Brookside star Philip Foster jailed for modelling fraud
More than 6,000 victims parted with money on the false promise of securing paid modelling work from Foster, whose address was given as Chermside Road, Liverpool, but who operated from his base in Spain.He used a network of associates in England to operate a string of sham modelling agencies and photography studios in cities including London, Manchester, Leeds, Bristol, Coventry and Nottingham.The scam was uncovered in a six-year investigation by National Trading Standards (NTS).After sentencing, NTS chairman Lord Bichard said Foster's "cruel exploits left thousands of victims in serious debt, causing lasting emotional distress and significant financial pressures".
Payday loans
Victims first received emails telling them they had potential after they responded to a social media advertising campaign.They were invited to a "free" test shoot at a photographic studio where they were handed glossy brochures and told they had passed their studio test, but would need to buy a portfolio of images for the modelling agencies who were interested in them.Some victims used credit deals arranged by the fraudsters or expensive payday loans to make the upfront payment.In return, they got poor quality digital photographs which stood no real chance of landing them professional jobs and most did not get paid modelling work.
The sham agencies, which paid no tax, existed for short periods before being dissolved and rebranded.Money from the scam was laundered through UK bank accounts before being transferred to Spain, or carried in cash on commercial flights by co-conspirators, the NTS said.North Yorkshire councillor Greg White said: "Foster and his fellow scammers cruelly exploited young hopefuls trying to break into one of the most competitive industries."In some cases, parents borrowed money or sacrificed savings believing they were investing in their children's futures."Foster bought high-end watches and cars with his share of the proceeds, while many victims told NTS investigators they had been left financially and emotionally devastated and felt humiliated and betrayed.Some experienced lasting distress that affected their confidence, wellbeing and ability to trust others, the court heard.
The other defendants sentenced for conspiracy to defraud were:Michael Foster, 27, of Florence Gardens in Hereford and who failed to turn up to court, was jailed for three and a half yearsJamie Peters, 52, of Warrington, received a suspended 24-month prison sentenceLisa Foster, 42, of Manchester Road in Astley, was given an 18-month suspended prison sentenceEmily Newall, 29, of Bolton Road, Kearsley, was handed a 10-month suspended prison sentenceAtif Qadar, 44, of Larkswood Drive in Crowthorne, got a suspended 12-month prison sentencePaul Fleury, 57, of Manchester Road, Swinton, received a suspended 18-month prison sentenceAdditionally, the following sentences were passed for charges relating to money laundering:Paul Evans, 39, of no known address, jailed for three and a half yearsAslihan Foster, 39, of Tredington Road, Coventry, received an18-month suspended prison sentence
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Child sex images gets Liverpool teaching assistant classroom ban
A teaching assistant who was convicted of possessing more than 260 indecent images of children has been barred from ever setting foot in a classroom uncovered a Dropbox account associated to Reece Gordon in 2023 while he was working at Dovecot Primary IP address linked to him found he had accessed hundreds of indecent images of children. He was convicted at Liverpool Crown Court in October last was sentenced to 10 months in prison suspended for two years and made subject of a sexual harm prevention order for 10 years. A teacher regulation agency (TRA) hearing held in private last month has now ordered that he never be allowed to return to the classroom again.A report into the hearing set out how Gordon was employed at Dovecot Primary School as a teaching assistant between September 2023 and February also carried out teaching work during this time, according to the Local Democracy Reporting received information before Gordon started at the school that the Dropbox account associated with his email address had accessed 268 category A – the most severe – images online. 'No remorse' He appeared at Liverpool Crown Court in October 2024 and was sentenced a month later, including a rehabilitation activity requirement of 60 days and an unpaid work requirement of 100 TRA panel remarked how Gordon's actions were relevant to teaching, working with children and working in an education setting, and constituted serious and safeguarding risks for any the assessment, the panel said there had been no proof Gordon demonstrated "exceptionally high standards in his personal and professional conduct or had contributed significantly to the education sector".Documents described Gordon's offending as "a large string of instances over a prolonged period of time".The panel also found no evidence of remorse by the former teaching said there was "every risk" the offences could be repeated "in circumstances where Gordon was permitted to continue to work as a teacher."As a result, Gordon is now prohibited from teaching indefinitely and cannot teach in any school, sixth form college, relevant youth accommodation or children's home in will not be permitted to appeal. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Thug who brutally knocked his girlfriend out in middle of the street in chilling attack caught on Ring doorbell footage is jailed
A thug has been jailed after shattering his girlfriend's eye socket in an unprovoked brutal street attack that left her unconscious. Thomas Jennings struck his partner with a mobile phone in a seemingly motiveless attack before throwing her to the floor and kicking her in the head. The sickening assault in Harbreck Grove, Liverpool on March 31 knocked her out, smashed her eye socket and broke her jaw. Career criminal Jennings, 30, left his girlfriend motionless in the street and began walking away before telling one witness: 'If you filmed me, I'll f****** burn your house down.' But he has now been jailed after admitting causing grievous bodily harm with intent to then-girlfriend Paula Richardson, who was found with a gash to her head and still suffers vision problems after undergoing surgery. Liverpool Crown Court heard on Thursday that Jennings assaulted Ms Richardson'on a residential street in broad daylight' after approaching her and repeatedly striking her with a mobile phone 'without hesitation'. 'You little slapper,' Jennings can be heard saying in the footage as he hits her across the face. 'You little f******, s***, get in the car now,' he yells, before he begins raining blows down on her as she begs him to 'please stop'. She then yells 'get off me' before Jennings aims a kick at her head, leaving her seemingly dazed, sitting upright. The second kick appears to knock her out. She lies motionless in the road as neighbours rush to help. Julian Nutter, defending Jennings during his latest appearance, told the court: 'We have a defendant here who has suffered mental health issues over a number of years, which may or may not have been drug related. 'We have a defendant who, for the first time, has been demonstrating remorse and has put forward an apology for what he has done. 'He is deeply ashamed for what he did to this lady. That is the first step on the road to reform, and he has taken it. 'What we have seen, there cannot be any excuse for. What he asked me to do is to repeat his apology, and that is the start of a very long path.' Jennings admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent. Sentencing, Recorder Mark Bradshaw said: 'This incident happened in the street in broad daylight. The footage we have all seen is, frankly, chilling. 'It appears that very little happened before you simply, without hesitation, struck her repeatedly to the head and face with a mobile phone used as a weapon. 'After she fell to the ground, you delivered two kicks to the head, the last of which rendered her unconscious. You then simply walked away. It was, in my judgement, a cowardly attack. 'It is plain that the consequences could have been far worse. It is fortunate for you that they were not. 'This offence represents an escalation in terms of your violent offending. You continued attacking someone who was lying on the floor and was defenceless. 'It is aggravated by the domestic context of the assault and the threats to the member of the public who tried to intervene.' Jennings, it can now be reported, has a long record of criminal behaviour: 36 convictions for 64 offences, including drugs and firearms offences. In 2020, he was jailed for 92 months after handling a weapon that was used in a shooting that later led to Mikey Rainsford, 20, being shot dead in a tit-for-tat act of gang violence. Jennings had provided a gun to another member of the so-called Kirkstone Riot Squad, Darren Russell, to shoot Lewis Gubb in September 2019. Gubb's associate, James Foy and his older brother Michael, then shot dead Mr Rainsford despite the fact he had no involvement in gangs. Both are serving life terms. On Jennings' latest offence, the judge added: 'It occurred while you were on licence for the weapons offences, leading to your second recall on those offences. 'I have regard to your significant mental health issues due to the passing of your mother. 'You have used drugs, which added to your anxiety and paranoia and caused suicidal thoughts. I take into account your difficult upbringing.' Jennings, appearing via video link to HMP Liverpool wearing a white Asics t-shirt, was jailed for four years and handed an extended licence period of three years.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Expert for The Jury: Murder Trial believes second series reaches 'wrong verdict' next week
Criminal barrister Alex McBride says he found the reasoning behind the verdict to be "imprecise" on the BAFTA-winning show, to be stripped over four consecutive nights on Channel 4 A criminal barrister who appears as an expert on Channel 4's Bafta -winning legal series The Jury: Murder Trial believes the 12 men and women chosen to re-enact the real-life case reached the wrong verdict. As the second run kicks off next week, Alex McBride said he disagreed with the conclusion the Liverpool-based jury came too, after two weeks of drama that included furious rows and tears. This time the defendant is a young mother who has murdered her boyfriend of six months by stabbing him through the heart and the jury must decide if she acted in self defence - or not. READ MORE: Tommy Fury reveals brutal Molly-Mae wake-up call as 'everything was gone' Alex said that because jurors bring their own life experience into the jury room, they interpret evidence differently - which was an important part of the process. 'They actually struggle in this show. I'm not going to give away the verdict but I thought it was fascinating, the process they went through and I don't personally agree with the verdict they came up with.' Claiming that nevertheless their verdict in the murder trial was 'justice being done', he explained: 'Looking at it and seeing how they came to their verdict, it was imprecise, it wasn't done in a particularly neat way.' Viewers will learn in the fourth episode whether the verdict of the ordinary people selected as TV jurors matches the one given in the original trial. While the details remain identical, the names and locations have been changed in order to anonymise the case. This series will feature just one jury rather than the two that featured last year, because audience feedback suggested it had been confusing to engage with 24 separate characters. Executive producer Ed Kellie admitted there could be 'a PR effect' because of the possibility of the original defendant having been found guilty and sent to prison. He said: 'We anonymise the case out of the moral belief we shouldn't be retrying people - we're not a campaigning programme, we're trying to shine a light on what happens in thousands of trials. We pick real trials because you could never write the complexity - there is something special about real life. 'The verdict our jury reaches has no legal effect. It could have a PR effect but we'll never comment on the ordinal case or confirm what it was.' The defendant is pleading self defence and there is witness and CCTV evidence which shows the victim had been a violent and aggressive person who used drugs and alcohol. She claims she stabbed him to save her own life because he was strangling her but is also shown to have lied to the emergency services and delayed calling an ambulance. One juror, retired chef Dave, is convinced the young woman is guilty from the off while support worker Aimee, is equally sure she is innocent and a victim of domestic abuse. The fourth episode sees a surprising new piece of evidence from the defence. Ed says they went through 2000 cases to find the right one to re-enact for the show. 'We go to extreme lengths to try and create something that's as authentic and realistic as it possibly can be,' he said. 'Our agenda is to tell the best, most gripping story. True crime has twists and turns and we were looking for proper emotional complexity.' Laurie-Anne Power KC, who also provided expert advice for the programme, said there was no fairer way of reaching justice than trial by jury, despite experiments showing that different verdicts will be reached by different groups hearing the same evidence up to 33% of the time. 'Don't touch juries!' she pleaded. 'As a system, it's as close to perfect as we're going to get.' Laurie-Anne said that the group selected to take part in the TV show, which features actors in the other roles, were 'a true reflection of the types of jury we get at the Old Bailey all the time'. Alex agreed that the alternative, being tried by a judge and magistrates, was not a good option. 'I know many judges and some of them are the worst human beings - you wouldn't want them deciding on your guilt or innocence. The system has to be fair, and the fairest way is with a jury."
