Big numbers for Budget 2025 - but will they be big enough?
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Budget 2025 will deliver some big numbers, but closer examination suggests they might not be all they seem.
Next Thursday (22 May) Nicola Willis will deliver her second annual Budget, setting out how and where money will be spent over the next financial year.
There are some giant figures; $190 million for social investment, $100m for kids needing extra maths help and a whopping $12 billion over the next four years for defence.
But according to Brian Roper, an associate professor in the political programme at Otago University, a key phrase to keep in mind when looking at these figures is "in relation to inflation".
"You always have to take account of inflation, because that's really what the government is spending in real terms as opposed to nominal terms," he says.
For example, you might have previously got by with $100 per week for groceries. But this year you find things are more expensive and you have to add $20 to your budget to keep buying the same list of items. That's an example of change in real spending.
But let's say you only upped your budget by $10. While it's technically an increase it's not enough to cover the more expensive grocery bill so it's really a cut. That's a nominal spending change.
Treasury has forecast 1.8 percent CPI inflation for this year and 2.1 percent inflation for 2026. Roper has crunched the numbers and says health needs an additional $588m and education needs an extra $435m, just to continue operating the way it is now.
But he's not confident that's what this Budget will deliver.
"Looking at the pre-Budget speeches of Nicola Willis and Christopher Luxon they are both crystal clear that they want to see a decline in government spending as a percentage of GDP," he says.
Roper says that means we can expect nominal increases to social sector budgets that won't be enough to match the rate of inflation.
Whether or not that's a good thing depends on which side of the political divide you're on.
"If you're Business New Zealand, or Federated Farmers or one of New Zealand's business lobby groups, then really what you want to see this government doing is cutting taxes on the one side and cutting social spending on the other. Pretty much what this government has been doing," he says.
But for low- to middle-income earners, or those who are reliant on public services such as health, housing, education and retirement income, Roper says this budget is unlikely to bring many benefits.
The Detail
also speaks to Luke Malpass, political editor for The Post and The Press, who says both sides of the political sector will try to swing the budget narrative in their favour in the lead up to Budget Day. That includes labelling them.
"So for example the 2023 Budget ... the government said, 'this will be a bread-and-butter Budget'.
"That was obviously when inflation was high, cost of living was very high on people's priority list and the idea of a bread-and-butter Budget is 'we're paring it back to basics'," he explains.
Malpass says an example of where the opposition won control of the narrative was the 2008 "block of cheese Budget", a label coined by Labour after working out that John Key's tax cut package actually only gave the average wage earner an extra $16 per week, the equivalent to a block of cheese at the time.
Malpass says this government is following a similar track to previous governments when it comes to what they deliver in each budget over their term.
"When you first get into power you want to spend money on your priorities ... and the second budget is usually a response to basically to whatever the economic conditions of the day are.
"It's worth noting that Grant Robertson, when he was still Finance Minister, had very much pointed out that this was what was coming down the line regardless of who won the 2023 election. So, politically the question is, how the government responds to that and how fair and reasonable New Zealanders think that response is."
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail
here
.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on
Facebook
or following us on
Twitter
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
New Zealand abandons international fossil fuel pledge
New Zealand's departure from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance came quietly, but not as a surprise to anyone closely following the Government's fossil fuel policies. Resources Minister Shane Jones says the coalition's fossil fuel plans meant the exit was inevitable. But he also says more formal agreements, like free trade deals with the EU, include wriggle room for matters of sovereign risk, such as national energy supply. Jones saw the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance as a 'women's knitting group' by comparison and said New Zealand's energy needs were significant enough to warrant gas exploration under that 'sovereign risk' provision – meaning other international agreements were not set for some sort of domino effect. As the Government's agenda items began to surface in 2023, chief executive of World Wildlife Fund NZ Kayla Kingdon-Bebb told Newsroom the international community's backlash against its climate policies would be harsher than the Government expected – particularly the National Party. When New Zealand joined the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance in 2021, it was only permitted as an associate member. Full membership hinged on a decision to ban onshore oil and gas exploration. Full members include Denmark, Ireland, France and several Pacific countries including Samoa, Vanuatu and Tuvalu. But coalition agreements between all three Government parties committed to reversing the ban on offshore gas exploration, and $200 million was set aside in Budget 2025 to encourage exploration in New Zealand waters. Legal advice later provided to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said repealing the 2018 ban on offshore oil and gas 'would likely be inconsistent with the obligations in several of New Zealand's free trade agreements'. The Green Party warned on Tuesday that, based on the assessment of an independent KC, the move breached another international commitment: the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability. This agreement was celebrated by Trade Minister Todd McClay last year as a 'pioneering' endeavour. On Tuesday afternoon, McClay responded to questions from Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick by doubling down on the nation's commitment to its climate targets: 'What it says about this Government is we will meet our international obligations. When we enter into them, we take them seriously.' The following morning, New Zealand was found to have withdrawn from the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance. Swarbrick said the move showed the Government was 'straight up lying to New Zealanders when it talks a big game about renewables'. 'They are handing out subsidies to fossil fuel extraction beginning in a decade, cutting local energy efficiency programmes, breaching our international agreements, and now walking away from long-standing coalitions with historically bipartisan support.' When Simon Watts assumed the position of climate change minister, he said he didn't expect a backlash from the international community as a result of lifting the ban. As recently as November, he told Newsroom that officials assessed New Zealand could stay in the alliance while repealing the offshore ban. But later that month, the co-chair of the alliance, Lars Aagaard, said New Zealand's status would need to be re-evaluated if it repealed the offshore drilling ban. Meanwhile, Jones told Newsroom he'd long thought New Zealand would need to withdraw from the alliance, given the decision to resume oil and gas exploration. A departure had been 'uppermost in my mind' when he spoke to then-energy minister Simeon Brown 'quite some time back'. Jones said 'I would never have agreed for us to join up anyway.' On Wednesday, following New Zealand's withdrawal from the alliance, Watts held his stance about international perceptions, but not about staying in the alliance. Watts said he had received advice that withdrawing from the alliance was 'not going to have any significant impact' on New Zealand's international perception. On June 21, New Zealand's alliance partners were notified the country would be pulling out of the alliance. Watts said these partners had not previously expressed concern over his Government's climate policies. He said the incoming repeal of New Zealand's oil and gas ban was clear government policy, and now he was certain it would pass, withdrawing from the alliance was the right thing. Jones, a longtime advocate for the fossil fuel sector, did not see all obligations as equal. He said the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance was more of a 'women's knitting group' than a firm legal commitment was the climate equivalent of the 'country women's institute'. 'You can go in and out of it.' New Zealand's other commitments were instruments of a different character, Jones said. 'All of these international instruments leave New Zealand with enough wriggle room to address sovereign risks, and we do have challenges towards affordability and security of power.' The Crown Minerals Amendment Bill passed its second reading in November. It was yet to pass its third reading.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Luxon departs NATO summit after meeting with Ukraine's Zelensky
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon arrives for a dinner at the Royal Palace in The Hague, on June 24, 2025. Photo: AFP / John Thys The prime minister said his two days' attendance at the NATO summit was worthwhile for New Zealand, calling the alliance an important partner and praising commitments to defence spending and supporting Ukraine. At the summit in The Hague, the alliance's 32 European and North American countries agreed to increase their defence spending to 5 percent of GDP within a decade. Participants also agreed to an "ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all", easing European fears that US President Donald Trump was wavering on that commitment. The final communique followed days of lavish praise from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, in the hope Trump - who had been sceptical of the alliance - would not derail the summit. At a news conference on Wednesday morning (local time), Rutte went as far as saying "sometimes Daddy needs to use strong language," when asked about Trump's expletive-laden quip at Israel and Iran on Tuesday. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, right, welcomes Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: AFP / POOL / Geert Vanden Wijngaert But the deference seemed to work. After the summit, Trump confirmed his support for the alliance. "I left here differently," he told a news conference. "I left here saying that these people really love their countries, it's not a rip-off and we're here to help them protect their country." New Zealand is not a NATO member, so while the alliance's leaders were meeting in an auditorium in The Hague, Luxon was meeting with other partners including the EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and Australian deputy prime minister Richard Marles. He then held a bilateral meeting with Ukraine President Volodomyr Zelensky. "I think he's feeling incredibly supported," Luxon said after the meeting. "I think, you know, this is a big win for Ukraine as well. Because clearly there'll be a big investment here that's been committed to, and a significant amount of that money will go into Ukraine ultimately." There had been concern that support for Ukraine could be diluted compared to previous NATO summits, particularly with Trump's past antipathy towards Zelensky. But the final communique included a line promising further support to Ukraine, noting that its "security contributes to ours". However, it stopped short of directly condemning Russia. Christopher Luxon has had a succession of meetings during NATO. Photo: AFP / NurPhoto /Jakub Porzycki After that meeting, Rutte met with Luxon, Marles and the foreign ministers of Japan and South Korea for a gathering of a grouping that's been dubbed the Indo-Pacific 4, or IP4. "We have that relationship and the Pacific countries … not because we want to extend NATO to the Indo-Pacific, but because we have friends in the Indo-Pacific," he said. "There is a lot of use and importance in making joint analysis of the security threats facing us here, and what is happening in the Indo-Pacific knowing that these two areas, these two theatres, are getting more interconnected." Luxon said that collaboration could ultimately make things more cost-effective for New Zealand. "As we go through our asset upgrades and our defence capability being built out, there's a real need for us to plug into some of those procurement exercises as well so we can get more value for the money that we're spending," he said. "I think there's huge opportunities in that." The prime minister has spent two days walking the corridors and halls of this venue which has taken over half the centre of The Hague, with helicopters circling above and snipers perched on rooftops. He held formal meetings with 11 leaders - including breakfast with the new Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney - and had brief interactions with many more on the sidelines or at a state dinner at the Dutch King's palace on Tuesday. "It's been a pretty historic NATO in the regard of a commitment to spending, which has been really important." But throughout, Luxon has tried to stress that any pressure that had been placed upon NATO members to increase defence spending did not apply to New Zealand.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
‘Torturous' Parent Resident Visa ballots leave families in limbo
Evan Chen and his parents on the summit of Auckland's Mt Eden in 2024. Photo: Supplied Chinese families have slammed the unfairness of a ballot system that is used to allocate Parent Resident Visas to some applicants. They also called for expressions of interest in the visa to be extended beyond the existing two-year limit, arguing that the submission process was costly despite little guarantee of success. An online petition to reform the settings of the visa has attracted nearly 10,000 signatures so far. The Parent Resident Visa - a separate visa category from the recently announced Parent Boost Visa - allows migrants' parents to stay in New Zealand indefinitely if they met certain requirements surrounding finances and health. The visa was suspended in 2016 before being reinstated in 2020 with a lower annual cap and significantly tougher financial requirements, which have been described as impossible by many . In 2022, the visa's annual cap was increased from 1000 to 2500 , and the income threshold for sponsors was also lowered. Up to 2000 visas were granted to applicants who had filed existing expressions of interest, while a further 500 visas were granted from a ballot that was introduced for new expressions of interest submitted from October 2022 until the old queue had been cleared. Michael Wood, immigration minister at the time, said that moving to a ballot meant people would avoid lengthy queues. Jock Gilray, visa director at Immigration New Zealand Photo: Supplied As of now, all queued expressions of interest have been drawn "with some still in progress for various reasons", according to Immigration New Zealand's visa director, Jock Gilray. Meanwhile, 9746 expressions of interest covering 14,792 applicants were currently in the ballot pool as of 23 June, Gilray said. "The average processing time for a Parent Resident Visa application is 13 months," Gilray said. However, Auckland woman Sophie Liu said the actual time frame was unlikely to be as promising. Liu, who works in risk management in healthcare, submitted an expression of interest for her mother, who lives alone in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou two years ago. "Nine draws have taken place in the past two years, but we haven't been selected," Liu said. "I can't see any hope." The emotional swing between being hopeful and disappointed when the draw happened every three months was "torturous", she said. "The ballot system isn't reasonable," she said. "It's stressful and torturous. It has been affecting my mental health." An expression of interest stays in the ballot pool for two years, so applicants need to resubmit the paperwork when it expires - a process that costs between $450 and $575. The system was "unfair" because there were no guarantee applications would be approved, Liu said. Sophie Liu celebrates her mother's birthday in China in 2023. Photo: Supplied In the petition before Parliament, Liu called on the government to remove the two-year expiry setting or waive reapplication fees, select most expression of interests in order of the date of submission, introduce a bonus draw and increase the annual cap to 5500. The new Parent Boost Visa wasn't practical in terms of high application fees, a lack of insurance offerings , which could potentially be costly and health check requirements, Liu said. She said the situation was particularly difficult for children of China's one-child generation, as they typically don't have siblings to jointly sponsor parents' applications and their parents don't have a lot of support in their home country. Many were unable to apply for residency for their parents due to the income threshold and those who could were mostly highly skilled migrants with high incomes, Liu said. "We have made a huge contribution to society, but our parents don't have a chance to reunite with us," Liu said. "We may have to leave New Zealand, either returning to our home country or going to another country that has more friendly parent residency policies." Immigration Minister Erica Stanford Photo: Samuel Rillstone / RNZ Jane Li, who hails from China's Hebei province, recently purchased one-way air tickets to China for herself and her two young children after failing to secure residency for her parents in New Zealand. Li, who works as a medical specialist, has been earning enough to sponsor both of her parents' applications. The Auckland resident first submitted an application in 2022, resubmitting it last year after it expired without success. "I feel anxious and frustrated," Li said. Li gave birth to her first child during the Covid-19 pandemic and developed postnatal depression. However, she felt in a much better mental state raising her second 2-month-old child because her mother had flown to Auckland to share the workload. As her mother held a regular visitor visa, she was set to return to China soon. "I have no choice but to [also] return to China," Li said. "I wanted to continue working here, and I'm very good at my job. "I face a lot of challenges returning to China, but for the sake of being with my parents and getting their help, I have no choice." Her parents provided Li with emotional support that was just as useful as their day-to-day assistance. "My parents are getting older," Liu said. "They also want us to be around. They're lonely on their own." Evan Chen and his parents in Waipara, Canterbury in 2023. Photo: Supplied Wellington IT worker Evan Chen, from Heilongjiang province in northeastern China, has been waiting almost two years for his parents' visa application to be approved. Chen is now preparing to hand in a new application for the visa as the expiry date looms. As of May 2025, 10,441 applications had been filed covering 15,887 applicants, according to latest published data from Immigration New Zealand. Based on the current annual quota of 2500, the chance of Chen's parents being successful with their application was about 16 percent, and there was no guarantee that applications could be approved after 10 or 20 years, he said. Chen, who is also an only child, said a selection process based on a queue would provide more certainty. "If Immigration told me to wait for five years or even seven, eight years, I could accept that because at least I can make plans," Chen said. "I don't know what I need to do with the ballot system," he said. "Can I start a business or other things? My parents are waiting for the news as well. ... It's a huge mental pressure." Chen said he would love to stay in New Zealand but would consider other options if it was too hard for his parents to join him. "A lot of us are only children," Chen said. "Our family doesn't want to use New Zealand's medical and other resources. "We just want to be able to look after them when they're older." A spokesperson from Immigration Minister Erica Stanford's office said the government's focus had been on delivering the Parent Boost Visa to support parents living offshore to visit and stay with their families in New Zealand for longer. The spokesperson said the ballot was introduced by the previous government in 2022, and advice from officials at the time said it would take six to 10 years for a parent to reach the front of the queue, with that time frame extending as the queue lengthened. "Regardless of the mechanism, it has always been the case that the demand for the Parent Resident category has been significantly more than the places available," the spokesperson said. "The two-year expiry ensures the information provided is up to date and accurate about current interest and eligibility for the visa. "This reduces the chance that EOI [expressions of interest] are selected for people who are no longer interested or eligible, causing delays for those who are," the spokesperson said. "As the EOI fee covers the cost for Immigration New Zealand to process the EOI, it is not refunded if the EOI is not selected and must be paid again for each new EOI," the spokesperson said. "The minister has directed officials to ensure this fee is at an appropriate level in the next fee and levy review."
