
In Indigenous communities, MAiD is a fraught conversation
Two and a half weeks after the infarction, he sought Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD).
His partner, Mary Palmater, an Indigenous elder living in New Brunswick, supported him fully. 'We always had a pact,' she said. 'If he decided, I would support him 100 per cent and vice versa.'
During her husband's final days at a Fredericton hospice, staff explained the MAiD process carefully and made room for cultural traditions, including allowing a drummer to be present during his passing, which brought the family an immense measure of peace.
'They bent over backwards to accommodate it,' she said. 'Even a few months after, they kept in contact with me, just to see how I was doing.'
The degree of care, cultural safety and communication they received should be widely available across Indigenous communities in Canada, she said.
'People should know their options,' she said. 'If there's no hope and no return, people should be supported to go with dignity.'
'When people pass in our communities, our whole community shuts down for a period of time. ... It's not something we take lightly whatsoever,' said Josie Nepinak, president of the Native Women's Association of Canada.
Yet this experience is an exception, not a norm: many Indigenous communities face persistent barriers that call into question whether MAiD is truly a free choice or a forced response to systemic issues.
According to the document obtained by Canada's National Observer through an access-to-information request, since late 2023, the federal government has invested more than $3.3 million to support Indigenous-led consultations across the country. These include roundtables, sharing circles and surveys that involve hundreds of participants from diverse Indigenous communities — urban, rural and remote — as well as 2SLGBTQI+ groups, elders and health practitioners. With the mental health crisis and high suicide rates in Indigenous communities, these efforts pave the way for a broader conversation around MAiD, which has largely remained unexplored until now.
State of choice
Medical assistance in dying became legal in Canada in 2016 for adults with 'grievous and irremediable' conditions where death is 'reasonably foreseeable.' Since then, eligibility has gradually expanded, including plans to broaden access to those with mental illness as their sole condition — a change delayed until at least 2027 amid widespread concern.
Brendon Moore, national chief of Congress of Aboriginal People — a group that represents the interests of Indigenous people is concerned that expanding MAiD, especially for those with mental illness as a sole condition — is especially troubling in communities that already experience the highest rates of suicide as a result of intergenerational trauma and systemic racism.
The nightmare scenario: MAiD could substitute investments in living supports and mental health care if underlying conditions aren't addressed first.
'We're looking for an equitable opportunity to live first,' he said. 'If we had culturally safe palliative care and mental health support, some people might choose that path instead of moving toward MAiD.'
The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples grew concerned about MAiD after seeing an increase in requests from Indigenous inmates, who continue to be overrepresented in the federal correctional system.
'We believe compassionate release should be prioritized, allowing individuals the opportunity to make end-of-life decisions with dignity, surrounded by family and cultural support and not from within a prison cell,' Moore said.
This problem reflects broader systemic struggles confronting Indigenous communities nationally.
Moore said many Indigenous people, especially those living off-reserve, were left out of the MAiD national discussion. Their group stepped in to voice their concerns because these laws impact Indigenous communities that had no role in shaping them.
'Our main concern is that medical assistance in dying will become the easier choice for people within our communities that are continuing to struggle with the systemic barriers that are placed in front of them,' Moore said.
Culturally safe care
Josie Nepinak, president of the Native Women's Association of Canada, which has been at the forefront of research into MAiD's impact on Indigenous women, Two Spirit, and gender-diverse people, said communities are deeply divided. Some people see it as supporting personal choice, while others feel it conflicts with their spiritual and cultural beliefs about family and traditions.
The most pressing challenge, she said, is the lack of culturally safe healthcare — which undermines true, informed choice.
According to a Native Women's Association of Canada report funded by Indigenous Services Canada as part of a national effort, 85 per cent of providers serving Indigenous communities have had no formal cultural safety training for MAiD, leaving 'many Indigenous patients without true support at the most vulnerable times in their lives,' Nepinak said. Even Indigenous healthcare providers reported inadequate support for navigating the tensions between rigid Western healthcare systems and Indigenous cultural beliefs.
Urban Indigenous organizations like the National Association of Friendship Centres provide vital culturally appropriate services to a large population of Indigenous people annually, offering healthcare navigation, mental health support and cultural connection.
Jocelyn Formsma, CEO of the association, said many Indigenous people have to leave home to get health care — often traveling from remote reserves or northern communities to urban centers for everything from cancer treatments to palliative care.
'There's no guarantee that they're able to access culturally relevant health care services when they do come to the city,' she said.
While a handful of hospitals and some provinces are trying to add Indigenous programming, it's 'still kind of part and parcel of the mainstream system,' she said.
Friendship centres have stepped in to offer basic health clinics, navigation programs, hospital visits and support during serious illnesses or end-of-life care. In some communities, they provide rides to appointments, help families understand their options and ensure people are treated with respect and cultural understanding. But most friendship centres lack regular funding or formal recognition for this work, so support is 'ad hoc, depending on the community you're in,' Formsma said.
Without better access and culturally safe care, MAiD risks being chosen as a result of lack of hope, resources or social connection rather than true free will, Nepinak said.
'When people pass in our communities, our whole community shuts down for a period of time. ... It's not something we take lightly whatsoever,' she said.
Surface engagement
A Health Canada spokesperson told Canada's National Observer it's continuing to work with Indigenous communities on MAID and end-of-life care and to increase participation in that consultation, the survey was shared with Indigenous Services Canada, provinces and territories and various Indigenous organizations.
However, Moore described their efforts as 'surface engagement' that only 'touch[ed] on the topic,' lacking the resources for meaningful dialogue involving knowledge keepers and elders.
Moore said MAiD makes sense in some cases, but for most Indigenous communities, the reality remains much more complex. Meaningful consultation would require investing heavily in ongoing community conversations, allowing time for reflection and multiple rounds of feedback, which has not been provided so far.
'We're really still in the baby steps of reconciliation. Reconciliation is meant to bring us back to par with the average Canadian and their rights, but this is a very Western perspective, not something you find in many of our ways. It's deeply concerning that work is moving forward on things like this and attempting to make it law, when we still haven't made much progress on reconciliation,' Moore said.
The department stated that it will share more details about its consultations later this summer but has not responded to further questions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
9 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Renewing long-term care needs a balance of quality and quantity
Canada's long-term care sector is in the midst of an unprecedented boom, with federal and provincial governments investing billions to fund the development of new facilities. In Ontario, for example, the government has committed to building 30,000 beds by 2028. In B.C., plans are underway to replace or build 5,070 publicly subsidized beds by 2030. Similarly, Nova Scotia has committed to adding or modernizing 5,700 long-term care beds by 2032. To meet the demands of an aging population, the Canadian Medical Association has estimated that 199,000 new beds will be needed by 2035, costing $64 billion in capital. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. This investment is both urgent and necessary. But the investment requires more than beds alone. Building more beds has received far greater attention than supporting the care that residents need. Equal emphasis must be placed on improving quality of care, otherwise we risk scaling up the very problems we set out to solve. A clear example of this challenge is the ongoing use of antipsychotic medications in long-term care. These medications are often prescribed to manage behaviours in residents with dementia, even when there is no diagnosis, such as schizophrenia, that would warrant their use. This is considered inappropriate and can lead to serious harms, including sedation, falls, strokes and even death. Despite years of awareness and improvement efforts, Canada's rate of antipsychotic prescribing in long-term care has climbed following the COVID pandemic. Currently, 24.5 per cent of residents are prescribed these drugs when there is not a diagnosis to indicate their use. This is more than double the rate in the U.S. at 10 per cent and well above the 18 per cent in Australia and 15 per cent in Sweden. These differences point to a care system that is stretched thin, where medications are sometimes used as a substitute for time, training or resources to provide more personalized care. In response to these rising rates, a national coalition has set a target to reduce inappropriate antipsychotic use in Canadian long-term care homes to 15 per cent . Developed by an expert panel through a months-long consensus process, this is an achievable and necessary goal. But meeting it requires reinvestment not only in where care is delivered, but how it is delivered. This includes investing in training in behavioural support and dementia care. It means providing enough staffing hours, so care teams have the time to build relationships and understand resident needs. It also requires clear accountability supports in long-term care to sustain improvement efforts. We already know these approaches work. Across Canada, many homes have successfully implemented behavioural approaches that reduce reliance on medications while improving resident well-being. Music therapy, access to outdoor space, one-on-one engagement and meaningful recreational activities have all been shown to support residents with responsive behaviours without the need for antipsychotics. These approaches not only improve symptoms safely but treat residents with the care and dignity they deserve. Canada has an opportunity to renew long-term care. The success of this reinvestment must be measured not only by how many beds we add, but how well those beds are staffed, how care teams are supported, and how our residents are treated. Prioritizing quality alongside quantity is the only way to deliver not just more care, but better care. Dr. Wendy Levinson is chair of Choosing Wisely Canada and a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto.


Global News
10 hours ago
- Global News
Saskatchewan Health Authority faces criticism for Indigenous hair-cutting policy
See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook The First Nations Health Ombudsperson Office is calling for accountability from the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) following an Indigenous woman's hair being cut without her consent. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy This comes as SHA implements its Indigenous Hair Cutting Policy this month. As Global's Nicole Healey explains in the video above, the family and community say it's time for true consultation and respect of Indigenous culture.


Toronto Sun
a day ago
- Toronto Sun
LILLEY: CSA pushes for mandatory masking in all health settings
Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox A member of the medical staff listens as Montefiore Medical Center nurses call for N95 masks and other critical PPE to handle the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on April 1, 2020 in New York. (Photo by Bryan R. Smith / AFP) (Photo by BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images) Are you ready to wear a mask every time you visit your doctor or go to a hospital? That's a recommendation soon to come from the Canadian Standards Association backed by several activist groups. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The CSA is conducting public consultations on the issue until Aug. 19. The proposal would be that patients, staff and medical personnel would be required to wear an N95 respirator mask – not those little blue surgical masks – at all times. Part of the proposal would exempt some areas of a hospital; for example, if it was just in use by administrators and not open to patients. The activists backing this, though, believe that isn't good enough and want the exempt areas limited or done away with all together. The idea is likely to gain support from some groups but don't expect everyone in the medical community to be on board even though supporters claim this idea is backed by the best science. One specialist in the infectious disease area reached out to express their opposition, adding many doctors don't like this. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'It has caused massive waves in the infection control community because even they think it's ridiculous,' the doctor said. Thankfully, for those who believe in sanity, pronouncements from the CSA aren't binding on hospitals or doctors' offices. The CSA is a private organization and while a recommendation from the organization can carry some weight, it's not backed up by law. 'There are no plans to adopt or implement such a requirement in Ontario,' said Jackson Jacobs, a spokesperson for Health Minister Sylvia Jones. Alberta's health ministry also has no plans to make masks mandatory. 'At this time, decisions regarding mask use will continue to be guided by site-level leadership, provincial health agencies, and operational teams based on local context and clinical judgment,' a spokesperson for the province's Ministry of Primary and Preventative Health Services. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Masks have become very political since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommended video We all know those people, on both sides of the divide, who can't let go of those dark days. For many it has resulted in not being able to function in public without wearing a mask. You can see these people walking along the street, through parks or driving their car all alone with a mask on. It's more of a security blanket and a political statement than a medical device. Still, supporters are dressing this idea up as settled science. An international coalition of highly political doctors calling themselves The World Health Network has been organizing a campaign to support making this measure mandatory. 'The World Health Network (WHN) supports the draft CSA Z94.4-25 standard, which establishes a science-based framework for the selection, use, and care of respirators across workplaces, including health care,' the WHN statement reads. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Let's be clear, the WHN believes that wearing N95 masks all day everyday should extend to other workplaces as well, but they are adamant in their support of a CSA guideline calling for mandatory use in health settings. 'It establishes that all health-care workers must wear respirators (minimum PL1) in health-care facilities and during delivery of care, except in designated low-risk zones determined by qualified airborne transmission risk assessment,' their statement reads. One of the backers of the WHN is a Calgary-area doctor named Joe Vipond. If that name rings a bell it's because during the pandemic, Vipond was a strong critic of the Kenney government, supported every stronger lockdowns and opposed any easing of restrictions. He was highly visible in the media without ever exposing his strong NDP ties, including nearly $20,000 in donations to the Alberta NDP. Now, he and his official sounding group want the CSA to recommend mandatory N95 masks in all health settings and then for governments to use their legal and regulatory authority to make that a reality. There are people who need to wear masks for health reasons; there is no medical basis for me to wear a mask for a doctor's appointment or in-patient service in a hospital. There is no need for nurses, doctors and support staff to be forced to wear these devices over a gruelling shift. Let's hope medical officials and provincial health authorities take a pass on this idea. Weird Opinion Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA