logo
Tokyo snubs Washington: Japan pulls plug on 2+2 security talks with US; defence budget demand sparks row

Tokyo snubs Washington: Japan pulls plug on 2+2 security talks with US; defence budget demand sparks row

Time of India21-06-2025
Japanese PM Shigeru Ishiba (left) and US President Donald Trump (PTI)
Japan has cancelled a high-level meeting with its closest ally United States, after the Trump administration abruptly demanded Tokyo to spend more on defence, reported The Financial Times on Friday.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio and defence secretary Pete Hegseth were expected to meet their Japanese counterparts, defence minister general Nakatani and foreign minister Takeshi Iwaya in Washington on July 1, for an annual 2+2 security talks.
However, Tokyo called off the meeting after the US asked Japan to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, up from an earlier request of 3 per cent, according to three sources familiar with the discussions, including two officials based in Tokyo, cited by the newspaper.
A senior Japanese official stated that the decision to cancel the July 1 meeting was also influenced by the upcoming upper house elections on July 20, where the ruling Liberal Democratic Party is anticipated to lose seats.
Reuters quoted a US government official confirming, Japan had 'postponed' the meeting and the decision was made weeks earlier, though no reason was provided. Meanwhile, a non-government source familiar with the matter confirmed hearing about Japan's withdrawal from the talks but was also unaware of the motive behind the move.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
The Financial Times said, the new, increased demand came in recent weeks by Elbridge Colby, the third-most senior official in the Pentagon, who also recently stirred tensions with another major US ally in the Indo-Pacific by initiating a review of AUKUS, the nuclear-powered submarine deal with Australia.
The tensions of security come as Japan and other US allies have been engaged with the United States in a tough trade talk over US President
Donald Trump
's worldwide tariff onslaught.
While speaking at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue defence forum in Singapore last month, Hegseth urged Asia-Pacific allies to follow the 'newfound example' set by Europeans in boosting defence spending, pointing to regional threats from China and North Korea.
'The US is now playing hardball with allies in the Asia-Pacific,' one defence official was quoted.
In March, Elbridge Colby's call for Japan to boost its defense spending, at his Senate confirmation hearing for under secretary of defense for policy, prompted a sharp response from Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who asserted that Japan's defense budget would be determined by Tokyo alone, not by outside pressure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tariffs a ‘major shock' but opportunity for India to ‘get out of comfort mindset', says Uday Kotak
US tariffs a ‘major shock' but opportunity for India to ‘get out of comfort mindset', says Uday Kotak

Mint

time23 minutes ago

  • Mint

US tariffs a ‘major shock' but opportunity for India to ‘get out of comfort mindset', says Uday Kotak

Uday Kotak has joined the chorus calling on the Centre to channel budgetary support towards MSMEs, in order to brace against impact from United States President Donald Trump's hiked tariffs. Speaking to the Financial Times (FT), the billionaire industrialist and founder of Kotak Mahindra Bank, said the development is an 'opportunity' for India to 'get out of our comfort mindset' and expand support for small and medium entreprises. Uday Kotak said the hiked US tariffs came as a 'major shock' to many Indians, who 'woke up' to the impact of Donald Trump's trade war on the domestic economy. 'We (India) must think about this as an opportunity for us to get out of our cruise mindset and from a comfort mindset to 'we are at risk',' he told FT. He said that direct monetary support — capital, private equity and risk capital — from the government to small and medium industries would 'turbocharge' manufacturing, research and technology in India. According to Kotak, the tariff uncertainty has created urgency to 'transform India' and pivot, stating, 'India's macroeconomic situation is very comfortable. Our fiscal deficit is under control, our current account is under control, you've got macroeconomic stability. Policymakers and businesses should use the trade war to get focused on productivity, efficiency, excellence and building world-class brands.' He added that India with per capita GDP of $2,700, 'cannot be in a comfort zone', when compared to China ($13,000) and US ($89,000). 'At the current 'cruise' level, we'll keep on improving our position, but is it fast enough for us to get past the middle-income trap? I think there's a gap,' Kotak told the publication. Donald Trump last month announced that the US would charge India a total of 50 per cent tariffs — 25 per cent reciprocal duties and an additional 25 per cent as 'punishment' for trade with Russia amid the Ukraine invasion. In light of this, earlier in August, Mahindra Group Chairman Anand Mahindra also called on the government to direct liquidity towards MSMEs; and RPG Entreprises Harsh Goenka also expressed support for a fund to help exporters shift from China and find new markets.

Intel rescue will depend on Trump as investor — and pitchman
Intel rescue will depend on Trump as investor — and pitchman

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Intel rescue will depend on Trump as investor — and pitchman

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills A US government plan to take a stake in Intel Corp . would give the ailing chipmaker a powerful backer, even if a bigger challenge still lies ahead: finding enough paying Street analysts don't expect the money alone to turn around Intel 's business, which has suffered from years of declining sales and the loss of market share. But there is a possibility that pressure from President Donald Trump will help the chipmaker line up more clients for its production arm — potentially justifying the cost of expanding domestic the US ends up owning part of Intel, 'Trump kind of becomes your salesman,' said Dan Morgan, a senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust who has covered the company since the president has this year secured trillions of dollars' worth of pledges to invest in the US — even if some of those commitments are repackaged versions of existing plans. That includes a vow by Apple Inc. to spend $600 billion on a domestic expansion. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., meanwhile, has pledged $165 billion as part of a factory buildout in time around, the administration will need to pull off something with even longer odds: convincing skeptical prospective clients to use Intel for their manufacturing needs. The company has been trying to compete with TSMC in the so-called foundry business — manufacturing chips based on the designs of customers — but it has struggled to show it can match the industry leader's capabilities.'Beside money, Intel needs customers,' Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said in a note to clients. 'Is it conceivable that as part of something like this the administration might 'encourage' customers to use Intel's capacity (either directly, or indirectly through tariff policy or other regulation)? We don't know.' SoftBank Group Corp . this week agreed to buy $2 billion in Intel shares, raising the possibility that the Japanese conglomerate could use the company for chipmaking. Founder Masayoshi Son, who has forged a close relationship with Trump, has ambitions to develop AI chips that would compete with Nvidia cheered the idea, sending Intel shares up 7% on Tuesday. The stock had rallied 23% the previous week, when Bloomberg News first reported that the government was discussing the Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed this week that the government is discussing a plan to own part of Intel, casting the idea as a bid to convert Chips and Science Act grants into equity. The company had been poised to get about $11 billion from that program — initiated by a 2022 law signed by President Joe Biden — and the investment is expected to be roughly that same amount, people familiar with the deliberations have said.'We need to make our own chips here,' Lutnick said. 'We cannot rely on Taiwan.'Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, declined to was a striking turnabout for Intel Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan, whom Trump had criticized earlier this month. The US president had urged the executive to resign over his past ties to China, but Trump changed his stance after meeting Tan at the White an optimistic moment for a company plagued by upheaval and decline in recent years. Previous CEO Pat Gelsinger had bet that a factory expansion plan — centered on an ambitious new facility in Ohio — would turn around Intel's aim was to transform Intel into a chip foundry and make semiconductors for outside clients, a growing business that turned TSMC into a trillion-dollar company. The Chips Act money was meant to help make that vision come true. Biden and Gelsinger even held a groundbreaking ceremony for the Ohio site in 2022, promising 20,000 construction jobs and a fresh start for the domestic chip the economics of the plant don't work without big outside customers — especially because it's meant to feature cutting-edge technology that will be costly to adopt. Intel has repeatedly delayed the project, which isn't currently slated to be ready until the Goldberg, an analyst at Seaport Research Partners, estimates that it would take about $20 billion for Intel to get its next-generation manufacturing technology the government's cash-for-equity deal isn't necessarily a better arrangement than the original Chips Act grants, Rasgon said.'Funding a buildout with no customers probably won't end well for shareholders, of whom the US government would be the largest under this situation,' he also doesn't change Intel's standing in the technology industry. It has fallen behind in producing the kinds of chips most prized for AI tasks — an area now dominated by hyperscalers — the largest data center operators, like Alphabet Inc.'s Google, which are now committing upwards of $80 billion per year to buying new hardware — aren't going to settle for lesser chips because the government tells them to, Cowen Inc. analyst Joshua Buchalter said. It's not clear how the US investment fixes a problem that stems from a lack of competitiveness, he said.'You can't force hyperscalers to use less performant processors or else you're inhibiting their competitiveness globally,' Buchalter is the go-to chip foundry for much of the tech industry, including Apple, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices though, has yet to prove it can keep pace with global chip designers and manufacturers again — let alone act as the linchpin for a revival of domestic production.'Intel still has to deliver,' Morgan said. 'Will this stake really make a whole lot of difference?'

A new era of financial oversight and regulation is here, says RBI Deputy Governor
A new era of financial oversight and regulation is here, says RBI Deputy Governor

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

A new era of financial oversight and regulation is here, says RBI Deputy Governor

The Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) is embarking on a significant transformation in its regulatory approach, according to the central bank's Deputy Governor M Rajeshwar Rao . The central bank is gradually moving towards principle and outcome-based regulations; this shift aims to provide greater operational flexibility to regulated entities (REs), allowing them to align their activities with their specific needs while still adhering to a robust regulatory framework, he said. Rao made this observations during a recent address at the Department of Personnel and Training's Management Development Programme on Financial Market Regulations at the Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode. Underlining the complexities regulators face when crafting regulations, Rao said that there is no universally perfect regulatory model. However, he suggested that principle and outcome-based frameworks tend to suit mature markets better, as they can adapt to the unique challenges presented by evolving financial landscapes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Top 25 Most Beautiful Women In The World Car Novels Undo Rao's comments underscore a fundamental shift in regulatory philosophy. He stressed that regulators must adopt a forward-looking approach to effectively address emerging risks and ensure the resilience of the financial system. To achieve this, he called for a proactive mindset that embraces innovation and utilises data and technology to enhance regulatory efficiency. The deputy governor further emphasised the need for regulators to leverage technology not only to improve internal processes but also for supervisory functions. He advocated for regulatory horizon risk scanning and the need to stay updated with rapid technological advancements. Live Events In an era defined by digital transformation, collaboration with domain experts is essential for regulators to keep pace with ongoing changes in the financial sector, he said. Rao also touched upon the importance of refining regulations to facilitate compliance for REs. Simplifying regulations, enhancing clarity, and eliminating redundancies are crucial steps in this process. The RBI has already begun to incorporate examples and frequently asked questions into its regulatory documents to aid REs in understanding compliance requirements. Consumer protection emerged as a key theme in Rao's speech. He pointed out that regulatory policies must consider the interests of consumers, who are pivotal stakeholders in the financial system. By empowering consumers and safeguarding their rights, regulators can foster a more equitable financial environment. Striking a balance between stability and innovation is critical in regulatory policy, Rao noted. While it is essential to mitigate systemic risks and protect consumers, overregulation can stifle creativity and hinder competition. Conversely, a sole focus on innovation without adequate safeguards may lead to financial instability and a loss of public confidence in the system, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store