RCEP and the future of Asean's economy: Between potential and pitfalls
It brings together all 10 Asea member states with five of their FTA partners — China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand — into a comprehensive trade bloc encompassing around 2.2 billion people and 30 per cent of the world's gross domestic product (GDP) and global trade.
RCEP is a landmark Asean-led initiative that aims to harmonise and deepen existing Asean+1 FTAs under a unified, modern, and inclusive framework.
With 20 chapters, including trade in goods, services, investment, intellectual property, e-commerce, competition, SMEs and dispute settlement, RCEP is expected to catalyse trade flows, strengthen regional value chains (RVCs) and boost post-pandemic economic recovery.
Does RCEP genuinely empower Asean economies? Or does it risk reinforcing asymmetrical benefits that favour larger, more developed partners?
WHAT MAKES RCEP UNIQUE?
Unlike agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) or the EU Single Market, RCEP reflects Asean's distinct model of "soft regionalism": voluntary, flexible and consensus-based.
It is designed not to impose deep political integration or rigid regulatory convergence but instead to create a pragmatic and inclusive economic partnership adaptable to development diversity among member states.
RCEP's key innovations include:
(1) Consolidated Rules of Origin (RoO): A single RoO framework that simplifies trade documentation and reduces compliance costs, thus enabling firms to source inputs from across RCEP countries without losing preferential access.
(2) Differential Tariff Concessions: These allow flexibility for countries to maintain sensitive sector protections while still advancing gradual liberalisation.
(3) Special and Differential Treatment (SDT): Targeted support for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) within Asean—especially Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam (CLMV)—to facilitate their integration into regional trade.
(4) Living Agreement Structure: RCEP includes institutional mechanisms (e.g., RCEP Joint Committee, subcommittees) to review and expand the agreement's scope to address emerging challenges like digital trade, climate change and pandemics.
However, RCEP remains modest in ambition in areas like labour protections, environmental standards, data flows and state-owned enterprise (SOE) disciplines—areas where the CPTPP sets higher benchmarks.
Critics argue that without stronger commitments in these domains, RCEP's long-term contribution to sustainable development may be limited.
BENEFITS AND RISKS FOR ASEAN: STRATEGIC LEVERAGE OR UNEQUAL PROMISE?
In principle, RCEP offers numerous strategic advantages to Asean:
(1) Enhanced Economic Centrality: Asean remains at the centre of the agreement's architecture, reinforcing its convening power and diplomatic relevance in the Indo-Pacific.
(2) Trade and Investment Gains: According to CGE simulations (Itakura, 2022), Asean countries stand to experience notable gains in GDP, exports and welfare by 2035, especially under scenarios that include tariff reductions, trade facilitation and services liberalisation.
(3) SME and GVC Participation: The agreement promotes inclusive integration by helping SMEs join RVCs through simplified customs procedures and regional trade facilitation.
Yet, benefits will be asymmetrical. Countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam, already integrated into global value chains (GVCs) and possessing strong digital infrastructure, are well-positioned to benefit early and significantly.
Conversely, CLMV countries with weaker institutional capacity, infrastructure deficits and limited trade readiness may struggle to fully leverage RCEP without capacity-building support.
Moreover, the pandemic and the US-China trade war have exposed Asean's dependency on external markets. There is growing concern that RCEP could entrench such dependencies further, particularly on China, unless balanced by internal Asean Economic Community (AEC) integration.
KEY ENABLERS OF SUCCESS FOR ASEAN
To transform RCEP from a legal agreement into a transformative engine for inclusive growth, Asean must prioritise the following policy enablers.
1. Domestic Readiness and Reform
(a) Upgrade trade infrastructure and adopt paperless trade systems.
(b) Strengthen digital and human capital, particularly for SMEs and underserved populations.
(c) Encourage private sector engagement and public-private partnerships (PPPs).
2. Deepening Asean Economic Community (AEC) Integration
(a) Eliminate non-tariff barriers (NTBs), harmonise standards and streamline customs procedures.
(b) Strengthen intra-Asean connectivity and production networks.
(c) Develop unified digital and green standards to align Asean with future trade demands.
3. Digital and Services Integration
(a) Expand the scope of digital trade rules within RCEP by advocating for stronger provisions on cross-border data flows, cybersecurity and digital inclusion.
(b) Enhance services liberalisation through a negative-list approach and stronger regulatory frameworks.
(c) Support skills upgrading for workers in ICT-enabled and high-value services sectors.
4. Institutional Governance and Implementation Monitoring
(a) Empower the RCEP Joint Committee and subcommittees to carry out robust implementation reviews.
(b) Create inclusive, transparent and participatory mechanisms to monitor RCEP's impact on SMEs, women, informal workers and rural communities.
(c) Provide technical assistance and dispute resolution access for smaller and less developed member states.
ASEAN LEADERSHIP AT AMM 58: WHAT MUST BE DONE
Strong political direction is needed to steer RCEP implementation toward equitable outcomes. Recommended actions include:
(1) Establish a Regional RCEP Implementation Taskforce under the Asean Secretariat to assess commitments, facilitate peer learning, and enhance transparency.
(2) Create an Asean RCEP Transition Fund, contributed by more advanced economies, to support institutional capacity-building, regulatory reform, and infrastructure enhancement in CLMV countries.
(3) Reaffirm Asean Centrality in RCEP Governance, ensuring the Asean Secretariat works closely with RCEP institutional bodies to steer policy alignment and manage tensions between large partners.
(4) Mainstream Sustainability and Inclusivity, embedding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), gender equality, labour safeguards, and environmental sustainability into RCEP's evolving work programme.
BETWEEN OPPORTUNITY AND TEST
RCEP is a reflection of Asean's ability to lead regional integration in an era of fractured globalisation. It offers a unique opportunity to bridge development gaps, modernise economies and reassert Asean's relevance in global economic governance.
But it also poses a test of political will and institutional coherence. Without urgent reforms, the agreement may inadvertently deepen regional inequalities and reinforce asymmetric dependencies. The success of RCEP, therefore, depends on Asean's commitment to leadership, solidarity, and shared prosperity.
The message from Kuala Lumpur must then be bold and clear: Asean does not merely seek a seat at the table but it aims to lead, shape and humanise the future of regional economic integration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Sabah delegation to attend Traditional Chinese Medicine Expo in China
Frankie Liew (center) presents the Sabah-China Chamber of Commerce handbook to Dr Sim Hun Yung. KOTA KINABALU (July 24): The Sabah-China Chamber of Commerce (SCCC) will lead a delegation together with the Sabah Chinese Herbal Doctors' Association to participate in the 2025 International (Bozhou) Traditional Chinese Medicine Expo and the 3rd China (Bozhou) – RCEP TCM Industry Cooperation Conference' to be held in Bozhou City, Anhui Province, China. SCCC president Datuk Frankie Liew expressed hope that through the initiative of 'Sabah TCM Going Global,' it can drive the upgrade and development of local traditional Chinese medicine in terms of technology, services, and industry. 'As is well known, Sabah is rich in medicinal resources and has a strong tradition of using traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). These advantages are highly compatible and complementary with China, offering Sabah the opportunity to become the most important TCM production and research base outside of China,' he said. Liew made this announcement yesterday after holding a dialogue with the Sabah Chinese Physicians Association. Representatives from the Sabah Chinese Herbal Doctors' Association who attended included chariman Sim Hun Yung, vice chairman Lung Tet Kun, assistant secretary Tan Ker Shin, members Chin Cheong Mong, Loh Yun Kent and SCCC committee members Chin Hui Zhi and Cheong Siau Ling. Liew revealed that the 2025 International (Bozhou) TCM Expo and the 3rd China (Bozhou) – RCEP TCM Industry Cooperation Conference will take place from September 6 to 10. He further stated that this time, the delegation from Sabah will be led by the SCCC, jointly with the Sabah Chinese Herbal Doctors' Association, and will include representatives from the business community and TCM professionals, to participate in this major event in the field of traditional Chinese medicine. He also emphasized that the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has brought new business opportunities to China and ASEAN countries. The TCM industries of RCEP member countries are highly complementary, which helps promote trade, investment and technological cooperation among enterprises in the TCM field across these countries. Liew looks forward to this event fostering collaboration among the TCM industries of Malaysia and other RCEP member countries. He hopes it will help develop planning and policy alignment, identify entry points and areas of focus for cooperation, and jointly create an open, shared and mutually beneficial trade platform. This will support Sabah's TCM industry and its enterprises to expand cooperation and advance new developments in TCM cooperation under the RCEP framework. 'We hope that the standards and equipment of TCM in Sabah will continue to improve in the future and remain a key healthcare option, enabling people to enjoy better TCM services and treatment, bringing benefits to the public,' he stated.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
News Analysis - Deadly Thai-Cambodian dispute puts Asean's relevance on the line
SINGAPORE: Asean's continuing silence on mounting tensions between Thailand and Cambodia is once again testing its long-standing principle of non-interference. Deadly clashes between its two member states on July 24 left at least 12 dead more than two months after border hostilities reignited. The escalation underscores Asean's limitations in handling intra-regional disputes, experts told The Straits Times, and raises fresh questions about its relevance in managing crises among its own members. 'It is institutional inertia,' said Mr Andrew Mantong, a researcher at Indonesia's Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). 'The region has spent decades building platforms and mechanisms for peace. Yet when war erupts in its backyard, it is diplomacy by absence.' At least 12 Thais, mostly civilians, have been killed in the latest outbreak of a long-standing border dispute. Fighting erupted in a contested area, with Cambodia accused of firing rockets into a Thai village and attacking a hospital, while Thailand launched air strikes on Cambodian military targets. In response, Thailand has closed its entire border and urged its citizens to leave Cambodia. Phnom Penh has downgraded diplomatic ties, accusing Bangkok of using excessive force. The current flare-up began in May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed during a brief exchange of gunfire. Tensions have steadily escalated since, culminating in the recent air strikes and cross-border shelling. Asean has remained publicly silent throughout, although some individual members states have called for peace. The conflict was also not raised at the recent Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia is the current Asean chair and when asked about the issue during a press conference on July 11, Malaysia Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan called it a bilateral issue and reaffirmed the group's traditional stance of non-interference. While Asean has long prided itself on consensus-building and neutrality, Mr Andrew of CSIS said its silence in the face of open conflict is unwise and risks diminishing its standing on the world stage. That credibility has taken a further hit as Cambodia seems to have bypassed the grouping by appealing directly to the United Nations. On July 24, Cambodian media published Prime Minister Hun Manet's letter to the UN Security Council's president, Pakistan's envoy Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, calling for an urgent meeting of the 15-member body. It is the first time in more than a decade that an Asean member has made such a request. Cambodia also made the previous request in 2011, when artillery exchanges with Thailand near the Preah Vihear temple prompted Phnom Penh to seek international intervention. The UN Security Council is expected to convene in the coming days, but observers say any outcome will likely mirror that of 2011, which had included calls for maximum restraint and for Asean to play a more active role in dispute resolution. Still, the referral itself is telling. If countries in the region feel compelled to turn to New York to manage tensions with their neighbours, it reflects a worrying lack of trust in Asean, or in any regional third party, to help defuse a conflict in its own backyard. 'The gap between Asean's aspirational vision and its operational readiness has rarely been this exposed; and I am worried that the current geopolitical contour will make it more frequently exposed,' said Mr Andrew. On Thursday (July 24), Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said that he had sent messages to the prime ministers of Cambodia and Thailand, hoping to speak with them personally. Calling the situation worrying, he said that both countries are key members of Asean and close neighbours to Malaysia, adding that he hoped they would de-escalate tensions and return to the negotiating table. Trust a key issue? Some analysts say a key factor holding Asean back is the lack of trust between the parties involved. Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn is Cambodian, and some observers argue that Thailand may not view him as a neutral mediator. A similar impasse occurred in 2008, when Cambodia rejected mediation by then-Asean secretary-general Surin Pitsuwan, a veteran Thai diplomat, during border clashes near the Preah Vihear temple. After mediation failed, the conflict simmered without formal resolution, until 2011, when Cambodia turned to the UN following renewed violence at the same border area. However, others say the problem is structural, not personal. Ms Joanne Lin, a senior fellow at the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, said the issue lies with Asean's institutional design, not the nationality of its representatives. 'The Secretariat does not have the mandate to lead politically, and decisions must come from member states,' she said, noting how back in 2011 Cambodia had similarly turned to the UN. Eventually, the case went to the International Court of Justice, which ruled in 2013 that Cambodia had sovereignty over the temple and ordered Thai troops to withdraw. That verdict helped ease tensions, but more than a decade on, diplomatic relations between the two neighbours are at their lowest in years. Bilateral channels, said Ms Lin, may no longer be viable. Still, she believes Asean has a narrow window to act. Neutral members like Indonesia or Singapore could potentially step in to broker talks or quietly facilitate de-escalation. In the last bout of fighting between the two countries in 2011 – when Indonesia was the Asean chair – then Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa undertook shuttle diplomacy to defuse tensions. He held talks with both sides in their respective capitals, and also subsequently met with the UN Security Council alongside the two nations' foreign ministers. With the current ignition of tensions, Ms Lin said, 'if Asean doesn't step up, it risks being sidelined in its own region. China, which has close ties with both countries, has already shown interest in stepping in'. China on July 24 expressed deep concern over the border clashes and offered to play a constructive role in promoting peace, urging both sides to resolve the dispute through dialogue and pledging to remain fair, impartial and supportive of regional stability. Asean would prefer that the two countries resolve the conflict bilaterally, as both are members of the regional organisation. But if that is not possible, they should resolve it peacefully through third-party mediation, said Dr Mustafa Izzuddin, a senior international affairs analyst at business consultancy Solaris Strategies Singapore. However, the non-response from Asean – as of July 24 – signifies 'collective fatigue' on the part of the group in dealing with conflict in the region, he added. The group has faced criticism for its failure to implement the five-point peace plan with Myanmar's military regime, as well as its inability to conclude negotiations on a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea, aimed at managing tensions amid overlapping maritime claims. 'Asean is acting strategically so that it does not need to bite off more than it can chew as a multilateral organisation with a multitude of interests that are focused on regional integration,' said Dr Mustafa. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Asian leaders call for calm over deadly Cambodia-Thailand border clashes
Smoke billowing from the roof of a convenience store attached to a petrol station in Sisaket province in Thailand after it was hit by a rocket strike from Cambodia. -- PHOTO: AFP SOUTH-EAST ASIA: Thailand launched air strikes on Cambodian military targets on July 24 as Cambodia fired rockets and artillery, killing at least 11 civilians, in a dramatic escalation of a long-running border row between the two neighbours. The developments have caused concern among countries in Asia, with leaders urging calm and swift de-escalation. Here are the reactions. Malaysia Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has sent messages to the prime ministers of Cambodia and Thailand, hoping to speak with them personally on July 24, reported the New Straits Times. Malaysia currently holds the chairmanship of Asean. 'The situation is worrying. They are key members of Asean and close neighbours to Malaysia… At the very least, we hope they will de-escalate tensions and return to the negotiating table,' he said. 'Efforts have been made, but I still firmly believe that peace is the only option.' Philippines The Department of Foreign Affairs remained hopeful that Cambodia and Thailand could resolve the issue in accordance with international law and the peaceful settlement of disputes. 'We urge both parties to extend due consideration and care to innocent civilians who may be affected by the ongoing conflict,' it said. 'The Philippines does not take any position on this dispute but underscores the importance of maintaining open lines of communication and ensuring the de-escalation of the situation.' Manila said it is continually monitoring the situation and remains ready to extend all possible assistance to Filipinos living in these two countries if necessary. To date, no Filipino nationals have been reported to be affected by the conflict, it added. China Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said China is deeply concerned over the current developments and hopes both sides can properly resolve issues through dialogue and consultations. 'Good neighbourliness and properly handling differences are in line with the fundamental and long-term interests of both sides,' he said. Guo said China would adopt a 'fair and impartial position' in the clashes. Beijing 'has and will continue to in its own way do its best to promote peace and dialogue, and play a constructive role in promoting the easing and cooling down of the situation', he added. Japan Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said Japan has been working to encourage both Cambodia and Thailand to de-escalate the situation. 'A sound relationship between Cambodia and Thailand is extremely important for peace and stability in the region,' he said. 'Japan urges both Cambodia and Thailand to exercise maximum restraint and strongly hopes that the tension between the two countries will be eased peacefully through dialogue.' Unicef The United Nations Children's Fund's regional director for East Asia and the Pacific, Ms June Kunugi, called on all parties to exercise maximum restraint and protect children. 'Children must be protected at all times and their safety and well-being must be prioritised while schools must remain safe spaces for learning,' she said. - Agencies/The Straits Times-Asia News Network
