logo
The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Is One Massive EV

The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ Is One Massive EV

Yahoo17-03-2025
"Massive" is a word that gets misused quite often, but it's entirely apropos in the world of the Cadillac Escalade. Step up to the electric Cadillac Escalade IQ, however, and it's more like supermassive black hole, especially if you're cloaked in the shade informally known as Town Car black. That's because the IQ steps things up with a wheelbase that's over 15 inches longer than that of a regular Escalade, plus about an extra foot of overall length. The IQ is wider, too, but it's also slightly lower than a regular Escalade, and it looks even lower than the numbers suggest because its rear end falls away in a graceful arc, not the blunt chopped-off profile of the gas version.
It also weighs approximately 9000 pounds, owing to its all-electric powertrain and a massive (there's that word again) lithium-ion battery with 205.0 kWh of usable energy. That's enough juice to power the Escalade IQ for a claimed 460 miles. Note: This Cadillac is exempt from EPA testing and labeling requirements because its Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,000 pounds. It has an 800-volt electrical system that can replenish the battery at up to 350 kW, which is sufficient to add 100 miles of range in 10 minutes, according to Cadillac. These figures are similar to those for the GMC Hummer EV pickup, but in our testing the Hummer took 19 minutes to add 100 miles and required a full 109 minutes to charge from a 10 to 90 percent. We will see.
A pair of permanent-magnet motors teams up to produce 750 horsepower and 785 pound-feet of torque in the raciest mode, Velocity Max. That tops even the Cadillac Escalade-V's supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 and its 682 horsepower and 653 pound-feet of twist, though the IQ's normal output amounts to 680 horses and 615 pound-feet. Press the accelerator and the Escalade IQ responds with verve, if not the neck-snapping response of some EVs. Still, a claimed 4.7-second 60-mph time is nothing to sneeze at for something weighing four-plus tons, especially given that we got the merely 6290-pound Escalade-V to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds. Yes, we said "merely" in referencing the Escalade-V's 6290 pounds. That's the kind of rejiggering necessary to understand the Escalade IQ. It bends reality around itself.
The brakes are strong in the IQ as well. There are three regenerative-brake settings, including off. In this mode the braking feels natural, in that the vehicle rolls with the slight drag you might get from engine braking. When you work the brake pedal to slow down further, the effort is precisely matched to the deceleration you get. There's little sensation of the colossal weight you're controlling—it's just normal. Conversely, step up the regen to the highest level, and you never have to touch the brake at all except for panic-stop situations. Just bleed off speed with the accelerator, and you can soon learn to bring the IQ smoothly to a stop. The middle setting is still good for one pedal operation, too, but if your driving is the least bit aggressive you'll find yourself dabbing the brakes now and again.
The steering is where things get interesting. At first, it feels noncommittal, neither too communicative nor too numb. Twirl the wheel in parking lots and around tight corners, however, and rear-wheel steering of up to 10 degrees comes to the fore, trimming the turning circle to just less than 40 feet, which is seriously impressive for a vehicle with a grand 136.2-inch wheelbase. There's also Arrival mode, which turns the rear wheels in line with the fronts to allow the vehicle to crab sideways. It's fun, but this a mere parlor trick that has few uses in the real world.
Upper and lower control arms with air springs at all four corners support the Escalade IQ, with the air springs able to be lowered up to two inches or raised as much as an inch. Fourth-generation MagneRide magnetorheological dampers do their best to smother impacts, and they carry out this task with supreme efficiency in Tour mode. The IQ's ride felt considerably stiffer in Sport mode on the tight, technical (and lumpy) roads of Northern California, which we somewhat expected given the massive (there's that word again) 24-inch wheels wrapped with 35-inch tires. Still, the big rollers do a credible job of taking it in stride over all but the most punishing pavement.
Inside, the handsome seats are spacious and well trimmed, but we did struggle to get in because of tight toe space on the sidestep, which made us stand a bit tall to duck in. We also would have liked it if the steering wheel telescoped out a bit more, but in the end, we were able to settle in well enough. Setting the outside mirrors was a bit of a trick, because the mirror on the passenger side loses is convex shape, which is required by law for vehicles this heavy. Cadillac's solution: camera mirrors that pop up when you signal a turn. Not bad, but that doesn't help much if you're just taking a peek at traffic. And you'll want to use the rear camera mirror because the sloping roofline impedes rear visibility.
Once inside and settled, the first thing you notice is the colossal 55.0-inch pillar-to-pillar expanse of screen before you. Thankfully, it's a bit predictive, placing things you're bound to need on a smaller central cockpit screen. Normally the home of HVAC controls, this screen switches to power door controls when you have selected Park, and it also can display the regenerative braking controls. It brings up the Arrival mode display when you select that feature too. Further back, the second row is likewise roomy and comfortable. The third row is more of a kids-only affair, which is why some might wait for the 2026 Escalade IQL and its 4.2 inches of additional length, plus a slightly less aerodynamic roofline that adds an inch of third-row headroom.
The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ is on sale now. It comes in two trims, Sport and Luxury, with Super Cruise, a head-up display, and a 12-cubic-foot front trunk all included. Basically, you get a splash of chrome trim and model-specific wheels with the Luxury for $129,990 or body-color trim and different wheels with the Sport for $130,490. The main upgrade bundle costs $20K for each, resulting in a Luxury 2 model for $149,990 or a Sport 2 for $150,490. This enhancement consists of an upgrade from 11.5 to 19.2 kW for the onboard charger, an integrated trailer brake controller and other towing features, an AKG premium audio system, night vision, 126-color ambient lighting, power seats with massage, power open/close doors, and more.
The 2025 Escalade-V, on the other hand, starts at $164,495. Sure, it's quick and sounds mean, but yikes. Viewed in that light, the 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ's price, while substantial, is one of the few things about it that isn't supermassive.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The week in EV tech: Glitz on the coast, grit from Detroit
The week in EV tech: Glitz on the coast, grit from Detroit

Digital Trends

time16 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

The week in EV tech: Glitz on the coast, grit from Detroit

Welcome to Digital Trends' weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. Monterey Car Week and its jewel event The Quail: A Motorsports Gathering have become the automotive world's most exclusive runway. Here, the richest of the rich—and the most daring of the designers—unveil concept cars that seem plucked from sci-fi dreams. Yet in the same week, a very different kind of revolution was also announced by Ford: a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, born from a new software‑designed, small‑battery platform meant to power a whole new 'family' of affordable electric vehicles. It's a reminder that while ultra‑luxury is dazzling, democratized EV tech isn't just possible—it's on the horizon. Recommended Videos Sculpted Innovations on the Lawn At The Quail, brands unleashed show‑stoppers resting somewhere between movie props and next‑gen vehicles. · Cadillac's Elevated Velocity concept redefined luxury and utility with flair: gullwing doors; bold 24‑inch wheels; and modes like Terra for off‑road, Elements Defy vibrating debris off the body, and Sand Vision for enhanced visibility in dust storms—all wrapped in cabin amenities like red‑light therapy and a 'waterfall' screen embedded in the steering wheel. · Karma Automotive impressed with its Kaveya super‑coupe and 'GT‑UV' study—complete with a production‑ready interior, carbon‑fiber structure, and a blistering 1,000 hp electric drivetrain. · A wave of ultra‑luxury and performance electrics also made their presence felt: from Rimac's 2,107‑hp Nevera Rhypercar (price: ~$2.5 million), to Acura's RSX prototype, powered by an in‑house EV architecture and showcasing Honda's e:Architecture, soon to reach production. Not to mention Mercedes‑AMG's futuristic Concept GT XX with 1,341 hp from triple axial‑flux motors, a radical performance blueprint. Set against this spectacle of excess, these vehicles illustrate the creative peak of EV tech: performance, luxury, radical design—yet firmly perched out of reach for most of us. Ford's 'Model‑T Moment' Hits Home Now look at the other end of the spectrum: Ford's bold announcement of a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, built on a software‑defined vehicle platform, sparked a collective intake of breath—not for its headline price, but for its implications. This 'universal EV Platform' is designed with a small, affordable LFP (lithium‑iron‑phosphate) battery, fewer parts, and an architecture structured to spawn a family of cost‑efficient models. More than just building a pickup, Ford is signaling the arrival of integrated EV tech where intelligent software, battery management, and production‑scale efficiency converge. Unsurprisingly, Ford CEO explicitly framed the move as a technological and price war with BYD—China's EV champion known for cost‑effective batteries and platform economies. Ford's plan is a direct challenge to the global dominance of affordable EVs emerging from Asia, blending scale, simplicity, and local battery production to undercut and compete. Ford's new generation of EVs will be built as software-defined vehicles, meaning their core systems—everything from performance tuning to infotainment and battery management—will be controlled by centralized software platforms. Much like a smartphone, they'll receive over-the-air (OTA) updates, enabling Ford to introduce new features, improve efficiency, enhance safety, and fix bugs without a trip to the dealership. This concept first became reality in 2012, when Tesla introduced OTA updates in its Model S, setting a new standard for connected vehicle technology. In the years that followed, Chinese EV startups NIO and XPeng adopted similar software-first architectures, launching their own OTA-capable vehicles around 2018. By 2021, American EV makers Lucid and Rivian als o embraced the software-defined model, reinforcing the shift away from the traditional, hardware-centric approach to vehicle design. Today, SDVs are becoming increasingly commonplace across the industry. For drivers, this means owning a more adaptable and future-ready vehicle—one that can evolve over time. Automakers can remotely update vehicle behavior, improve range estimates, refine infotainment interfaces, and even introduce entirely new capabilities after the car has been sold. This also paves the way for personalized experiences and subscription-based features, where owners can unlock upgrades or tailor their vehicle's digital environment on demand. Two Worlds. One Future. What's most compelling is the contrast—and the convergence—of these stories. On one side, Monterey's lawn dazzles with what's next-level bold: solar visions, luxury interiors, hyper‑performance, AI‑driven cabins, and exaggerated power figures. On the other, Ford offers a quieter, yet perhaps revolutionary pivot: EV tech embedded in affordability, not as an afterthought, but as its core. Software-defined platforms mean updates, performance, safety, and user features can be upgraded without hardware overhaul—a glimpse at how mass‑market EVs can evolve fast. This isn't just a tech fantasy. It signals that EV solutions for the mainstream are maturing. Deep integration of cost‑effective battery chemistry, lean parts architecture, and software-centric control are what make an attainable EV reality—not just for well‑heeled collectors, but for everyday families.

A silver lining in Trump's anti-climate agenda
A silver lining in Trump's anti-climate agenda

Politico

time3 days ago

  • Politico

A silver lining in Trump's anti-climate agenda

Presented by With help from Noah Baustin, Annie Snider and Jordan Wolman THE SAFETY IN ENDANGERMENT: The Trump administration is about to roll back the federal government's power to regulate climate change, but a former top Biden administration official sees a silver lining for California. Ann Carlson, a UCLA professor who served as acting administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under Biden, said the Trump administration's move to nix the so-called endangerment finding — which the Obama administration issued in 2009 and lays out the legal basis for EPA to regulate greenhouse gases as a threat to human health — could open the door for states to create their own emissions rules for the transportation sector. While states are preempted from setting vehicle greenhouse gas standards under Massachusetts v. EPA, a 2007 case that affirmed EPA's authority to regulate those emissions, Carlson said that the federal government getting out of the emissions game would present state leaders with a serious argument that preemption is off the table. That would be especially useful for California, after Congress in June revoked its unique ability to create stricter-than-federal pollution rules. Carlson spoke with POLITICO about the endangerment finding, the Supreme Court and what electric vehicle policies she wants California to push forward. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. It seems counterintuitive that the Trump administration rolling back EPA's ability to reduce greenhouse gases could potentially help California regulate its own emissions. Can you explain your thinking? I would start with the reality that what it looks like when you read the endangerment finding proposal from EPA is that it's essentially making arguments that greenhouse gases are not air pollutants under Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. That's the section that regulates vehicle emissions. So if that's true, then the states presumably are not preempted from regulating greenhouse gases. If you want Massachusetts v. EPA to be overturned, which is essentially what they're arguing, then you're basically saying that the Clean Air Act doesn't cover greenhouse gases, or at least with respect to mobile sources. How exactly would that help a state like California to develop greenhouse gas rules for vehicles? One of the arguments that opponents make against California's special authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate mobile sources is that Section 209, which is the section that both preempts other states and gives California its authority, is really designed to attack air pollution, because historically, that's been California's big problem. Los Angeles has the worst air pollution in the country, and that's really what that provision is about. And so if California is trying to use its authority to regulate greenhouse gases, opponents say that is beyond its scope. But now, if EPA is in fact arguing that Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, which gives it authority to regulate pollution from mobile sources, doesn't cover greenhouse gases, then states aren't preempted from regulating them. You could have 50 states potentially regulating greenhouse gases coming out of vehicles. Do you think that argument would hold up in front of a conservative Supreme Court? What EPA is doing is squarely putting on a collision course the combination question of whether Massachusetts v. EPA should be overturned and whether states can regulate independently because they're not preempted. Let's take power plants as an example. States can regulate greenhouse gases from power plants, because there's no preemption provision in the Clean Air Act. That's why California has its cap-and-invest program, for example. I believe the answer would be that if Section 202 doesn't cover greenhouse gases, there should be no prohibition on states regulating. Does that mean the Supreme Court would agree with me? Who knows. But it would raise a conundrum for them, because the conservatives on the court have been very reluctant to let EPA regulate greenhouse gases ambitiously. This seems to be a serious conundrum for the auto industry, which pushed the administration to revoke California's EV mandate. It's not an accident that the industry has not been urging EPA to withdraw the endangerment finding. If you look at who's aligned with that concept, going back to the first Trump administration, auto companies and the [U.S.] Chamber of Commerce are staying on the sidelines. It's the oil industry generally that has been arguing in favor of doing this. Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order after Trump revoked California's EV mandate, directing state agencies to develop recommendations for maintaining progress. If you were a state regulator, what policies would you advocate for? Incentives are one way to push. For example, replacing the rollback of the federal tax credits is one possibility. Cities and counties can invest in zero-emission technology and consider things like feebates, where you reward buyers of electric vehicles through lower vehicle license fees. You can use the indirect source rules that require stationary sources that attract a lot of vehicle traffic to ensure that some of those vehicles are low-emission or zero-emission. All of those sorts of things are, I think, appropriate. I think the harder question is, can you do enough to replace straight regulation? Yeah, right. That's why this opportunity is potentially interesting. If the endangerment finding is going to go away, maybe California has authority that it didn't think it had. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! WAIT FOR US: The Trump administration is jumping into truck manufacturers' lawsuit seeking to dissolve a zero-emission sales agreement with California. The Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division filed the motion to intervene in a Sacramento federal court on Thursday, three days after four truck makers — Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo North America — sued to break a 2023 voluntary agreement with the state. The move is the latest step in the administration's aggressive effort to dismantle California's electric vehicle policies, most notably Congress' June revocation of EPA waivers that allow the state to enforce ZEV mandates. DOJ's filing, like the industry's lawsuit, argues that without the waivers, California no longer has the authority to enforce the Clean Truck Partnership, which was negotiated by nine manufacturers and the Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association. 'Agreement, contract, partnership, mandate — whatever California wants to call it, this unlawful action attempts to undermine federal law,' Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson said in a statement. — AN ROLL OUT THE RED CARPET: A who's who of the California wind energy industry, and their regulators, visited Merced County on Thursday to tour the under-construction Gonzaga Ridge Wind Farm. Just three of the new turbines being installed will produce more power than the 1980s-era installation of 166 turbines that it's replacing, according to the developer, Scout Clean Energy. In total, its capacity will reach 147.5 megawatts. 'That demonstrates how far the technology has come,' said California Energy Commission Chair David Hochschild as he gazed at the site. 'This is what the future looks like.' Besides the state's top energy boss, POLITICO also spotted Ignis Energy USA General Manager Pedro Blanquer, Wind Stream Properties co-owner Bob Gates, Assemblymember Esmeralda Soria's field representative Vanessa Barraza and California Wind Energy Association lobbyist Melissa Cortez. Also in attendance were representatives of Clean Power SF, whose agency has committed to purchasing the power for San Franciscans to use, and the state park system, whose land the installation sits on. Rows and rows of turbine blades were being stored on the location, a welcome site to Scout Clean Energy CEO Michael Rucker. When his team heard that the Trump administration would be imposing hefty tariffs, they sped to expedite shipping supplies from India, Germany, and Malaysia. The blades, which were manufactured in Turkey, cleared customs one day before Liberation Day, according to Rucker. 'We were lucky,' he said. — NB BETTER TO BE LUCKY: Warnings that the Trump administration's Forest Service downsizing could hamper wildfire response efforts haven't materialized yet, thanks in part to favorable weather conditions in fire-prone parts of the country. Democratic lawmakers and state officials across the country have warned that the Trump administration is courting disaster by removing about 5,000 Forest Service workers through early retirement and buyout programs, including about 1,600 people with wildland firefighting qualifications. But decent spring and summer rainfall and cooler temperatures across the West have helped contain wildfires, making existing personnel and resources adequate for ongoing response efforts, POLITICO's Jordan Wolman reports. 'He's gotten lucky in a way,' Steve Ellis, a former Forest Service supervisor who now serves as chair of the National Association of Forest Service Retirees, said of Trump. 'You're not really going to look bad until fire gets going and you don't have enough resources.' — AN, JW KEEPING THE TAP FLOWING: California can expect to receive steady Colorado River water supplies for the rest of the year, but the situation is getting dicey. The Interior Department announced Friday that states along the river will continue to get stable supplies, despite the latest projections for the waterway, which show water levels at the two main reservoirs continuing to plummet, POLITICO's Annie Snider reports. New projections show Lake Mead at elevation 1,056 feet at the beginning of 2026 — almost 8 feet lower than it was on New Year's Day 2025 — and Lake Powell at elevation 3,538 feet — 33.5 feet lower than it was on Jan. 1. But the Trump administration left open the possibility of making mid-year changes to how much water gets released from Lake Powell, and potentially also releasing water from other reservoirs upstream in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah and New Mexico. The news comes as the administration warns it could develop its own water-sharing rules for Western states if they can't reach an agreement among themselves. — AN, AS — Former Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter gives Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin's AB 1408 a shoutout in his call to speed up clean energy installations. — A small Napa County town is experimenting with a new microgrid run on batteries and liquid hydrogen. — An invasive swan species is a growing threat to California's wetlands, sparking a debate over whether hunters should be allowed to begin killing the beautiful birds.

Tested: 2026 Lucid Gravity Dream Edition Is a Magic Bus
Tested: 2026 Lucid Gravity Dream Edition Is a Magic Bus

Car and Driver

time3 days ago

  • Car and Driver

Tested: 2026 Lucid Gravity Dream Edition Is a Magic Bus

A sedan-only lineup is not a winning strategy these days, which is why fledgling automaker Lucid Motors is adding the Gravity SUV, available as either a five- or seven-seater, as a follow-up to its excellent Air sedan. While plenty of us think the Gravity's lozenge form factor and low roof look more minivan than rough-and-tumble SUV, the aerodynamics-first design is great for efficiency and range. While this limited-edition Dream model's summer tires reduce its EPA estimated range figure, the most efficient Grand Touring version earns 450 miles of EPA range, which is 98 percent of what the bluff Cadillac Escalade IQ gets, even though the Lucid has only 60 percent of the Cadillac's battery energy. view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Despite the low roof, the Gravity's packaging is near-minivan excellent, with a sprawling second row and a third row that's comfortable even for six-plus-footers. Remarkably, the seat cushions are not squashed to the floor to create headroom, so this isn't a knees-in-the-chest situation, either. Interior materials are top-shelf, and the front seats have great wrap-around support. Again, compared with the Escalade iQ, the Gravity has similar passenger space in all three rows, as well as cargo space in back, despite having almost 17 inches less wheelbase and a roofline that's nearly a foot lower. HIGHS: Three roomy rows of seats, Corvette Z06–level acceleration, more fun to drive than other three-row EVs. But enough left-brain talk. Plenty of EVs are quick, but more impressive than the 1070-hp Gravity's 3.1-second rush to 60 mph is the second wave of thrust beyond that speed. The front end lifts, the steering goes light, and the Lucid rockets to an easy 160 mph. Its 10.6-second quarter-mile is neck and neck with a Corvette Z06's, and by 150 mph, the Gravity is nearly a full three seconds ahead. It's the quickest SUV we've ever tested. view interior Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver view interior Photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver Better than the raw speed is that the Gravity drives with verve heretofore unseen in the ranks of heavy, three-row electric SUVs. It's rare that any vehicle is so unerringly neutral that it wants to go tail out around our 300-foot skidpad—the Toyota GR86 comes to mind—but the Gravity, shockingly, requires countersteer. Its helm is satisfyingly sharp, too, and you can feel the rear-steer system quickening the Gravity's responses. The ride quality is surprisingly reasonable—its air springs no doubt help—especially considering the 22-inch front and 23-inch rear wheels and Pirelli P Zero PZ5 summer tires. And the 1.5-inch-wide front brake rotors look more Le Mans racer than street car—no wonder they haul down the three-ton Gravity with zero fade. LOWS: A few rough edges, lower-spec versions will be better values. There are a few details that feel unfinished. The power mechanism for the second-row seats is loud and moves coarsely, the head-up display is unreadable, the folding mechanism for the third row is wobbly, the lane-centering function can be jerky, and the Gravity erroneously dimmed its infotainment screens repeatedly on a bright summer day. These are issues that the long-standing automakers likely would have addressed, and Lucid could fix at least some of these things with over-the-air software updates. view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver view exterior photos Marc Urbano | Car and Driver While it remains to be seen how the Gravity might ignite Lucid's sales, as with the Air, lower-powered, less-expensive models will be a much better value. As for its appearance, our staff most frequently compared it to the Mercedes-Benz R63 AMG, a flash-in-the-pan nameplate we loved even if the marketplace didn't. VERDICT: A mega minivan. Specifications Specifications 2026 Lucid Gravity Dream Edition Vehicle Type: front- and rear-motor, all-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 4-door wagon PRICE Base/As Tested: $141,550/$142,050 POWERTRAIN Front Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC Rear Motor: permanent-magnet synchronous AC Combined Power: 1070 hp Combined Torque: 909 lb-ft Battery Pack: liquid-cooled lithium-ion, 123 kWh Onboard Charger: 19.2 kW Peak DC Fast-Charge Rate: 400 kW Transmissions, F/R: direct-drive CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: control arms/multilink Brakes, F/R: 15.4-in vented disc/15.3-in vented disc Tires: Pirelli P Zero PZ5 Elect PNCS F: HL265/40R-22 109Y LM1 R: HL285/35R-23 110Y LM1 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 119.5 in Length: 198.2 in Width: 78.7 in Height: 65.2 in Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 59/59/37 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 98/48/15 ft3 C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 3.1 sec 100 mph: 5.9 sec 130 mph: 9.1 sec 1/4-Mile: 10.6 sec @ 140 mph 150 mph: 12.3 sec Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 3.3 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.4 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 1.5 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 160 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 163 ft Braking, 100–0 mph: 330 ft Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.90 g Interior Sound Idle: 28 dBA/1 sone Full Throttle: 71 dBA 70-mph Cruising: 69 dBA/24 sone C/D FUEL ECONOMY Observed: 63 MPGe EPA FUEL ECONOMY Combined/City/Highway: 90/91/87 MPGe Range: 378 mi C/D TESTING EXPLAINED Tested by Dave VanderWerp Director, Vehicle Testing Dave VanderWerp has spent more than 20 years in the automotive industry, in varied roles from engineering to product consulting, and now leading Car and Driver's vehicle-testing efforts. Dave got his very lucky start at C/D by happening to submit an unsolicited resume at just the right time to land a part-time road warrior job when he was a student at the University of Michigan, where he immediately became enthralled with the world of automotive journalism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store