US lifts first sanctions on Syria following Trump's surprise announcement
On Friday, the US Department of the Treasury announced sweeping relief to an array of individuals and entities, which it said will 'enable new investment and private sector activity consistent with [Trump's] America First strategy'.
The US State Department, meanwhile, concurrently issued a waiver to a 2019 law, the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, that would 'enable our foreign partners, allies, and the region to further unlock Syria's potential'.
Trump surprised the international community when, on May 13, he pledged to remove sanctions placed on Syria during the leadership of its now-ousted leader, President Bashar al-Assad.
Friday's announcements mark an initial step towards that goal, as Syria recovers from abuses under al-Assad's government and 13 years of civil war.
'As President Trump promised, the Treasury Department and the State Department are implementing authorizations to encourage new investment into Syria,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.
'Syria must also continue to work towards becoming a stable country that is at peace, and today's actions will hopefully put the country on a path to a bright, prosperous, and stable future'.Trump first unveiled his plans for sanctions relief during a tour of the Middle East in mid-May. He said lifting US sanctions would give Syria 'a chance at greatness', since the restrictions left the war-torn country economically isolated.
'It's their time to shine. We're taking them all off,' he said from Riyadh.
Shortly after, Trump met and shook hands with Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa, who had only recently been removed from the US's 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist' list.
Calls for sanctions relief had grown following the fall of al-Assad's government last December. As head of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group, al-Sharaa spearheaded the offensive that led to al-Assad fleeing the country, bringing the civil war to an end.
The war, which first broke out in 2011, had left Syria's economy in tatters.
As many as 656,493 people were killed during the conflict, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, and a 2020 report from the United Nations estimated that the country suffered total economic losses of about $442.2bn in the first eight years of the war alone.
Sanctions have further dampened Syria's economic outlook, making it difficult for countries with ties to the US to conduct business there.
Since taking power in December, Syria's interim government has argued the ongoing sanctions, largely imposed during al-Assad's rule, would slow development and cause further instability.
Trump's announcement earlier this month buoyed hope for many Syrians of a new path forward, although the extent of the relief had remained unclear.
Earlier this week, the European Union also announced it had lifted sanctions against Syria.
Friday's sanctions relief in the US applies to the 'the Government of Syria … as in existence on or after May 13, 2025', according to the Treasury Department.
The reprieve also applies to several previously sanctioned transportation, banking, tourism and fossil fuel entities.
Transactions related to Russia, Iran and North Korea remain under US sanctions.
One of the biggest hurdles, however, is the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, a law that was passed in 2019, during Trump's first term.
It included broad sanctions that targeted al-Assad's government and its allies and supporters for atrocities committed against civilians.
The act was named after a former Syrian military photographer and whistleblower who smuggled out of the country a cache of images showing torture and mass killing at detention centres run by al-Assad's security forces.
But since the law was passed by Congress, it will likely take an act of Congress to completely lift its restrictions.
The president, however, can issue temporary waivers to the law, which is what the Trump administration did on Friday.
In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the waiver will last for 180 days, in order to 'increase investments and cash flows that will facilitate basic services and reconstruction in Syria'.
'We support the Syrian people's efforts to build a more hopeful future,' Rubio said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
What's the Texas redistricting fight about, and how has California reacted?
President Donald Trump and his allies have kicked off a redistricting fight in the United States as the country's two main political parties angle for advantage in the 2026 midterm elections. In an effort to maintain control of Congress, Republican leaders in the right-wing stronghold of Texas have pushed to redraw the state's congressional districts in a way that would net the party as many as five additional seats in the US House of Representatives. Trump has encouraged the effort, calling it a 'big WIN for the Great State of Texas'. The state's Senate is expected to vote on the new district plans as early as Thursday evening. But that effort has prompted a backlash. The Democratic-leaning state of California responded in kind by passing a plan on Thursday to abandon nonpartisan redistricting and create new congressional maps that could bring the Democrats five more seats, negating the effort in Texas. Party leaders in other states, including Missouri and Florida, have also indicated they may seek to rejigger their districts to pick up more seats. The standoff points to larger questions about how to ensure fair representation in Congress and how Trump has sought to exert wide-reaching control over the country's political system. With Trump's approval rating slipping to around 40 percent, Republicans risk losing their narrow, 219-person majority in the 435-seat House of Representatives in the midterm races. So what is redistricting? And what could it mean for upcoming elections? We answer those questions and more in this quick explainer. What is redistricting? Simply put, the practice of redistricting refers to drawing the boundaries of an election district. Ideally, districts should be designed as an accurate and proportionate reflection of the area's population. Maps are generally updated every 10 years, in accordance with the latest population census. But political parties can take steps to shape districts to their benefit, in a process sometimes referred to as gerrymandering. That involves finding creative ways to maximise the number of seats a party can win by carving districts based on demographics and voting trends, to increase the electoral weight of certain groups and minimise the influence of others. 'Politicians can look at information about the partisan and demographic breakdown of an area and stack the decks in their favour,' said Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at the University of California at San Diego. This practice has a long and fraught history in the US, especially in states with histories of segregation and discrimination, where maps were often drawn to dilute representation for minority voters. What is happening in Texas? While redistricting is far from new, Texas has been in the spotlight recently for a particularly overt partisan effort. Part of the controversy stems from the involvement of President Trump, who prompted Texas Republicans to redraw maps. In June and July, reports began to emerge that the White House was holding calls with Texas state leaders to tee up a redistricting battle, in preparation for the 2026 midterms. Despite early concerns that the effort could backfire, Republican lawmakers in the state quickly put the plan in motion. Speaking by phone to CNBC on August 5, Trump seemed to suggest that the make-up of the US Congress should reflect his success in the 2024 presidential race. 'We should have many more seats in Congress,' Trump said. 'I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.' The state's House of Representatives passed a new election map on Wednesday, and the Texas Senate is expected to do the same in the next few days. The new maps would carve out five additional districts in areas where Trump performed strongly during the last election. How did Texas Democrats respond? Texas Democrats condemned the redistricting as a partisan power grab and tried to prevent a vote on the new congressional map. In early August, they left the state in a bid to deny the Texas legislature the quorum it needed to move the plan forward. But as a minority voting bloc in the firmly Republican state legislature, the Democrats ultimately failed to stop the redistricting scheme. While away, Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the absent Democrats' arrest, and the Republicans in the state House echoed that effort with a vote to issue arrest warrants. Abbott also threatened the Democrats with criminal charges, including for bribery, if they solicited funds during their absence. What's more, the Texas Democrats faced a series of reported bomb threats at their Illinois hotels. Eventually, after two weeks, they returned to their home state, allowing the vote to proceed. Democratic leaders have said that, while they did not stop the redistricting push, they drew attention to the issue and are preparing to challenge the new maps in court. Do both parties gerrymander? Yes, both parties have engaged in gerrymandering, and the practice has been employed throughout US history in varying contexts. In recent years, however, the practice has been more commonly associated with right-leaning states. Princeton University's Gerrymandering Project found that states with the most severe gerrymandering tend to be Republican-led states in the southern US, where the practice has historically been employed to dilute the influence of Black voters. The project also found that a handful of states, such as Oregon, Illinois and Nevada, have partisan election maps that heavily favour Democrats. Some Democrats previously criticised gerrymandering as anti-democratic and pushed for changes to ensure that redistricting is nonpartisan. 'Public servants should earn the votes of the people that they hope to represent. What Republicans are trying to do in Texas is to have politicians choose their voters,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently told reporters. But as Trump seeks to increase his party's advantage, some Democratic leaders have urged the party to change its approach and 'fight fire with fire' through more explicitly partisan tactics. Is gerrymandering legal? Courts have, on occasion, struck down gerrymandered congressional maps on the basis that they violate the US Constitution's Equal Protection Clause by disadvantaging racial minorities and other demographics. But the Supreme Court has ruled it will not intervene in questions of partisan gerrymandering, though state courts can. How is California responding? Following the developments in Texas, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced his state would begin its own redistricting effort meant to add five congressional seats to the Democrats' tally in the US House of Representatives. California, the largest state by population, is considered solidly left-leaning: Nearly 47 percent of registered voters identified as Democrat in 2023, compared with 24 percent for Republicans. On Thursday, the state's legislature voted largely along party lines to forward the redistricting plan to Newsom's desk for a signature. 'It's the fact that this has been so baldly political and driven by demands from Trump that has allowed Democrats to take the gloves off,' said Kousser. Newsom has depicted his actions as an unfortunate but necessary response to the Texas Republicans. He said he will shelve California's redistricting plans if Texas agrees to do the same, but he argues that Democrat-led states cannot 'unilaterally disarm' and allow partisan redistricting to disadvantage them in Congress. 'Other blue states need to stand up,' Newsom said as he announced his plan. 'We need to be firm.' Former Democratic President Barack Obama said that, while his 'preference' is to do away with gerrymandering, Newsom was taking a 'responsible approach' by countering the Republicans. Are other states considering redistricting plans? Yes. The Republican-led state of Ohio announced redistricting plans, and Republican leaders in Florida, Indiana and Missouri have also suggested they will follow suit. Meanwhile, officials in the Democrat-led state of Illinois are also mulling changes to the map-drawing process. New York's Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul also said that her state may pursue redistricting if Texas moves forward with its plan. How could this affect future elections? It is unclear how much this redistricting battle will tip the scales for either party, particularly as Democrats consider steps to negate Republican gains. But experts say there are generally more Republican-led states where redistricting might be viable The primary objective is to gain an advantage in anticipation of the 2026 midterms, when control of Congress is up for grabs. While each state receives exactly two senators, the number of representatives in the House varies depending on each state's population size. All 435 seats in the House will be up for grabs in the midterms, and each congressional district is responsible for selecting the winner for one of those seats. Trump last month called Texas the greatest prize — 'the biggest one' — in the redistricting battle. On Thursday, he framed the five seats Republicans hope to gain there as integral to his platform: 'On our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself. Texas never lets us down.' But halfway through Trump's first term in office, the Republicans lost their majority in the House during the midterm elections. That loss gave Democrats greater power to stymie Trump's legislative priorities. 'Trump is urging his allies to redraw districts as a way to insulate him and his political party from possible backlash in the midterms,' said Kousser. Isn't California doing the same thing as Texas? Newsom has attempted to assuage concerns about California's redistricting scheme by contrasting his plan with the one in Texas. He says that California's new map will go before voters in November for approval, unlike in Texas, and will only go into effect if Republican-led states do the same. Still, his efforts would require sidelining a nonpartisan redistricting panel previously approved by California voters. But Kousser says that Trump's push for greater sway over the country's political system may induce more Democrats to adopt partisan redistricting for themselves. 'Newsom was explicit that there is a way to back down from this arms race,' he said. 'But he's also saying that, if Republicans don't back away from this, Democrats will use these means as well.'
Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
US, EU seal trade deal with 15% tariff on most imports
Agencies American and European Union officials released a bare-bones account Thursday of the trade deal they reached last month and that includes a 15% U.S. tariff on most imports from the bloc, including autos, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber. Still, they left blank key areas such as wine and spirits as well as steel and indicated that talks would continue on those and a slew of other important sectors. The two sides said the document was only 'a first step in a process that can be further expanded to cover additional areas.' They are dealing with the vast range of goods traded between the two economies in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, involving $2 trillion in annual trans-Atlantic business. The 3 1/2-page text represents a political commitment and is not legally binding. It contrasts with the typical format for trade agreements, which can be hundreds of pages long and carry legal force. The key provisions are the 15% tariff on most EU goods, a zero rate on U.S. cars and other industrial goods exported to the 27-member EU, and a range of exceptions to the 15% rate for aircraft and aircraft parts, generic pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients, with other sectors to be added for goods crucial to each other's economies. Those goods would face lower tariffs from before President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught. 'The EU has agreed to open its $20 Trillion market,' Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on social media platform X. 'The second largest in the world behind the great USA.' He said the deal was 'a major win for American workers, US industries, and our national security. Tariffs should be one of America's favorite words.' European officials have had to defend the deal against dismay from businesses and member governments at the higher tariffs and criticism that the EU gave away too much. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen sold the deal as granting quick relief from the even higher U.S. tariff on EU cars of 27.5% and as opening the way for further negotiations that could exclude more goods from the 15% tariffs. The deal provides that the lower tariff on cars would apply retroactively from Aug. 1 if the EU can introduce legislation to implement its part of the deal by then, which EU officials say they will do. 'Faced with a challenging situation, we have delivered for our member states and industry and restored clarity and coherence to transatlantic trade,' von der Leyen said. 'This is not the end of the process.' The chief EU trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, echoed those sentiments. 'The alternative was a trade war with sky high tariffs ... it builds confidence. It brings stability,' he said. Economists say higher tariffs slow economic growth and will be reflected in higher consumer category of goods not excluded from tariffs on EU goods was wine and spirits, which had enjoyed zero tariffs on both ends since a 1997 trade deal. Sefcovic, said EU officials had not won an exemption 'yet' but hoped to in future talks and that 'doors are not closed forever' on that issue. That means American distillers face zero tariffs in Europe the short term, but also the possibility of EU retaliation down the line, said Chris Swonger, president and CEO of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States. 'Without a permanent return to zero-for-zero tariffs on spirits, American distillers do not have the certainty to plan for future export and job growth without the fear of retaliatory tariffs returning,' Swonger said in a EU has suspended retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods including wine and spirits until Feb. 5, 2026. Proposals to exempt a certain amount of EU steel imports, known as a tariff rate quota, have been left unresolved pending more talks. The 15% tariff is much higher than tariff levels on both sides from before Trump began imposing his tariffs, when they averaged in the low single digits. The tariffs are paid on the U.S. end, either absorbed by American businesses importing the goods, lowering their profits, or passed on to U.S. consumers in the form of higher prices at the cash register. The deal also includes nonbinding EU commitments to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and for EU companies to invest $600 billion in the U.S. In both cases, the money would come from private companies and is based on assessment by the European Commission on what companies were planning to spend.
Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
Russia intensifies airstrikes on Ukraine; Kiev strikes back
dpa Kiev Russia deployed a number of combat drones and fired multiple missiles in the direction of Ukrainian cities despite ongoing peace efforts, The Kyiv Independent reported early on Thursday. According to Ukrainian figures, the air force detected 614 enemy aircraft, including hundreds of drones, as well as hypersonic, ballistic and cruise missiles. The RBC Ukraine news agency reported that explosions were heard in Kiev and in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv. RBC Ukraine cited the military governor of Lviv, Maksym Kozytskyi, as saying that air defences were activated in the region. An air alert had previously been issued in Kiev on Wednesday evening and the drone attacks continued there overnight, with sirens reportedly lasting nearly 8 hours. Air defences were also active in the city. People were told to stay in shelters, the news agency wrote, citing Kiev's military administration. There was initially no precise information on casualties or damage. Missiles struck in western Ukraine, including Mukachevo near the Hungarian border, where 15 people were injured. Media reports indicate a factory for electronic components was hit, sparking a large fire. In Lviv, one person was killed and three others injured, according to Mayor Andrii Sadovyi. Meanwhile, Ukraine conducted overnight attacks on Russian territory using combat drones. The Russian Defence Ministry reported 49 drones intercepted. Russian Telegram channels cited strikes on the Novoshakhtinsk refinery in Rostov, causing a fire, temporary closure of a railway line in Voronezh, and short-term airport suspensions in Volgograd and Kaluga due to drone alerts. Ukraine has been defending itself against a Russian invasion for almost three and a half years. The latest attacks come amid a recent push by US President Donald Trump for a solution to the war in Ukraine. To that end, he has hosted a series of meetings in recent days - first in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, then in Washington with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders on Monday. Trump is next trying to arrange a Putin-Zelensky meeting. A possible three-way summit with Trump, Putin and Zelensky is also on the cards.
