I'm an oncologist. Here's my biggest piece of advice for Biden right now.
In a statement released Sunday, Biden's office disclosed that he had Stage 4 prostate cancer with 'metastasis to the bone.' The disease was noted to be an 'aggressive form' with a Gleason score of 9 (on a scale of 6 to 10), which reflects the heightened abnormality of the cells. The former president is now exploring treatment options with his doctors.
Not long ago, my 74-year-old uncle found himself in the same place. In 2023, his prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test — which measures a protein produced by both normal and cancerous cells of the prostate gland — was 1.5, well below the age-appropriate normal of 4.0. But within a year, despite only vague urinary symptoms, his level spiked to 104.
An MRI of the prostate and biopsy duly followed, and confirmed cancer with a high Gleason score. Shortly after, a PET scan showed that the disease had already spread to various bones and lymph nodes. Like Biden, in other words, my uncle's malady was Stage 4 at the time of diagnosis — controllable but incurable.
Because prostate cancers are often slow-growing and assessed regularly with PSA levels, the vast majority (70%, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) are first detected at an early stage, still localized to the prostate. But while such advanced presentations are unlikely at the time of initial detection, they are not impossible. According to the CDC, 8% of prostate cancers are first diagnosed when the cancer has already spread so widely.
After my uncle's unexpected diagnosis, I had to provide space for him and his immediate family to absorb the news. And though I would not be the primary doctor for his treatment, I did reassure him that regardless of the advanced cancer, an effective treatment plan did exist.
The former president will receive the same treatment plan my uncle has: an individualized strategy that accounts for his disease specifics, physical ability, co-morbidities and quality of life. And crucially, my uncle could start this journey with optimism, thanks not only to his personal faith but to the burgeoning potential of current prostate cancer treatments — hormone therapy, chemotherapy, radiation and others.
'Over the past decade, treatment for advanced prostate cancer has evolved significantly,' said Bilawal Ahmed, an oncologist at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and a panel contributor on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's guidelines for prostate cancer. 'While Stage 4 prostate cancer is not curable, it is very often treatable and manageable as a chronic disease. This helps shift the focus from fear to a long-term care plan rooted in hope and ongoing support.'
This is where Biden, and others like my uncle, stand to potentially benefit from the bounties of the former president's own 'moonshot' mission to reduce cancer deaths through significant investment in research. Such efforts, which are threatened by the Trump administration's ongoing budget cuts, are the mainspring to expand our arsenal against a disease whose incidence and death toll remain substantial.
'Cancer touches us all,' Biden posted Monday on social media. For me, this holds true both personally and professionally. My uncle has made incredible progress on his cancer journey: His PSA has cratered on treatment and scans show no active disease. While no two cancers are ever alike, I hope the former president's path meets equal success.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7 minutes ago
Taylor Swift shares update on dad's health after heart surgery
Taylor Swift is sharing an update on her dad Scott Swift's and mom Andrea Swift's health. The pop superstar opened up about her parents in Wednesday's podcast episode of "New Heights," which is hosted by Swift's boyfriend Travis Kelce and his older brother Jason Kelce. Swift said her 73-year-old father is recovering following what she described as a "really intense" heart surgery in Florida earlier this summer. "He's doing good," Swift said. "He is doing incredibly well. My dad had an interesting summer. He actually had a quintuple bypass surgery, and that's a really intense surgery." The 35-year-old said that her dad previously had "perfect" electrocardiogram or EKG tests, a type of test doctors use to measure the electrical activity, rate, and regularity of a person's heartbeat, which they use to help diagnose heart conditions, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, Swift said her dad subsequently went in for a nuclear stress test -- an imaging test in which stress is induced through exercise or pharmacologic agents to view how blood flows through the heart, according to StatPearls, an online library published in the National Library of Medicine -- and doctors found reduced blood flow in five areas in his heart that needed to be treated quickly. Swift said her dad's major surgery brought their family, including her mom and brother Austin, closer and that they "all moved in with him for the whole summer," helping him both in and out of the hospital, an experience she called both "special" and "surreal." "He came out of surgery, tried to give guitar picks to all the nurses and doctors, but he wasn't wearing pants. Didn't have pockets, hospital gown," Swift recalled. "I'm having these moments where I'm like, this dude built play sets and swing sets and cribs for me. I'm building his … shower chair and his walker ... Like, it's just surreal, man." Swift also revealed that her mom also underwent surgery recently, getting a knee replacement. "My mom just got a new knee. She's doing great," Swift said. "This was just, like, the summer of my parental upgrades. We're just upgrading the parents, making sure that they live to be at least 186 years old, because they're two of my best friends." "It was actually one of the most special things that's ever happened to me, like, spending all that time with them this summer," she added.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bipartisan solutions for Afghan allies spark hope
After a long period of uncertainty for many Afghan allies of the U.S., it is encouraging to see a glimmer of hope. Recently, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a new bill that would offer legal pathways for Afghans who risked their lives supporting U.S. forces. The legislation is a hopeful spark for both Afghan allies living in the U.S. and the American community members who now call these individuals neighbors and friends. Four years have passed since the fall of Kabul, and yet uncertainty continues to overshadow the lives of our Afghan allies, both here in the United States and abroad. Recent policy changes have increased confusion around the future of many allies. Just in July, nearly 11,000 Afghans lost their Temporary Protected Status, including many who worked alongside U.S. troops for nearly two decades of military engagement in Afghanistan. The fourth anniversary of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan should be not only a reminder of our allies' plight but also a call for urgent action — encouraging compassion and decisive legislative measures to honor our commitments. Recently, President Trump commented on the plight of Afghan refugees in the United States, saying, 'We're going to take care of those people, the ones that did a job [for us], the ones that were told certain things.' Such comments combined with the legislative developments signal a promising beginning to the long-overdue solutions our allies deserve. Thousands of Afghan men and women helped and fought alongside our troops during the United States' time in Afghanistan. They fought with us and for their own country's future, hoping that democracy and freedom would prevail. They stood beside us as interpreters, pilots, soldiers and medical professionals — ensuring our mission's success. By the end of 2023 the UN Refugee Agency estimated that there were 6.4 million Afghan refugees globally. The United States is home to nearly 200,000 of these displaced people who arrived under the Biden administration during the fall of Kabul. In January of this year, family reunification flights were cancelled as the U.S. refugee program was temporarily shut down. Last year around this time I wrote on my own disappointment at the lack of action we've seen from lawmakers to support our displaced Afghan allies. Now we are four years out from the fall of Kabul — and while it has seemed as if there would be no change, this new bipartisan effort gives me hope that the U.S. government will still fulfill the promises made to our Afghan allies. It is not only about promises made and kept — it is undeniable that the U.S. prospers when refugees join our communities. A 2024 study by the Department of Health and Human Services found that refugees and asylees contributed $123.8 billion to the U.S. economy over a 15-year period. They join and create businesses, and they revitalize American communities. For four years this population has been in a limbo, building lives and making American communities stronger with no guarantee for tomorrow. They have become a part of our schools, our businesses and our churches. They have become more than simply allies; they have become neighbors. It is beyond time for us to seek bipartisan solutions that allow them a safe and productive future in the country they helped protect and serve. Most of Americans want to see Congress and the administration protecting Afghans by providing them permanent status — a commitment that is long overdue.
Wall Street Journal
37 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘To Lose a War' Review: Back Again in Kabul
Afghanistan was an American national nightmare for two decades. It began with a war launched there in late 2001, after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, and ended in a Vietnam-like military withdrawal under President Biden in August 2021—an ignominious pullout that was set in motion by President Trump the year before. Some 2,500 U.S. troops were killed during those two decades, and the cost to the American taxpayer of this fundamentally honorable, frequently naive and always brutal entanglement has been put at $2.3 trillion—all spent 'To Lose a War,' as Jon Lee Anderson titles his book on Afghanistan. The book's subtitle, 'The Fall and Rise of the Taliban,' is depressingly apt. Shortly after the war began, the U.S. and its allies defeated the Taliban—a cadre of austere and radical Islamist warriors who had established a Shariah-state in Afghanistan in 1996—only to see the same benighted group return to power in 2021. They had waited 20 years for their own restoration. ('You have the watches, but we have the time,' goes an adage attributed to the Taliban.) Now ensconced in power, the Taliban is ripping out all the modernity—however superficial—that had been brought to Afghanistan in their absence. Mr. Anderson is a long-serving war correspondent and staff writer for the New Yorker magazine. He first reported on Afghanistan in the late 1980s when the occupying Soviets were driven out by the mujahideen, an alliance of Afghan nationalists, tribal warlords and Islamist guerrillas who enacted their own defiant chapter in a long tradition of hostility to outsiders. 'Afghanistan has always been more of a battleground of history than it has been a nation,' writes Mr. Anderson, and the Soviets were the latest in a long line of foreign armies sent packing by 'the hardy Afghans.' 'To Lose a War' is a compilation of Mr. Anderson's previously published essays on Afghanistan (with a sprinkling of unpublished material). This is his second such collection, his first being 'The Lion's Grave' (2002). The latter, a concise book, was 'a chronicle of the first year of the American presence in Afghanistan.' Mr. Anderson had returned to the country in the wake of 9/11 and wrote an insightful series of dispatches at a time when Americans were thirsting for knowledge of a cryptic foe in an unfamiliar land. The last of these pieces was an investigation into who killed Ahmad Shah Massoud, the legendary mujahideen leader, on Sept. 9, 2001—two days before the al Qaeda attacks on U.S. soil. An admirable feat of reportage done at great personal risk, it was published in June 2002.
