British Meteorologist's Remains Recovered 66 Years Later from Antarctic Glacier
They were identified by DNA testing as those of Dennis 'Tink' Bell, who died aged 25 when he was working for the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, which became the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), the U.K.'s polar research institute.
Bell died on Admiralty Bay on King George Island, located 120 kilometers off the coast of Antarctica, on July 26, 1959.
He was stationed on the island for a two-year assignment at a small U.K. research base.
Bell and three other men had set out to climb and survey a glacier, when he fell through a crevasse — a deep chasm in the ice. His body was never recovered.
The remains, which were exposed by a receding glacier, were found on Jan. 19 by a team from the Henryk Arctowski Polish Antarctic Station.
'This discovery brings closure to a decades-long mystery and reminds us of the human stories embedded in the history of Antarctic science,' said BAS director Jane Francis.
The bone fragments were carried to the Falkland Islands by the BAS Royal Research Ship Sir David Attenborough, and then brought to London for DNA testing.
Alongside his remains, the Polish team also found over 200 personal items including radio equipment, a flashlight, ski poles, an inscribed wristwatch and a Swedish-brand knife.
Bell's brother David Bell, who lives in Australia, said the discovery after 66 years left him and his sister 'shocked and amazed.'
'Dennis was the oldest of three siblings and was my hero as he seemed to be able to turn his hand to anything,' said his brother.
Francis said the confirmation of the remains 'is both a poignant and profound moment for all of us at British Antarctic Survey.'
Bell 'was one of the many brave … personnel who contributed to the early science and exploration of Antarctica under extraordinarily harsh conditions,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
10 hours ago
- Japan Today
Robots deployed for Fukushima radioactive debris removal
Around 880 tons of hazardous material remain inside Fukushima power plant, site of one of the world's worst nuclear accidents after it was hit by a tsunami in 2011. Japanese technicians at the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant have sent in remote-controlled robots to one of the damaged reactor buildings as part of preparations to remove radioactive debris. Dangerously high radiation levels mean that removing melted fuel and other debris from the plant hit by a huge tsunami in 2011 is seen as the most daunting challenge in the decades-long decommissioning project. Around 880 tonnes of hazardous material remain inside the power station, site of one of the world's worst nuclear accidents after a tsunami triggered by a 9.0-magnitude earthquake in 2011. A spokesman for plant operator TEPCO told AFP that the company had deployed two robots -- "Spot" and "Packbot" -- at one of the damaged reactor buildings on Tuesday to measure the level of radiation. Both are equipped with dosimeters, a device used to measure radiation, and "Spot" -- which resembles a dog -- has a camera. The results of the investigation would be used to help decide upon "a full-scale fuel debris retrieval method", TEPCO said in a press release. Public broadcaster NHK and other local media reported that the survey would continue for about a month. Tiny samples of radioactive material have twice been collected under a trial project using special tools, but full-fledged extractions are yet to take place. The samples have been delivered to a research lab for analysis. TEPCO announced in July that the massive operation to remove debris had been delayed until at least 2037. The company previously said it hoped to start in the early 2030s. The new schedule throws into doubt previously stated goals by TEPCO and the government to declare the Fukushima plant defunct by 2051. But TEPCO said last month the deadline was achievable despite acknowledging it would be "tough". © 2025 AFP
Yomiuri Shimbun
a day ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
British Meteorologist's Remains Recovered 66 Years Later from Antarctic Glacier
LONDON (AFP-Jiji) — The remains of a British meteorologist who died in an Antarctic expedition in 1959 have been recovered six decades later from a glacier, the British Antarctic Survey said on Aug. 11. They were identified by DNA testing as those of Dennis 'Tink' Bell, who died aged 25 when he was working for the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, which became the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), the U.K.'s polar research institute. Bell died on Admiralty Bay on King George Island, located 120 kilometers off the coast of Antarctica, on July 26, 1959. He was stationed on the island for a two-year assignment at a small U.K. research base. Bell and three other men had set out to climb and survey a glacier, when he fell through a crevasse — a deep chasm in the ice. His body was never recovered. The remains, which were exposed by a receding glacier, were found on Jan. 19 by a team from the Henryk Arctowski Polish Antarctic Station. 'This discovery brings closure to a decades-long mystery and reminds us of the human stories embedded in the history of Antarctic science,' said BAS director Jane Francis. The bone fragments were carried to the Falkland Islands by the BAS Royal Research Ship Sir David Attenborough, and then brought to London for DNA testing. Alongside his remains, the Polish team also found over 200 personal items including radio equipment, a flashlight, ski poles, an inscribed wristwatch and a Swedish-brand knife. Bell's brother David Bell, who lives in Australia, said the discovery after 66 years left him and his sister 'shocked and amazed.' 'Dennis was the oldest of three siblings and was my hero as he seemed to be able to turn his hand to anything,' said his brother. Francis said the confirmation of the remains 'is both a poignant and profound moment for all of us at British Antarctic Survey.' Bell 'was one of the many brave … personnel who contributed to the early science and exploration of Antarctica under extraordinarily harsh conditions,' she added.
Japan Today
2 days ago
- Japan Today
Why are Westerners so reluctant to eat seaweed?
By Steven David Pickering Seaweed is one of the few foods that can credibly claim to be good for both people and the planet. So why don't Westerners eat more of it? It's rich in vitamins, minerals, omega-3 fatty acids and fiber. It grows without fertilizers, pesticides or fresh water, and requires no farmland. Some species even capture carbon from the atmosphere and help counter ocean acidification. From an environmental and nutritional standpoint, seaweed seems like an obvious choice for a sustainable diet. Yet in much of the West, it remains a fringe ingredient, appearing far more often wrapped around sushi in a restaurant than in a household's weekly meals. My team has been investigating this gap between seaweed's potential and its place in everyday diets. Our aim was to find out why people in some countries eat seaweed regularly and why others do not. Even actor Samuel L Jackson has recently been promoting the virtues of seaweed snacks sourced from reefs beneath offshore windfarms. But seaweed snacks are far from mainstream, especially in countries like the UK. Some of my computational social science students worked with the Europe-wide seaweed association North Sea Farmers to develop a campaign to encourage people in the Netherlands to eat more seaweed. They quickly realized that before trying to persuade people to eat more, it was important to understand the reasons they might not be eating it already. This question was the focus of our new study surveying people living in both the UK (where seaweed is rarely eaten) and Japan (where it is a daily staple). By comparing the answers, we could separate cultural familiarity from other social and psychological factors that might influence consumption. We didn't just ask whether people eat seaweed. We explored how often they eat it, how easy they think it is to buy, how likely they are to eat it in future, and how healthy they believe it to be. We also looked at their education, gender, age, political orientation, willingness to take risks, ethnic background in the UK, and levels of trust in institutions. These factors are often linked to openness to new foods and could help explain differences between countries. Some results were not too surprising. Japanese respondents ate seaweed far more often than their British counterparts, found it easier to buy, and were more willing to eat it in the future. In both countries, people who were more willing to take risks, including trying unfamiliar foods, were more likely to eat seaweed. But the really interesting differences lay in who those seaweed-eaters were. In the UK, consumption was higher among ethnic minorities and university graduates, and it tended to appeal more to those on the political left. In Japan, it was more common among women and those on the political right, reflecting its place as a traditional food rather than an alternative one. Trust in government, scientists or social media played a smaller and less consistent role, and the patterns varied between countries. In Japan, trust in government was linked with seeing seaweed as healthy, while in the UK there was no similar link. These contrasts probably reflect how seaweed is framed in each country's media and cultural narratives. The way forward Seaweed is not simply another fashionable superfood. Its potential role in sustainable food systems is supported by strong evidence. It has a low environmental footprint, can be cultivated at scale, and can improve the nutritional value of other foods when used as an ingredient. However, our research shows that making seaweed more available or promoting its health benefits will not automatically increase its use. In the UK, familiarity is a major barrier. People may have access to seaweed products yet still avoid them if they do not feel part of their cultural food landscape. In Japan, where familiarity is high, the challenge lies in ensuring younger generations keep eating it as diets become more Westernized. For countries with little tradition of eating seaweed, our research suggests the way forward is to integrate it into familiar dishes, use clear labeling and recipe ideas, and present it as an attractive and approachable option. Public figures, as Jackson has shown, can play a role in normalizing it. In countries with a strong seaweed tradition, there is room for innovation to keep the ingredient relevant and appealing in changing diets. Addressing global environmental challenges requires more than good science. It requires understanding people's habits, values and motivations, and finding ways to work with them to create change. If seaweed is to move from occasional novelty to a regular part of diets in countries where it is unfamiliar, the evidence suggests that cultural connection will be as important as nutritional value or environmental benefit. Steven David Pickering is Honorary Professor, International Relations, Brunel University of London. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
