EU trade deal possible, says US President
To press for what Mr Trump views as better terms with trading partners and ways to shrink a huge US trade deficit, his administration has been negotiating trade deals ahead of an 1 August deadline, when duties on most US imports are due to rise again.
"We're very close to India, and we could possibly make a deal with (the) EU," President Trump said during an interview aired on Real America's Voice, when asked which trade deals were on the horizon.
Mr Trump's comments come as EU trade chief Maroš Šefčovič is headed to Washington for tariff discussions, while an Indian trade delegation arrived in Washington on Monday for fresh talks.
"(The) European Union has been brutal, and now they're being very nice. They want to make a deal, and it'll be a lot different than the deal that we've had for years," he added.
Asked about the prospects of a deal with Canada, which like the EU, is readying countermeasures if talks with the US fail to produce a deal, Mr Trump said: "Too soon to say."
His comment was in line with the assessment of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who said earlier that a deal that works for Canadian workers was not yet on the table.
Mr Trump also said he would probably put a blanket 10% or 15% tariff on smaller countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
23 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa will be in Beijing on Thursday for an EU-China summit that is overshadowed by disputes over market access, export controls and Russia's war in Ukraine. Just over a week later, the United States is due to impose a 30 per cent tariff on goods imported from the EU, unless a deal is agreed before then. When Donald Trump announced his tariffs on about 60 countries and trading blocs four months ago, they looked set to push China and the EU closer together. But relations between Brussels and Beijing have deteriorated so sharply in recent weeks that China has scaled back this week's summit, which will now last for just one day instead of two as originally planned. The US, which at one stage imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, is now negotiating with China and Trump is expected to meet Xi Jinping later this year. Washington has lifted its ban on the export of some advanced semiconductors to China and Beijing has restored the supply of rare earth magnets to the US. For much of the 21st century, Europe could rely on Russia for energy, the US for security, and China as an export market. But Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago severed the EU's economic relationship with Russia, Trump has brought the US security guarantee into question and China has lost much of its appetite for high-end European products. READ MORE Most EU member-states now see Russia, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, as a potentially existential security threat if it prevails in Ukraine and they are ramping up defence spending accordingly. However, Trump's support for Ukraine is contingent at best and could be deployed as a bargaining chip if the EU responds aggressively to tariffs by using its Anti-Coercion Instrument to target US services, intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. The EU's fear of Russia, its grievances against China and its anxiety about the US's intentions are all based in reality and Europe needs to become more self-reliant in defence while protecting its industrial base from Chinese competition. But its response to a rapidly changing geopolitical environment has too often been piecemeal, defensive and lacking in vision. Mario Draghi's report on competitiveness and Enrico Letta's on the single market last year offered bold blueprints for action to combat Europe's economic weaknesses. The EU needs similarly fresh thinking on its place in the world, the security architecture of the continent, the future of the transatlantic relationship, the rise of China and the growing importance of middle powers such as Brazil and Saudi Arabia in an increasingly multipolar world.
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
IFAC accuses Govt of 'poor planning and budgeting'
The State's fiscal watchdog has accused the Government of "poor planning and budgeting" following the release of yesterday's Summer Economic Statement. The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council said: "Budget 2025 had planned a €3bn increase in spending. Yesterday, this was revised up by €3.3bn, meaning the actual 2025 increase will be more than double the original plan." It added that current spending this year is likely to be €1bn higher than stated in the Summer Economic Statement. It said when volatile windfall corporation tax paid by multinationals were excluded from the figures the Government was running a deficit of almost €11bn next year. The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council also criticised the Government for stating that it would have a smaller budget package if the economic environment deteriorated because of the trade war between the US and EU. It said this approach was the "exactly the opposite of standard economic advice." It added: "Countercyclical policy means giving more support when the economy is weak and less when it is strong." It said that the government's budgetary plans were focused on the short term. It added: "The Government has yet to outline a fiscal framework. It has not set a limit for what it sees as a sustainable pace of net spending growth." However, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council was more positive about the review of the National Development Plan which it said had "ambitious targets" for the coming years. It said if the plan was well executed it could help address shortfalls in Ireland's infrastructure. But it added the last National Development Plan "struggled with timely delivery". It said: "Of the 88 large projects we can track that were scheduled for completion between 2020 and 2025, only 77 are now expected to be finished within that timeframe."
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Possible tariff deal with US not a win for EU but does avoid damaging trade war
After months of back and forth and lots of shadow boxing, the European Union and the United States are said to be closing in on a trade deal that would impose a 15 per cent tariff on European imports. This would be similar to the agreement Donald Trump struck with Japan earlier this week and half the level threatened in recent weeks by the White House. On the face of it, such a deal might be considered a victory for the EU, limiting the damage for Irish and other European imports. There is talk of exclusions for medical devices and spirits, which would be of benefit to Ireland. READ MORE Yet a 15 per cent deal would be five percentage points higher than what the UK has agreed with Trump, putting Irish exporters at a disadvantage to their counterparts in Britain and north of the Border. It also means that some companies will have to consider raising their prices for a second time this year – a universal 10 per cent tariff has been in place since April 5th -or taking the tax hit themselves. Neither is an appealing scenario. [ US and EU close in on 15% tariff deal Opens in new window ] And it goes without saying that US consumers might baulk at the price of Kerrygold butter being increased again. There has to be a ceiling to what they are prepared to pay for a block of butter. Plus, what of the pharma sector (a key source of exports and corporation tax for Ireland), which has been separately threatened with tariffs of up to 200 per cent? Lots of details remain to be ironed out and a deal has yet to be signed, sealed and delivered. Trump might yet do another U-turn on negotiations. Anything is possible in the current uncertain climate. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 But a deal would avoid a damaging trade war, and hopefully, draw a line under this saga. Irish and European businesses will also welcome some certainty on the tariffs issue, albeit at a cost to them, and an end to the swirl or rumour and uncertainty that has existed since Trump returned to power.
