Parents, midwives mourn closure of family birth unit at Montreal's Notre-Dame Hospital
The CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, which oversees the hospital, announced the closure a week ago, blaming a lack of specialized obstetrics staff.
The loss is a "missed opportunity" and a blow for patients who would prefer to give birth outside of a traditional hospital setting, said Barbara Beccafico, a birth doula and board member with the Quebec Association of Doulas (AQD).
"The community was very saddened," said Beccafico. "We felt like it was a beautiful project that was stillborn."
The family birth unit emphasized physiological — or natural — medication-free births and collaborated with midwives, who shared their expertise and knowledge with the unit's nurses.
The unit was supposed to accommodate 1,500 births a year or 125 a month. In the end, only 46 children were born there.
In an email, Amaili Jetté, the president of the Regroupement les sages-femmes du Québec (RSFQ), a collective representing midwife groups, said it's important these kinds of collaborations continue in the future, while respecting each other's areas of competence and expertise.
"Physiological births are in demand, and it is vital that we continue to offer care and facilities that meet the needs of the population," said Jetté, adding that the island of Montreal currently has five birthing centres and one midwifery service.
Bridge between home and hospital
Shannon Godin had planned on delivering her son, Tomas, at Notre-Dame Hospital, which is close to her home.
The Notre-Dame unit was designed as a bridge between the experience of home births and that of hospital deliveries.
Unlike a traditional hospital setting, the family birth unit had large, private rooms equipped with bath tubs. Birthing balls, stools and other supports such as slings and ceiling bars were also available to help patients during delivery.
The patient would remain in the same room to recover rather than changing units, which Godin also liked.
But when the family birth unit was temporarily closed last summer, Godin began to search for another option.
A nurse herself, she said she isn't surprised the unit struggled to maintain staffing due to the nursing shortage throughout the health- care system. Even so, she admits it was "frustrating and disappointing" to have to start over and find a new place to give birth.
"It's too bad that they went ahead and built it when they didn't have the resources to actually run it," said Godin.
Needs have evolved
The Notre-Dame Hospital family birth unit has faced a lot of challenges.
Construction delays, recruitment difficulties and the COVID-19 pandemic postponed the project several times.
It finally opened in February 2024.
But by the summer, the unit had to temporarily suspend operations due to staffing difficulties, reduced availability of obstetricians and the arrival of the summer holiday period, said Marianne Paquette, a spokesperson for CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal.
Last fall, the unit postponed its reopening indefinitely and an external consultant from the Health Ministry was called in to try to find a solution.
Despite several recruitment drives, "specialized labour in this field is scarce and we have not been able to fill a sufficient number of positions to ensure a safe reopening," said Paquette.
Paquette said the community's needs have also evolved since the project started seven years ago.
The regional health authority said other birthing centres in greater Montreal have the capacity to handle the demand, given that latest projections show the birth rate will continue to decline.
When Health Minister Christian Dubé was asked about the short-lived unit, he used it as an example to underline the importance of Santé Québec, the new Crown corporation responsible for the province's health-care system.
"There were a lot of projects that were looked [at] on a standalone basis by an establishment," said Dubé. "We cannot just spend money on a local basis without thinking globally."
But Beccafico said that decision is shortsighted.
Although they understand the province is always looking to get the most bang for its buck, they say more and more people are interested in giving birth outside of a traditional hospital setting.
"By shutting down this initiative, they are sending a clear message: budget priorities matter more than parents' choices," said Beccafico.
They believe the real issue is a lack of commitment, support and training for this birthing option, which in the end, could help save money.
Beccafico believes a patient-centric approach that focuses on natural births can help patients feel empowered and may even help lower the chances of postpartum depression.
The CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal has met with all the employees and doctors about the closure.
Many of the unit's nurses and orderlies were already re-distributed to other birthing centres after Notre-Dame's unit closed last summer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Ousted FDA vaccine chief Vinay Prasad is returning to the agency
WASHINGTON (AP) — A Food and Drug Administration official is getting his job back as the agency's top vaccine regulator, less than two weeks after he was pressured to step down at the urging of biotech executives, patient groups and conservative allies of President Donald Trump. Dr. Vinay Prasad is resuming leadership of the FDA center that regulates vaccines and biotech therapies, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement Monday. Prasad left the agency late last month after drawing ire of right-wing activists, including Laura Loomer, because of his past statements criticizing Trump. A longtime a critic of FDA's standards for approving medicines, Prasad briefly ordered the maker of a gene therapy for Duchenne's muscular dystrophy to halt shipments after two patient deaths. But that action triggered pushback from the families of boys with the fatal condition and libertarian supporters of increased access to experimental medicines. Prasad's decision to pause the therapy was criticized by The Wall Street Journal editorial board, former Republican Sen. Rick Santorum and others. The FDA swiftly reversed its decision suspending the therapy's use. Loomer posted online that Prasad was 'a progressive leftist saboteur,' noting his history of praising liberal independent Sen. Bernie Sanders. But Prasad has had the backing of FDA Commissioner Marty Makary and health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have both called for scrutinizing the use of COVID-19 vaccines. Under Prasad, the FDA restricted the approval of two new COVID-19 shots from vaccine makers Novavax and Moderna and set stricter testing requirements for future approvals. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. doctor loses challenge of dismissal for COVID vaccine refusal
A B.C. judge has rejected a Charter challenge brought by a Kamloops doctor who said her rights were violated when her hospital privileges were revoked for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak brought the action in B.C. Supreme Court in Kelowna against the Interior Health Authority and the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the health agency's decision. Judge Steven Wilson said the revocation was an administrative decision, not a matter of Charter rights, and ruled in favour of health officials. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Szezepaniak worked as a hospitalist at Royal Inland Hospital in Kamloops during the pandemic. On Oct. 14, 2021, provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry issued an order that all doctors and nurses must be vaccinated. Those who refused were told they must resign their privileges or run the risk of being disciplined. The doctor refused either to get the vaccine or resign, instead launching an appeal with the Hospital Appeal Board, which largely upheld the decision of Interior Health, although it ' concluded that the sanction of termination was too harsh.' The appeal board said Szezepaniak should be suspended instead, effectively ending her contract while the health order was in place. Szezepaniak 'argues that her decision not to be vaccinated was one she was entitled to make, and because the provincial health order precluded her from working at the hospital, she ought not to have been disciplined at all.' The doctor argued the discipline meant she has a 'black mark' on her record that will have to be disclosed whenever she applies for new positions. She argued that violates Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it 'includes the right to earn an income to support oneself and family.' The judge noted neither the validity of the health order nor the question of the efficacy of the COVID vaccine were at issue in the case. The judge also said it was not a test of the 'procedural fairness' of the appeal board hearing or of Interior Health's procedures and rules for employees. Szezepaniak has been practising medicine for 23 years and was a clinical instructor at UBC for 15 years. The primary earner in her family, she moved to 100 Mile House and took a position there after the Royal Inland dismissal. Hospital privileges in all B.C. health authorities are reviewed annually by the regional board of directors, and when a medical worker fails to abide by the Hospital Act or any of its bylaws, a disciplinary process is started. Interior Health's board cancelled Szezepaniak's hospital privileges in a resolution dated Aug. 18, 2022. She appealed to the Hospital Appeal Board, which upheld the dismissal and rejected the Charter argument. The appeal board 'acknowledged that the petitioner was free to make the decision to remain unvaccinated, but concluded that discipline was nonetheless the consequence of that decision.' As for the Charter argument, the appeal board said the health authority was only making a 'routine or regular' application of existing government policy. 'While made in response to the effects of the (provincial health) order, it did not constitute application or implementation of government policy.' The judge also agreed the operational decision to suspend Szezepaniak's hospital privileges was not 'patently unreasonable' in the circumstances, a condition that could trigger a Charter challenge. 'I do not accept that a hospital board's ability to exclude a practitioner from the hospital for failing to comply with the bylaws is a decision that is governmental in nature,' said the judge in the ruling posted online late last week. While the vaccination mandate was a provincial health order, 'the decision regarding how to discipline the hospital medical staff for their breach of the PHO (order) was not subject to governmental control under the Hospital Act, as the responsibility for adopting disciplinary measures for governmental policies rests with the Interior Health Authority board. 'It follows that I conclude that the Charter does not apply to the circumstances in this case.' Though acknowledging that Szezepaniak encountered 'stress and hardship' in making her decision to reject the vaccine, the judge said that 'does not make the orders a state interference with their physical or psychological integrity.' The judge referred to an earlier ruling that said 'the right to security of the person does not protect the individual from the ordinary stresses and anxieties that a person of reasonable sensibility would suffer as a result of government action. 'If the right were interpreted with such broad sweep, countless government initiatives could be challenged on the ground that they infringe the right to security of the person, massively expanding the scope of judicial review, and, in the process, trivializing what it means for a right to be constitutionally protected.' jruttle@
National Observer
8 hours ago
- National Observer
In Indigenous communities, MAiD is a fraught conversation
During the darkest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, James Frank Palmater faced relentless, crushing pain. A massive heart attack had reduced his heart function to only 15 per cent. The isolation of social distancing in his palliative care ward deepened his suffering. Two and a half weeks after the infarction, he sought Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). His partner, Mary Palmater, an Indigenous elder living in New Brunswick, supported him fully. 'We always had a pact,' she said. 'If he decided, I would support him 100 per cent and vice versa.' During her husband's final days at a Fredericton hospice, staff explained the MAiD process carefully and made room for cultural traditions, including allowing a drummer to be present during his passing, which brought the family an immense measure of peace. 'They bent over backwards to accommodate it,' she said. 'Even a few months after, they kept in contact with me, just to see how I was doing.' The degree of care, cultural safety and communication they received should be widely available across Indigenous communities in Canada, she said. 'People should know their options,' she said. 'If there's no hope and no return, people should be supported to go with dignity.' 'When people pass in our communities, our whole community shuts down for a period of time. ... It's not something we take lightly whatsoever,' said Josie Nepinak, president of the Native Women's Association of Canada. Yet this experience is an exception, not a norm: many Indigenous communities face persistent barriers that call into question whether MAiD is truly a free choice or a forced response to systemic issues. According to the document obtained by Canada's National Observer through an access-to-information request, since late 2023, the federal government has invested more than $3.3 million to support Indigenous-led consultations across the country. These include roundtables, sharing circles and surveys that involve hundreds of participants from diverse Indigenous communities — urban, rural and remote — as well as 2SLGBTQI+ groups, elders and health practitioners. With the mental health crisis and high suicide rates in Indigenous communities, these efforts pave the way for a broader conversation around MAiD, which has largely remained unexplored until now. State of choice Medical assistance in dying became legal in Canada in 2016 for adults with 'grievous and irremediable' conditions where death is 'reasonably foreseeable.' Since then, eligibility has gradually expanded, including plans to broaden access to those with mental illness as their sole condition — a change delayed until at least 2027 amid widespread concern. Brendon Moore, national chief of Congress of Aboriginal People — a group that represents the interests of Indigenous people is concerned that expanding MAiD, especially for those with mental illness as a sole condition — is especially troubling in communities that already experience the highest rates of suicide as a result of intergenerational trauma and systemic racism. The nightmare scenario: MAiD could substitute investments in living supports and mental health care if underlying conditions aren't addressed first. 'We're looking for an equitable opportunity to live first,' he said. 'If we had culturally safe palliative care and mental health support, some people might choose that path instead of moving toward MAiD.' The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples grew concerned about MAiD after seeing an increase in requests from Indigenous inmates, who continue to be overrepresented in the federal correctional system. 'We believe compassionate release should be prioritized, allowing individuals the opportunity to make end-of-life decisions with dignity, surrounded by family and cultural support and not from within a prison cell,' Moore said. This problem reflects broader systemic struggles confronting Indigenous communities nationally. Moore said many Indigenous people, especially those living off-reserve, were left out of the MAiD national discussion. Their group stepped in to voice their concerns because these laws impact Indigenous communities that had no role in shaping them. 'Our main concern is that medical assistance in dying will become the easier choice for people within our communities that are continuing to struggle with the systemic barriers that are placed in front of them,' Moore said. Culturally safe care Josie Nepinak, president of the Native Women's Association of Canada, which has been at the forefront of research into MAiD's impact on Indigenous women, Two Spirit, and gender-diverse people, said communities are deeply divided. Some people see it as supporting personal choice, while others feel it conflicts with their spiritual and cultural beliefs about family and traditions. The most pressing challenge, she said, is the lack of culturally safe healthcare — which undermines true, informed choice. According to a Native Women's Association of Canada report funded by Indigenous Services Canada as part of a national effort, 85 per cent of providers serving Indigenous communities have had no formal cultural safety training for MAiD, leaving 'many Indigenous patients without true support at the most vulnerable times in their lives,' Nepinak said. Even Indigenous healthcare providers reported inadequate support for navigating the tensions between rigid Western healthcare systems and Indigenous cultural beliefs. Urban Indigenous organizations like the National Association of Friendship Centres provide vital culturally appropriate services to a large population of Indigenous people annually, offering healthcare navigation, mental health support and cultural connection. Jocelyn Formsma, CEO of the association, said many Indigenous people have to leave home to get health care — often traveling from remote reserves or northern communities to urban centers for everything from cancer treatments to palliative care. 'There's no guarantee that they're able to access culturally relevant health care services when they do come to the city,' she said. While a handful of hospitals and some provinces are trying to add Indigenous programming, it's 'still kind of part and parcel of the mainstream system,' she said. Friendship centres have stepped in to offer basic health clinics, navigation programs, hospital visits and support during serious illnesses or end-of-life care. In some communities, they provide rides to appointments, help families understand their options and ensure people are treated with respect and cultural understanding. But most friendship centres lack regular funding or formal recognition for this work, so support is 'ad hoc, depending on the community you're in,' Formsma said. Without better access and culturally safe care, MAiD risks being chosen as a result of lack of hope, resources or social connection rather than true free will, Nepinak said. 'When people pass in our communities, our whole community shuts down for a period of time. ... It's not something we take lightly whatsoever,' she said. Surface engagement A Health Canada spokesperson told Canada's National Observer it's continuing to work with Indigenous communities on MAID and end-of-life care and to increase participation in that consultation, the survey was shared with Indigenous Services Canada, provinces and territories and various Indigenous organizations. However, Moore described their efforts as 'surface engagement' that only 'touch[ed] on the topic,' lacking the resources for meaningful dialogue involving knowledge keepers and elders. Moore said MAiD makes sense in some cases, but for most Indigenous communities, the reality remains much more complex. Meaningful consultation would require investing heavily in ongoing community conversations, allowing time for reflection and multiple rounds of feedback, which has not been provided so far. 'We're really still in the baby steps of reconciliation. Reconciliation is meant to bring us back to par with the average Canadian and their rights, but this is a very Western perspective, not something you find in many of our ways. It's deeply concerning that work is moving forward on things like this and attempting to make it law, when we still haven't made much progress on reconciliation,' Moore said. The department stated that it will share more details about its consultations later this summer but has not responded to further questions.
