Tourist attraction shut nearly as often as open
A Northern Ireland tourist attraction which has received millions for repairs and maintenance has been closed nearly as many days as it has open in the past decade.
The Gobbins Cliff Path in Islandmagee, County Antrim reopened to the public in 2015.
Mid and East Antrim Borough Council has spent about £4.3m since 2017 on repairs to the path, which has faced prolonged closures due to rockfalls, storm damage, planned works and inspections.
A council spokesperson said the attraction is "projected to beak even" within five years of of a planned major revamp, which will mark "an important milestone in its long-term sustainability".
The Gobbins first opened in 1902, designed by the engineer Berkeley Deane Wise.
The cliff walk, made up of a series of bridges, paths and tunnels, had fallen into disrepair by the 1950s but a £7.5m investment saw it open again in 2015.
Since 2015 the attraction has been shut for a combined 1,624 days, or about 46% of the time, according to figures released to the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act.
The longest closure was for over a year from 19 June 2016 until 30 June 2017.
A Scottish based company that offers tours of Northern Ireland said while they promote the Gobbins on their website, they haven't included it on tours due to its "unreliable" opening.
Heather Rennie-McGill, director of marketing and sales at Rabbie's, said the Gobbins has "real potential" as a "unique attraction".
"If we're selling tours six to twelve months out for customers, and something like this would be a key highlight because the tour lasts two and half to three hours which is a big chunk of a day, we'd need reliability," she said.
"We can't include things in our itineraries where it would be taken out at the last minute."
The path is currently closed due to a recent rockfall, the cost of repairs for which is not known.
Mid and East Antrim Council have said they are not able to provide figures on spending on the path before 2017.
The BBC has previously reported that essential maintenance costing £400,000 was carried out to fix the access path after damage caused by Storm Frank in 2015, with an additional £1.6m allocated for scaling works ahead of the 2017 season.
This suggests that at least £5.6m has been spent to maintain the tourist attraction since it reopened.
Mother and daughter Isabella and Léa Petit Boyer had hoped to visit the path during a week-long trip to Northern Ireland but were disappointed.
"It's a shame that we can't see this cliff," Léa said.
"We first wanted to do the Gobbins Cliff Path because first of all the coast is really wonderful, [and] it's a great tourist attraction."
Stephen Weir, an Islandmagee resident said he and his wife had hoped to visit the path for his 60th birthday but couldn't due to it being closed.
"It seems to be a regular occurrence," he said.
"Hopefully it will be open and we'll get to do it later on in year but you'd think coming in to the summer season... now would be the time that it would be open."
Stephen also questioned the economic viability of the site.
"In theory it's a brilliant idea to get round there and see the birds and all that in their natural habitat but I mean especially in the current economic climate, I mean do we really need to spend all that money if it's not working?"
Stephen Henry, who also lives in the borough, said he thinks the path is a "waste of money".
"The rates are paying for it and it's for a service that's never open."
He said that he had been to do the tour on a previous occasion when it was open.
"It's nice to look at, there's no doubt about it.
"But is it value for money? Probably not."
Last year, Mid and east Antrim Borough Council announced an investment in the Gobbins of £13.5m, with £12.6 million coming from the Belfast Region City Deal.
The plans include a new 60m-high staircase, a rope bridge and new cliff-top welcome hub.
The current visitor centre is located a five minute drive from the path, with tours accessing the path via a shuttle bus service from the centre.
The spending also includes plans to create a new virtual reality offering at the existing visitor centre for those who cannot access the path.
A council spokesperson said that once completed, "the Phase II development is expected to deliver substantial economic and tourism benefits, including 245,000 cliff path visitor numbers annually, driving substantial growth in the local economy".
White-knuckle cliff walk reopens
Aerial view of restored Gobbins path
Gobbins coastal path closed again
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort stalled
The Scottish government has stalled plans for a controversial holiday park at Loch Lomond. Ministers had previously been set to give permission for the development, overturning the national park authority which said it did not comply with environmental and nature conservation policies. Theme park operator Flamingo Land believed it would be given the go-ahead to build a £40m resort called Lomond Banks, featuring a waterpark, monorail, hotel and restaurants. The Scottish government's Minister for Public Finance, Ivan McKee, has now said he will recall the plans because "the development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park". He said: "This means that the appeal should be determined at a national level." McKee has previously resisted calls for ministers to intervene in the decision to allow the plans to go forward. Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort set for approval Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort rejected by park authority What is happening with Flamingo Land at Loch Lomond? The original proposal sparked protests and was initially rejected last September by Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park authority, who said it did not comply with environmental and nature conservation policies. But that was appealed to the Scottish government reporter, who last month said they intended to grant permission - subject to a legal agreement between Flamingo Land and the park. Government reporters consider the vast majority of appeals, appointed by ministers to make a decision on their behalf. However some of these are "recalled" by ministers who will then make the final decision themselves. When the Scottish government reporter announced in May the intention to back the plans, development director for Lomond Banks Jim Paterson said it was a "real milestone moment" which had been "a long time in the making". But Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer, who has been a long-standing critic of the plan, said the development would cause "irreversible damage" and the decision was an "anti-democratic outrage". Following Ivan McKee's 's latest announcement, Greer said it was "the right move". He added: "The evidence of the damage it would do to one of Scotland's most iconic locations is overwhelming. "Once ministers consider the flood risk, loss of ancient woodland, hundreds of additional cars which would be brought onto notoriously congested roads and the litany of other devastating impacts it would have, I am sure they will reject the mega-resort application and finally end this decade-long saga." The decision comes ahead of a vote in the Scottish Parliament on the issue, led by Scottish Labour. The party's deputy leader Jackie Baillie welcomed McKee's decision to recall plan, saying: "It shouldn't have taken the fear of a defeat in Parliament to force them to reach this decision. "The SNP has ignored concerns time and time again – from politicians across the chamber and from local campaigners." The Balloch and Haldane Community Council previously said it was "deeply disappointed" in the decision to approve park plans. The group said this "contradicts the expressed will of the community". A spokesperson added: "This is not just a bad planning decision, it is a fundamental failure of democracy and policy. "This decision rides roughshod over the principles of community empowerment, environmental protection, and democratic accountability. Flamingo Land first submitted plans for the site in 2018, but withdrew them the following year after a wave of negative reaction. It submitted updated plans in 2020, insisting the proposal would be a "major step away" from its other resorts, including a theme park and zoo in Yorkshire. But the Loch Lomond park authority board ruled that the updated scheme still conflicted with both regional and national environmental policies. Stuart Pearce, "director of place" for the park authority, previously said the plans created "unacceptable risk" of flooding of the River Leven. More than 174,000 people signed a petition against the project. The Flamingo Land resort in North Yorkshire has been operating since 1959, initially as a zoo. The name comes from a colony of the brightly coloured birds that were among the first animals on the site at Kirby Misperton. By the 1970s, the zoo was losing money, and the attraction was revamped as a "day out" experience with a growing focus on amusement rides. The Yorkshire site continues to have exotic animals, and there is also a large holiday village with static caravans and lodges.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fort Smith human resources director retires amid internal auditor hiring controversy
FORT SMITH, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — The human resources director for Fort Smith, who has been recently involved in a controversy regarding the hiring and subsequent dismissal of an internal auditor, has retired. Rick Lolley has served as the city's Chief Human Resources Officer since 2018. The city announced on Saturday that Lolley's retirement was effective immediately. 'Rick Lolley has demonstrated considerable experience and instilled a level of professionalism in the city's Human Resources Department over his seven years as its department head,' Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman said in a news release. 'I wish Rick well as he moves on.' The announcement comes after the Board of Directors voted to hire Rebecca Cowan as internal auditor on April 22. Two days later, the board changed course after it was revealed that Cowan faced a felony stalking charge. Fort Smith-based attorneys Joey McCutchen and Stephen Napurano filed the lawsuit against the city on May 2 after claiming Fort Smith failed to provide all public records related to the hiring of Cowan. The City of Fort Smith told Talk Business & Politics, 'Human Resources produced the background check and relayed the information to Administration per City protocol.' Judge rules City of Fort Smith violated Freedom of Information Act following failed hire Acting City Administrator Jeff Dingman, in an email to McCutchen, said, 'The background check information was delivered in hard copy. That record no longer exists. The Chief Human Resources Officer does not have a copy of the packet that was delivered. There is no hard copy.' An email from Dingman, not included in the city's FOIA response, was later obtained directly from a board member, according to the lawsuit. This email stated that Dingman 'did not believe a background check was performed.' The lawsuit also alleged the city failed to respond in a timely manner and may have withheld or destroyed public records. On June 3, the judge assigned to the lawsuit ruled in favor of McCutchen and Napurano during a hearing. An order, officially filed on June 5, said 'The Defendants' failure to timely respond, thefailure to provide clearly responsive records, the absence of any valid extension or waiver, and the troubling lack of transparency regarding the missing background check' were reasons as to why the city was ruled to have violated the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act. 'The Court is troubled by the timeline of events, the lack of transparency demonstrated by the City of Fort Smith and City Administrator Jeff Dingman, and by the missing background check which, according to the testimony, was provided by Mr. Rick Lolley to Mr. Jeff Dingman but was neither preserved nor produced in response to the FOIA request,' the judge said in the order. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'The latest Race Across the World episode had one big problem'
Race Across the World series five has been an exciting ride so far but Wednesday's penultimate episode seemed to veer off track. Don't get me wrong, I loved the twist. Seeing last week's race leaders, Brian and Melvyn, open the checkpoint hotel book first — only to discover they were in fourth place. And a massive 17 hours behind. My heart sunk for them. Disappointed Brian sums it up perfectly in one word: "B*******." How this blow was delivered worked well on-screen... Only this is where I say the dreaded word "but". The latest episode was missing glimpses of the teams' journeys to the checkpoint. It is a race. I want to feel like I'm a passenger on the journey. That's one of the best things about race: vicariously travelling and feeling like you are part of the experience. I don't personally agree with some complaints online from viewers that the focus of the show has shifted to showing too much of "sob stories" instead of the journey. It's important to get to know the individuals taking part on the show and tell their extraordinary ordinary stories. That helps you choose who you are rooting for. But I did feel there wasn't enough racing which is particularly noticeable in this episode. (Note: this is my only grumbling complaint for the whole series.) There were too many jumps. We see Brian and Melvyn face a disaster while trying to leave the fancy vineyards in India. They are told on the phone: "Our office is closed today. But you can wait at the hotel, I'll send my representative in 45 minutes maximum". Then it cuts to them mysteriously arriving at Panjim. It was only upon revisiting the episode, I found the BBC snuck the answer into John Hannah's voiceover where they are trying to make up for the missing gaps. "After an 11-hour bus, Brian and Melvyn have arrived in Panjim," he quickly informs us before the brothers get into race mode to the checkpoint. Were there really no moments from the 11-hour bus journey really worth showing? And why did Brian and Melvyn choose to get the bus in the first place? This feels massive to miss out, especially as the previous race leaders are unlikely to win the show now. From behind the scenes, Brian on Instagram gives us more information: "That was a bit unfortunate. Started first, ended up last, 17 hours behind everybody. Maybe it was the vineyard. I don't know. It could have been maybe. We didn't catch a train, that might have been our mistake. But one more leg to go." Check out the telling photos from Race Across the World's final... Race Across the World's Fin and Sioned are seen prioritising travel on the final leg of the race. (BBC/Studio Lambert) Melvyn adds in a separate video on Instagram: "Unfortunate that one wasn't it? Was it the vineyard that took us out the way? I've just seen Brian's video and I kind of agree. I'm still trying to figure out how we ended up so far behind. The vineyard was a pleasant treat. The countryside was absolutely beautiful." It's not only Brian and Melvyn's journeys that are cut short. They all are. With Sioned and Fin, we know that a kind Indian stranger calls a taxi for them and it's going to cost them INR 6,000 (£51), including tolls. "He'll be waiting for us? Wow that's good. What a lovely guy," Fin says. Only we never see the teenage couple get into the taxi. And we don't see them navigate their way to checkpoint. We only see the disappointment they feel at coming third place at the checkpoint hotel. When it comes to Elizabeth and Letitia, the last time we see them before the checkpoint they are just northeast of Mumbai. "We are getting to checkpoint today," they jointly celebrate while getting onto the train. The voiceover tells us they are taking "advantage of the Indian rail network" but the rest of their journey remains a mystery. Six minutes later the sisters are back on screen magically opening the page of the book to find out they are in second place. We do know that current race leaders Caroline and Tom managed to miraculously get their seats confirmed for the train out of Mumbai. This is a surprise as Sioned and Fin had been warned by a local not to go via Mumbai to Goa because the train tickets are often booked up months in advance. But it is also a hint that Caroline and Tom are going to be accelerated into first place in the race. We do get to see moments of them running up the stairs in the glossy checkpoint hotel but the rest of their journey is glossed over. Maybe the answer is longer episodes or perhaps more episodes in the series to fit everything in. I hope the edit of the final captures everything we need to know about the last leg of the journey so we aren't left feeling cheated at the outcome. We all have our favourites watching at home but it's not really about who wins on Race Across the World. It's about the journey. Race Across the World's final airs at 9pm on Wednesday on BBC One.
