
Romania lays to rest divisive first post-communist leader Ion Iliescu
A religious ceremony was held at the presidential Cotroceni Palace before Iliescu's casket was transferred to a cemetery for military honours. He died Tuesday at age 95 after a lung cancer diagnosis following years of declining health, after retiring from public life in 2017.
Yet, even in those years, President Iliescu continued to symbolise Romania's violent transition from communism to democracy in the 1989 revolution, followed by years of convulsions as Romanians embarked on and succeeded in their pro-Western journey.
He dominated over a decade of Romania's post-communist evolution, with his shrewd mastery of navigating the endless crises that gripped the country over and over again, often with tragic results.
His personality, actions and legacy remain too complex to be explicated in black and white terms to the point that Romanians remain divided whether Iliescu saved Romania in 1989 and thereafter by keeping it together, or if he destroyed the extraordinary impression Romanians made with their courage in confronting dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu's repressive system with their bare hands.
Man of the hour
Educated in the USSR and initiated by the Soviets as the Gorbachev-type of alternative to Ceaușescu, Iliescu turned out to be the man of the moment in the 1989 Revolution.
Iliescu first served as a minister in the communist government but was sidelined in 1971. He then held de facto military authority during the anti-communist revolt. He assumed power and his first major decision was to order that Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife Elena be executed by firing squad on 25 December 1989.
In the first hours after dictator Ceaușescu fled, Iliescu surfaced with the support of the security apparatus to grab power and start Romania's painful transition towards a prudent democracy.
Iliescu's legacy is now for the historians to dissect, as he evaded a major war crimes trial that would settle the record on the tragedies of the Romanian revolution, including the accusations that a coup d'etat led by the Communist party apparatchiks and the repressive military and security forces confiscated the real revolution of 16-22 December 1989.
More than 1,100 people died during the revolution, 862 of them after Iliescu had seized power, in a national psychosis that the so-called 'terrorists' organised by Ceaușescu to keep him in power were fighting back and killing the revolutionaries.
He denied any wrongdoing and refused to be interrogated by military prosecutors, claiming his actions were for the success of the revolution.
In the meantime, he ended up being the one cautioning that a country of 23 million emerging overnight from decades of a harrowing, debilitating dictatorship cannot jump face forward into a capitalist European democracy.
He was both loathed and loved by a divided Romania, a polarisation that still grips the society to this day.
With his apparently suave and warm display, Iliescu was on one hand projecting a calming safety to those afraid of an overnight change of the world around them, but he was equally combating, often in violent, tragic manners, those who wanted to decisively cut the communist umbilical cord and move fast towards a Western society.
He did it all in his own way, carefully manoeuvring the levers of society with his true Socialist beliefs.
As some still claim he was a political visionary, Iliescu gradually shifted his eastward sympathies to his own library and decisively pushed for Romania to join the European Union and NATO, with success.
One last political rift
While many former leaders and officials paid tribute to Iliescu on Thursday, in contrast to the Save Romania Union party, a governing coalition partner that opposed the day of national mourning and said party representatives would not attend the funeral, triggering a rift in the recently sworn-in government.
USR's decision drew the ire of coalition partners from the Social Democratic Party, or PSD, which Iliescu founded and has been the most dominant party since the revolution.
'These are just shameful attacks from people who will never live up to the legacy left by the founding leader of the PSD,' Marcel Ciolacu, a former PSD leader and prime minister, said in a post on Facebook, adding that it 'demonstrates only sick hatred and lack of decency.'
A notable absence from the funeral was Romania's recently elected President Nicușor Dan, who founded the USR party in 2016, and sent a short statement after the former president's death, stating that 'history will judge Ion Iliescu.'
The heated national debate over whether he should be given a national funeral proves that the deep wounds of the post-1989 Romanian society still linger on to this day, as many painful chapters of the last decades are still awaiting their truthful, honest conclusions.
Ultimately, after being elected twice as president in two completely different political moments, in the first democratic elections and then in the middle of Romania's efforts to join the EU and NATO, Iliescu remains a much-debated, towering personality for Romanians, but clearly one of the decisive figures of the Romanian state.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
20 hours ago
- Euronews
Why some fight to use paper in a paperless world
The European Union made the digital transition as one of its priorities and more public services, as well as advertising, are being moved online and are now received by email. This is being presented as an opportunity to modernise the economy and save paper – however the "Keep Me Posted EU' group is arguing that it is leading to a digital exclusion of a not negligible part of the population. Keep Me Posted EU is a campaign financed by the industries of envelopes, printing, paper and posting services and supported by NGOs protecting older people, people with disabilities, union and consumers. In a report published earlier this year, they demonstrate how seniors, persons with disabilities, low-income households and inhabitants of rural areas were most likely to be excluded from the digital transition. Lack of digital literacy makes it harder for people to complete essential tasks such as filling out their taxes, access to medical bills or payment of electricity bills. In 2023, only 56% of EU citizens had basic or above-basic digital skills. Finland and the Netherlands lead the way with over 80% of their populations proficient in using digital tools, while Romania (27%) and Bulgaria (35%) rank lowest. The problem is also due to the fact that a large part of the population cannot easily go online as only 57% of households in the Romanian country side have access to internet. The report also notes that choosing paper over digital is not only about ability, but also about preference. Some business owners and citizens are quoted as favouring paper for keeping records of important documents. It also highlights, quoting a 2025 survey, that half of the population is worried about online security and the risk of personal information being hacked, and feel already overexposed to screens. With the EU drafting a roadmap for the next five years on consumer protection laws, Keep Me Posted urges the European Commission to ensure that no consumer is left behind in their strategy. In short, they are asking to leave the choice to citizens and for them not being charged more or less for choosing one of the options.


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Solomon Islands says China not influencing diplomatic decisions
China, the United States and Taiwan have all been barred from the annual Pacific Islands Forum in Honiara next month, an event they usually attend. China counts the Solomon Islands among its closest partners in the South Pacific and signed a secretive security pact with Honiara in 2022. It has been accused of agitating behind the scenes to see Taiwan excluded from attending the Forum as an observer. The Pacific bloc's top diplomats met in Fiji on Thursday to discuss the Forum's agenda, and Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Peter Shanel Agovaka said his nation was not influenced by China. "Our focus is not on China or Taiwan. Our focus is on the (Pacific) region," Agovaka told AFP. He expressed frustration and blamed the Forum secretariat for the ban because it was yet to agree on "dialogue partners". Agovaka added that the Forum was "all over the place". New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters had earlier warned that "outsiders" interfering with Forum decisions threatened to split the bloc. Peters did not mention China by name, but said the issue would be raised during the foreign ministers' meeting. "We've got to make sure that every outsider comes here with respect for those of us who are inside the organisation," he said. Agovaka defended the presence of such observers at Forum meetings. "They enhance our meetings," he said. - 'Very perplexing' - Communist China has never ruled Taiwan, but Beijing insists the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. China and Taiwan have long vied for diplomatic influence in the South Pacific and elsewhere, with Beijing spending hundreds of millions of dollars building sports stadiums, presidential palaces, hospitals and roads in Pacific island nations. Peters later described Agovaka's comments as "very perplexing". "At this point in time, when aid from another source or other countries is desperately needed and we're out there trying to get it, if the message is we're not interested in seeing you, how's this going to fall?" he said. Chinese officials described accusations they were agitating behind the scenes as "misinformation". "China has participated in every Forum dialogue, and remains committed and looks forward to continuing such engagement," a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the New Zealand capital said. The annual pre-Forum meeting of foreign ministers is typically a light-hearted affair, although the gathering in Suva on Thursday was noticeably more tense. Several countries did send ministers and others did not engage fully. Nauru's representative left, smoking a cigar, after only one morning session. "We're going to sort things out... we'll get things back on an even keel," Peters said. The Forum will be held in Honiara from September 8-12.


AFP
2 days ago
- AFP
Naval exercise footage shot in US, not Taiwan
"The army of. US.. Has arrived. in Taiwan," says part of Tagalog-language text overlaid to a Facebook video shared July 30, 2025. The footage, showing aerial shots of troops disembarking from a ship on a beach, has racked up more than one million views. "Let's pray for our fellow Filipinos working in Taiwan," says a narrator, adding the US Navy landed in Taiwan amid heightened tensions with China. Image Screenshot of the false post taken on August 10, 2025, with the red X mark added by AFP The video has also been reshared on TikTok by Filipino users worried about potential conflict in their nearest northern neighbour. Communist China has never ruled Taiwan but Beijing insists the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control (archived link). While the United States is legally bound to provide arms to Taiwan -- which Beijing opposes -- Washington has long maintained when it comes to whether it would deploy its military to defend it from a Chinese attack (archived link). According to retired US Navy Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery in a May 15 Congressional hearing, there are about 500 US military trainers in Taiwan (archived link). However, the circulating video shows clips from a military exercise on the eastern coast of the United States. Google reverse image searches found the visuals originally published on the US Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) on July 1, 2025 (archived link). The DVIDS caption says they depict an amphibious landing during the Atlantic Alliance exercise in Virginia on June 30, 2025. The Atlantic Alliance exercise is conducted "along the eastern seaboard of the United States" by the US Fleet Forces Command and US Marine Forces Command, it adds. Clips from the 10-minute video have been mirrored and repurposed in the false posts. The video of troops landing on the beach corresponds to the 2:42 mark of the DVIDS video. Image Screenshot comparison of the false video (L) and the US DVIDS video At the 5:30 mark, the same military vehicle is seen disembarking the ship. Image Screenshot comparison of the false video (L) and the US DVIDS video Finally, the aerial video of a huge ship docking on the beach to bring in more military men matches the 6:23 mark of the DVIDS video. Image Screenshot comparison of the false video (L) and the US DVIDS video The video compilation also appeared on the US Central Command's official website on June 30, 2025 (archived link). AFP has fact-checked other misinformation related to Taiwan here.