the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections , citing Gandhi's recent remarks targeting the Election Commission of India (ECI). Speaking to reporters, Paswan accused Gandhi of deflecting blame and targeting constitutional bodies instead of holding his own party accountable. "The problem with Congress and its leaders is that when introspection is needed, they look for excuses for losing elections," Paswan said, as quoted by the news agency ANI. "If Rahul Gandhi needs to find faults in any institution, it should not be a constitutional institution, but his own Congress party. Blaming the Election Commission, accusing someone of fixing elections, saying that the EVM is faulty, all this shows that Rahul Gandhi has already accepted defeat in the Bihar Assembly elections. " Bihar will go to the polls later this year. Paswan further predicted that after Bihar, the opposition will suffer defeats in Assam and West Bengal as well. Meanwhile, RJD leader and Bihar's leader of opposition, Tejashwi Yadav , came out in strong support of Gandhi. Speaking in Patna, Yadav accused the BJP of compromising constitutional institutions, claiming, "Ever since Narendra Modi has become the Prime Minister, all constitutional institutions have been hijacked. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Windows Users Don't Forget To Do This Before Sunday Read More Undo Before the ECI announces the elections, the BJP IT Cell knows the schedule." Tejashwi said the opposition's efforts were not just about power. "Everyone is working together, not to form the government, but to strengthen Bihar," he added, backing Gandhi's criticism of the ECI. Gandhi, who is the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, had on Saturday posted on X criticising the ECI's response to his allegations of rigging in the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. He wrote, 'Dear EC, You are a Constitutional body. Releasing unsigned, evasive notes to intermediaries is not the way to respond to serious questions.' He urged the Commission to publish machine-readable electoral rolls and release all CCTV footage from polling booths post-5 pm to ensure transparency. 'Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' he wrote. The ECI later dismissed Gandhi's remarks, calling his allegations "unsubstantiated" and an 'affront to the rule of law.' The Commission said that all relevant facts had been shared with the Congress party in December 2024 and are publicly available. The poll panel warned that spreading misinformation disrespects the law and demotivates lakhs of honest poll workers. 'After any unfavourable verdict by the voters, trying to defame the Election Commission... is completely absurd,' the Commission said in a detailed statement. In his op-ed titled Match-fixing Maharashtra, Gandhi had alleged that the state elections were a 'blueprint for rigging democracy', involving fake voters, inflated turnout, targeted bogus voting, and concealed evidence.

RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It
RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

RBI Cuts Repo Rate: Major Banks Slash Lending Rates; Know Objective Behind It

RBI Repo Rate Cut: In a bid to boost economic momentum, several major banks have followed the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) lead after it cut the repo rate by 50 basis points. Among them, Punjab National Bank (PNB), Bank of India, and UCO Bank have announced reductions in their lending rates. The RBI's move is aimed at making borrowing easier and more affordable for both individuals and businesses. Wasting no time, Punjab National Bank was quick to respond, bringing down its repo-linked lending rate from 8.85% to 8.35%, setting the tone for others to follow. Bank of India Repo Rate: Bank of India responded to the RBI's repo rate cut by lowering its repo-linked lending rate from 8.85% to 8.35%, as disclosed in a stock exchange filing. However, the bank chose to keep its base rate and marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) unchanged. UCO Bank Reduces MCLR Across All Loan Tenures Taking a slightly different path, UCO Bank opted to reduce its MCLR by 10 basis points across all loan tenures. This move, effective from June 10, aims to ease borrowing costs for various types of loans, including home and personal loans. Specifically, UCO Bank trimmed its overnight MCLR from 8.25% to 8.15%, the one-month rate from 8.45% to 8.35%, and the three-month rate from 8.6% to 8.5%. The six-month and one-year MCLRs were also adjusted to 8.8% and 9%, respectively. Bank of Baroda Repo Rate: Adding to the trend, Bank of Baroda announced a 50 basis point cut in its repo-linked lending rates for select loan tenures. These rate revisions follow the RBI's latest decision—announced by the Monetary Policy Committee led by Governor Sanjay Malhotra—to lower the repo rate, the key policy rate at which the central bank lends to commercial banks. The broader goal: to ease borrowing costs and stimulate economic activity. Objective Behind Cut In Repo Rate The objective behind the rate cut is to energise the economy by encouraging spending and investment through cheaper loans. In addition to the repo rate cut, the RBI also reduced the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) by 100 basis points, from 4 per cent to 3 per cent. Repo Rate Reduction In Four Phases This reduction will be rolled out in four phases and is expected to inject Rs 2.5 lakh crore of liquidity into the banking system. The CRR is the portion of bank deposits that must be maintained with the RBI, and lowering it allows banks to lend more. (With Inputs From IANS)

Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute
Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Chhattisgarh high court declines to intervene in tata projects and CHiPS bank guarantee dispute

RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh high court disposed of a writ petition filed by Tata Projects Limited, directing the company to seek remedy before the Commercial Court. The petition concerned the encashment of a performance bank guarantee of Rs 167.46 crore by the Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (CHiPS), the nodal agency for driving IT growth and implementing IT and e-Governance initiatives in the state. A division bench of Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad heard the petition filed by Tata Projects. The company sought restoration of the status quo ante, asking for the return of the Rs 167.46 crore to State Bank of India and the issuance of an identical bank guarantee. Alternatively, Tata Projects requested CHiPS to deposit the amount in an interest-bearing account until the dispute's resolution. According to court records, CHiPS issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the selection of a Master System Integrator (MSI) for the BharatNet Phase-II Project in Chhattisgarh. A dispute arose between Tata Projects and CHiPS during the commercial contract. Previously, Tata Projects filed a writ petition, in which a single bench of the high court on 2 July 2024, granted interim protection, restraining respondents from encashing the performance bank guarantee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo This writ petition was later disposed of on 30 April 2025, with the court re-delegating the parties to approach the Commercial Court. Subsequently, Tata Projects filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Commercial Court, on 3 May 2025, ordered an interim status quo regarding the invocation of the bank guarantee. However, after the respondents filed their reply, the Commercial Court disposed of the application on 6 May 2025, vacating the status quo order. The initiation of the bank guarantee encashment process led Tata Projects to approach the highcourt. Senior Counsel Kishore Bhaduri, appearing for Tata Projects, argued that CHiPS's conduct was fraudulent and high-handed, misleading the court and misusing its power by attempting to invoke the bank guarantee. Counsel for the respondents and the state argued that the writ petition was not maintainable, as Tata Projects had remedies available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, or under the Chhattisgarh Madhyashtham Adhikaran Act, 1983. The high court observed that an arbitration clause existed in the agreement and that Tata Projects already approached the Commercial Court. The court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable at this juncture. However, it granted Tata Projects the liberty to pursue statutory remedies before the Commercial Court. The court also clarified that the respondents were free to raise objections regarding the maintainability of any application. The high court directed the Commercial Court to consider and decide any interim application or application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with the law. The high court also made it clear that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the case, leaving it to the Commercial Court to decide independently.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store