
RCEP and the future of Asean's economy: Between potential and pitfalls
It brings together all 10 Asea member states with five of their FTA partners — China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand — into a comprehensive trade bloc encompassing around 2.2 billion people and 30 per cent of the world's gross domestic product (GDP) and global trade.
RCEP is a landmark Asean-led initiative that aims to harmonise and deepen existing Asean+1 FTAs under a unified, modern, and inclusive framework.
With 20 chapters, including trade in goods, services, investment, intellectual property, e-commerce, competition, SMEs and dispute settlement, RCEP is expected to catalyse trade flows, strengthen regional value chains (RVCs) and boost post-pandemic economic recovery.
Does RCEP genuinely empower Asean economies? Or does it risk reinforcing asymmetrical benefits that favour larger, more developed partners?
WHAT MAKES RCEP UNIQUE?
Unlike agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) or the EU Single Market, RCEP reflects Asean's distinct model of "soft regionalism": voluntary, flexible and consensus-based.
It is designed not to impose deep political integration or rigid regulatory convergence but instead to create a pragmatic and inclusive economic partnership adaptable to development diversity among member states.
RCEP's key innovations include:
(1) Consolidated Rules of Origin (RoO): A single RoO framework that simplifies trade documentation and reduces compliance costs, thus enabling firms to source inputs from across RCEP countries without losing preferential access.
(2) Differential Tariff Concessions: These allow flexibility for countries to maintain sensitive sector protections while still advancing gradual liberalisation.
(3) Special and Differential Treatment (SDT): Targeted support for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) within Asean—especially Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam (CLMV)—to facilitate their integration into regional trade.
(4) Living Agreement Structure: RCEP includes institutional mechanisms (e.g., RCEP Joint Committee, subcommittees) to review and expand the agreement's scope to address emerging challenges like digital trade, climate change and pandemics.
However, RCEP remains modest in ambition in areas like labour protections, environmental standards, data flows and state-owned enterprise (SOE) disciplines—areas where the CPTPP sets higher benchmarks.
Critics argue that without stronger commitments in these domains, RCEP's long-term contribution to sustainable development may be limited.
BENEFITS AND RISKS FOR ASEAN: STRATEGIC LEVERAGE OR UNEQUAL PROMISE?
In principle, RCEP offers numerous strategic advantages to Asean:
(1) Enhanced Economic Centrality: Asean remains at the centre of the agreement's architecture, reinforcing its convening power and diplomatic relevance in the Indo-Pacific.
(2) Trade and Investment Gains: According to CGE simulations (Itakura, 2022), Asean countries stand to experience notable gains in GDP, exports and welfare by 2035, especially under scenarios that include tariff reductions, trade facilitation and services liberalisation.
(3) SME and GVC Participation: The agreement promotes inclusive integration by helping SMEs join RVCs through simplified customs procedures and regional trade facilitation.
Yet, benefits will be asymmetrical. Countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam, already integrated into global value chains (GVCs) and possessing strong digital infrastructure, are well-positioned to benefit early and significantly.
Conversely, CLMV countries with weaker institutional capacity, infrastructure deficits and limited trade readiness may struggle to fully leverage RCEP without capacity-building support.
Moreover, the pandemic and the US-China trade war have exposed Asean's dependency on external markets. There is growing concern that RCEP could entrench such dependencies further, particularly on China, unless balanced by internal Asean Economic Community (AEC) integration.
KEY ENABLERS OF SUCCESS FOR ASEAN
To transform RCEP from a legal agreement into a transformative engine for inclusive growth, Asean must prioritise the following policy enablers.
1. Domestic Readiness and Reform
(a) Upgrade trade infrastructure and adopt paperless trade systems.
(b) Strengthen digital and human capital, particularly for SMEs and underserved populations.
(c) Encourage private sector engagement and public-private partnerships (PPPs).
2. Deepening Asean Economic Community (AEC) Integration
(a) Eliminate non-tariff barriers (NTBs), harmonise standards and streamline customs procedures.
(b) Strengthen intra-Asean connectivity and production networks.
(c) Develop unified digital and green standards to align Asean with future trade demands.
3. Digital and Services Integration
(a) Expand the scope of digital trade rules within RCEP by advocating for stronger provisions on cross-border data flows, cybersecurity and digital inclusion.
(b) Enhance services liberalisation through a negative-list approach and stronger regulatory frameworks.
(c) Support skills upgrading for workers in ICT-enabled and high-value services sectors.
4. Institutional Governance and Implementation Monitoring
(a) Empower the RCEP Joint Committee and subcommittees to carry out robust implementation reviews.
(b) Create inclusive, transparent and participatory mechanisms to monitor RCEP's impact on SMEs, women, informal workers and rural communities.
(c) Provide technical assistance and dispute resolution access for smaller and less developed member states.
ASEAN LEADERSHIP AT AMM 58: WHAT MUST BE DONE
Strong political direction is needed to steer RCEP implementation toward equitable outcomes. Recommended actions include:
(1) Establish a Regional RCEP Implementation Taskforce under the Asean Secretariat to assess commitments, facilitate peer learning, and enhance transparency.
(2) Create an Asean RCEP Transition Fund, contributed by more advanced economies, to support institutional capacity-building, regulatory reform, and infrastructure enhancement in CLMV countries.
(3) Reaffirm Asean Centrality in RCEP Governance, ensuring the Asean Secretariat works closely with RCEP institutional bodies to steer policy alignment and manage tensions between large partners.
(4) Mainstream Sustainability and Inclusivity, embedding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender equality, labour safeguards, and environmental sustainability into RCEP's evolving work programme.
BETWEEN OPPORTUNITY AND TEST
RCEP is a reflection of Asean's ability to lead regional integration in an era of fractured globalisation. It offers a unique opportunity to bridge development gaps, modernise economies and reassert Asean's relevance in global economic governance.
But it also poses a test of political will and institutional coherence. Without urgent reforms, the agreement may inadvertently deepen regional inequalities and reinforce asymmetric dependencies. The success of RCEP, therefore, depends on Asean's commitment to leadership, solidarity, and shared prosperity.
The message from Kuala Lumpur must then be bold and clear: Asean does not merely seek a seat at the table but it aims to lead, shape and humanise the future of regional economic integration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
LVMH in talks to sell Marc Jacobs for $1 billion, sources reveal
PARIS: French luxury conglomerate LVMH is in discussions with multiple buyers, including Authentic Brands Group and WHP Global, to sell its fashion label Marc Jacobs, according to sources familiar with the matter. The deal could be valued at around $1 billion, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. The Bernard Arnault-led company has been exploring strategic options for Marc Jacobs after receiving interest from potential buyers. Authentic Brands, which owns Reebok, declined to comment, while WHP Global did not immediately respond. Bluestar Alliance, owner of Brookstone, is also reportedly interested in acquiring the brand. Marc Jacobs, founded in 1984 by the American designer of the same name, is known for its bold, high-fashion aesthetic. LVMH acquired a stake in the label in 1997 and later appointed Jacobs as creative director of Louis Vuitton. The Journal noted that a deal could be finalized soon if negotiations proceed smoothly. LVMH has been streamlining its portfolio by divesting non-core brands. Last year, it sold Off-White to Bluestar Alliance, and earlier this year, Stella McCartney repurchased LVMH's minority stake in her eponymous label. The luxury sector has seen significant dealmaking activity, including Prada's acquisition of Versace from Capri Holdings for $1.4 billion. Meanwhile, LVMH's second-quarter sales fell slightly below expectations, though analysts noted signs of recovery in China. Deutsche Bank's Adam Cochrane described the results as mixed but highlighted 'glimmers of hope.' French luxury brands continue to face challenges, including market downturns and potential U.S. import tariffs. - Reuters


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Thailand, Cambodia agree to ceasefire
The country and Cambodia have agreed to a ceasefire and to withdraw their troops from the border, says the Malaysian government. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said both countries had agreed but requested some time, as their troops were already stationed at the border and needed time to pull back. Malaysia currently holds the chairmanship of Asean, of which Thailand and Cambodia are both members of the regional bloc. Earlier, acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai had warned that cross-border clashes with Cambodia that have uprooted more than 130,000 people 'could develop into war', as the countries traded deadly strikes for a second day. A long-running border dispute erupted into intense fighting with jets, artillery, tanks and ground troops on Thursday, and the UN Security Council is set to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis. A steady thump of artillery strikes could be heard from the Cambodian side of the border yesterday, where the province of Oddar Meanchey reported one civilian – a 70-year-old man – had been killed and five more wounded. More than 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thailand's border regions, its health ministry said, reporting 15 fatalities – 14 civilians and a soldier – with a further 46 wounded, including 15 troops. 'We have tried to compromise as we are neighbours, but we have now instructed the Thai military to act immediately in case of urgency,' said Phumtham. 'If the situation escalates, it could develop into war – though for now, it remains limited to clashes,' he said in Bangkok. Fighting resumed in three areas around 4am yesterday, the Thai army said, with Cambodian forces firing heavy weapons, field artillery, and BM-21 rocket systems, and Thai troops responding 'with appropriate supporting fire'. But in the afternoon, foreign ministry spokesman Nikorndej Balankura said there were signs the fighting was easing off, and said Thailand was open to talks. Cambodia has stayed tight-lipped about its casualty numbers, but AFP journalists saw four wounded soldiers and three civilians receiving treatment at a hospital in Oddar Meanchey. The soldiers said they were injured during the fighting on Thursday, while the civilians said they were hit by shrapnel. In the Cambodian town of Samraong, 20km from the border, journalists saw families speeding away in vehicles with their children and belongings as gunfire erupted. 'I live very close to the border. We are scared,' Pro Bak, 41, said. He was taking his wife and children to a Buddhist temple to seek refuge. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours – both popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists – over their shared 800km frontier. Dozens of kilometres in several areas are contested and fighting broke out between 2008 and 2011, leaving at least 28 people dead and tens of thousands displaced. A UN court ruling in 2013 settled the matter for over a decade, but the current crisis erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a new clash. Fighting on Thursday was focused on six locations, according to the Thai army, including around two ancient temples. Ground troops backed up by tanks battled for control of territory, while Cambodia fired rockets and shells into Thailand and the Thais scrambled F-16 jets to hit military targets across the border. Both sides blamed each other for firing first, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station hit by at least one rocket. The United States urged an 'immediate' end to the conflict, while Cambodia's former colonial ruler France made a similar call. The EU and China – a close ally of Phnom Penh – said they were 'deeply concerned' about the clashes, calling for dialogue. — AFP


The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Can Malaysia secure a deal?
AS we are just days away from Aug 1, 2025, the effective date when Malaysian exports to the United States will be subject to a 25% tariff rate, it is still a guessing game as to how negotiations between Malaysia and the United States will unfold and whether we will get a better deal or maintain the status quo. For Malaysia, what is at stake is not just the final rate we will eventually settle on, but also what we are willing to sacrifice to secure a lower rate, as seen with countries like Vietnam, the Philippines, and Indonesia in the Asean region, and Japan, which has a revised rate of 15%.