Latest news with #Mezzacappa
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- General
- Yahoo
Pa. Supreme Court ruling limits access to mug shots
County prisons in Northeast Pennsylvania have stopped providing mug shots of accused criminals to media organizations, with officials citing a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling as the reason for the change. The unanimous high court ruling in April in Mezzacappa v. Northampton County states that mug shots are categorized as 'identifiable descriptors' and county agencies are prohibited from distributing them under the state's Criminal History Record Information Act, or CHRIA. Police departments may provide mug shots to noncriminal justice agencies, such as media organizations, and individuals. The Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association takes issue with the ruling and submitted a brief to the state Supreme Court before its decision, stressing the importance of transparency when it comes to the dissemination of public documents. 'The records in this case provide significant insight into law enforcement actions and the administration of justice, and they have been available to press since law enforcement began using photography to document individuals taken into government custody,' the brief read. Melissa Melewsky, attorney for the news media organization, said that mug shots do not only provide a photo of an accused criminal at the time of their arrest; they provide a historical account of the demeanor of the accused at the time of their arrest. 'For instance, the mug shot of civil rights icon Rosa Parks displays dignity and resolve in the face of racial segregation and conveys commitment to her act of civil disobedience, in addition to serving as an official record of the fact that she was arrested,' she said. Another example Melewsky provided was Jerry Sandusky's mug shots released first by the Pennsylvania attorney general's office after his 2011 arrest and then by the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections after he began serving his sentence. 'These photographs were used in media coverage initially to illustrate the defendant's custody, appearance and countenance, and then later, to confirm that the defendant was incarcerated as required by law,' she said of Sandusky's mug shot. Also significant was the release of President Donald's Trump mug shot in 2023, interesting to both his supporters and detractors, she said. Trump himself posted the image to his account on X, formerly Twitter. Local impact Lackawanna County District Attorney Brian Gallagher has put a pause on providing mug shots to media sources while his office evaluates the opinion to ensure the office is complying with the law. Gallagher also plans to contact district attorneys from other counties in the state to have an understanding of their interpretation of the ruling. Luzerne County prison officials received a memo Thursday morning indicating they were no longer at liberty to provide mug shots to media sources because of the ruling. A Schuylkill County Prison employee told a Times-Tribune reporter that the prison had stopped providing mug shots to the media as of Wednesday and that officials were reviewing the ruling. * Trump (SUBMITTED) * Jerry Sandusky (SUBMITTED) * The front of the Lackawanna County Prison in Scranton Thursday, April 10, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * ROSA PARKS (SUBMITTED) Show Caption 1 of 4 Trump (SUBMITTED) Expand Supreme Court decision The case that ultimately led to April's Supreme Court decision had its roots in a Nov. 7, 2020, Right to Know request. Tricia Mezzacappa submitted the request to Northampton County Prison for the mug shots of two individuals who had allegedly been detained at the prison. The county denied the request Dec. 15, 2020, claiming the records were exempt from disclosure because they related to criminal investigations. Mezzacappa appealed and the county released the mug shots to her. In Dec. 28, 2020, Mezzacappa filed a second Right to Know request, seeking 'all mugshots taken of all inmates at the jail from October 2020 to present, including inmates released on bail' and other documents. On Feb. 3, 2021, the county denied Mezzacappa's request for the mug shots, indicating they were 'insufficiently specific and unduly burdensome in the context requested.' In denying the request, Northampton County said the mug shots comprise criminal history record information under CHRIA and that the photos could be released only by state or local police departments. In March 2021, Mezzacappa appealed the denial to the Office of Open Records, which directed the county to provide the mug shots. Northampton County, however, challenged the decision in Commonwealth Court, which ruled in favor of the Office of Open Records and directed the release of the mug shots. Ultimately, the county challenged that decision in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled in its favor and reversed the Commonwealth Court ruling. 'We conclude that mug shots constitute 'identifiable descriptions' as contemplated in CHRIA's definition of 'criminal history record information,'' the court wrote. 'We further conclude that … criminal history record information may only be disseminated to noncriminal justice agencies and individuals by a police department, and, thus, that the County, as a non-law enforcement agency, is prohibited from releasing the mug shots requested.' History of mug shots The official use of mug shots can be traced to Birmingham, England, in 1848, when police officers began taking photos of prostitutes and thieves. A book from that time period titled 'Accusare: Storia del Novecento' includes mug shots, indicating that at least some of those photos became public, according to a recent collection of mug shots and information compiled by local historian Nicholas Petula in his book, 'Faces of the Accused: A History of Scranton Mugshots and Criminal Activity.' Scranton, with a growing crime problem, began using a mug shot system in the 1890s, with photos accompanied by a description of the accused. Many of those mug shots became public and are included in Petula's book.
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- General
- Yahoo
PA Supreme Court ruling means you may not see a suspect's mugshot in the news
PENNSYLVANIA (WTAJ) — A Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling will now change how mugshots are handled when it comes to local news outlets, including access to them. In a ruling from April, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down the decision in Mezzacappa v. Northampton County after a right-to-know (RTK) request was submitted over four years ago in Northampton County. In December 2020, the request was submitted for various records, including a request for 'all mug shots taken of all inmates' from October 2020 through December 2020. The County delivered everything except the mug shots in February 2021, advising that the mug shots were exempt from disclosure under the right-to-know law because they constituted 'confidential criminal history record information,' according to the lawsuit. Later that same month, the requester appealed the denial to the Office of Open Records, which then directed the County to provide the mug shots. However, the requester filed a second RTK in which she stated she was seeking the last names of correctional officers who worked on the unit where she had been incarcerated between October 13 and October 15, 2020, as well as the previous request relating to the mug shots. In February 2021, the County granted the second request in part. The County advised that the request for the mug shots was 'insufficiently specific and unduly burdensome in the context requested,' according to the lawsuit. Furthermore, the County also noted that the mug shots could only be shared by State or local police departments as the photos comprised criminal history record information. The requester then appealed the denial for a second time, and the Office of Open Records ultimately ordered the County in March 2021 to provide the requester with the mug shots. The office noted that 'mug shots are routinely disseminated to the press, sometimes as part of a press release' and that if a mug shot contains criminal history record information, the County can redact the information, the lawsuit reads. The County then proceeded to challenge the decision made by the Office of Open Records in the Commonwealth Court, where the ruling was handed down in favor of the office, with the court holding that the mug shots do not constitute 'identifiable descriptions,' according to the lawsuit. The County then proceeded to challenge the decision in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Ultimately, the PA Supreme Court ruled that mug shots do constitute 'identifiable descriptions' as defined in 'Criminal history record information' in the Pennsylvania Constitution. We further conclude that, pursuant to Section 9121(b), criminal history record information may only be disseminated to noncriminal justice agencies and individuals by a police department, and, thus, that the County, as a non-law enforcement agency, is prohibited from releasing the mug shots requested by Appellee. Accordingly, we reverse the decisions of the Commonwealth Court. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court In an email to WTAJ, the Bedford County Prison confirmed that as a result of the aforementioned ruling, the facility is unable to provide any mug shots until further notice. 'Based upon a recent PA Supreme Court decision, the County is prohibited from releasing the request intake photos (mugshots) under the Pennsylvania Criminal History Record Information Act. 18 Pa. Cons, Stat. Ann. Sec. 9101, et seq,' The email reads. 'I know this is a departure from our usual practice, but based on this court ruling, I am unable to provide these. Once I receive more information related to this decision, I will provide an additional response.' Outlets are currently advised to reach out to local or State police departments for mug shots until further information is released on the ruling. However, departments may not have photos available before someone is processed into a county prison. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
