logo
What to watch as Wisconsin and Florida host the first major elections of Trump's second term

What to watch as Wisconsin and Florida host the first major elections of Trump's second term

Yahoo01-04-2025

The first major elections of President Doanld Trump's second term will take place on Tuesday, as voters head to the polls in Wisconsin, a perennial battleground, and in Trump-friendly territory in Florida.
Tens of millions of dollars have poured into Wisconsin ahead of Tuesday's state Supreme Court race in a contest that could have huge national implications. It's the first major statewide contest in a battleground since the 2024 election — and it's happening in the state where Trump saw his narrowest margin-of-victory in November.
Elon Musk has emerged as a major player in the Wisconsin race as he expands his political portfolio, providing Democrats with an early test for whether the billionaire Trump adviser can be an effective boogeyman.
And in Florida, voters will head to the polls for special elections in the deep-red 1st and 6th Congressional Districts, where Republicans are looking to pad their razor-thin House majority. And though both districts are on Trump's turf, Republicans have been anxious that the races could prove to be competitive, as grassroots energy — and dollars — boost the Democratic contenders.
Polls close at 7 p.m. ET in Florida's 6th District and 8 p.m. ET in the 1st District, which is in the central time zone. And polls in Wisconsin close at 9 p.m. ET.
Tuesday's Wisconsin Supreme Court race marks the second time in two years that the bench's ideological majority will be at stake. Liberals on the technically nonpartisan court currently hold a 4-3 advantage, and another liberal win could keep that majority alive for at least one more year — while a conservative victory would give them the edge ahead of a term likely to see cases on abortion rights, unions and collective bargaining rights, and congressional maps and redistricting.
The race is between liberal candidate Susan Crawford — a state judge in Madison who has received the backing of the state and national Democratic Party organizations, as well as the financial support, directly and indirectly, of a cadre of liberal billionaires — and Brad Schimel, a state judge and former Republican state attorney general who has the backing of Trump and Musk, the tech billionaire and leader of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency.
However, more than Trump, who endorsed Schimel 11 days ahead of the race in a late-night social media post, it's been Musk who has taken on the starring role in the campaign on both sides.
'It's become kind of a referendum on the Trump administration, and what Elon Musk is doing as part of that, and Musk has amplified that by getting involved in Wisconsin,' explained Barry Burden, a political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 'If there was any doubt about whether this election had a connection to national politics, Trump and Musk have made that connection for voters.'
Musk and his super PAC have spent at least $15 million to boost Schimel, campaign finance records show, on top of three $1 million prizes Musk has awarded to those who signed his petition against 'activist judges.' He came to Wisconsin on Sunday night to campaign for Schimel in person.
Democrats and groups supporting Crawford leaned heavily into making Musk the centerpiece of the race, attacking him in ads, on the trail, and on social media over his actions at DOGE and accusing him of 'trying to buy' Schimel. (Many groups also pointed out that Tesla, Musk's electric car company, filed a suit in Wisconsin in January challenging a state law banning carmakers from owning dealerships — a case that could potentially come before the state Supreme Court).
Overall, Democrats and their affiliated outside groups have outspent Republicans on the airwaves — they've spent almost $42 million compared to almost $33 million from conservatives, enough to make it the most expensive state Supreme Court race on record, as far as ad spending, according to the ad-tracking firm AdImpact.
Despite the level of attention and spending, the springtime, off-year contest, will feature far fewer voters than in presidential and midterm races — meaning that both sides have sought to juice their turnout on Tuesday.
To that end, Schimel and Republican and conservative groups supporting him have heavily emphasized Trump's endorsement of Schimel — a move that could help turn out Republican voters in a state that Trump carried in two of the past three presidential elections.
In addition to running ads touting the endorsement down the home stretch of the campaign, Schimel appeared at a campaign town hall event in March with Donald Trump Jr. and told a group of canvassers from the conservative group Turning Point USA that Trump needs a 'support network' around him to help him fight the myriad suits his administration has faced.
While the race also included a barrage of messaging on both sides on crime and reproductive rights, groups supporting Schimel, in addition to focusing on Trump, built a closing message on the airwaves that attacked Crawford over transgender issues — a move that replicates the successful strategy Republicans and Trump used during the final weeks of their winning 2024 campaign.
The pair of Florida special elections will be fought on Trump's territory, testing his influence over his base and Democrats' enthusiasm in the Trump era. Republicans are expecting to win both races, but there are concerns that closer-than-expected results could fuel a narrative of Democratic momentum.
The winner in Florida's 1st District in the Panhandle will replace former GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz, while the 6th District winner will replace former GOP Rep. Mike Waltz, now Trump's national security adviser. Trump carried the 1st District by 37 points in November and the 6th by 30 points, according to election results from NBC News' Decision Desk.
The races are more competitive due to expectations of lower turnout, which Democrats have leveraged in other special elections in the Trump era, and blockbuster fundraising from the two Democratic candidates.
Republicans have raised more concerns about the 6th District race, where GOP state Sen. Randy Fine is competing against Democratic teacher Josh Weil, pointing to Fine's lackluster fundraising and late ad spending. In the 1st District, Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis is facing Democrat Gay Valimont, a former activist with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America who ran against Gaetz in November.
Both Republican candidates have Trump's backing, and the president held tele-town halls for them last week, encouraging his voters to go to the polls. They've also gotten a boost from outside groups in recent days. Musk's super PAC has also jumped into the contests, spending nearly $100,000 on phone calls and texts in the races, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission.
Neither Democratic candidate has directly targeted Musk in their ads. But both candidates suggested in recent interviews that the Musk-led effort to slash the size of the federal government, and potential GOP cuts to entitlement programs, could impact their races, since the 1st District has a large share of veterans and the 6th District has a sizable senior population.
Further down the Wisconsin ballot on Tuesday are two other races that haven't garnered much national attention but have been major local issues. There is a proposed amendment to enshrine an existing voter ID law into the state constitution, as well as a state superintendent race that has also become somewhat of a referendum on the role Musk has played in downsizing the federal government.
The voter ID law is already part of the state code, but conservatives want to add it to the constitution to make it more difficult to strike the law down — if, for example, a liberal-majority state Supreme Court were to invalidate the law with a ruling. Trump himself endorsed the proposed amendment in a social media post Monday.
But many strategists in the state, including Republicans, have acknowledged another motivation for adding the question to the ballot was to juice conservative turnout in the state Supreme Court race.
The race for the superintendent of public instruction — a job that oversees the state's education system — has taken on increased importance in the weeks since Trump signed an executive order to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, thereby beginning a process to put far more responsibility on education policy directly in states' hands.
Like the state Supreme Court contest, the technically nonpartisan race has taken on a distinctly partisan flavor. The incumbent, Dr. Jill Underly, is backed by the state Democratic Party, while her challenger, Brittany Kinser, has received the backing of conservative groups and funders, though she has called herself a moderate.
Kinser is an education consultant who has made expanding school choice programs the main tenet of her campaign.
Underly, who is in her first term, has attempted to tie Kinser to Trump's dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education, as well as Musk's DOGE effort.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

time16 minutes ago

In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles

The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'

MAGA Supporters Counter Anti-ICE Protests: 'Go Back to Mexico'
MAGA Supporters Counter Anti-ICE Protests: 'Go Back to Mexico'

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

MAGA Supporters Counter Anti-ICE Protests: 'Go Back to Mexico'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Donald Trump supporters in Tampa, Florida, have started counter-protests to anti-ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demonstrations. Video footage posted on X, formerly Twitter, shows a man holding a red "MAGA country" flag chanting "we want ICE" and telling a woman holding a Mexican flag: "If you love Mexico, go back to Mexico." In another clip, a group of men can be seen holding a Trump-Vance banner, before move for a truck coming through. Hundreds gathered outside Tampa's City Hall to protest on Monday, after a weekend of violent clashes between anti-ICE demonstrators and law enforcement. Police intervened during some heated moments between anti-ICE protesters and counter-protesters but there was no violence, according to Tampa broadcaster FOX13. This is a developing story - more to follow.

Attorney for Deported Makeup Artist: If ‘It Could Happen to Him … It Could Happen to You.'
Attorney for Deported Makeup Artist: If ‘It Could Happen to Him … It Could Happen to You.'

Business of Fashion

time18 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Attorney for Deported Makeup Artist: If ‘It Could Happen to Him … It Could Happen to You.'

In a defiant speech, Lindsay Toczylowski, president and co-founder of social justice legal firm Immigrant Defenders Law Center, called the deportation of undocumented immigrants without due process a direct attack on democracy. Her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, a 31-year-old Venezuelan makeup artist seeking asylum in the US, was in March deported to El Salvador, where he was taken to the country's notorious CECOT prison along with over 200 other Venezuelan and Salvadoran deportees. The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing the Trump administration over its use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport undocumented immigrants without due process, said in court filings that the government relied solely on Romero's tattoos to incorrectly label him a violent gang member. Family and supporters say they fear for the safety of Romero, who is gay and was seeking asylum after being persecuted for his sexual orientation in Venezuela. He has not been seen or heard from since his arrival in El Salvador, including by his legal representation. 'The only fight that we lose is the one we give up on… It's about the future of our democracy and the country we want to live in,' she said, speaking at The Business of Beauty Global Forum in Napa Valley, California. 'His story is the embodiment of it could happen to him, it could happen to me, it could happen to you, it could happen to any one of us. It's why the rule of law is so important. It's why due process is so important.' Toczylowski also addressed escalating tensions in Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard and Marines to quell protests against ICE deportation roundups in the city. Opponents of the move, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, say the decision to send troops was disproportionate to the small number of violent incidents associated with the protests, and will only inflame the situation. On Monday, protests spread to other cities around the country. 'There are more than 200 residents of Los Angeles that have been picked up off the streets,' said Toczylowski. 'I have watched masked agents in plain clothes push people into service elevators in the middle of federal buildings in downtown LA in the last two weeks. This is an all-out assault on the values that we hold as Angelenos, as Californians, as Americans.' She said one of the most important methods of pushing back against the Trump administration's immigration actions, whether in LA or El Salvador, is to speak out against them as often, and as forcefully as possible. 'The moment that we stop talking about [Romero], about his story and others like him is the moment that the Trump administration is successful in completing the disappearance of Andry José Hernández Romero,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store