PA Supreme Court ruling means you may not see a suspect's mugshot in the news
In a ruling from April, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down the decision in Mezzacappa v. Northampton County after a right-to-know (RTK) request was submitted over four years ago in Northampton County.
In December 2020, the request was submitted for various records, including a request for 'all mug shots taken of all inmates' from October 2020 through December 2020.
The County delivered everything except the mug shots in February 2021, advising that the mug shots were exempt from disclosure under the right-to-know law because they constituted 'confidential criminal history record information,' according to the lawsuit.
Later that same month, the requester appealed the denial to the Office of Open Records, which then directed the County to provide the mug shots. However, the requester filed a second RTK in which she stated she was seeking the last names of correctional officers who worked on the unit where she had been incarcerated between October 13 and October 15, 2020, as well as the previous request relating to the mug shots.
In February 2021, the County granted the second request in part. The County advised that the request for the mug shots was 'insufficiently specific and unduly burdensome in the context requested,' according to the lawsuit. Furthermore, the County also noted that the mug shots could only be shared by State or local police departments as the photos comprised criminal history record information.
The requester then appealed the denial for a second time, and the Office of Open Records ultimately ordered the County in March 2021 to provide the requester with the mug shots. The office noted that 'mug shots are routinely disseminated to the press, sometimes as part of a press release' and that if a mug shot contains criminal history record information, the County can redact the information, the lawsuit reads.
The County then proceeded to challenge the decision made by the Office of Open Records in the Commonwealth Court, where the ruling was handed down in favor of the office, with the court holding that the mug shots do not constitute 'identifiable descriptions,' according to the lawsuit. The County then proceeded to challenge the decision in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Ultimately, the PA Supreme Court ruled that mug shots do constitute 'identifiable descriptions' as defined in 'Criminal history record information' in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
We further conclude that, pursuant to Section 9121(b), criminal history record information may only be disseminated to noncriminal justice agencies and individuals by a police department, and, thus, that the County, as a non-law enforcement agency, is prohibited from releasing the mug shots requested by Appellee. Accordingly, we reverse the decisions of the Commonwealth Court.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court
In an email to WTAJ, the Bedford County Prison confirmed that as a result of the aforementioned ruling, the facility is unable to provide any mug shots until further notice.
'Based upon a recent PA Supreme Court decision, the County is prohibited from releasing the request intake photos (mugshots) under the Pennsylvania Criminal History Record Information Act. 18 Pa. Cons, Stat. Ann. Sec. 9101, et seq,' The email reads. 'I know this is a departure from our usual practice, but based on this court ruling, I am unable to provide these. Once I receive more information related to this decision, I will provide an additional response.'
Outlets are currently advised to reach out to local or State police departments for mug shots until further information is released on the ruling. However, departments may not have photos available before someone is processed into a county prison.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says Only U.S. Votes by Mail. Here Are the Facts
A vote by mail ballot for the 2024 general election, sent to all registered voters in Los Angeles County, photographed October 28, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Credit - Jay L. Clendenin—Getty Images President Donald Trump said he will "get rid of" mail-in ballots and voting machines before the 2026 midterm elections—and he's spreading misinformation on social media about the voting methods ahead of time. 'I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES,' Trump posted on Truth Social Monday morning, adding that he will sign an Executive Order eliminating them before the 2026 election. 'We are now the only Country in the World that uses Mail-In Voting. All others gave it up because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED.' Trump reiterated those claims during an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House on Monday, once again dubbing it 'corrupt' to reporters. Absentee voting and vote-by-mail allow people to send in their ballots via the postal service. Not all states allow it, and the laws vary in each state that does. Some states permit universal mail-in voting, for example, where anyone can vote by mail for any reason. Others allow it in specific circumstances. Lots of other countries vote by mail Despite what Trump claims, the United States is not the only country that utilizes mail-in ballots. In fact, multiple other countries do, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany. The International Institute for Democracy & Electoral Assistance (IDEA), an intergovernmental organization that works to protect democratic institutions, found that 34 countries allow postal voting—12 of which allow it for all voters, and 22 of which allow it for some voters. IDEA found that the COVID-19 pandemic created an incentive for these countries to upscale their mail-in ballot infrastructure for public health reasons, but most have kept these avenues open for citizens. Read more: Voting by Mail Dates Back to America's Earliest Years. Here's How It's Changed Over the Years Although Trump says he will use Executive Order powers to end the practice, the U.S. Constitution directs state legislatures to determine the "times, places and manner" of holding elections, which is part of the reason why only some states have vote-by-mail practices, and each state with vote-by-mail has different requirements. There's no evidence that mail voting is corrupt Trump's post continued by reviving well-worn rhetoric—that mail-in voting is used by his opponents, Democrats, for corrupt purposes, despite no evidence to support this claim. 'Democrats are virtually Unelectable without using this completely disproven Mail-In SCAM. ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,' Trump said. 'I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS.' This is not the first time Trump has attacked mail-in ballots as a form of voting. During the 2020 election—which Trump lost to former President Joe Biden—Trump heavily attacked the use of mail-in ballots and suggested, without evidence, that mail voting would lead to 'massive fraud, and abuse,' and discredited physical ballot drop boxes. He also threatened to deploy law enforcement to polling places on Election Day. Trump's rhetoric made it seem that mail-in ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be 'rigged' as a result. When he lost the 2020 election, Trump was quick to blame mail-in ballots, drop boxes, and voting machines, claiming that the system was corrupt. Though research shows that partisan rhetoric made voting by mail a more 'Democrat' thing to do in 2020 and 2022, experts—including the Brennan Center for Justice, the Bipartisan Policy Center, and the Center for Election Innovation and Research—have debunked Trump's claims and found that vote-by-mail methods only expand voting options for voters, and that the 2020 election was not marred by corruption. In the 2024 election, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission found that though mail-in ballots were not quite as popular as during the COVID-19 pandemic, they still accounted for nearly a third of ballots cast. And, in part motivated by Trump's claims of fraud, at least 19 states have passed new mail voting restrictions in place to make the practice more difficult since 2020, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Person hospitalized after being rescued from Ludlow Falls; Fire department warns of dangers
A person was hospitalized after he was rescued from Ludlow Falls in Miami County Saturday evening. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Just after 6:30 p.m., several crews from the Ludlow Falls Fire Department and several other Miami County fire departments were dispatched to a water rescue at Ludlow Falls. TRENDING STORIES: Police searching for woman accused of stealing goods from Kroger 'Violation of your privacy;' Police searching for person responsible for several daytime break-ins Officers, medics respond after car hits tree on busy Dayton street Once on scene, crews were able to locate a person who had jumped into the falls, according to a post from the department. News Center 7 previously reported that the person had jumped into the water but had to be pulled out because they could not walk, according to Miami County deputies. Crews worked together to get to the person and get them ready to be hoisted out of the water by a ladder truck and onto solid ground. The person was then taken to an area hospital by responding medics. The fire department is now warning people of the dangers of swimming in the falls. 'We want to remind everyone swimming at the falls can look fun and be a nice way to cool off but there are dangers that lie within that water,' the post read. According to the post, Ludlow Fire crews have responded multiple times to the falls to either 'rescue or make an unfortunate recovery.' 'Please be responsible and safe when swimming, and we highly suggest to stay out of the falls here in Ludlow due to the dangers of the falls,' the post read. It is also illegal to swim at Ludlow Falls, and signs are posted that say 'no swimming'. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Rare sighting of white-tailed eagle
A rare sighting of one of the largest birds of prey in the UK far from their usual breeding ground has delighted nature lovers. The white-tailed eagle was spotted by bird watchers at Stainmore, on the border between Cumbria and County Durham. It has been identified as G818, a female eagle originally released on the Isle of Wight in 2021, by volunteers from the Roy Dennis Wildlife Foundation. Tim Mackrill, an ornithologist for the foundation, said a number of eagles pass through Cumbria each year but sightings are "rare". G818 has spent the summer in the Scottish Highlands and is now making her way down to the south coast. "She began heading south on 2 August and then spent 3-9 August near Stanmore," Mr Mackrill said. "We are hopeful she will find a mate and settle somewhere on the south coast over the course of the coming autumn and winter. "There are currently three established pairs of white-tailed eagles on the south coast as a result of the reintroduction, with two of the pairs breeding successfully this summer." White-tailed sea eagles Brown body with a noticeably pale head and neck, which can become almost white in older birds Enormous, broad wings – much broader than a golden eagle's – with fingered ends Huge, chunky yellow beak (dark in juveniles) and yellow feet Adults have white tail feathers, as their name suggests Soars with wings held flat, rather than in a 'V' shape like golden eagles Source: RSPB Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram. More stories like this Bid to reintroduce bird of prey to region First white-tailed eagle born in south in 240 years Island's sea eagle project sees chicks fledge Related internet links Roy Dennis Wildlife Foundation