
Wealthy people will avoid inheritance tax raid on their pensions by taking more HOLIDAYS
Many people with large pensions intend to splash out on more holidays to avoid a new inheritance tax levy, research reveals.
Pensions are going to become liable for death duties like other assets such as property, savings and investments starting in April 2027.
Well over half of over-45s with at least £300,000 already set aside for retirement plan to spend more to dodge inheritance tax, with taking holidays easily their fondest desire.
Enjoying experiences with family - which could also mean going on holiday - was their second favourite objective, closely followed by making gifts to family.
'The results of our survey back up what we have experienced in terms of enquiries since October's Budget,' says Daniel Hough, financial planner at RBC Brewin Dolphin.
'Retirees and people approaching retirement are increasingly looking to spend more of their pension, rather than risk a big portion of it being lost to inheritance tax when they pass away.'
Hough adds: 'The fact that the vast majority of respondents are planning to spend more on holidays is unsurprising – we've seen a number of cases where parents or grandparents have decided to pay to take the whole family away on five-figure trips so that they can experience something special.'
The Government said in the Autumn Budget that it is 'removing the opportunity for individuals to use pensions as a vehicle for inheritance tax planning' by bringing unspent pots into the scope of inheritance tax.
Only the richest 4 or 5 per cent of families currently pay inheritance tax, which is charged at 40 per cent on assets above the key thresholds - though that is expected to rise significantly when pensions start being counted towards the levy.
With frozen thresholds and higher property values also inflating inheritance tax bills, the Treasury is now predicted to rake in a total of £66.9billion between 2024 and the end of the decade, when the annual take will hit £14.3billion.
The Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts receipts of £9.1billion in the current tax year, rising to £11.7billion in 2027-2028, the first year that pensions become liable for inheritance tax.
The Government's plan to impose inheritance tax on death benefits too has received far less attention, but could be even more significant to some grieving relatives.
> How to avoid paying IHT on your pensions: Find out below
Some 56 per cent of middle-aged and older people with more than £300,000 already saved for retirement plan to spend more of their fund to stop it falling into the hands of the taxman, an RBC Brewin Dolphin survey found.
But 27 per cent don't intend to change their plans, and 17 per cent didn't know, according to the poll of 1,045 adults, one thousand of whom were aged 45-plus.
Among those who have decided to spend more, 75 per cent will take more holidays, 40 per cent will prioritise experiences with family, 39 per cent will gift more to family members, and 10 per cent will pay off mortgages or other debts.
Other objectives mentioned, but less frequently, were buying a new house, making home improvements and getting a new car.
RBC Brewin Dolphin cautioned that the inheritance tax changes for pensions are not scheduled until 6 April 2027, and detailed legislation has not yet passed so it is advisable to wait for that before making any significant spending decisions.
Hough says: 'There is, of course, nothing wrong with wanting to live as full a life as possible and spend money on your family so that they remember having an incredible time with you.
'But, there are also inevitably risks in doing too much of that. People need to be very careful not to go overboard and leave themselves short for the remainder of their retirement.'
He adds: 'We would encourage people not to let the prospect of paying more in tax be the main driver behind any significant spending decisions or lifestyle changes.'
RBC Brewin Dolphin survey found 60 per cent of the wealthy pension savers it surveyed had either got financial advice already or planned to in future, but the rest would not do so.
How to cut inheritance tax on pensions
Changes to inheritance tax don't come in until April 2027, but people are being advised to review existing arrangements well in advance.
Some are looking to cash in as much of their pensions as possible while avoiding a big income tax bill - although it is better to avoid crystallising losses by making bigger pension withdrawals in market downturns.
Other options include gifting out of surplus income which remains inheritance tax free providing you can afford it, or buying life insurance and putting it in trust.
Some savers will be deciding whether to leave more or all of their estate to spouses - who can still benefit from estates free of inheritance tax - instead of their children to delay and minimise the eventual bill.
Wealth manager Evelyn Partners has suggested we could see a marriage boom or rise in civil partnerships among older couples as a result.
Evelyn's financial planning partner Gary Smith suggests six ways to cut inheritance tax on pensions here.
How much is inheritance tax and who pays?
Inheritance tax is levied at 40 per cent on estates above a certain size.
You need to be worth £325,000 if you are single, or £650,000 jointly if you are married or in a civil partnership, for your loved ones to have to stump up inheritance tax.
A further allowance, the residence nil rate band, increases the threshold by £175,000 each - so £350,000 for a married couple - for those who leave their home to direct descendants. This creates a potential maximum joint inheritance tax-free total of £1million.
This own home allowance starts being removed once an estate reaches £2million, at a rate of £1 for every £2 above the threshold. It vanishes completely by £2.3million.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said in the Budget these thresholds will be frozen until 2030.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Leaving oil in the ground an ‘act of national self-harm', says Findlay
It would be a 'complete act of national self-harm' not to continue drilling for oil and gas in the North Sea, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives has said. Speaking as his party's conference got under way in Edinburgh, Russell Findlay said Scotland should use its own oil, rather than relying on foreign imports. He also continued his attacks on the Scottish Government's target to reach net zero by 2045, describing the goal as 'completely unrealistic'. UK Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is expected to tell the Scottish conference on Friday that the windfall tax on oil and gas companies, and the ban on new licences in the North Sea, should be scrapped. Appearing on BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme, Mr Findlay said Scots will need oil and gas 'for decades to come'. He said: 'We are the party who completely support the North Sea oil and gas industry. 'The SNP in Edinburgh are completely hostile to any form of new exploration, and it's exactly the same with Sir Keir Starmer and Ed Miliband in London. 'They want to leave this oil and gas in the North Sea and import oil and gas from further afield. It makes absolutely no sense.' He warned it would be a mistake not to drill for more oil in Scotland. 'We, as a country, are going to need oil and gas for decades. 'The SNP's net zero target of 2045 is completely unrealistic on the basis of what we know the cost that it will inflict on the paying public. 'Even if net zero is achieved within a timescale, any kind of timescale like that, we're still going to need that oil and gas. 'It's a complete act of national self-harm to leave this natural resource in the ground and then just rely on foreign imports.' Mr Findlay said there should be a 'mix' of energy production in Scotland, including nuclear energy – something opposed by the Scottish Government. In her keynote speech to the conference at Murrayfield, Ms Badenoch will accuse the UK Government of 'killing' the North Sea oil and gas sector. She will say the current windfall tax on energy firms – first introduced by the last Conservative government and extended by Labour – would mean that by 2030, there would be no oil and gas industry to tax.'We must scrap the ban on new licences,' she will say. 'We must overturn the ban on supporting oil and gas technology exports. 'And we must champion our own industry.' Dame Jackie Baillie, the deputy leader of Scottish Labour, said the Tories are on the side of oil and gas companies 'rather than working Scots'. She added: 'With Kemi Badenoch desperately attempting to rally the few remaining Scottish Tories, it seems like it won't be long until they can fit all of their MSPs in a single taxi.' The SNP has been approached for comment.


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Novo Nordisk regains crown as Europe's most valuable company
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters) - Drugmaker Novo Nordisk ( opens new tab is once again Europe's largest company by market capitalisation, rising above German software firm SAP ( opens new tab on Friday. The Danish company reached $367.91 billion in market value, including its unlisted shares, according to LSEG data. Chipmaker ASML ( opens new tab is in third place.


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
Private schools lose High Court battle against Starmer's VAT raid
A group of private schools, pupils and their parents have lost a High Court challenge over Labour's imposition of VAT on fees. It comes after six families last year launched a legal challenge against the government's controversial tax raid, claiming the tax raid is discriminatory against certain pupils. The legal challenge claimed the policy - which imposes 20 per cent VAT on private schools - causes unnecessary harm to certain categories of children, such as those with special needs. The families were therefore seeking a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act, saying the new tax is incompatible with ECHR rights. While the legal challenge would not have been able to halt the VAT policy in its tracks or reverse it even if successful, it would have been a major blow to ministers and piled pressure on them to consider further exemptions. The government has estimated the tax raid will raise £1.7bn per year by 2029-30, money which ministers said would be used to fund 6,500 new teachers for state schools. So far, private school pupil numbers have fallen by more than 11,000 in England following the tax hike, Department for Education data showed. In January 2025, there were around 582,500 pupils at English private schools, down from 593,500 at the same point last year. When the policy was introduced, Treasury impact assessments estimated that private school fees would increase by around 10 per cent as a result of the introduction of VAT, But in May, ISC figures showed that fees have increased by 22.6 per cent in the last year, with parents now paying out more than £22,000 a year on average. On average, the Treasury predicts that 35,000 pupils would move into UK state schools 'in the long-term steady state'. A further 2,000 children would leave private schools, the department estimated, consisting of international pupils who do not move into the UK state system or domestic pupils who move into homeschooling.