RCEP and the future of Asean's economy: Between potential and pitfalls
It brings together all 10 Asea member states with five of their FTA partners — China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand — into a comprehensive trade bloc encompassing around 2.2 billion people and 30 per cent of the world's gross domestic product (GDP) and global trade.
RCEP is a landmark Asean-led initiative that aims to harmonise and deepen existing Asean+1 FTAs under a unified, modern, and inclusive framework.
With 20 chapters, including trade in goods, services, investment, intellectual property, e-commerce, competition, SMEs and dispute settlement, RCEP is expected to catalyse trade flows, strengthen regional value chains (RVCs) and boost post-pandemic economic recovery.
Does RCEP genuinely empower Asean economies? Or does it risk reinforcing asymmetrical benefits that favour larger, more developed partners?
WHAT MAKES RCEP UNIQUE?
Unlike agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) or the EU Single Market, RCEP reflects Asean's distinct model of "soft regionalism": voluntary, flexible and consensus-based.
It is designed not to impose deep political integration or rigid regulatory convergence but instead to create a pragmatic and inclusive economic partnership adaptable to development diversity among member states.
RCEP's key innovations include:
(1) Consolidated Rules of Origin (RoO): A single RoO framework that simplifies trade documentation and reduces compliance costs, thus enabling firms to source inputs from across RCEP countries without losing preferential access.
(2) Differential Tariff Concessions: These allow flexibility for countries to maintain sensitive sector protections while still advancing gradual liberalisation.
(3) Special and Differential Treatment (SDT): Targeted support for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) within Asean—especially Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam (CLMV)—to facilitate their integration into regional trade.
(4) Living Agreement Structure: RCEP includes institutional mechanisms (e.g., RCEP Joint Committee, subcommittees) to review and expand the agreement's scope to address emerging challenges like digital trade, climate change and pandemics.
However, RCEP remains modest in ambition in areas like labour protections, environmental standards, data flows and state-owned enterprise (SOE) disciplines—areas where the CPTPP sets higher benchmarks.
Critics argue that without stronger commitments in these domains, RCEP's long-term contribution to sustainable development may be limited.
BENEFITS AND RISKS FOR ASEAN: STRATEGIC LEVERAGE OR UNEQUAL PROMISE?
In principle, RCEP offers numerous strategic advantages to Asean:
(1) Enhanced Economic Centrality: Asean remains at the centre of the agreement's architecture, reinforcing its convening power and diplomatic relevance in the Indo-Pacific.
(2) Trade and Investment Gains: According to CGE simulations (Itakura, 2022), Asean countries stand to experience notable gains in GDP, exports and welfare by 2035, especially under scenarios that include tariff reductions, trade facilitation and services liberalisation.
(3) SME and GVC Participation: The agreement promotes inclusive integration by helping SMEs join RVCs through simplified customs procedures and regional trade facilitation.
Yet, benefits will be asymmetrical. Countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam, already integrated into global value chains (GVCs) and possessing strong digital infrastructure, are well-positioned to benefit early and significantly.
Conversely, CLMV countries with weaker institutional capacity, infrastructure deficits and limited trade readiness may struggle to fully leverage RCEP without capacity-building support.
Moreover, the pandemic and the US-China trade war have exposed Asean's dependency on external markets. There is growing concern that RCEP could entrench such dependencies further, particularly on China, unless balanced by internal Asean Economic Community (AEC) integration.
KEY ENABLERS OF SUCCESS FOR ASEAN
To transform RCEP from a legal agreement into a transformative engine for inclusive growth, Asean must prioritise the following policy enablers.
1. Domestic Readiness and Reform
(a) Upgrade trade infrastructure and adopt paperless trade systems.
(b) Strengthen digital and human capital, particularly for SMEs and underserved populations.
(c) Encourage private sector engagement and public-private partnerships (PPPs).
2. Deepening Asean Economic Community (AEC) Integration
(a) Eliminate non-tariff barriers (NTBs), harmonise standards and streamline customs procedures.
(b) Strengthen intra-Asean connectivity and production networks.
(c) Develop unified digital and green standards to align Asean with future trade demands.
3. Digital and Services Integration
(a) Expand the scope of digital trade rules within RCEP by advocating for stronger provisions on cross-border data flows, cybersecurity and digital inclusion.
(b) Enhance services liberalisation through a negative-list approach and stronger regulatory frameworks.
(c) Support skills upgrading for workers in ICT-enabled and high-value services sectors.
4. Institutional Governance and Implementation Monitoring
(a) Empower the RCEP Joint Committee and subcommittees to carry out robust implementation reviews.
(b) Create inclusive, transparent and participatory mechanisms to monitor RCEP's impact on SMEs, women, informal workers and rural communities.
(c) Provide technical assistance and dispute resolution access for smaller and less developed member states.
ASEAN LEADERSHIP AT AMM 58: WHAT MUST BE DONE
Strong political direction is needed to steer RCEP implementation toward equitable outcomes. Recommended actions include:
(1) Establish a Regional RCEP Implementation Taskforce under the Asean Secretariat to assess commitments, facilitate peer learning, and enhance transparency.
(2) Create an Asean RCEP Transition Fund, contributed by more advanced economies, to support institutional capacity-building, regulatory reform, and infrastructure enhancement in CLMV countries.
(3) Reaffirm Asean Centrality in RCEP Governance, ensuring the Asean Secretariat works closely with RCEP institutional bodies to steer policy alignment and manage tensions between large partners.
(4) Mainstream Sustainability and Inclusivity, embedding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender equality, labour safeguards, and environmental sustainability into RCEP's evolving work programme.
BETWEEN OPPORTUNITY AND TEST
RCEP is a reflection of Asean's ability to lead regional integration in an era of fractured globalisation. It offers a unique opportunity to bridge development gaps, modernise economies and reassert Asean's relevance in global economic governance.
But it also poses a test of political will and institutional coherence. Without urgent reforms, the agreement may inadvertently deepen regional inequalities and reinforce asymmetric dependencies. The success of RCEP, therefore, depends on Asean's commitment to leadership, solidarity, and shared prosperity.
The message from Kuala Lumpur must then be bold and clear: Asean does not merely seek a seat at the table but it aims to lead, shape and humanise the future of regional economic integration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Asean leaders renew call for Thailand, Cambodia to end hostilities
IPOH: Thailand and Cambodia have been urged to cease all hostilities and to settle any disputes peacefully. In a joint statement by Asean's Foreign Ministers, it said that the ongoing situation at the border between both countries was deeply concerning as it resulted in increasing number of casualties, destruction of properties and displacement of a large number of people. "We emphasise the need for both sides to exercise maximum restraint and undertake an immediate ceasefire, and refrain from taking any actions that may undermine it. "We further urge both sides to cease all hostilities, return to the negotiating table to restore peace and stability, and settle disputes and differences by peaceful means, based on the principles of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in South-East Asia, the Asean Charter as well as the Charter of the United Nations, and in the spirit of Asean family, unity and good neighborliness," it said. "We remain supportive of the efforts of the Asean Chair in facilitating both sides to resume dialogue and end the fighting," it added.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
CK Hutchison wants Chinese firm to join bidding for its US$22.8 billion ports business
HONG KONG: CK Hutchison said on Monday it wants a major Chinese strategic investor to join the BlackRock-led consortium bidding for its US$22.8 billion ports business, after media reported that state-owned China COSCO Shipping Corp aims to join the group. The Hong Kong conglomerate in a statement said changes to the composition of the consortium and structure of the transaction will be necessary to secure regulatory approval, and that it will allow as much time as needed to achieve that. A 145-day exclusivity period for talks between the parties expired on Sunday. CK Hutchison's Hong Kong-listed shares were due to open higher just shy of one per cent on Monday. A deal would cover 43 ports in 23 countries including two ports near the Panama Canal which links the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. US President Donald Trump initially hailed the sale as "reclaiming" the Panama Canal after his administration called for the removal of what it said was Chinese ownership of some ports. US investment firm BlackRock declined to comment. COSCO, Italian consortium member MSC and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China views the potential sale as a threat to its interests, seeing the consortium as a proxy for growing American influence in a region it considers economically and geopolitically significant. State-backed media, in criticism of the sale, said China has significant national interests in the matter and that selling the ports would be a betrayal of the country. China's top market regulator said it was paying close attention to developments and stressed the deal would be subject to a Chinese antitrust review. CK Hutchison in its statement said any new investor must be a "significant" member of the consortium. "This is an interesting development. A PRC (China) investor with majority control of the consortium sounds like a non-starter in my view. An investor with a less than 50 per cent stake you would think should keep everyone happy," said strategist David Blennerhassett of Ballingal Investment Advisors who publishes on SmartKarma.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Not feasible for Singapore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table
SINGAPORE: It is no longer feasible nor practical for Singapore to avoid working towards a net-zero future, said Dr Tan See Leng (pic), Singapore's Minister-in-charge of Energy and Science & Technology. Fluctuations in the prices of fossil fuels due to geopolitical conflicts have driven up energy prices. Dealing with the impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels, is also critical for Singapore, he said. 'Energy is existential for us, just like water was existential in the 90s,' said Dr Tan in his first formal interview as Minister-in-charge of Energy and Science & Technology on July 21. The portfolio sits under the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and was created in the latest round of Cabinet changes in May. Dr Tan was previously Second Minister for Trade and Industry, and he continues to helm the Manpower Ministry in the new Cabinet. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong had said that science and technology are key drivers of growth, while energy – especially clean energy – will be an important part of his Government's agenda. Singapore now relies on natural gas, a fossil fuel, for about 95 per cent of its energy needs. The Republic's goal is to reach net-zero emissions – where the total amount of emissions is balanced by activities to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – by 2050. Achieving this would require the energy sector, which makes up about 40 per cent of the nation's total emissions, to cut its emissions. Dr Tan said Singapore is exploring all possible options in its energy transition to ensure its energy needs are met in a sustainable, resilient and cost-effective way. 'Nothing is off the table. We will explore every single pathway, every single possibility, and... make sure it is cost-effective and sustainable,' he said. During the 90-minute interview, Dr Tan fielded a range of questions about Singapore's energy future, from developments in the Asean power grid, to the country's exploration of nuclear and geothermal energy, and the role of emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage. He acknowledged that Singapore's energy transition will result in higher costs, and said the Government will provide support to help people cope. For example, utility rebates such as the U-Save rebates help households to offset utility expenses, while climate vouchers are meant to encourage them to switch to green appliances. Meanwhile, he said the Government will work with businesses such as through energy efficiency grants to help them manage this impact. 'It is not going to be possible for the cost to not go up,' Dr Tan said. 'But what we will endeavour to do is to manage that gradient... and supplement it with rebates, with grants to help our local population, our households and businesses.' Dr Tan said that in the near term, renewable energy imports hold the most promise for Singapore. The Republic has limited access to renewable energy resources, so importing clean electricity generated elsewhere can help. In 2024, Singapore raised its low-carbon electricity import target from four gigawatts (GW) to six GW by 2035. This is expected to make up around a third of the country's energy needs by 2035. Dr Tan said there is a possibility to increase the target beyond this, depending on partnerships. The Asean power grid – which will allow countries to share renewable energy resources – is also gaining traction, with a growing number of bilateral discussions on the issue. For example, Singapore and Indonesia in June inked three key agreements to strengthen cooperation in clean energy and sustainable development, including agreements on cross-border electricity trade. A regional grid is a win-win for countries importing and exporting renewable energy, Dr Tan noted. It will not only help Asean achieve its net-zero ambitions earlier, he said, but also bring about economic growth to the countries. 'Given the vast amount of potential that is within Asean itself, you could unlock significant economic opportunities,' he added. A US-Singapore study on energy connectivity in South-East Asia had assessed that building the Asean power grid can generate US$2 billion (S$2.6 billion) annually in research and development, and create as many as 9,000 jobs a year. Asked if the breakdown of multilateralism around the world helped to focus attention on the importance of the regional grid, Dr Tan said: 'I think that in a way, we've all been encouraged as a result of all of the recent developments.' He added: 'I don't think there's any one major particular push. It's a whole series of nudges. I think the tariffs could also be one of those reminders to encourage all of us to come together and work even more closely as one united Asean.' Dr Tan said the other pathways that Singapore is exploring – such as the use of carbon capture technologies, the potential of hydrogen as a clean fuel, or tapping nuclear energy – are 'still some distance away'. 'So I think in the foreseeable next five years, you will see a lot of work on renewable energy imports, and at the same time, still natural gas, and how to decarbonise natural gas.' Calling his new portfolio a 'redesignation' since he had also overseen energy issues as Second Minister for Trade and Industry, Dr Tan said the new title will help him up the ante in international partnerships. 'It allows a more seamless coordination across the different government agencies within Singapore and also at the same time, when we negotiate internationally,' he said, noting that many countries have dedicated energy ministers. Dr Tan said that while progress on the Asean grid has been made, challenges remain. These include logistical issues like the need to upgrade existing infrastructure to transfer energy. This is where Singapore could step in to provide investments, such as initial funding to crowd in more capital for cross-border energy projects. For example, the Government has appointed Singapore Energy Interconnections, a newly incorporated government-linked company, to specialise in developing cross-border power infrastructure. Singapore's S$10 billion Future Energy Fund – set up to catalyse investments in clean energy technology that may involve high upfront costs and significant commercial, technological and geopolitical risks – could also provide initial funding. But to attract other sources of capital, such as from the private sector, government-to-government frameworks will be needed to give investors greater certainty, said Dr Tan. That would improve the 'bankability' of such projects, he said. 'I think it will attract significant investments, both from public capital, private capital, and even longer-term philanthropic capital.' Going forward, Dr Tan said natural gas will likely remain a core pillar in Singapore's energy mix. But its share will change depending on the development of technologies. 'A good position for Singapore is that by the mid-2040s, natural gas will be around just slightly below 50 per cent of our mix,' he said. - The Straits Times/ANN
