China's six-year-olds are already being offered AI classes in school in a bid to train the next generation of DeepSeek founders
Following DeepSeek's explosive success, AI classes are coming to primary and secondary schools in China's capital, Beijing—and it's not the only country that's training kids to be the next Liang Wenfeng.
China has a new secret weapon in the global AI-wars: elementary school kids. Beijing is training its next cohort of tech CEOs before they've even left the playground.
Starting this fall semester, primary and secondary schools in Beijing will offer at least eight hours of AI classes every academic year—with students as young as six years old being taught how to use chatbots and other tools, general background on the technology, and AI ethics.
In a recent statement, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission said that schools can integrate the courses with existing studies like information technology or science, or let them stand alone. It also outlines plans to construct a multi-year AI curriculum, build a general AI education and training system, roll out a support system, and drum up promotion of the study.
China's capital hopes this training will bolster the country's strength in winning the AI wars—especially after DeepSeek's explosive entry onto the scene. And efforts are well underway; last December, China's Ministry of Education announced that it selected 184 Chinese schools to pilot models and programs in the AI curriculum to serve as a basis for wider programming. And Huai Jinpeng, the minister of the government agency, said that AI is the 'golden key' for the country's educational system.
Beijing's schools may be trying to replicate the success it's seen out of Zhejiang University in Hangzhou—where two of China's most prominent tech leaders, DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng and Unitree's Wang Xingxing both graduated from. By getting students to grips with AI at an even younger age, the nation's capital could see an explosion of innovation—if it can keep pace with other countries also integrating AI into school curriculums.
China isn't the only country to bring AI to kids.
Estonia's government announced a partnership with OpenAI last month to equip secondary school students and teachers with ChatGPT Edu, a version of ChatGPT customized for education systems. It will be rolled out among 10th and 11th graders in the country starting September this year, and the collaboration will also entail technical assistance, administrative task streamlining, study support, and lesson planning.
'We are now starting a new chapter in the development of our education system and digital society,' Estonian President Alar Karis said. 'Artificial intelligence has permanently changed the world, and like all sectors, the education system must adapt to these changes.'
Other countries like Canada and South Korea have also integrated the advanced tech into K-12 studies, including using AI-powered digital textbooks and programs for teachers to integrate AI in class. A private school in the U.K. similarly launched a 'teacherless' classroom last year, where about 20 students used virtual reality headsets and AI platforms to learn instead of listening to humans. And American education provider McGraw Hill launched two genAI tools for the classroom in 2024: AI Reader to mark up digital books and Writing Assistant to get specific feedback in the writing process.
Despite the waves AI can make in learning, education companies and ministries head caution with overreliance on tech tools. Advanced tech has the capability to be anyone's personal tutor—free of charge—which can be conveniently accessed on any device. But there are risks, too. The United Nations has stressed children's safety by using inclusive AI tools, setting clear guidelines, emphasizing 'humanity' at the center of the curriculums, and managing risk. And education business leaders echo the same considerations.
'Our levels of brand trust are so high that the greatest risk for us is not moving too slowly on AI, it's moving too fast on AI,' Dylan Arena, chief data science and AI officer at McGraw Hill, told Fortune.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
22 minutes ago
- The Verge
Posted Jun 11, 2025 at 5:17 PM EDT
Wikipedia halts experiment with AI-generated article summaries. Following a slew of complaints from editors, a Wikimedia Foundation spokesperson confirmed to 404 Media that it's pausing the two-week test, which began on June 2nd. The experiment put AI-generated summaries at the top of articles for users who opted in. One editor responded to the idea by saying, 'Just because Google has rolled out its AI summaries doesn't mean we need to one-up them.'
Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Hong Kong outlaws video game, saying it promotes ‘armed revolution'
The game was removed from Apple's app store in Hong Kong on Wednesday, but remains available elsewhere. Advertisement But it had already been out of reach for many gamers. It was never available in mainland China, and earlier this month Google removed Reversed Front from its app store, citing hateful language, according to the developers. ESC Taiwan is a group of anonymous volunteers who are outspoken against China's Communist Party. Their products, which include a board game released in 2020, are supported by crowdfunded donations. The developers said that the removal of the game demonstrated how mobile apps in Hong Kong are subject to the type of political censorship seen in mainland China. 'Our game is precisely accusing and revealing such intentions,' the group's representatives said in an email. In social media posts, they also thanked authorities for the free publicity and posted screenshots of the game's name surging in Google searches. They said the comments and pseudonyms selected by players in the game would not be censored, whether they were in support or in opposition of the Communist Party. Advertisement In its statement, Hong Kong police said the game promoted 'secessionist agendas' and was intended to provoke hatred of the government. They said that publishing, recommending, and downloading the game, or supporting the online campaigns that funded it, could amount to sedition and incitement to secession under the national security law in Hong Kong, offenses that can lead to jail sentences. This is not the first time a video game has been used as an avenue for political protest that has incurred the wrath of Chinese authorities. Animal Crossing, an online game in which players could build elaborate designs of their own island, was removed from mainland China after players began importing Hong Kong protest slogans into the game. Even though virtually all forms of dissent in Hong Kong have been quashed, the national security dragnet in the city continues to widen. Authorities have made widespread arrests under the law, which was imposed five years ago in the wake of massive pro-democracy protests. Last week, Hong Kong authorities laid new national security charges against Joshua Wong, one of the city's most prominent young activists. Wong is serving the prison sentence of another national security charge that ends in January 2027. Authorities last month charged the father of Anna Kwok, an outspoken activist living in Washington, D.C., accusing him of helping handle her financial assets. Kwok is on a list of people overseas wanted by the Hong Kong police, which has placed bounties on their heads by offering rewards for information that would lead to their arrest. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
Hamilton Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
